EL,
Rossi has stated the plant was shipped and installed in the customers US
location and that he attended to do the install.
AG
On 19/01/2012 7:17 PM, Energy Liberator wrote:
This is what I said earlier. I don't recall Rossi ever saying that the
container was shipped. The seems to have
EL,
The plant has not moved, despite what has been said. The images confirm
that.
AG
On 19/01/2012 6:08 PM, Energy Liberator wrote:
Jones
Isn't it possible that the US customer's facility is in Italy? If the
customer is military, as speculated to be, then it's possible that they
are using
EL,
Rossi stated the plant did ship to his US customer and he attended to do
the install.
AG
On 19/01/2012 5:45 PM, Energy Liberator wrote:
Perhaps the original 1MW plant never shipped to the customer's location
as the customer wanted it fixed before shipping, i.e. the leaking
gaskets, the
Robert,
Gotta admit, from what Rossi has stated, the Jan 12 image may be from
Jan 12, despite the stained floor no longer being stained.
Note the tubing that connected the water supply to the pumps is seen
lying at the left side and parallel to the BBB. It even has the aluminum
duck tape on
Daniel,
It is about the product. Leonardo Corp needs to show me a product that I
can sell. That means they need to show QUALITY, certification of the
product and certification of the manufacturing plant.
Product certification means nothing if the manufacturing facility has
not been
Wolf,
On 30 Oct 2011, Andrea Rossi said the 1 MW plant had been shipped to the
customer and he was building the next 1 MW plant in a new container.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=27#comment-106637
Andrea Rossi
October 30th, 2011 at 2:15 PM
Dear Luke Mortensen:
1- yes
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=27#comment-106637
AG
On 19/01/2012 11:21 PM, Frank Acland wrote:
I haven't been able to find any place where Rossi said that the 1MW
plant was taken away by the customer. Nor can I find anywhere where he
states that the unit was going to
of the exposure. So I don't think it's conclusive.
On 19/01/12 03:24, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Daniel,
Try this image of the non and stained floors.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/shO4Ub6pXlC5p1kWhUIZ89MTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
AG
On 19/01/2012 1:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
I cannot see
The issue is:
Rossi says the plant is gone (shipped).
Rossi says he is attending the customer's US site to do the install.
Rossi say he is working with the customer and NI and is making amazing
progress.
Rossi says it has not been returned by the customer.
A video from 12 Jan
Wolf,
I have a VERY good memory. Almost pictorial. I know what I have read and
heard. It may take me some time to find it but I will find it.
AG
On 19/01/2012 11:30 PM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Thanks for searching and clarifying that. So he lied, plain and simple.
Someone should confront him
... gone).
Andre Blum
On 01/19/2012 08:56 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Wolf,
On 30 Oct 2011, Andrea Rossi said the 1 MW plant had been shipped to
the customer and he was building the next 1 MW plant in a new container.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=27#comment-106637
Andrea
EL,
Work on it?
How?
Nothing is there to test it under load. How can you test for leaks with
no water circulation system in place and no heat load to generate steam
and increase the pressure?
I'm just an engineer, so I may be wrong but I don't think so.
AG
On 19/01/2012 11:38 PM, Energy
EL,
Look I still believe the E-Cat is a workable FPE device. BUT it needs a
LOT of work by good engineers. I don't see that happening as Rossi
appears to be holding the IP VERY close to his chest. This product needs
a really good team of experienced development engineers. Not just NI.
an engineer
and not a scientists?
I like noise as that is where all the interesting stuff lives.
AG
On 20/01/2012 12:25 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just an engineer, so I may be wrong but I don't think so
EL,
No that is not correct.
Rossi clearly said that the unit we saw in the 28 Oct demo had been
shipped (it was gone) and he had attended the customers site to install it.
He stated he was building a new plant in a new container.
AG
On 20/01/2012 12:50 AM, Energy Liberator wrote:
I
EL,
Rossi has already stated the BBB in the video is the same unit as in the
28 Oct video. We know it has not moved despite Rossi saying YES to the
question WAS IT GONE.
AG
On 20/01/2012 12:55 AM, Energy Liberator wrote:
I still don't think that was spelled out clear enough to ensure an
Daniel,
It is also obvious that there are no E-Cats heating that facility in
Italy. You may ask is heating needed in a Florida E-Cat manufacturing plant?
There are no coolant circulation systems nor heat exchangers attached to
the 12 Jan imaged BBB. How can there be any testing of the BBB in
Daniel,
Rossi said the 28 Oct BBB was shipped to the customer. We now know it
was not shipped nor was the BBB gone as he also claimed.
AG
On 20/01/2012 12:52 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
The problem it is that he said THAT container with its contents were
sold. Or so, that's what I understood.
EL,
Yup. The BBB never moved, was never gone, was never shipped, was never
returned, is not currently operational and is not in testing despite
what Rossi has claimed.
Also that facility is not heated with an E-Cat.
Is there another facility that is making fully functional E-Cat, has a
to throw a bad light over him and
his work.
On 19/01/12 14:46, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Daniel,
It is also obvious that there are no E-Cats heating that facility in
Italy. You may ask is heating needed in a Florida E-Cat manufacturing
plant?
There are no coolant circulation systems nor heat exchangers
Daniel,
I believe the data I have seen. There is a real product. It works.
As an engineer, I believe there is still a LOT of engineer time, money
and effort needed to make this a reliable and certifiable product,
produced in a ISO 9001/2008 and product certified manufacturing facility
that
Jones,
The BBB was not shipped.
Rossi's statement that it was shipped to the customer was not correct.
Your statement that it was returned by the customer is also not correct.
Jones please stop making up false and misleading statement that either
you are making up or your source is making up.
. Then walk naked, with no
tools or technology or memory of technology / tools into the jungle and
see how long you last.
AG
On 20/01/2012 12:42 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I like noise as that is where all
Jed,
Please don't try to rewrite history as other will now tear this
fabricated story apart. The internet has a very good memory and Rossi
has enemies.
Rossi said he was attending the US customer's site, to assist with the
install and commissioning. As we now know, that never happened as
this little black duck.
AG
On 20/01/2012 2:15 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
All we need is ONE photograph of another E-Cat on a production.
He has to solve the eCat-napping problem before he can proceed. It
might
Jones,
I have my sources. Horses mouth sort of sources. 100% accurate.
AG
On 20/01/2012 2:28 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
AG: How do you know it was not shipped?
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat
Jones,
The BBB was not shipped.
Gotta like this guy. Go Terry Go.
AG
On 20/01/2012 2:25 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Chemical Engineercheme...@gmail.com wrote:
If that is all I had to do to become a licensed engineer or other
professional, then I would also be a doctor and a professional
Jones,
WTF?
You think I'm a happy camper?
My board will hang me out to dry, after kicking my ass so much my nose
bleeds.
That said I still believe the E-Cat data I have seen.
It works.
It needs work before it can be sold in a litigious world.
Simple as that.
AG
On 20/01/2012 2:34 AM, Jones
Daniel,
At the moment Rossi's opponents will clean up the floor with what he has
said. The only thing that will save Rossi and the E-Cat is to say
Company XYZ will be doing a 1 week public trial and test of the latest
E-Cat module. All the data, testing equipment and test protocols will be
?
Is there really a 10 kW home E-Cat that will retail for $500 and can be
refilled for $10 by a home owner in the winter of 2012?
Every statement Rossi has made is now in question.
If he doesn't do a public test, REAL SOON, he and the E-Cat are dead.
AG
On 20/01/2012 2:51 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Aussie Guy
- find a new forum to spout your nonsense. We do
not need it here.
Jones
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat
Jones,
The BBB was not shipped.
Rossi's statement that it was shipped to the customer was not correct. Your
statement that it was returned by the customer is also
at 9:03 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I like noise as that is where all the interesting stuff lives.
Just don't be demeaning engineers. Just an engineer . . really!
We are Yaldabaoth!
:-)
T
Steven,
It is almost 4am here. Time for me to chill out and get some sleep.
AG
On 20/01/2012 3:10 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
From AG:
Jed,
This is more than chaos. He has buried himself. How can anybody believe a
word of what he says anymore?
He did not ship the plant.
Steven,
Didn't sleep much last night. Went for a morning walk along the beach
with my dog and watched the sun come up. Just had a coffee with our
chairman who lives not that far from me. I'm taking 2 weeks leave to get
my head together. The company will not be moving forward with any of my
Which make it even more interesting.
AG
On 18/01/2012 11:38 PM, Energy Liberator wrote:
That to me looks like it was from Jan 13 2009, not a few days ago.
On 18/01/12 13:05, Paul Calvo wrote:
*what do you make of this statement by Joe Zawodny / NASA a few days
ago?*
*
*
The box may contain a primary coolant circulating pump that is speed
controlled by the electronics as part of the regulation of the energy
generation process.
AG
On 18/01/2012 11:48 PM, Energy Liberator wrote:
It's remarkable how quick things change with this. In a previous post on
JONP a
Terry,
I find it difficult to believe these guys would not be able to get Rossi
on a Skype connection, especially as they had Dick Smith's $200k riding
on the call.
I have no association with this group.
AG
On 19/01/2012 12:15 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
I feel as though I'm watching a late
I have done a blink comparison. The 2 images were not taken from exactly
the same spot. I have tried to apply corrections.
https://picasaweb.google.com/100758632386227249211/January192012?authuser=0feat=directlink
Apparently it is the same E-Cat BBB as from 28 Oct 2011. Look at the
Daniel,
So too do I care about these images!
What we don't really know is if the Jan 12 2012 video is really from Jan
12 2012 or not. In the Oct 28 image there are a lot of stains on the
floor in front of the E-Cat. In the Jan 12 images, these stains are
missing. I do note there are other
Jones,
All that can be said at the present point in time is the images are of
the same BBB. Until we can determine the date of the Jan 12 video
interview's images of the BBB, any assumptions are just guess work.
Differential staining on the floor in front of the E-Cat plant is
suggestive of
Jones,
The only thing we do know for sure about that video is the date is was
posted onto the internet.
I do note in the first 10 seconds of the video you can see inside what
may be a prototype of the home E-Cat, with a home sized parallel plate
heat exchanger in the background.
This is
Daniel,
Look at the stains on the floor in front of the opened doors of the BBB
on 28 Oct and in the supposed 12 Jan video. No stains in the 12 Jan
image and stains in the 28 Oct video. Also the 12 Jan BBB video is of a
E-Cat in construction (lots of things inside not connected) and in the
Daniel,
See what I can do. Will play with Gamma and Contrast. Did you look at MY
blinker? It is very obvious.
https://picasaweb.google.com/100758632386227249211/January192012?authuser=0feat=directlink
You need to click on the LEFT image in the album to see the animated GIF
image changing
Daniel,
Try this image of the non and stained floors.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/shO4Ub6pXlC5p1kWhUIZ89MTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
AG
On 19/01/2012 1:26 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
I cannot see colors well, I have some color blindness, deuteranomaly.
Can you enhance the
Daniel,
Sure but other floor stains in the same area have not been removed /
cleaned up. Note the dirty area is not just in front of the BBB. It
continues along the edge of the painted / non painted edge in front of
the BBB.
There are no signs of scratched on the painted floor where various
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=14#comment-171562
*
Andrea Rossi
January 17th, 2012 at 4:41 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=14#comment-171562
Dear Mark Szlazak:
It will be cm 30 x 30 x 12 circa. Not able to make electricity yet.
Wonder if Krivit sent the email to Rossi, Focardi, Celani, Levi and
Piantelli?
AG
Jan. 15, 2012
*
*LENR and Cold Fusion Theory Index *
*I continue to receive mixed responses about the media attention I give
to the Widom-Larsen theory of LENRs.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=42#comment-170607
*
Andrea Rossi
January 16th, 2012 at 7:09 AM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=42#comment-170607
Dear Roger:
Another “rumorist” has written somewhere that our Customer has given
us
Jones,
So you are OK with DFG taking Rossi's invention and in effect stealing
it from him? You do admit it worked. But not for long enough. So what?
IT WORKED. What part of IT WORKED don't you understand?
And now your saying DFG will eat the lunch Rossi prepared and you think
they are OK in
on this forum.
Mary, who ever you really are, you are wrong about Rossi and his E-Cat.
Soon you and all the other deniers will know you are wrong.
AG
On 17/01/2012 8:56 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
Wolf,
Heard you got a question into the program. Well down.
I think Rossi is dead right on the pricing structure. This way he will
make it very difficult for another FPE device to get into HIS market. If
he sells at a higher price then there is enough fat to allow another
competitor to
Wolf,
With a reactor temp around 600 deg C and the coolant at 120 deg C there
is a wide operational margin. As the coolant temp get to 450 deg C it is
only 150 deg C below the reactor temp. A lot less fat to play with. I
would speculate there is a much higher chance of a runaway and Ni powder
Yamali,
450 deg C E-Cats 1 MW industrial plants are not 60 deg C 10 kW home
E-Cats. You can use just about any coolant at 60 deg C. At 450 deg C you
are talking about molten salts. Whole different set of engineering
challenges.
The home E-Cat is probably just a squashed version of the
To be fair to all parties on this forum we need to read Joe Zawodny's
comments on the Nasa video:
http://joe.zawodny.com/index.php/2012/01/14/technology-gateway-video/
Mary,
To be fair to both sides, I do note Zawodny has not seen a Rossi reactor
and is a competitor. So his statements do nothing to dampen Rossi's
claims. Like all scientists, he is saying it needs more money to be
thrown at it / him.
Of course it does. Rossi is at the Model T stage. Just
As suggested I did send Rossi a copy of the statement made by Jones Beene.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg61105.html
Rossi's comments were
This is totally false and ridiculous.
AG
On 1/16/2012 4:46 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Harry Veeder
Mark,
Rossi claimed, in the latest interview, two 511 keV gammas, going in
opposite directions, were produced and had been measured as a result of
electron–positron annihilation inside the E-Cat reactor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron%E2%80%93positron_annihilation
AG
On 1/16/2012
Rossi has delivered a 1 MW E-Cat, has said they are building the other
13 x 1 MW E-Cats and he has ample cash. What he said here was they are
not yet finished with the optimization of the NI system. Why read
something else into his statement?
AG
On 1/14/2012 6:35 PM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
So you know the name of Rossi's first customer? Which is?
AG
On 1/15/2012 3:01 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
No, I am not an employee of the customer, but it is a rather large group...
... ever heard of any large group keeping a secret secure, once too many
tongue-waggers know about it? People
Interesting info. So you are confirming Rossi DID ship the 1 MW reactor
to his customer. That it did not work over extended periods is to be
expected with new technology. If this has happened it says 2 things:
Rossi did ship the reactor to his customer. Excellent news
The reactor did work but
Wolf,
Rossi has stated the customer is a US organization engaged in military
research, the first 1 MW plant was at the customers site in the US and
that he and others have attended to install the plant. Later he stated,
he, the customer's engineer and NI are working on the advanced control
Mary you need to direct this to Jones Beene who claims to have the
inside information that the customer is real, did receive the plant and
that it worked but not as long as the customer expected. Even you would
have to admit this is good information and what one would expect from a
first off
Jones,
I haven't spoken to Andrea for some time, waiting on the specs of the
high temp plant before we get into contracts. I have emailed him about
your comments.
AG
On 1/15/2012 9:45 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat
Mary you need to direct
that
the leading edge is also called the bleeding edge and for very good
reasons.
AG
On 1/15/2012 9:45 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat
Mary you need to direct this to Jones Beene who claims to have the inside
information ...
AG: I could not make it any
Jed,
Yup. Learning that the hard way. But it does WORK.
AG
On 1/15/2012 10:01 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Cold fusion is much harder than it looks.
In the interview, Rossi said the customer price would be $500 for a 10
kW E-Cat.
AG
On 1/15/2012 10:57 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:54:16 -0800:
Hi,
I think the price of the 10 kW modules is just a projected price, and is
probably
Rossi says the domestic E-Cat is in UL certification.
AG
On 1/15/2012 10:57 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:54:16 -0800:
Hi,
I think the price of the 10 kW modules is just a projected price, and is
probably more likely to be a
Size of a portable computer. Refill works like refilling a ball point pen.
AG
On 1/15/2012 11:09 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Aussie Guy E-Cat's message of Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:04:53 +1030:
Hi,
[snip]
In the interview, Rossi said the customer price would be $500 for a 10
kW
about the 1 MW
plant were 100% incorrect. Care to do better now?
AG
On 1/15/2012 12:05 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
mailto:jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat
Why you put
about the 1 MW
plant were 100% incorrect. Care to do better now?
AG
On 1/15/2012 12:05 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
mailto:jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat
Why you put
Steven,
That is what Rossi has said. Listed to the interview. He is working with
UL to get the home unit certified. That means he has the final
production unit working as UL don't certify prototypes. They will
however work with a company on the final product so as to obtain
certification and
What I learned from the interview.
10 kW home E-Cat is the size of a portable computer.
Rossi calls the recharges Energy Sticks, fits with the ball point pen
refill statement.
Replacement is simple and can be done by anyone.
No H2 canisters used. Reactor stores and recycles the H2. Only
it was real.
It's real. It has control issues. Those control issues are what
engineers, engineering hours and money fix.
AG
On 1/15/2012 1:05 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary
at 9:00 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Steven,
That is what Rossi has said. Listed to the interview. He is working with UL
to get the home unit certified. That means he has the final production unit
working as UL don't certify prototypes. They will however work with a
company
Steven,
I have been involved with UL certification. You first send them a unit
for their analysis. Then following their initial report, you make a few
changes to tweak the product so it will pass.
AG
On 1/15/2012 1:10 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
They will however work
Jed,
I agree. I did once design embedded control systems. The cost to Rossi
would be around $10, especially in the 1m unit pricing. Electronics
today is done for almost nothing. Retail price can however be 1,000s of
time higher, especially if you must buy that failed controller from a
single
for $400 to $500 each.
AG
On 1/15/2012 1:04 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
What I learned from the interview.
10 kW home E-Cat is the size of a portable computer.SNIP
Just curious
Jed,
Rossi is onto a winner here.
Look at the earlier copper pipe Door Knob style reactor. It produced in
the 10 to 20 kW range, same as the home E-Cat. Put it in a case, a few
fittings for the fluid, small mirco for control, small transformerless
power supply, wraparound heater, RFG coil, a
wrote:
At this time I bet being in certification means Rossi is in
discussions with the certifier to see if the test environment can be
secured.
Harry
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Steven,
I have been involved with UL certification. You first
1.6 hours long
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP5cG-36Bag
Listening to the interview again.
Home E-Cat reactor is the size of a package of cigarettes. Smaller than
I thought but still based on the flat reactor assembly as used in the
Fat E-Cats.
AG
On 1/15/2012 4:26 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
1.6 hours long
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP5cG
Finally there is movement at the station.
http://www.mountainman.com.au/mansnowy.html
Now all are starting the hunt for the FPE / LENR Colt that got away.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs_-DKUimeo
One day someone will do something like this for the LENR mob and their
journey to catch the Colt.
Being a quite achiever. Lots happening and in progress.
AG
On 1/13/2012 6:47 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 06:20 AM 1/12/2012, David ledin wrote:
Dick Smith will give to the charity group $200,000 if Mr Bryce, a
member of the Australian Skeptics confirm e-cat work as claimed by
rossi.
Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Being a quite achiever. Lots happening and in progress.
Are you involved in this test? Will you give us a special report if so?
T
It is my dyslexia. Always get letters back to front. Many times spell
check can't pick it up. I need to type much slower and reread everything
I type several times. Even then I miss some words.
AG
On 1/13/2012 9:46 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
Yes it is a BIG change. The reactor design must be VERY different. It is
a good development. Go Rossi Go.
AG
On 1/13/2012 9:57 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
January 12th, 2012 at 5:51 PM
Andrea Rossi
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=11#comment-168783
Dear Mattia Zirzi:
Dick Smith is legendary. If he gets behind Rossi, it will make our
efforts seem like child's play. He can open doors at any level of
industry or government. He is not afraid to back the underdog, attach
the status quo and to have a go mate. With this getting into the SMH
and Dick Smith sending
What a wanker report
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/01/12/smith_offers_ecat_prize/
The only BS is that from this publication.
). Maybe like a dead D cell battery?
AG
On 1/13/2012 10:26 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 03:46 PM 1/12/2012, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Yes it is a BIG change. The reactor design must be VERY different. It
is a good development. Go Rossi Go.
It must be an integrated Nickel+Hydrogen cartridge.
will give to the charity group
$200,000 if
e-cat work as claimed by rossi
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, January 13, 2012 10:00 am
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com
What a wanker report
Look at the transmutations . Holey sheet!
AG
On 1/13/2012 4:04 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
If this is true then don't you think Santilli's claims are even more
extravagant (to use one of M. Y.'
s favorite adjectives) than Rossi's claims?
harry
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Mark
Interesting revelation that torque has been generated from a FPE device.
Wonder when that occurred?
AG
On 1/9/2012 10:15 AM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
and energy produced from cold fusion reactions has been used to drive a
Stirling engine.
Apparently the Swartz paper never made it into the lenr-canr.org
archives. It is mentioned several times.
On 1/9/2012 10:29 AM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Swartz, M., Excess Power Gain using High Impedance and Codepositional LANR Devices
Monitored by Calorimetry, Heat Flow, and Paired Stirling
Did find the Swartz paper on his site. Very interesting paper. Thanks
for the link. It did revealed what I expected, which was that as the
excess heat is removed from the reaction chamber, via the dual Stirling
engines, the reactor temp drops and the process can revert to non OU
operation. To
:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
To stay
in OU mode requires control of the operational Sweet Spot.
Ah, yes, the OOP. Rossi seems to be able to sense when his reaction
begins. I've often wondered if it is an audible que.
T
Image of the Brown Box that apparently controlled the heaters and the RFGs:
https://picasaweb.google.com/100758632386227249211/November282011#5681035346850592738
AG
On 1/9/2012 11:40 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote
I thought the door bell vibrator to jiggle the instrument panel was
cool. My kind of solution.
AG
On 1/7/2012 12:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
I like how a dummy wooden prop was used to disguised the aircraft's
secret propulsion system.
Harry
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
12:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
I like how a dummy wooden prop was used to disguised the aircraft's
secret propulsion system.
Harry
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.aircraftowner.com/videos/view/americas-first-jet-flight-october-1942_1617
Exactly.
AG
On 1/6/2012 5:56 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
What’s coming will make the transistor age look small…
will be a major cost component of the E-Cat. Even computerized
appliances like refrigerators sell for twice that. When I see that low
price…when I can buy at that low price… I will believe it./
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote
1 - 100 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
