Here is the one I remember
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWSPROFESSORS/pdf/MileyClusterRydbLPBsing.pdf
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MileyGHcondensedm.pdf
There are others but I hope this one will do for
On 7/20/14, 8:22 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com
mailto:foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
/Earlier he had chastised theorists for throwing out the laws of
thermodynamics, and here he does essentially the same thing./
If the
*But thermodynamics says energy cannot spontaneously accumulate in one
location. Yes, unusual quantum mechanical effects happen. Odd things can
occur once in a while. But, given the number of required reactions to make
the observed heat, it would be a violation of the laws of thermodynamics to
as far as I understand for naive people, the thermodynamic law assume all
particles are acting randomly like in a liquid, or a hot latice...
however if there is an insulated environment where particles can act in a
coherent way, then they each coherent/intricated group considered as one
particle
Okay, so maybe I'm not so level-headed. But violations of thermodynamics
tend to get under a scientist's skin, and Ed is pretty cavalier (so are
you, by the way) in accusing some theorists of violating it and then he
just casually states that the laws of thermodynamics don't apply to his
favored
For anyone who has 50 minutes and an interest in cold fusion theory. We
discuss both Ed's theory specifically and the theory landscape generally --
and get into a number of other topics in between. Thanks for listening:
http://coldfusionnow.org/interview-with-dr-edmund-storms-on-lenr-theory/
should be interesting!
is there a transcript?
2014-07-20 16:57 GMT+02:00 Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com:
For anyone who has 50 minutes and an interest in cold fusion theory. We
discuss both Ed's theory specifically and the theory landscape generally --
and get into a number of other topics in
Thanks. Good interview.
The main complaint from the non-specialists - which will insure that it gets
few viewers - is lack of graphics.
Which is unrealistic of course, since who (especially among volunteers) has the
resources for a graphics artist these days?
I was going to suggest
Why is the hydroton different from Rydberg hydrogen crystals(aka matter)?
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Thanks. Good interview.
The main complaint from the non-specialists - which will insure that it
gets few viewers - is lack of graphics.
maybe some connexions, but Hydroton is a 1D object, constrained in a
lattice defect... metallic 1D hydrogen...
Rydberg states is rather talking of excitation of the electrons..
maybe is rydberg state of atoms in a coherent 1D chain of metallic
hydrogen...
maybe is is a 1D rydberg matter... need
At about 10:45...
Chemical structure/cracks that initiate the nuclear reaction... Most of the
theories have tried to focus on the nuclear reaction taking place within
the lattice. If you try to do that, you automatically get in conflict with
the laws of thermodynamics. I move the reaction to
Hydrogen Rydberg matter is the metallic form of solid hydrogen.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rydberg_matter
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
wrote:
maybe some connexions, but Hydroton is a 1D object, constrained in a
lattice defect... metallic 1D
Maybe instead of metallic 1D hydrogen, it's a Vibrational 1D Luttinger
Liquid BEC forming. A V1DLLBEC.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
wrote:
maybe some connexions, but Hydroton is a 1D object, constrained in a
lattice defect... metallic 1D hydrogen...
Miley has measures zero resistance in the Nano cavity that holds the
hydrogen, So the hydrogen is superconducting. That has to be a BEC. How
does this experimental finding impact Ed Storms theory? Has Ed included
this dot in his collection?
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Kevin O'Malley
I have been in correspondence over the past with Ed Storms over BEC
theories. He has very low regard for them. Primarily, he thinks they
can't happen at anything close to the temperatures that LENR operates. And
to be candid, when I see that there is evidence that LENR effects increase
as the
*More...*
*A 1 dimensional atom strings will form a 1 dimensional superconductor. A
long thin string of hydrogen atoms will be superconducting. The process
that forms these strings is condensation from plasma. Ed Storms should have
had the courtesy to use the name of this stuff that the
In the field of topological materials, superconductivity is produced by
confinement of electrons to a tight path. Electrons seem to jump over
defects that would usually cause them to demonstrate resistance.
Reconsidering, one dimensional topology does not require a BEC to form to
produce zero
It occurs to me that we're not really talking about 1Dimension. We're
talking about 2 Dimensions, with atoms strung together in a straight
line. But the reality is that a string of atoms in a chain will not be in
a straight line, more like a virtual straight line of least resistance
like a wire
See:
https://nanohub.org/resources/1641/download/2006.07.13-sands.pdf
My responses embedded within your post with a triple asterisk ***
designation.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*More...*
*A 1 dimensional atom strings will form a 1 dimensional superconductor. *
***Most of us suspect that superconductor theory will
Axil:
My responses are embedded within your email designated by 3 asterisks ***.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote In
the field of topological materials, superconductivity is produced by
confinement of electrons to a tight path.
***such a thing sound eminently
OK. There's ALOT to respond to here, so let me do my best considering Ed is
not here to talk for himself:
Axil --
Why is the hydroton different from Rydberg hydrogen crystals(aka matter)?
Last I checked there is only evidence for Rydberg matter applications in
hot fusion, not cold fusion. Its
I do think cold plasma at the interface might be having some contribution
to the reaction however, but its not critical, as has been shown in a
number of systems where a cold plasma never forms yet still produces excess
heat effect.
***What? If a cold plasma never forms then how can it produce an
I'm saying that its not necessary to initiate LENR, but when it is present,
it does perhaps work as a catalyst (or something similar) in some way. Hope
that makes better sense.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote:
I do think cold plasma at the interface
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
OK. There's ALOT to respond to here, so let me do my best considering Ed
is not here to talk for himself:
Axil --
*It keeps the confusion level down. *
...For example, I think its fair to say that some of what you write
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin --
*Earlier he had chastised theorists for throwing out the laws of
thermodynamics, and here he does essentially the same thing.*
I don't think he's doing the same thing at all. Nothing about
thermodynamics is
Do we really need to go point-counterpoint on whether Axil is hard to
understand at times? Axil aside, aren't we all? The only reason I brought
it up is because pots shouldn't call tea kettles black. We all have to be a
little more self-aware and not waste time with trivial pot-shots I think.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
OK. There's ALOT to respond to here, so let me do my best considering Ed
is not here to talk for himself:
Kevin --
*Earlier he had chastised theorists for throwing out the laws of
thermodynamics, and here he does
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
OK. There's ALOT to respond to here, so let me do my best considering Ed
is not here to talk for himself:
Kevin --
*Earlier he had chastised theorists for throwing out the laws of
thermodynamics, and here he does
Kevin -- I'm not a scientist, its not my theory, take your objections
directly to Ed (you have his email it would appear) if you're serious about
finding out the nitty-gritty specifics.
But quickly, based on my understanding -- if nuclear level heat events were
going to take place within a
Kevin -- you make it really hard to have a level-headed discussion with you
sometimes. I appreciate your wanting to have a conversation on the subject,
but some of the stuff you write is pointlessly antagonistic and
counterproductive to a healthy dialogue. Do you want to keep going on like
this or
It makes as much sense as a 2-storey outhouse.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying that its not necessary to initiate LENR, but when it is
present, it does perhaps work as a catalyst (or something similar) in some
way. Hope that makes better
OK. I got you loud and clear. Thanks.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote:
It makes as much sense as a 2-storey outhouse.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying that its not necessary to initiate LENR, but
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_conduction
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Axil:
My responses are embedded within your email designated by 3 asterisks
***.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote In
the
My responses embedded by 3 asterisks***.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin -- I'm not a scientist, its not my theory, take your objections
directly to Ed
***My responses are to YOU. If you say something about his theory, I'm
responding to YOU. Do
Axil -- Can you link the paper(s) where Miley measured zero-resistance in
NAE? I've always been curious where the origin of synthesizing LENR w/
superconductivity originated. Was his work the original? Thanks.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote:
My
36 matches
Mail list logo
