thomas malloy wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
The return of the Jews, the conquest of the land, it's subsequent
prosperity, the hatred of the Arabs, their refusal to get over the
indignity of the loss of that part of their conquered land, the
Liberals support of Islam. I
Edmund Storms wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
The return of the Jews, the conquest of the land, it's subsequent
prosperity, the hatred of the Arabs, their refusal to get over the
indignity of the loss of that part of their conquered land, the
Liberals support of Islam. IMHO, It's all supernatura
Howdy Vorts,
Seems this thread has taken on a life of it's own. Time to take the mirror
down from behind the bar before sumbuddy starts preaching a sermon and
tosses a whiskey bottle.
The boys at the Dime Box saloon practice peaceful co-existence and .. the
rule is to be wise as serpents and
As for fighting thugs, you seem to forget that the people in Palestine
were first attacked when Israel was formed.
This is simply not true - a lie in fact - among many others I've seen from Ed.
Ed can be as amazed as he wishes; his ignorance of history is spellbinding...
And this is coming fro
--- Robin:
> This means two fast alphas, with equal energy, and
opposite momentum, and presumably no gammas.
On first read, that is simply impossible, Robin,
unless I am missing something. The nature of fast
alphas is to create copious gammas on interaction with
condensed matter. Unless by "fast"
I'm amazed Philip that you would call my analysis lies and hypocrisy. We
can differ about what the facts mean, but I don't understand why you
can't acknowledge easily verifiable facts. Unfortunately, your reaction
is not uncommon and it is the reason why rational decisions are not
being made. S
I don't like to play amateur moderator, and you can correctly say that I
have no business either. It's just selfish: I enjoy the posts from the
participants here, want them to stay, and I can tell the conversation is
just this close " to where people begin to leave in a huff or get put in the
coole
Hmmm... Ya don't think that higher oil prices are due to (1) greed, and (2) the
holy purpose of holding the world by the balls until the Caliphate is
established (ie - the West succumbs financially and goes down the tubes)? It
seems that the scientific idea of cause and effect is somewhat inapp
thomas malloy wrote:
The return of the Jews, the conquest of the land, it's subsequent
prosperity, the hatred of the Arabs, their refusal to get over the
indignity of the loss of that part of their conquered land, the Liberals
support of Islam. IMHO, It's all supernatural. BTW, comprise wil
The return of the Jews, the conquest of the land, it's subsequent
prosperity, the hatred of the Arabs, their refusal to get over the
indignity of the loss of that part of their conquered land, the Liberals
support of Islam. IMHO, It's all supernatural. BTW, comprise will get
no where with the
Good suggestion, Philip. I have read the biographies of Edgar Cayce. He
is another example of powers that have no physical explanation and no
religious significance.
Ed
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
Quite right Ed. For an interesting story on this, read any of the
biographies of Edgar Cayce - "Th
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:19:12 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>Where are the gammas then?
I see two possibilities (and I suspect Arata of adhering to the first).
1) The cluster of four deuterium atoms creates 2 alphas concurrently (or 1 Be8*
that subsequently fissions).
Quite right Ed. For an interesting story on this, read any of the biographies
of Edgar Cayce - "The Sleeping Prophet"
P..
- Original Message
From: Edmund Storms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Oil Gang responds
St
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:03:44 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin,
>
>(replying on-list, in case you forgot to change the address line or are unable
>to get through again)
>
>0.04g D2 is 0.04g D, and D is 2g/mol, so that should be 0.04/2 mol * 6E23
>atoms/mol = 1.2 E22 a
test
Good idea, Steven, but I suggest a different approach from atheism. A
good dose of real humility would work as well. If they would simply
question whether a god as old and complex as the one that must exist in
a universe as vast and old as ours would give a shit who occupies this
speck of land.
>From Ed Storms:
> Sorry to misinterpret you [S. Lawrence]. Nevertheless,
> I agree with you. However, international law is a
> recent concept as our examples point out. So, on that
> basis, Israel has violated international law as well
> as the moral behavior Christ taught. So, what remains?
> I
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
You are certainly right Stephen, might does make right and land is
always taken by force and retained the victor.
Excuse me, I didn't say that, or didn't intend to. It's Thomas who
elevated it to a principle of international law in this
Edmund Storms wrote:
You are certainly right Stephen, might does make right and land is
always taken by force and retained the victor.
Excuse me, I didn't say that, or didn't intend to. It's Thomas who
elevated it to a principle of international law in this thread, just
before I went balli
Apology to all: This is way, way off topic. I won't respond again on
anything biblical, or even Middle Eastern, in this thread. (If you want
to yell at me about it do it privately and spare the rest of the list.)
thomas malloy wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
R C Macaulay wrote:
How
>From Thomas:
>> R C Macaulay wrote:
>>
>>> Howdy Vorts,
>>>
>>> Gosh, golly, gee folks, here we go again with the Jews and arabs.
>>> This time the "wedge" is oil. The USA uses oil like toilet paper and
>>> everybuddy knows wez intitled to it.. or we think we do. We have
>>> enough oil provided w
You are certainly right Stephen, might does make right and land is
always taken by force and retained the victor. We did it to the British,
the Indians, and to the Mexicans while feeling very proud of ourselves.
However, the situation with Israel is different. Here a higher moral
principal is
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
R C Macaulay wrote:
Howdy Vorts,
Gosh, golly, gee folks, here we go again with the Jews and arabs.
This time the "wedge" is oil. The USA uses oil like toilet paper and
everybuddy knows wez intitled to it.. or we think we do. We have
enough oil provided we turn
On a more personal note, Shephen. I agree, the brain can do some very
strange things. Naturally, these are always explained using established
physical laws, rather like the approach we experience with cold fusion.
But as I get older and more educated about other possibilities, I find I
have a
I think people make a mistake by defining the problem too narrowly. Only
those facts or observation that involve physical processes are
considered. Everything else is pushed aside as being religion,
mysticism, or imagination. Granted, if each metaphysical observation is
viewed in isolation, suc
Jones Said:
...
> Mills considers the hydrino to be stable- but that may
> be the part he got wrong. Or partly wrong if most are
> unstable and immediately reinflate. Mills even claims
> to have captured them ; and has pictures on his site
> of this: LOL as if a picture were proof.
>
> Only probl
Jones Beene wrote:
Only problem is he sent out dozens of samples to MRI
XPS and NMR specialists and not a single one will
independently confirm his claim.
When contacted indpendently - even Mills best
"supporter" has hedged. Eric Kreig, no matter what you
may think of him, has tried to verif
Edmund Storms wrote:
Stephen, you are making a huge assumption when you say that past lives
are not remembered.
True, it's a big one; it's based on the small amount I've read about
brain science plus some major guesses.
So far, as we continue to learn more about brain function, everything
--- Michel Jullian wrote:
> Aren't gammas a "hotfusionomorphic" view of fusion?
Rightly or wrongly, that is the only view of fusion
which is accepted by physics, and it can accommodate
all of LENR when properly (re)interpreted.
If you do not need to invent a new model from the
ground up, then w
Stephen sez:
>> Perhaps in ten or twelve more lifetimes I'll get the
>> hang of it. ;-)
> Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way; there isn't
> any "practice effect" among incarnated beings.
>
> Memory is organic, mediated by the hippocampus and
> related brain "hardware". Consequently at the e
Yes, the Eliica. Quite a monster:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=L7zHcvDPxYU
Here's another, more humble application:
http://www.csiro.au/multimedia/ppf32.html
Terry
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Mike Carrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen a video about a Japanese motor-in-wheel elect
Stephen, you are making a huge assumption when you say that past lives
are not remembered. I suggest you read the books by Dr. Ian Stevenson
(MD). Prof. Stevenson spent his career at the University of Virginia
investigating reincarnation using a scientific approach. Naturally, his
extensive inv
Aren't gammas a "hotfusionomorphic" view of fusion? The energy may be released
in some other way in the particular environment.
Mills' hydrinos may not be needed either, after all all that's required is a
_temporary_ lowering of the Coulomb barrier, as in Horace's deflation fusion
hypothesis (k
--- Michel Jullian wrote:
> However it is probable that only a tiny part of the
> absorbed D is consumed in the putative anomalous
> reactions (in such experiments one retrieves roughly
> the same amount of D2 at deloading than was put in
> at loading doesn't one?), in which case nuclear type
> en
OrionWorks wrote:
Philip sez:
...
People are where they are because it's where they
are, as "part of the dream." My approach is, "live
with it." go out, have a coffee and a bagel (or some
nice organic bread) and get on with life. There's
room enough for everyone, and everyone can make good
Howdy Thomas,
Don't know. Doubt any complex conspiracies are developing in Wash DC other
than a regime is passing and the players in the great game are scrambling as
new players form behind the curtain for the next act in the drama. Beyond
gridlock could be the theme and the music a takeoff of
Robin,
(replying on-list, in case you forgot to change the address line or are unable
to get through again)
0.04g D2 is 0.04g D, and D is 2g/mol, so that should be 0.04/2 mol * 6E23
atoms/mol = 1.2 E22 atoms D, which makes the energy per atom half what you
said, but since the actual time is re
R C Macaulay wrote:
Howdy Vorts,
Gosh, golly, gee folks, here we go again with the Jews and arabs. This
time the "wedge" is oil. The USA uses oil like toilet paper and
everybuddy knows wez intitled to it.. or we think we do. We have
enough oil provided we turn off a few lights and live like
38 matches
Mail list logo
