I wrote:
Apart from noise in measurements, such a discrepancy might be due to
natural variation in the isotopic composition of nickel; to a reaction
eating away some of the 61Ni and 64Ni; or to Rossi's using a preparation
that is somehow depleted in these specific isotopes.
I think the
Its entirely conceivable that if the nickel micro particles are spaced far
enough apart, then no transmutation from nickel to copper will be seen. The
magnetic beams that produce the LENR reaction will usually project away
from the tips of the nanowire field emitters on the micro particles. The
www.rossilivecat.com/
The item is about #60 now--it is dated Oct 5 at 1:48 PM.
The items on the rossi blog are listed by date and time.
Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE SmartphoneEric Walker
eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:21 AM, frobertcook
Yes, but I am torn between Axil’s posit that the hydrogen atoms form a bose
condensate and equally thermalize and this posit by Bob that the sites are
discrete pockets contained by zirconia dielectric.. are these 2 posits as
conflicted as they appear or perhaps this is a matter of scale where
Perhaps it could be more than just housing the nanoparticles because of the
very strong electrostatic field created within the zeolite cavities and the
oscillation of the cavity.
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/j100558a022
http://youtu.be/2L-lKozWjSA
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Bob
Greetings Vortex-L,
Just saw thishave not evaluated it:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/10/08/e-cat-report-leaked/
Ad Astra,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
Doylestown PA
A very positive test.
Craig
On 10/08/2014 08:24 AM, Ron Kita wrote:
Greetings Vortex-L,
Just saw thishave not evaluated it:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/10/08/e-cat-report-leaked/
Ad Astra,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
Doylestown PA
It's here! And it's positive! I suppose not too shocking to any of us here.
COP looks very healthy and somewhere in between French's magic numbers and
Jones'/Brian Ahern's speculations. Also looks like the ash changed
significantly indicating some kind of novel nuclear reaction, as indicated
by
Also wasn't this supposed to have been carried out by others beside Levi,
Essen, and company? I don't see any new names here. Not that it matters to
me, but won't we just hear the same bullshit objections that it's a inside
job?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
It's an impressive result, despite running it in a way to make measurement
convenient and to minimize the likelihood of damaging the device. They ran
the power at a constant rate rather than allowing for self-sustained
periods. The COP was 3.13 to 3.74 depending on the power input level.
Given
Levi, Essen, and company have made the chalorimetry, look down in the
paper, there are more reports made by other people.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014
09:34:19 -0400, Foks0904 . wrote:
Also wasn't this supposed to have
been carried out by others beside Levi, Essen, and company? I don't see
any new
Aha. Thanks torulf.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, torulf.gr...@bredband.net wrote:
Levi, Essen, and company have made the chalorimetry, look down in the
paper, there are more reports made by other people.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:34:19 -0400, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also
See:
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/9-LuganoReportSubmit-pdf
Observation of abundant heat production from a reactor device
and of isotopic changes in the fuel
Giuseppe Levi, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
Evelyn Foschi, Bologna, Italy
Bo Höistad, Roland Pettersson and
This was not leaked. Essen gave a copy to someone who uploaded it with
permission. (I think it was Mats Lewan.) This has been submitted to arXiv
but it has been delayed for unknown reasons.
- Jed
not 6 month... the longitudinal hair cutters will say Rossi lied !
moreover it was done by LEVI, and others accomplice... thus since Levi have
seen an E-cat test work, and have not said it is a fraud (a sure fact), you
know that he is himself part of the fraud, and thus his report have no
Yeah exactly...that's going to be the pseudo-skeptical talking-point that
get's hammered home till we all want to puke.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
not 6 month... the longitudinal hair cutters will say Rossi lied !
moreover it was done by LEVI,
Although LENR supporters will be impressed at first glance, the biggest
problems – already being mentioned - and they could be fatal to wider
acceptance, are that Levi remains the lead author and the lack of reliable
calorimetry, and the strange isotope shifts. Look at these ! Bizarre and
*This is probably not going to be the instant bombshell, or extremely
well-prepared announcement from truly independent scientists that we had
hoped for.*
Agreed. I don't think any of us should be pinning all our hopes on this
overturning establishment beliefs, but I think it's a rather
The report cites the fuel as a combination of LiAlH4 and Ni + Fe. It
appears the Ni is treated with an Fe catalyst as I surmised - this is the
powder I have been working with. The LiAlH4 means that Rossi is using a
hydride supplying only H2 and not D.
Bob Higgins
What does that indicate about the reaction to you Bob?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
The report cites the fuel as a combination of LiAlH4 and Ni + Fe. It
appears the Ni is treated with an Fe catalyst as I surmised - this is the
powder I have
From: Foks0904
This is probably not going to be the instant bombshell, or
extremely well-prepared announcement from truly independent scientists that
we had hoped for.
Agreed. I don't think any of us should be pinning all our
hopes
My opinion is that it will matter to the people who can do something with
the information. It will matter to people with money to fund research and
companies who don't live in ivory towers. It will matter to potential
industrial customers of IH.
In the end, I think Rossi will be proven correct
Correction and addition. We seem to going from Ni58 all the way to Ni62,
much of the time without the orderly progression 58-59-60-61-62.
As for “hopping”… guess who is on the case:
https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:27064120
On the possibility of neutron hopping in crystals
Mats Lewan via eCat world : The report has been uploaded to Arxiv.org which,
however
has put it on hold, without specifying any motive for this. It has
also been sent to Journal of Physics D. I got the report sent to me
by Hanno Essén who said that he now considers it to be public,
although not
Jones -- I've been in contact on-and-off with Peter H. since last
October, but he's a very busy man with his teaching duties, etc. and I try
not to bother him too much. But I agree he is on my short-list no doubt and
will get a hold of him sooner than later.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Jones
There a few things I noticed in this. First is that Rossi's powder appears
to be less actively thermochemically processed than what I have first used
- I.E it seems more lightly thermochemically processed.
The second observation is that the reactor is not very clean. There
appears to be no
Interesting, thanks.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
There a few things I noticed in this. First is that Rossi's powder
appears to be less actively thermochemically processed than what I have
first used - I.E it seems more lightly thermochemically
Of further interest
https://archive.org/stream/TheLithiumAnomalyAndThe7li3he4he6liNeutronTransfe
rReaction/Lithium_Anomaly_2_djvu.txt
A thesis on “the lithium anomaly”
Correction and addition. We seem to going from Ni58
Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
So it appears that the air and water are not poisons for the reaction.
That is very surprising if true. Shocking!
- Jed
Releasing the report during Nobel week means that all the
scientific journalists will be busy on that and/or won't have space
for it (print versions).
The Lithium shift is interesting and doesn't seem to be by design :
it's purpose is just to supply the hydrogen, but it's obviously being
New scientific report on the E-Cat shows excess heat and nuclear process
http://matslew.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/new-scientific-report-on-the-e-cat-shows-excess-heat-and-nuclear-process/
Harry
the four neutron absorption remind be the 2,4 or 6 deuteron absorbed in
Iwamura, as Ed Storms spotted.
It is coherent with a symmetric reaction involving either 2/4/6 neutrons,
or 2/4/6 hydrogen atoms .
since there is no thermal neutron observed, there is no neutron involved in
high quantity, or
indeed.
to be honest AFAIK they don't need that report to know it.
however it can help them not to be ridiculed and fired.
2014-10-08 16:40 GMT+02:00 Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com:
My opinion is that it will matter to the people who can do something with
the information. It will matter to
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/probability-now-20/
Disappointed to see the same names at the top of the paper.Shocked to
see not even Arxiv will accept it. I will increase the probability if
does make it onto Arxiv or if we see IH and Cherokee step up.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Unfortunately there are some nuclear proliferation issues involved.
In what way
?
Harry
*the four neutron absorption remind be the 2,4 or 6 deuteron absorbed in
Iwamura, as Ed Storms spotted.*
*It is coherent with a symmetric reaction involving either 2/4/6 neutrons,
or 2/4/6 hydrogen atoms .*
Yeah absolutely. Ed is one of the few who consistently highlighted this
nugget as
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
This was not leaked. Essen gave a copy to someone who uploaded it with
permission. (I think it was Mats Lewan.) This has been submitted to arXiv
but it has been delayed for unknown reasons.
Physics has fallen into a low
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
The report cites the fuel as a combination of LiAlH4 and Ni + Fe. It
appears the Ni is treated with an Fe catalyst as I surmised - this is the
powder I have been working with. The LiAlH4 means that Rossi is using a
In one way, this report is shaping up as an amazing piece of oversight -
which Levi and the Swedes may have failed to grasp, or at least failed to
fully appreciated in its ultimate significance. There could be a shadow over
this story which goes back to 1989.
Moreover, do we even
On 10/08/2014 12:22 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
You have to wonder - given the tiny amount of hydrogen at the start, and the
isotopic analysis at the end, if hydrogen was necessary for this reaction.
This looks like a lithium burner.
Captain, we're going to need more dilithium crystals!
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig Haynie
You have to wonder - given the tiny amount of hydrogen at the start, and the
isotopic analysis at the end, if hydrogen was necessary for this reaction.
This looks like a lithium burner.
Captain, we're going to need more dilithium crystals!
I have postulated for years that a alkali metal would be the secret sauce
based on the operating temperature of the reactor.
When the operating temperature is about 1200C, this makes lithium the best
fit to vaporize at about 1330C and at lower temperatures condense into
nano-particles in areas of
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/9-LuganoReportSubmit-pdf
Registration required. Bleh.
Registration not required:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBX1lIMU42UWxyeFk/view?usp=sharing
This is interesting, and revealing:
New scientific report on the E-Cat shows excess heat and nuclear process
http://matslew.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/new-scientific-report-on-the-e-cat-shows-excess-heat-and-nuclear-process/
Mats has uploaded yet another copy of the report to his website. I will
Here is another copy:
https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/luganoreportsubmit.pdf
One more interesting thing about this report. If lithium is the active fuel,
and not hydrogen, which seems to be the case, then the ash which is lithium-6
is as valuable for batteries as is the natural metal. Maybe more valuable.
Thus the fuel is essentially free, since the ash can be sold for
What is missing from LENR theory is how any nuclear radiation types are
not detected in the Rossi reaction. I have put forward the Super-absorber
theory made possible by boson condensation. The testing and analysis group
are afraid to put their names onto a nuclear reaction mechanism that is
I wrote:
[JR comments: 1.5 megawatt-hours is 5040 MJ, which I believe is a new
record for cold fusion. Previous records were around 50 MJ.]
Correction: Roulette et al. reported 294 MJ, over 3 months, and McKubre et
al. got about 100 MJ over one month in their Arata replication. There may
be a
I also see that the tubules on the a fraction of the micro-particles are
melted by the high heat. This leads be to the conclusion that reaction is
also being carried by lithium based nano-particles produced by plasma
condensation. The testers are only looking at the nickel particles for
isotope
The efficiency of uranium pellets is only about 4% because of the
deterioration of the zirconium cladding that encloses the uranium.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
[JR comments: 1.5 megawatt-hours is 5040 MJ, which I believe is a new
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The efficiency of uranium pellets is only about 4% because of the
deterioration of the zirconium cladding that encloses the uranium.
That is true. So that means 4% of 29% of the pellet would be used up
(transmuted). That's ~1%. A pellet weighs ~ 7 g total,
To get a valid overview of the entire transmutation process, the testers
must look at a complete sample of the fuel, not just a few nickel
particles. There could be other nuclear processes going on away from the
nickel particles. The testers have made an assumption that the reaction
must be local
I predict that this new type of reactor cannot be shut down and restated
because a significant fraction of the nickel particles has had their
tubules melted off and many nickel micro-particles are now resurfaced as
relatively smooth.
Furthermore, if this reactor is cooled by a liquid based
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
To get a valid overview of the entire transmutation process, the testers
must look at a complete sample of the fuel, not just a few nickel
particles.
What makes you think this was not a complete sample, or not representative?
These are experts in mass
page 44...
Figure 3. SEI showing the areas where EDS analysis where performed on the
different fuel particles (a), EDS spectrum from the three different type of
particles found in the fuel material; particle 1 (b), particle 2 (c) and
particle 3 (d).
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jed Rothwell
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I predict that this new type of reactor cannot be shut down and restated
because a significant fraction of the nickel particles has had their
tubules melted off and many nickel micro-particles are now resurfaced as
relatively smooth.
Where does it say that
Again, if the reaction occurred in other particles why would they not see
them?
They will not see them because they have not looked.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
page 44...
Figure 3. SEI showing the areas where EDS analysis where performed on the
on page 43...
particle 2 and 3 have no tubercles.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I predict that this new type of reactor cannot be shut down and restated
because a significant fraction of the nickel particles
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, if the reaction occurred in other particles why would they not see
them?
They will not see them because they have not looked.
Well, I doubt you know as much about mass spectroscopy as these people do.
In any case, they found dramatic shifts in
I wrote:
The efficiency of uranium pellets is only about 4% because of the
deterioration of the zirconium cladding that encloses the uranium.
That is true. So that means 4% of 29% of the pellet would be used up
(transmuted).
Maybe that's wrong. This reference seems to indicate that nearly
I consider isotopic shits in nickel and lithium as structural damage
leading the eventual fuel failure. Since the reactor looks like the nickel
powder is packed in aluminum and oxygen compounds, I would expect to see
transmutation of aluminum and oxygen in the vicinity of the nickel powder.
shits should read shifts
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I consider isotopic shits in nickel and lithium as structural damage
leading the eventual fuel failure. Since the reactor looks like the nickel
powder is packed in aluminum and oxygen compounds, I
On the subject of energy balance and radiation
Mass of Ni58 =57.935 mass of Ni62 =61.928 difference 3.993 amu
Mass of neutron 1.0087 x 4 = 4.035
Mass of Li7=7.016 Mass of Li6= 6.015 difference 1.001 x 4= 4.004
The problem is that on paper - lithium cannot give up a neutron easily as there
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I consider isotopic shi[f]ts in nickel and lithium as structural damage
leading the eventual fuel failure.
Eventually, when? The fuel has to run out eventually. All fuel does. All
reactors have a limited lifetime. Either the fuel runs out, or some other
If you have noticed, the pattern of transmutation has changed over the
years based on how the powder is positioned in the reactor. Tight powder
packing leads to more transmutation of the powder. This transmutation will
eventually change nickel into some other element like titanium or iron.
This
Larry Forsley told me: The pellet is ceramic and comprised of U2O3 and
other U oxides, so the proportion of uranium is less than 100%, and hence,
the enrichment is likely close to 5%. Over the typical fuel cycle, 4 1/2
years, more than half of the U-235 will fission while neutron capture on
U-238
I wrote:
So, for 29% of the total energy from the pellet roughly 40 g of material
would be transmuted. I think.
I mean 40 mg. Of uranium. I do not know how much Ni we are talking about.
Perhaps, as Axil suggests, it varies with the design of the reactor.
My point is, there is a lot. Nuclear
The energy potential in the Ni/H reactor is very large in comparisons to
U235 and if the nickel powder is not destroyed. The hydrogen, aluminum, and
oxygen will transmute in all sorts of ways in a long chain of energy
producing transmutations over the years.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jed
It may have been noted that lithium has a heat of vaporization of about 140
kJ/mol and that the boiling point is close to the operating temp of this
reactor on the inside 1350C.
This seems to work out to a whopping 20 MJ/kg which is high (did I get that
wrong?) Consequently a lot thermal
p. 7 of the report:
Subsequent calculation proved that increasing the input by roughly 100
watts had caused an increase of about 700 watts in power emitted.
It might have worked even better. They did not push it:
The speed with which the temperature had risen persuaded us to desist from
any
I have read some of Yugo's comments on Mats blog and it amazes me that she
continues to claim that the input power is likely faked by that nonsense of a
connection. How could she consist in that belief when the scientists measuring
the input power are so aware of that trick? The skeptics are
Pomp, pomp, pomp:
http://stephanpomp.blogspot.se/2014/10/the-cat-is-dead.html
He apparently believes that calorimetry does not work, Prof. Stephan
Boltzman are frauds, and the laws of thermodynamics have been repealed.
Incorrigible is the word that comes to mind.
I am not a bit surprised. I
Hi Jed,
Side-track question... what constitutes a peer-review? And does this report
have one?
Regards,
Patrick
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
p. 7 of the report:
Subsequent calculation proved that increasing the input by roughly 100
watts had caused
Who took the fuel-ash samples, and there?
I can not find a account
for this.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:57:13 -0400, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Pomp, pomp, pomp:
http://stephanpomp.blogspot.se/2014/10/the-cat-is-dead.html [1]
He
apparently believes that calorimetry does not work, Prof. Stephan
it seems to be as Beaudette observed with nuclear physicist.
they imagine calorimetry is not science by cooking (and even cooking is
serious)
2014-10-08 23:57 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Pomp, pomp, pomp:
http://stephanpomp.blogspot.se/2014/10/the-cat-is-dead.html
He
Pomp makes a point though... the whole document is meaningless compared to
the ash measurement. Who cares about heat / input / blah blah lbah if
we're doing transumation without radiation.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
it seems to be as Beaudette
The simple reality is this - either Rossi has just changed reality as we
know it or not. There is no longer a gray area at all.
I'm betting he's a fraud, simply because the probability of him doing this
is too incredible. What he's done is nothing short of miraculous. It is
total inflection
I have to admit that it would be trivially easy for an apprentice
magician to construct a container into which you insert (say) white
powder as fuel and later on extract black powder as ash.
But the calorimetry stands.
Pomp doesn't even denigrate the calorimetry : he just ignores it
Because
One observation that I'm noting in reviewing the data is the remarkably
complete conversion of nickel isotopes to Ni68, (from 3.9% in the starting
fuel to 98.7% in the ash) and the corresponding nearly-complete transition
of lithium-6 from 8.6% fuel to 92.1% ash abundance ratios. Given that the
Er,
s/Ni68/Ni62/g
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellefson [mailto:vortex-h...@e2ke.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 5:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Intermediate products of isotope shifting reaction appear to
be
absent
One observation that I'm
At 1400C, the reactor is just shy of the melting point of Nickel. The
Reactor is relying on some special structure on the surface of the Nickel
to make this reaction work. The Nickle at that high temperature will
likely lose the correct surface structure even if it doesn't fully liquefy.
I
If Rossi switched out the ash, he's a fraud. End of story.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I have to admit that it would be trivially easy for an apprentice magician
to construct a container into which you insert (say) white powder as fuel
and later on
The reactor will run for as long as the micro powder remains nickel, as
long as the nickel is not Ni61, a non zero spin nucleus. I still believe
that hydrogen is the fuel that is being consumed. Rossi has not yet found a
way to protect his powder and lithium from destructive transmutation.
On
There may not be any transmutation of Ni at all. Read Norman Cook's paper
from ICCF-18. There could be isotope dependent depletion of Ni due to
fusion-fission or just fission. This would completely change the isotope
ratios with no shuttling between one Ni isotope and any other. The Ni
According to Cook, Ni61 does not participate in the reaction. Therefore, if
depletion of Ni is due to fusion-fission or just fission, then Ni61 would
become the majority of the nickel in the ash..
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
There may not be any
Is this a typo?
There is no Ni68.
Half life is less than 30 seconds
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellefson
One observation that I'm noting in reviewing the data is the remarkably
complete conversion of nickel isotopes to Ni68,
Yes, it was a typo, sorry. I meant Ni-62.
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 5:38 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Intermediate products of isotope shifting reaction
appear
to be absent
Is this a
Many things do not add up here, especially the drastic changes from the
original E-Cat.
The more I read the more skeptical is my outlook on this.
Could some clever troll have gotten hold of the manuscript and changed it just
enough to make it barely believable, so long as one does not
From the test report as follows:
*The Lithium content in the fuel is found to have the natural composition,
i.e. 6Li 7 % and 7Li 93 %. However at the end of the run a depletion of 7Li
in the ash was revealed by both the SIMS and the ICP-MS methods. In the
SIMS analysis the 7Li content was only
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Its entirely conceivable that if the nickel micro particles are spaced far
enough apart, then no transmutation from nickel to copper will be seen.
Personally, I haven't found transmutation from nickel to copper credible
for
Transmutation has be seen in LENR experiments for many years and even Ed
Storms says that Transmutation has nothing to do with the LENR reaction.
This test result does not tell us anything new.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Many things do not add up
Because Lithium is a non zero spin nucleus, it cannot transmute. The
additional Li6 seen in the ash must therefore be new lithium produced
directly from hydrogen.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
From the test report as follows:
*The Lithium content in the
Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jed,
Side-track question... what constitutes a peer-review?
We are peerless in this field. Posterity or God must judge us.
And does this report have one?
Seriously, not as far as I know.
Peer-review is overrated.
- Jed
From the last line on page 53...
Sample 2 was the fuel used to charge the E-Cat. It’s in the form of a very
fine powder. Besides the analyzed elements it has been found that the fuel
also contains rather high concentrations of C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn and these
are not found in the ash.
Does this
From page 41 of the test document...
To remove the siloxane that has diffused over the particle surface the area
being analyzed is sputtered. Figure 7 show the positive mass spectrum from
a particle surface sputter cleaned for 180 seconds.
The analyst cleaned the micro powder before he checked
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm betting he's a fraud, simply because the probability of him doing this
is too incredible. What he's done is nothing short of miraculous.
It is more miraculous than what Fleischmann and Pons and several hundred
other groups have done. Do
...I am torn between Axil’s posit that the hydrogen atoms form a bose
condensate ...
The condensate is made of bosons comprised of a tightly bound single
waveform of light and electron waves of equal energy. Extreme density of
these bosons provide high temperature condensation.
On Wed, Oct 8,
I meant that Rossi is NO more miraculous than what FP and hundreds of
others have done. Only the scale is larger.
The Chicago Pile 1 one-watt nuclear reactor was as momentous as the fission
bomb explosion. The scale was different, but they were equally convincing.
If you do not believe that, or
Jed, it doesn't matter. If the ash is a fraud, Rossi is a fraud. Plain
and simple. I'm not interesting in debating the other aspects of the
experiment because of the complexities involved in calorimetry.
There are no such complexities in the ash which makes the discussion very
Jed sez
Regarding what constitutes a peer-review?
We are peerless in this field. Posterity or God must judge us.
That's saying a lot from a devout atheist. ;-)
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
