y to
> LENR, perhaps involving the spins of the particles. So far, I have not
> seen adequate evidence that BEC reactions have anything to do with LENR. I
> hope that the mechanism will be understood soon as a consequence of the
> recent increased replication activity.
>
> Dave
Can an atom have a temperature between its different parts?
Is an atom that is excited and about to emit a photon not quite hot?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:09 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> I have considered what you are saying as being normal Mark. Relative
> motion of an atom to itself is zero
There used to be a product called Oxycise in the 90's, looking online it
still exists.
Huge issues regarding weight gain are probiotics, these can be responsible
for obesity or weight loss.
Many experiments with mice have proven this out.
Another significant issue seems to be food intolerances an
eing.. a semi virtual radiation that is misalighned to remain in our
> physical plane but interacts long enough to deliver black ligh as an
> artifact? I don’t know and realize my limb is already past breaking so let
> me end here while I await the SPLAT:_)
>
> Fran
>
>
>
&g
rom danger – in their frame the collision speed
> never increases and actually decreases once they get past 45 degree mark
> between space and time in the same Pythagorean relationship seen in the
> dilation formula.
>
> Fran
>
>
>
> *From:* John Berry [mailto:berry.joh...@gma
if the guy takes a path
> directly toward the black hole in his ship since it would accelerate very
> rapidly as it gains energy from the field. A form of race condition might
> exist as he speeds up along with the incoming light chasing him.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Origi
ases makes me think the random motion of
> gas is needed to “make the turn” made available by Casimir effect such that
> gas can “turn” further and further onto a temporal become spatial vector
> which allows Casimir effect to compound while the laser beam is locked into
> a trajectory s
You are going to also need some amazing shields to deal with 10,000 years
of radioactive decay in just an hour.
Actually many problems exist if we assume an accelerated passage of time
were possible, as the frequency of all radiation would be upshifted in
frequency by the same amount!
So you migh
Nope, that is self driving cars, it mentions an MIT professor who they
quoted, what he said in The WSJ
http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2014/02/28/brynjolfsson-says-self-driving-cars-developing-faster-than-expected/
And this makes sense of the comment of Google investing in it...
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at
Yes, but it isn't just automation.
It is efficiency of human labour.
Of course currently we have another source of robots.
People in 3rd world countries being treated and paid like $#!7.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> John Berry wrote:
>
>
>
> People aren't getting enough to really live on unless they live very hard,
>> there are fewer jobs so crime is very tempting . . .
>>
>
> Why would it incentivise crime?? It would incentivise work.
>
This is all predicated on there not being enough jobs.
So some people are going to have to mak
Jed, your system would seriously incentivise crime.
People aren't getting enough to really live on unless they live very hard,
there are fewer jobs so crime is very tempting, you get the extra
money/stuff you need and if you get caught you get to save the money you
couldn't live on anyway so that
2014 at 11:56 AM, Jed Rothwell
wrote:
>
> John Berry wrote:
>
> Give money to people in prison???
>>
>> Why? They can't really spend it, unless they are then charged for their
>> accommodation.
>>
>
> They would be charged. They would have to pay taxe
Give money to people in prison???
Why? They can't really spend it, unless they are then charged for their
accommodation.
Instead it would just build up.
Heck, sounds like a saving scheme, just commit a crime to get into a white
collar prison and when you get out you have a nice nest egg built up
little farm.
If only they also had a washing machine, dishwasher, car,
internet/phone/TV...
John
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Jed Rothwell
wrote:
>
> John Berry wrote:
>
> I just had another idea.
>>
>> Self sufficiency.
>>
>> The idea is that with su
hwell wrote:
>
> John Berry wrote:
>
>
>> 3: Free stuff, have the staples of life given freely, though not
>> unlimitedly.
>>
>
> It is easier and more efficient to hand out money. People who run soup
> kitchens and disaster relief say so. Given a choice between d
about self sufficiency over 20 to
100 people?
Only really to share resources over enough land to have a range of cattle,
fruit tree types.
Each community could experiment with means of fair distribution.
John
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 9:23 AM, John Berry wrote:
>
> Bob, unlike Jed I do thin
Bob, unlike Jed I do think your protectionist laws are plausible.
And while at first blush I considered them very promising, I then saw a
bunch of problems, and the largest problem as I see it is in a loss of
productivity.
Ultimately robots are a offering a path away from scarcity and towards
abu
Ok, let's explore options...
1: Hand out free money, the devil is in the details it seems, but done
right this is promising.
2: Get paid for work a robot does, in the end this is similar as getting
money for free, except it requires too much initiative, outlay and luck.
You need your robot to be
Bob, there is one point I thought of when reading Jed's post.
And that is what is the difference between one robot the size of a human
and 1 robot that is the size of 50 people and has 50-100 arms and other
components?
What would normally be an army of robots could be made as one single robot.
I
Sure, if someone dies of old age.
A different story if one or both parents die from an accident leaving their
possibly still you children to fend for themselves.
They never thought of giving a whole lot of assets to the children.
But if they did and the child dies?
Maybe a better system would b
Damn good idea Bob!
Yes, people can get paid for what their robot does!
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
> A simple law will fix the problem of robots replacing people. The main
> features of such a law follow:
>
> Only real persons shall be allowed to own a robot free o
others see.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:52 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
> John Berry,
> As you can see, my comment has again migrated to the bottom of the list of
> comments.
> I'm using Thunderbird. Nothing special.
> I copy and paste the subject from the comment to which I'm replying.
>
> Adrian Ashfield
>
>
Adrian, the bottom of what?
This will depend on your email client surely, and you have not mentioned
what client you are using.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:48 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
> Jed,
> I couldn't agree with you more.
> LENR will provide the means for universal wealth if we are not too
> po
modern technology.
I pretty much outlined a way it could possibly be done today by a group of
inspired people.
John
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Jed Rothwell
wrote:
> John Berry wrote:
>
> There is enough for everyone, but there is not YET enough for everyone to
>> do nothing
There are huge advantages of giving people enough to live on, and enough to
better themselves.
I don't know what can be done about the unpleasant jobs not enough will
want to do, maybe a small increase in pay could be enough.
Anyway Burger joints and cleaning can increasingly be automated today, y
There is enough for everyone, but there is not YET enough for everyone to
do nothing and have plenty.
And some things are getting worse not better, GM crops are killing the
soil, and pollution is making some even otherwise remote locations unable
to produce food. There are water shortages developi
ck hole.
Still nothing about a black hole really requires gravity when you consider
that all you need is a distortion of space that is so extreme that light
can't escape which is precisely what this would proposes to be.
John
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 2:04 PM, John Berry wrote:
> Ok, so this i
Ok, so this is a trippy thought, but you may be aware of one theory that
stars are opposite ends of the universe might be moving apart with a
relative velocity greater than C, but that this is ok since space in this
case is considered to be moving along too...
I could find a reference but it is a
e science might
> be the Navy in San Diego.
>
> I personally spent my own $ to attend ICCF-18 and I came away from that
> event less confident that LENR
> had potential as a viable energy source that before I attended.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 22,
Ok, so I am not super optimistic that current physics is right about quite
a lot...
But there is a strong line of reasoning that light should create some
degree of gravity.
And as such, then enough light in a small enough space should create a
black hole.
And if that is so, then higher frequency
David, I take it you now accept that energy can be stored without
increasing mass?
I can see you have avoided tackling the subject so I assume this is an
admission that you can't.
This then means we can produce a reactionless drive by changing between
forms of energy that do and do not contribute
n, except a person with a lot more trust capital
> witnessing the similar experience..
>
> Best Regards ,
> Lennart Thornros
>
> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
> lenn...@thornros.com
> +1 916 436 1899
> 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
>
> “Productivity is never an accident. It
ld be established and
disestablished this should increase the potential energy and hence mass of
everything that is effected by gravity, including light (in as much as
light has mass of a sorts).
Rather than magnetisms limited range of effects.
John
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:12 PM, John Berry
d energy then it
> does not function the way you suspect.
>
> I am not aware of any method of storing energy that does not result in an
> increase in the rest mass of the storage device. For example, heating a
> frying pan makes it more massive.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Ori
First off I believe that Newtons laws break down with regular engineering,
there are multiple mechanical devices that do genuinely appear to create a
net thrust.
However these can not be proven from conjecture, they must be accurately
replicated to maybe prove they work, and disproof may barely be
that of the light. That is a normal propulsion system.
>
> A reactionless system would have the ship with the spring begin to move in
> some direction without any type of ejection mass. That is my objection.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John
t planning, and focused effort.” PJM
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:53 PM, John Berry
> wrote:
>
>> Well I guess the class in logic I was imagining was created by logical
>> people to help make a logical improvement in logic.
>>
>> Of course if it is created by il
the same way the consequence of ignoring an extraordinary claim can
sometimes be great enough that it becomes an argument for investigation
despite contradictory beliefs or doubts.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> John Berry wrote:
>
> Jed, you sure can write a t
at 12:01 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> If the created particles were mesons, these particles would decay into
> electrons and neutrinos. I suspect that an experiment can be prepared to
> detect those electrons. Also the mesons would effect the rate of nuclear
> decay of radioactive isotopes.
.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Lennart Thornros
wrote:
> John Berry I agree with your conclusion.
> I do not agree with that "Seems like there should be a class in logic at
> school then if it isn't obvious enough." On the contrary that class will
> make logic
Ok, just a thought...
But if there are particles popping into (semi)existence for a moment...
If it were full existence their annihilation would not be so eventless.
Then could these particles be effected by magnetic and electric fields?
Could they react as other materials do?
Could they actuall
Dave I do not understand what you are talking about.
But if consider the following, it might? Generate the same conundrum while
not violating the conservation of momentum or energy.
Take a spring, compress it.
As the spring is allowed to decompress generates light (by either friction,
or electrom
Jed, you sure can write a thoroughly depressing post.
On the plus side if the world we have now is the result of a minority of
people being logical (jokes about women vastly underestimate the problem)
then it does give me hope for how great a society where the vast majority
actually grasps logic a
>who do not readily believe in new things until they have had a long
experience of them.
Which of course makes them not new, I didn't know Machiavelli had such a
good sense of humor, I guess he saw some advantage in it.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Lennart Thornros wr
As for 1) I think this highlight the most important aspect of the problem.
It should be unquestioned as an obvious truth that experiment ultimately
trumps arguments and theory.
That anyone with any respect for truth, reality or logic should argue that
theory should cause experimental results to b
Jed, you have said that before but it still floors me, as you say this is
stuff kids should know.
I read recently that Pi was almost changed to 3.2 by law:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Pi_Bill
But by comparison to what you mention, that is high level stuff really.
It makes me wonder though what
issue, it’s a
political issue. “
Sound familiar?
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:48 AM, John Berry wrote:
> I think the video I shared previously ( http://vimeo.com/22956103 ) shows
> why there should be a lot less close-mindedness around 'fringe' topics
> including aetheric and so
I think the video I shared previously ( http://vimeo.com/22956103 ) shows
why there should be a lot less close-mindedness around 'fringe' topics
including aetheric and so-called LENR research as there is so much we don't
know we can't know what all that unknown does to influence what we
otherwise t
Indeed what difference exists between "quantum fluid behavior " to quote
the article and "aether flow"?
Could I have my technology accepted by calling is a quantum fluid flow?
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:04 PM, John Berry wrote:
> Is there any reason to think that what
Is there any reason to think that what at least my image based aether tech
is doing isn't making 'polaritons'?
How would these be detected if this were so?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Roarty, Francis X <
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote:
>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/1
Those designs fail to be particularly active.
Having said that looking at that page did make my laptop crash due to a
critical temperature event.
Probably just because my laptop had to process all those images.
Having said that, my images do seem to have likely caused problems with 2
other lapto
When the thing being measured has been designed to be a reactionless thrust
producing engine, then yes that is what they have been testing.
I guess you could say a proposed & experimental reactionless engine.
But since that is the intention and goal of the device measured to have
apparently produ
Some good ideas.
I have already been to various fairs and markets, and it was interesting
hearing from other stalls hat at first they thought I was crazy, but after
watching people feel and get healing results for a number of hours they had
their opinion flip. Only a little money was made selling
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:22 PM, John Berry wrote:
>
> Ok, well sure.
>>
>> Kevin, I could show you a few coil designs that you could make, they run
>> unpowered (They would work powered too).
>>
> ***You should assume that none of us could make your coil. You ma
ribution in the future.
>
> If your device is as easily demonstrable as you claim, it could take off
> right here.
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:25 PM, John Berry
> wrote:
>
>> That is an interesting idea.
>>
>> I may give that some serious consideration.
.
>
>
>
> Perfect for prayer flags which blow in the wind. Have them printed in
> Tibet and get an Amazon account … these would sell out in California, but
> not the rural South.
>
>
>
> *From:* John Berry
>
>
>
> I did try selling them actually, and while
, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Kevin O'Malley
wrote:
> Yup. Youtube video is the best way to go. Basically free advertising.
> Those people whom you say are in no position to help can easily put up
> testimonials.
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 1:09 AM, John Berry
> wrote:
>
the
> man who has everything.
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:21 AM, John Berry
> wrote:
>
>> After I posted this, I realized I should have made it clear that I and
>> many people who feel the energy from the coils and images feel the energy
>> very intensely.
>>
nergy intensity level.
However I have presented this before here, and so I am not holding my
breath that anyone is interested.
John
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 8:24 PM, John Berry wrote:
> I am not sure I have a presentation as such, but I do sometimes explain
> what it is I do, and had occasi
his work myself eventually, so unless this
rant has found someone genuinely interested I think it is up to me.
John
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:32 PM, John Berry
> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like anyone I am making a presentation to, to first watch this.
>>
>
> Where is your presentation and what is the subject?
>
I was put on to this video by a friend, I think it is worth watching given
that it makes it clear that there is so much we don't know yet.
http://vimeo.com/22956103
This isn't something often admitted.
I'd like anyone I am making a presentation to, to first watch this.
John
Frank, you sole his shoes, what cobblers!
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 9:59 AM, wrote:
> In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Sat, 8 Nov 2014 13:33:58 -0500:
> Hi Frank,
> >I am fully aware of what is going on in my waking life and I believe that
> I do understand my interaction with the environm
Also further down there is a video of a cell phone playing a video of
worms, many frogs come up and try to eat the videoed worms.
Quite impressive.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson <
orionwo...@charter.net> wrote:
> Great photo Jed,
>
> BTW, when we were still
Also, if you seek a transient effect, does heat exist in a moment?
Heat is a chaotic form of random microscopic changes in kinetic energy, if
so there should be windows where there is no change in momentum which could
be argued to be as localized moments of zero heat?
Additionally maybe the requi
Interesting that Aether/orgone is also said to have a strong connection to
IR and UV.
And orgone seems connected to electrons and charge and one term given to
this is soft electrons or similar concepts of a form of electron charge.
This could be where the interface between my woo-woo and the more
>
> once you change the board, the rules becomes meaningless.
Once you change the board on which the game is played,the rules becomes
meaningless.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:06 PM, John Berry wrote:
> This is what I have been saying.
>
> Energy conservation is only true a
This is what I have been saying.
Energy conservation is only true and other normal observations of physics
are only true until the fabric of space and matter (aether, GR space-time)
is changed, once you change the board, the rules becomes meaningless.
This is why all the reports of the weird and
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/theres-giant-spot-sun-acting-weird/
>
>
>
> The Police warned tried to warn us:
>
I think it's either effecting your sentence structure, or my reading
comprehension too.
Mind giving some decent examples to take a look at?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.
wrote:
> There's plenty of better images of machinery and intelligently built
> artifacts on Mars than that ( especially from the
>
> Pathfinder rover ). Just zoom and pan hi-res images at ra
I have spoken to Boyd on the phone and I have interest in a few of his
patents and I believe they are genuinely exposing the nature of hidden
physics (the Aether).
And I believe in aliens visiting earth...
But the resemblance is too spot on unless the toy was based on that exact
photo.
Unless of
That toy is most definitively the thing in that photo.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Wow! Aren't we all impressed ...
>
>
> http://cdn-ugc.cafemom.com/gen/constrain/500/500/80/2014/10/31/12/76/xz/pohi
> wdpgkk.jpg
>
> I do find some of Bushman's patents rather amazing -pe
I think he was polite enough.
Most people just don't bother to explain.
I never bothered. He has been spouting this non-sense long enough.
But I do believe that sometimes there is an aetheric energy inductive
coupling between a linked motor and generator that is capable of making it
OU.
On Wed,
I think we can just be reasonable and assume that "doesn't care" does not
mean that he may not prefer.
And if her were pipped to the post by a day and a dollar it would frustrate.
But in this case it means that if someone comes along notably sooner, or
with a much better product he would be happy
we
don't have to write a forfeiture clause into everything we set out to do.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:06 AM, John Berry wrote:
> 20% is a bit low, the results were more 50% to 300% plus in the cases
> given.
>
> But yes, it is better to clean up and say you will not make that pr
20% is a bit low, the results were more 50% to 300% plus in the cases given.
But yes, it is better to clean up and say you will not make that promise
again than to clean up without the intention of keeping the new promise.
Doing otherwise is not even really a clean up since it was not authentic,
t; +1 916 436 1899
> 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
>
> “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a
> commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:43 PM, John Berry
> wrote:
>
>> Of
Of course there really isn't a neatly described scientific method.
But I just read a quote that underlies what must be recognized by anyone
interested in a scientific revolution...
*Kuhn makes clear in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, the
requirement for change in a scientific paradigm do
Yes, but then you need to convert the physical energy into electrical which
will cause some extra loss.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Robert Lynn <
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are at least 5-10 different kinds of old and new stirling engines
> available with 30-40% efficien
--
> From: jwinter
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Fri, Oct 17, 2014 10:45 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Why doesn't Rossi makes a self feeding Hot Cat and ends
> the controversy.
>
> On 18/10/2014 10:30 AM, John Berry wrote:
>
> Did you read/understand Paul's analysis?
>
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:45 PM, wrote:
> On 18/10/2014 10:30 AM, John Berry wrote:
>
> Did you read/understand Paul's analysis?
>
> I didn't need to! Did you read/understand mine!?
>
No, only the first line. Touche.
Now I have I confess I do not know enough abo
Did you read/understand Paul's analysis?
This is impractical and maybe impossible unless he can improve efficiency.
Carnot conversion just isn't great enough to turn the heat into usable
electricity.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
> I don't know why Rossi doesn't do this. I think he
The source of the energy is irrelevant to the existence of excess energy.
The ECAT shouldn't fall based on incorrect and ultimately irrelevant
beliefs of why it functions.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:43 PM, H Veeder wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
>> *From:*
Additionally some people get it but are apparently symptom-less beyond a
light touch of the flu.
This could very well be a nutrition issue, such that those with
insufficient nutrition fail.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:16 PM, wrote:
> In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:40:4
There is lots of evidence that this can get past biohazard containment
procedures:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2014/10/07/after-nurse-contracts-ebola-spanish-health-workers-raise-concerns-about-protective-equipment/
If this strain is so infectious that this is so, then wo
You want conspiracy???
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/breaking_news/2014/08/for-ebola-they-built-drive-through-gas-chambers.html
Basically the PCR test is 100% effective at registering positive when
tested on someone who has Ebola.
It has never been tested on someone without Ebola.
So does it test
It seems that Mega doses of Vitamin C are very promising:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2014/09/combating-ebola-how-to-fight-ebola-with-vitamin-c-ascorbic-acid.html
Vitamin C is needed to make collagen that keeps your blood on the inside.
Ebola causes Vitamin C to drop to Zero until the
No, it means he is important! Too important to waste his energy pressing
the shift button.
2014-09-01 2:07 GMT+12:00 Alexander Hollins :
>
> https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1673957641/free-energy?ref=category_popular
>
> all caps means he's REALLY serious.
>
Not just that update:
http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-windows/microsoft-yanks-botched-black-tuesday-patches-kb-2982791-kb-2970228-kb-2975719-and-kb-2975331-248582
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> 298 . . . my lysdexic friend.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Or
More on the null test...
http://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/2c8xah/nasa_validates_impossible_space_drive_wired_uk/cjdg3bh
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 11:21 PM, John Berry wrote:
> Different, but this made me think of Borbas Miklos, a simple ion free
> anomalous thrust expe
Different, but this made me think of Borbas Miklos, a simple ion free
anomalous thrust experiment:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090902150248/http://bmiklos2000.freeweb.hu/unipolar.htm
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:16 PM, John Berry wrote:
> However, apparently a dummy load produced zero thr
However, apparently a dummy load produced zero thrust...
And I think the other designs need to be better understood, should they
really be null?
http://i.imgur.com/daNmDty.png
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:09 PM, John Berry wrote:
> It looks like I can answer my own question.
>
contained internal physical
modifications that were designed to produce
thrust, while the other did not (with the latter being referred to as the
“null” test article).
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 9:16 PM, John Berry wrote:
> Alain, where did you read that the blank/dummy control drive also wor
Alain, where did you read that the blank/dummy control drive also worked?
>From what I read it seemed to indicate that it passed (got negative result)
on that drive.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
> few bad point for the test are :
> 1- the thrust is much weaker than EmDri
I was not aware of Poher, but given that shouldn't Morton be considered a
further and earlier verification of this effect?
Sure it might be harder to directly replicate his results, but the same
force from an asymmetrical spark discharge was noted.
It might also be worth noting Piggot:
http://www
Surely it would make a steam punk fans day.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Can this system support supercritical steam generation. How hot are the
> hot spots?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_steam_generator
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Frank roar
Excuse my ignorance, because my interest in Rossi is small maybe I have not
been paying enough attention...
But has this report still not come out and not a peep from them?
Just checking...
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Lennart Thornros
wrote:
> Different folks different culture. Sorry abou
And is it more light, or more ionization that can be understood by the
apparent light and light sources?
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Rest easy Harry
>
>
> The article itself is confused. Whoever wrote the article had its premise
> backward.
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 201
The description of Cravens reminds me of Muon catalyzed fusion.
I have not read up on Craven's work, did it involve Muons?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> From: Axil Axil
> One of the most amazing LENR systems of them all is the
> Cravens go
r the original version or both.
> Mats Lewin seems to think it is the hot version.
>
>
>
> The hot version fits more neatly into the SPP theoretical base and
> magnetism fits nicely as well… not to mention conversion of heat to
> electricity.
>
>
>
> *From:* Jo
101 - 200 of 1005 matches
Mail list logo
