On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
More probably this means that the catalyst is in homogeneous i.e. liquid
phase- a solution or a melt which covers the Ni powder (it happens at
350-450 deg Celsius)
Peter
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Terry
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:32:27 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Suppose it turns out you can extract much more energy per gram
from a Pd-D system than Ni-H.
I'm fairly sure that isn't the case. Most nuclear fusion reactions yield about 5
MeV / amu (ballpark). Nuclear fission
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:18:59 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Other - I bet that Rossi's nickel is NOt isotopically enriched in any way,
in order to separate isotopes you have to bring the metal in a fluid form
liquid or gaseous.
How about a salt in solution?
Regards,
Robin
This is one of the possibilities- it is not easy to solve, process- enerich,
dry, purify Ni)- that's not +10% of the price, it is is more than X times
the price of Nickel.
I have retired (in 1999) from the local Institute of Stable Isotopes-
producing isotopes of Li, C, N, products marked see
I found something:
citation:
Q: does the catalyzer works in a homogeneous phase with nickel powder?
Answer (Rossi):No
--
NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen!
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
Angela Kemmler angela.kemm...@gmx.de wrote:
Q: does the catalyzer works in a homogeneous phase with nickel powder?
Answer (Rossi):No
I do not understand what this means. Someone should please rewrite works in
a homogeneous phase with nickel powder. Does that mean the powder is
On 2011-04-13 23:25, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not understand what this means. Someone should please rewrite
works in a homogeneous phase with nickel powder. Does that mean the
powder is homogeneous? What is a homogeneous phase?
Maybe he meant this:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not understand what this means. Someone should please rewrite works in
a homogeneous phase with nickel powder. Does that mean the powder is
homogeneous? What is a homogeneous phase?
Probably, single isotope.
T
More probably this means that the catalyst is in homogeneous i.e. liquid
phase- a solution or a melt which covers the Ni powder (it happens at
350-450 deg Celsius)
Peter
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jed Rothwell
Thank you Terry!
Sorry for sleeping during this looong thread- geography is destiny even on
the short term. It is not excluded that he adds something to the nickel that
helps for a better nanostructure genesis or for an easier, faster and more
thorough removal of the gases from the active surface.
From Terry and Peter:
...
I'm willing to bet that Peter Gluck is right and Rossi bakes his Ni in
a vacuum to remove the gaseous impurities then puts it in the reaction
chamber under the bell jar. I think the catalyst is a red herring.
Meaning Rossi's Ni contains naturally found isotopic
Yessir!
normal, matural clean Ni ready to be nanometrized and degassed properly.
Isotopic enrichment is very difficult and costly..
I don't uinderstend exactly your idea with the prper pressure- they add
hydrogen, this is adsorbed in part, you cannot add exactly a dosis of
hydrogen- but surely
Hi,
I agree with Jed.
My first-hand personal experience with Italian people is the same.
Having to talk with them in meetings during several days can be very
exhausting due to their different pronounciation and sometimes
misunderstanding of the English language.
My personal classic example
From Peter Gluck:
...
I don't uinderstend exactly your idea with the prper pressure- they add
hydrogen, this is adsorbed in part, you cannot add exactly a dosis of
hydrogen- but surely there is a best practices type protocol here.
My apologies, Peter.
Let me try to clarify my previous
It was told me that some of the spurious results that have plagued the
CF community for the past 20 years is due to the fact that the process
is extremely susceptible to environmental/weather changes.
If we speak about Pd-D, perhaps the best is to find out what was the best,
most consistent,
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:26:41 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
And, in principle. will we ever have a technologizable Pd-D cold fusion?
Why would we want a technology based upon scarce ( expensive) substances (Pd
D) when we can have one based on cheap and readily available
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:26:41 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
I don't see any reason for wjich
an isotope of nickel could function better than an other isotope of
nickel???
I explained this in a previous post. The neutron rich isotopes probably have a
higher nuclear cross
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:26:41 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
And enrichment is very expensive difficult.
...and so unnecessary. If the reactions to stable copper are preferred (by the
reaction mechanism itself) above other reactions, then Ni62 Ni64 will
automatically be
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Why would we want a technology based upon scarce ( expensive) substances
(Pd
D) when we can have one based on cheap and readily available ones (Ni H)?
For the next several years I think researchers should concentrate on Ni-H,
but I think it would be a good idea
Dear Robin,
The reason is first of all historical- for 21.85 years and 15 ICCFs we have
tried to explore, understand and make use of the palladium- deuterium
systems,first of all.
Scientifically these are OK, but it is a problem of principle is POSSIBLE
to use them as an energy source? A reliable
Hello Everyone,
Over the past few months I have read many guesses as to what the catalyst(s)
might be.
A couple speculations are sodium hydride and zirconium.
Please use this thread to post your speculations as to the catalysts used in
the
E-Cat.
If we can figure this out replication work
Add to that:
8) the Ni processing system increases 10% the cost of Ni (Rossi, April 9)
That can't be much processing.
- Jed
Forgot:
9) The catalyst consists of Ni plus two other elements.
- Jed
Why not bet on what the catalyst is?
My guess is this (it is valid only in Italian)
The catalyst is Nickel electro- Nitrogen Telluride,
shortened name NieNTe - niente- i.e. nothing
Just a very good method of activation. I have told
this here three days ago and I am ready to bet.
Peter
On Mon,
Mills told us years ago that his catalyst is potassium. Why do we think
this is a different process? Remember that Mills started this work with
a nickel-hydrogen fuel cell. If it's real, then more than likely it's
the same process.
Craig
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 21:47 +0300, Peter Gluck wrote:
Why
Peter Gluck wrote:
Why not bet on what the catalyst is?
My guess is this (it is valid only in Italian)
The catalyst is Nickel electro- Nitrogen Telluride,
shortened name NieNTe - niente- i.e. nothing
So you are saying that Rossi is not telling the truth. Okay, but let us
try playing a round
In this case truth is a problem of definition. Ni as such can play the role
of a catalyst.
I think during the 22 years of CF history we have learned how important is
the nanometric structure of the metal. What I have called active sites in my
Topology paper and they are now NAE are products of
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
And as I have told so many times- the gases that could compete with
deuterium or hydrogen have to be thoroughly eliminated from the surface-
please read the (accepted!) patent WO 2010/058288
The Piantelli patent. So you are talking mainly about
-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
And as I have told so many times- the gases that could compete with deuterium
or hydrogen have to be thoroughly eliminated from the surface- please read the
(accepted!) patent WO
Rossi has stated they use ordinary nickel and not any one specific isotope of
nickel.
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 1:24:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
Peter Gluck
Dennis wrote:
notice that is not consistent with what you said earlier today:
Ni processing system increases 10% the cost of Ni
a pure isotope Nickel would cost a lot.
It is more likely a simple commercially available modification of Ni
Ah. You are right. Cancel that theory.
Could that be
On 04/11/2011 04:24 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Mono-isotopic nickel?
Could that be the secret?
It would be nice -- that would explain a lot of things, including the
lack of radioactive ash.
Unfortunately, the sample tested in Sweden was apparently natural
nickel, and natural copper.
So,
-- Forwarded message --
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:18 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
To: thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
This part of the Rossi patent caught my attention:
“The present inventor, moreover, has also
Putting aside Rossi for moment, I guess this has to be Piantelli's secret.
Or one of his secrets. I do not think you are allowed to add red herrings to
patents. (That is, irrelevant information or false clues as to how to make
the thing work.)
I have read this several times. It seems to me that
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
All this supports my contention that iron in the form of an X2O3 oxide forms
the site of the active nuclear component in the Rossi catalyst.
So the secret is rust?
T
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
All this supports my contention that iron in the form of an X2O3 oxide
forms the site of the active nuclear component in the Rossi catalyst.
So the
Hah! I thought I recognized JANAP 128 Protocol:
http://sites.google.com/site/mdprcp/proceduresandprotocols
T
I've been mad for fu**ing years, absolutely years, been
Over the edge for yonks, been working me buns off for bands...
I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the
Most of
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hah! I thought I recognized JANAP 128 Protocol:
http://sites.google.com/site/mdprcp/proceduresandprotocols
T
I've been mad for fu**ing years, absolutely years, been
Over the edge for yonks, been working me buns off
On 2011-04-11 23:04, Axil Axil wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
[...]
This is an extremely interesting, well thought post; you're definitely
onto something. Iron oxide (=rust) would also be quite cheap to add to
nickel power which is consistent to what we've read so far on
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
All this supports my contention that iron in the form of an X2O3 oxide
forms the site of the active nuclear component in the Rossi catalyst.
So the secret is rust?
Is your last name Foley, by chance? :-)
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:44 PM, SHIRAKAWA Akira
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2011-04-11 23:04, Axil Axil wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
[...]
This is an extremely interesting, well thought post; you're definitely onto
something. Iron oxide (=rust) would also be
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:15:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
should have instructed them: tell the reader what two isotopes you mean,
and what the desired proportion should be.
- Jed
Ni62 Ni64 in the proportion 70/30? ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
From: Axil Axil
* 316L stainless steel has 18% chromium and 65% iron more or less. If the
process was a mechanical based sputtering process then 2.7 % chromium
contamination should have been found in the ash and this chromium would have
still been alloyed with the iron.
What could have
On 2011-04-11 23:57, Axil Axil wrote:
The following speculation is offered as a springboard for discussion as
regards to the chemical and physical processes that underlie the Rossi
reactor. This is another attempt to connect the dots.
I haven't seen that part appear here.
Should I sent it
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Don't laugh at suggestion of 'rust' as a catalyst.
It was maniacal.
T
Axil Axil wrote:
IF maghemite(Fe2O3) is used in the Rossi process, and if the Rossi
reaction depends on the magnetic behavior of Iron oxide nanoparticles
. . .
Okay, that's 2 elements, and it would not add much to the cost. ~10%?
Essen did not say there was oxygen but he didn't say there
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 5:05:37 PM
Subject: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
There has been speculation within the cold-fusion community that Rossi is
being
disingenuous is stating that the reaction chamber
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:..
So sorry...please excuse me, I am just begining to learn the vortex ropes.
No, I apologize. We have speculated for so long.
T
Harry Veeder wrote:
disingenuous is stating that the reaction chamber is made of stainless steel.
Why? Stainless steel is a poor conductor of heat.
If stainless steel takes a few minutes longer to reach the maximum temperature
that is hardly a drawback if the Ecat runs for weeks or days or
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:..
So sorry...please excuse me, I am just begining to learn the vortex
ropes.
No, I apologize. We have speculated for so long.
T
From Axil
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:05:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The iron assay in the ash is higher than even copper. So how did it get so
high? The proton fusion theory of nickel does not support the transmutation
of iron. The Miley theory of natural isotopic abundance that I
Axil Axil wrote:
Deuterium impurities in the hydrogen will make formation of a
fermionic condensate impossible. This is why a small percentage (2% to
3%) of deuterium will kill the Rossi reaction.
Did Rossi say that? I don't recall that. Let's add that to the list of
What We Know From
In reply to SHIRAKAWA Akira's message of Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:44:33 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
On 2011-04-11 23:04, Axil Axil wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
[...]
This is an extremely interesting, well thought post; you're definitely
onto something. Iron oxide (=rust) would also be
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The pressure
buildup is so intense, the atoms stop being atoms, and the nucleus of the
former hydrogen atoms breaks apart into it's constituent protons, which then
break apart into their constituent sub-particles (quarks and
I meant that Axil Axil's essay is a remarkable synthesis. As far as I
can tell.
It is remarkable how much information can be gleaned from Rossi's
publications and comments. You could not gather this much about
Fleischmann and Pons at Technova, for example, because only Johnson
Matthey knew
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:23:55 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
What the function of the X2O3 does is absorb hydrogen is vast amounts by
packing the hydrogen atoms into a vast number of countless holes and defects
in the crystal structure of this X2O3 oxide compound.
This stuff
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:23:55 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Doing the first test, .25 grams of hydrogen was loaded into one gram of
nickel. That is an enormous amount of hydrogen to pack into a very small
quantity of nickel.
If I calculated correctly, this is 15 H to each Ni.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The pressure
buildup is so intense, the atoms stop being atoms, and the nucleus of the
former hydrogen atoms breaks apart into it's constituent
Okay; but, I cannot find the issue on proton breakdown. Perhaps you
could direct me.
Thanks!
T
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Axil Axil
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay; but, I cannot find the issue on proton breakdown. Perhaps you
could direct me.
Thanks!
T
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Terry
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It is as if a large amount of hydrogen atoms together with some other atoms
like nickel go into a quantum mechanical blender and turned into a coherent
quark soup.
Okay, the problem, as I see it, is overcoming the binding
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It is as if a large amount of hydrogen atoms together with some other
atoms
like nickel go into a quantum mechanical blender and turned into a
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, the problem, as I see it, is overcoming the binding energy of
the quarks in the proton. This blender would require energy levels
equivalent to those soon after the BB!
This would require about 1 GeV as I
, does this tell us anything about the type of catalyst he uses?
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 4:32:05 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
Okay; but, I cannot find
.
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 4:47:05 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay; but, I cannot find the issue on proton breakdown. Perhaps
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
Does this tell us anything new?
Dear “HRG”:
My process has nothing to do with Widom Larsen Theory.
Indeed! This tells us that Steve Krivit will soon reveal that Rossi is a
fraud, a cad, he snatches candy from babies, and throws stones at innocent
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
ROSSI ENRICHES HIS NICKEL!
Wow! That is a revelation. He *has* learned from Piantelli.
It is surprising he can do this for 10% of the cost of nickel.
It is surprising how much he reveals in his blog. I hope it does not
endanger his intellectual
From: noone noone
Dear Mr Mattias Carlsson:
Yes, we do.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
ROSSI ENRICHES HIS NICKEL!
Now, does this tell us anything about the type of catalyst he uses?
No – but it tells us volumes about someone’s basic honesty, doesn’t it ?
At least when you place this
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Why waste time with this nonsense?
Because it's fun? Fizzix is fun!
Personally, I contribute Rossi's success to spintronics!
Not.
T
was enriched there is probably less than one
kilogram of nickel remaining.
There was no dishonesty in any of this.
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 5:54:27 PM
Subject: RE: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
He has found some process of removing some of the other isotopes so that
there is a higher percentage of Ni62 and Ni64. This process costs about two
dollars. This is probably due to the chemicals used.
Bovine tripe,
Ackshully, the implication here is that someone is getting tooo close
to the truth.
T
On 04/11/2011 08:50 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
mailto:thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
ROSSI ENRICHES HIS NICKEL!
Wow! That is a revelation. He _has_ learned from Piantelli.
It is surprising he can do this for 10% of the cost of nickel.
It's also
I'm willing to bet that Peter Gluck is right and Rossi bakes his Ni in
a vacuum to remove the gaseous impurities then puts it in the reaction
chamber under the bell jar. I think the catalyst is a red herring.
T
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
He has found some process of removing some of the other isotopes so that
there is a higher percentage of Ni62 and Ni64. This process costs about two
dollars. This is probably due to the chemicals used.
Look up isotope separation methods and you
.
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 6:20:50 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
He has found some process of removing some of the other
Jones,
From the April 6th NyTeknik article:
NyTeknik: What results have you obtained from the analyses?
Kullander: Both measurements show that the pure nickel powder contains mainly
nickel, and the used powder is different in that several elements are present,
mainly 10 percent copper and
Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
Kullander: . . . The isotopic analysis through
ICP-MS doesn’t show any deviation from the natural isotopic composition of
nickel and copper.
This has to be a misunderstanding. Believe me, I have had many
misunderstandings trying to communicate with
I uploaded a question about this to his blog, here:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=338cpage=2
It has not shown up yet.
- Jed
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
HE DOES NOT WANT REPLICATION - how obvious that is by now.
It is obvious because he has said it, clearly, many times. He does sometimes
make himself clear.
I don't see anything untoward about it. Of course he doesn't want
replication! It would endanger
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
Kullander: . . . The isotopic analysis through
ICP-MS doesn’t show any deviation from the natural isotopic composition of
nickel and copper.
This has to be a
I find it strange that the Swedes did not incorporate their isotopic analysis
in
their report.
Harry
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 9:49:04 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
Harry Veeder hlvee
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
HE DOES NOT WANT REPLICATION - how obvious that is by now.
It is obvious because he has said it, clearly, many times. He does
sometimes make himself clear.
I don't see
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Mae West : Don't keep a man guessing too long--he's sure to find the
answer somewhere else.
I love it!
- Jed
From: Jed Rothwell
HE DOES NOT WANT REPLICATION - how obvious that is by now.
* It is obvious because he has said it, clearly, many times. He does
sometimes make himself clear.
Baloney. Where did he say this?
Bologna? G
* I don't see anything untoward about it. Of course he
.
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 7:36:44 PM
Subject: RE: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
From:Jed Rothwell
HE DOES NOT WANT REPLICATION - how obvious that is by now.
Ø It is obvious because he has
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:47:05 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
A further consequence of the LENR evaluation leads to the ratios R (n) (n =
1, 2, 3
) of the Boltzmann probabilities, namely R (n) = 3n. This suggests
a threefold property of stable configurations at magic numbers in
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:30:42 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On 04/11/2011 08:50 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
mailto:thesteornpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
ROSSI ENRICHES HIS NICKEL!
Wow! That is a revelation. He _has_ learned from
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
And then, when carrying out this ruse – he gets caught in obvious lies -
instead of condemnation, you want to go easy on him because he does not
speak the English language very well ?
I have experienced worse misunderstandings and miscommunication
In reply to noone noone's message of Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:36:54 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I do not think he is lying about this.
I think he is telling us the truth.
The only downside is that even though the enrichment only costs 10% of the
cost
of the nickel the final amount of nickel fuel is
catalysts he
is using.
_
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 7:36:44 PM
Subject: RE: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
From: Jed Rothwell
HE DOES NOT WANT REPLICATION - how obvious that is by now.
* It is obvious
91 matches
Mail list logo
