Game, Set, Match!
:-)
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 12:17 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Explaining Cold fusion -IV
In reply to MarkI-ZeroPoint's message of Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:24:50
LHC team observes first instance of D-mesons oscillating between matter and
antimatter
http://phys.org/news/2013-03-lhc-team-instance-d-mesons-oscillating.html
Preprint here:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1211.1230v1.pdf
As the ol' timers know, I've been pushing the concept that subatomic
Nice find Lou!!
At least it's an attempt to look for a theoretical explanation... it also
shows that some theoreticians aren't afraid to get involved with LENR.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com [mailto:pagnu...@htdconnect.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 8:35
I would posit that spin is the phase relationship of the oscillations...
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 2:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: Proton radius in question, after 3 years the textbooks
may need
If my memory serves me correctly, it was Dr. Peter Graneau who wrote:
Ampere-Neumann Electrodynamics of Metals
which was advocating longitudinal forces.
In the latest issue of JSE is this interesting article:
The Journal of Scientific Exploration has just published its latest issue at
Perhaps some LENR-knowledgeable people could show up and toss a monkey
wrench or two.
;-)
http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=38f0d981013eb1139756aaa6a
http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=38f0d981013eb1139756aaa6aid=07917ffeb3
e=ff83945204 id=07917ffeb3e=ff83945204
-Mark
The evidence is piling up that subatomic 'particles' are dipole-like
structures, and likely a type of dipole oscillation.
Looks, sounds, feels and quacks just like one.
;-)
HTSITYS,
-Mark
[darn pics made msg too large so had to delete the piccys]
---
Researchers
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
The evidence is piling up that subatomic 'particles' are
dipole-like structures, and likely a type of dipole oscillation...
Looks, sounds, feels and quacks just like one...
;-)
HTSITYS
to adequately explain the lack
of gammas in LENR - other than that they never happened at all.
Jones
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
The evidence is piling up that subatomic 'particles' are
dipole-like structures, and likely a type of dipole oscillation
correction:
Why are the UP-spin quarks on OPPOSITE sides of the nucleus from the
DOWN-spin quarks???
should be:
Why are the UP-spin quarks on OPPOSITE sides of the PROTON from the
DOWN-spin quarks???
-mark
_
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo
Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Apr 3, 2013 1:06 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A pile of clues... should be obvious by now!
Dave stated:
“… and that the energy from the reactions is shared among the atoms surrounding
it. I have been
Hmmm, sounds like only a fool would buy their argument!
:-)
Published April 1st... just a coincidence.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 2:56 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:It's a Plot
Proof that the
Hi Eric:
The article you reference
http://phys.org/news/2013-04-quarks-dictate-proton.html
was also included in my original posting… perhaps you should read the entire
thread?
I for one would be interested in hearing other more knowledgeable people’s
opinions on the point of my
So, out of all the erudite Vorts, no one can answer the following simple
questions:
Why are the UP-spin quarks on OPPOSITE sides of the proton from the
DOWN-spin quarks???
Why do...
All spin directions collapse on one or the OPPOSITE direction depending on
the measured photon polarization. ???
Steven:
What I was thinking as I was reading your most eloquent explanation and
question to Josh, was not quite so eloquent.
. what a waste of good brain cells.
-Mark
From: OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 8:15 AM
To:
In an attempt to trigger some out of the box thinking, let me contribute the
following...
Excerpt from Brookhaven National Lab:
-
http://www.bnl.gov/rhic/newPhysics.asp
A Perfect Liquid
RHIC scientists had
Polywater may come back to embarrass the so called 'competent' scientific
community...
As was originally brought up by Bill Beatty (this list's founder) in 2008,
unbeknownst to me, and later that year by me in this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg27994.html
is the
Ed:
Two things...
1. I don't think Fran's explanation adequately explained the Casimir
effect... (sorry Fran).
Theory posits that the vacuum is made up of almost an infinite range of
frequencies (some have proposed a cutoff frequency, probably approaching the
Plank frequency). Closely spaced,
(NiAl)
Hi Mark,
Possible typo alert:
I think you meant to say 'wavelengths', not 'frequencies'.
Andy.
On 17/05/13 18:22, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
Closely spaced, parallel conducting plates will ONLY exclude vacuum
frequencies LARGER than the spacing between the plates.
the casimir force is the best explanation of the observed force on
the plates, wouldn't the vacuum energy produce a drag on all moving bodies?
Harry
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:22 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
Ed:
Two things...
1. I don't think Fran's explanation
the
electron was attached. Why does this process not occur when the vacuum
photons interact with matter?
Ed Storms
On May 17, 2013, at 11:22 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
Ed:
Two things...
1. I don't think Fran's explanation adequately explained the Casimir
effect... (sorry Fran).
Theory posits
.
-mark
-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 3:12 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Nickel Aluminum (NiAl)
Hi Ed,
I want to extend a sincere thank you for engaging the inquisitive minds here
and helping to focus some
-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
Let's put some numbers to it...
From Dr. Milonni's YouTube presentation:
F = ((pi^2)*hbar*c) / (240d^4) (force per unit area, Casimir original
derivation in 1948)
F = 0.013 dyne for 1cm square plates separated by 1um.
Which is comparable to the Coulomb force
I know Ed has expressed concern, and a bit of frustration, at how some of
the Collective's discussions are too OOTB, or seemingly without much concern
for basic physics principles, for a seasoned scientist's tastes. and he
certainly has a valid point. However, many here do have a good grounding
I know Ed has expressed concern, and a bit of frustration, at how some of
the Collective's discussions are too OOTB, or seemingly without much concern
for basic physics principles, for a seasoned scientist's tastes. and he
certainly has a valid point. However, many here do have a good grounding
a new phenomenon is discovered.
On May 18, 2013, at 8:10 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
I know Ed has expressed concern, and a bit of frustration, at how some of
the Collective's discussions are too OOTB, or seemingly without much concern
for basic physics principles, for a seasoned
Couldn't agree MORE with your statement that mathematicians can find a
mathematical way to explain anything, given a few initial assumptions. case
in point, quantum physics! ;-) And those pesky infinities.what to do with
those? Let's just 'renormalize' them. I wonder if it as a physicist or a
I have to stop getting distracted from the main point I wanted to discuss in
this thread.
I posited the following: I would like to drill down a little more into
nothingness, and look inside a NAE.
--
Assume we start out with a chunk of solid palladium with NO internal voids
or
that insight. After
all, that is what we were taught science was all about,. Obviously, some
people slept through that lecture.
Ed Storms
On May 19, 2013, at 10:16 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
Ed said:
Some of these behaviors have been described in ways we call laws because
Alan, can you also put in a conventional nuclear reactor used for Electrical
power?
Use the nuclear radiation symbol for traditional nuclear power!
That would pretty much be the picture that is worth a thousand words.
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher [mailto:a...@well.com]
Telegraph across the continental US was completed in 1861, bringing an end
to the Pony Express.
The difference between now and back then is that news gets disseminated to
the *global masses* in seconds; not weeks or months if trying to send it
oversees. In a heartbeat, hundreds of millions of
Motl is deleting my comment
That doesn't surprise me.
I too posted a comment. we'll see if he deletes it as well.
Here is my post:
It is patently obvious that you have NOT read the paper, or only skimmed it
due to your *belief* that this is a scam.
1) you
I guess I should follow my own advice.
J
I had the steel and ceramic cylinders reversed; the SiN ceramic is the
*outermost* cylinder.
Still, why does he bring up the emissivity of nickel?
Obviously he has not read the paper past the abstract or first page.
-mark
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
Andrew,
This isn't about believe or disbelieve. black or white. Any good scientist
uses a 'sliding scale', and as more data comes in, that scale is adjusted as
to whether a given phenomenon or claim has gained in credibility, or
diminished. For me, this test has pushed that sliding scale a
Andrew,
At least give us some idea of how they would be used, or what could be inside,
that Rossi could use to carry out the fraud?
They are steel, and thus form a Faraday cage as does the steel cylinder which
houses the reactor core, so no way RF or IR laser could be used to remotely
heat
Kevin/ALL:
Regardless of strict legal definitions, please, EVERYONE, refrain from
posting entire articles; a LINK and an excerpt is best to avoid any
problems. Bill Beatty does NOT have the time to monitor/moderate; this
forum is to a large degree, self-moderated. It does not have the
with Kevin, but in practice I agree with Mark.
Harry
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:51 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
Kevin/ALL:
Regardless of strict legal definitions, please, EVERYONE, refrain from
posting entire articles; a LINK and an excerpt is best to avoid any
problems
SVJ writes, I thought Krivit had been 'honored' with a so-called demo when
he visited Rossi's lab.
What Krivit was likely EXPECTING was a 'test'; what he GOT was a 'demo'; two
very different things.
Was it reasonable for Krivit (a journalist) to expect the same kind of
'test' done for a
Hi Rich,
Yeah, its pretty much consumed bandwidth in the Collective since it came
out
-Mark
From: Rich Murray [mailto:rmfor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:49 PM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com; Rich Murray
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat HT shows excess heat from H gas + Ni powder
Apparently they have allocated the following funds to study the technology:
A report published earlier this year by ELFORSK showed that in 2012, 200,000
Swedish Krona (about 23,000 Euros) was budgeted for the study of the E-Cat,
and in each of the following three years 2,000,000 Krona was
Vorts,
Serves me right for copying verbatim from an article without checking.
Yes, as a general warning to all, I've seen this numerous times in just 4 days,
where someone states something that is picked up and repeated. I've seen this
happen not only in the comment section of various
Jed:
Thanks for pointing that out. In the several times I read it, I did not
catch that statement in the Figure caption.
But the text does not mention it. I'd like to ask them for clarification.
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 5:57 PM
To:
It is possible that RF would pass through these ceramics, no?
Yes, more than likely that RF could pass thru a ceramic, however, if
electrically conductive, then probably not.
An E or B field will most likely go thru the ceramics, but the reactor
vessel is stainless steel:
The most
: MarkI-ZeroPoint
“It is possible that RF would pass through these ceramics, no?”
Yes, more than likely that RF could pass thru a ceramic, however, if
electrically conductive, then probably not.
An E or B field will most likely go thru the ceramics, but the reactor vessel
is stainless steel
/2010/10/Grade-310S-
314.pdf
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
It is possible that RF would pass through these ceramics, no?
Yes, more than likely that RF could pass thru a ceramic, however, if
electrically conductive, then probably not.
An E or B field will most likely go thru
Axils reference states:
emission in the radio-frequency range 7-90 MHz.
Well, 7 (40 meter band) to 90Mhz (~3 meters) is smack in the amateur radio
(ham) bands:
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Hambands_color.pdf
So, if anyone lives in the area of Rossis office, find and talk to the ham
Dave states regarding Rossi:
“One thing is obvious, he likes to keep us guessing.”
I hope so… if he didn’t, we’d be really bored!
J
-mark
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:38 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Why did Rossi prevent
likes to keep us guessing.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, May 24, 2013 5:18 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Why did Rossi prevent detailed measurement of the power input?
Mr. Lynn,
You’re a bit too quick on the trigger
MarkG:
Good article
short, to the point, fair, providing links for those curious
enough to look up the credentials themselves without having to do the
separate web-searches.
Keep up the balanced reporting
-Mark Iverson
From: mark.gi...@gmail.com [mailto:mark.gi...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Axil,
unless its described elsewhere, everything that Ive read/pics seen,
indicates that the area inside the outer ceramic cylinder, and outside the
stainless reactor core, is not hermetically sealed; this is the area that
contains the carborundum ceramic which holds the coiled resistance
-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, May 24, 2013 5:18 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Why did Rossi prevent detailed measurement of the power input?
Mr. Lynn,
You’re a bit too quick on the trigger…
Let me repeat myself, a *magnetic
reading up on the simple
concept of AC EM field exclusion via skin effect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect
On 24 May 2013 22:18, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Mr. Lynn,
You're a bit too quick on the trigger.
Let me repeat myself, a *magnetic* field WILL penetrate most
Andrew:
I believe there is ample evidence of thermal runaway from competent scientists,
NOT Rossi. Jed and Ed can give you specifics, but one example might be what
happened in FPs lab at Univ of Utah… this was AFTER power was reduced or shut
off for the night, and the event caused a boil-off,
Great find Terry!!!
Everyone is so focused on one or two threads that new ones don't get much
attention...
Terry Blanton has stumbled across an interesting paper.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2893928/
The procedure to make these Ni nanochains is quite simple, and requires
“I took a picture every day of the connectors and cables to the powermeter in
case anyone would tamper with them when we were out.”
Its comments like this one and several others made by Torbjörn Hartman which
indicates that these guys came at this with the idea of possible cheating, and
If anyone cares to read the user manual for the power analyzer, see:
https://www1.elfa.se/data1/wwwroot/assets/datasheets/okCA8335_manual_en.pdf
-Mark Iverson
From: Andrew [mailto:andrew...@att.net]
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 10:55 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE:
Getting further down that rabbit hole, Jones!
I'd just like to comment on this part of your posting. Note that I've
capitalized a few words I'd like to emphasize:
---
The simulation showed that all of the springs shared the same amount of
vibrational energy; and thus almost verified one
).
_
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
If this sort of thing is happening in or around the NAE,
whatever they turn out to be, then it could very well explain how the
Coulomb barrier is overcome
Excellent examples Terry!
Trying to get millions of these to sync-up is more akin to what's happening
in bulk matter, and I think it's obvious why the probability of that is
nearly nonexistent, which is why bulk matter behavior dominates our everyday
lives, and physical laws (theory).
-Mark
Yes, I noticed that too Terry. Right most column, 2nd row.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 1:28 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Synchronization
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
Jed:
More importantly, why is he using the emissivity of stainless steel, when
the outer cylinder is painted ceramic, NOT stainless steel!!!
Answer:
- he did not read the report, or just skimmed it.
- on the emissivity point, he borrowed the basis of the argument from
someone else
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 2:45 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:33 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
Jed:
More importantly, why is he using the emissivity of stainless steel, when
the outer
: Monday, May 27, 2013 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Water Window, Hexavalency, Bergius and Rossi
Mark,
deleted
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:22 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
Mornin' Jones!
NAE might imply to some 'nuclear', but I qualified it with , ..in or around
Josh questions:
I'm talking about the December test, when a different paint was used. I
don't think we know anything about the emissivity of that paint, nor its
dependence on wavelength.
You could just as easily do a 30 second search and FIND THE ANSWER!
Emissivity of various materials:
: Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:24 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Of NAEs and nothingness...
On May 19, 2013, at 11:55 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
To which Ed answered, mainly expressing what his view is inside this void:
The answer depends on which theory you
Andrew:
IIRC, one of the team said that the 'waveform' could be seen on the power
analyzer screen. so in a sense, they had, albeit, a limited oscilloscope.
Perhaps that was considered enough for the given stage of testing.
Most all instruments today use fast ADCs and digital sampling to
For All:
Don't get pulled into JC's usual methods of casting doubt. for people
unfamiliar with his tactics, he seems objective and factual, however, you
need to follow the threads carefully since one of the common tactics is to
take something like the 3-phase power issue, and describe a
As to why 3-phase power for the FIRST test?
The reactors have been designed for industrial use, and to be a part of the
1MW shipping container unit. Do you really think that they are going to
plug that thing into a single-phase outlet!! That is laughable. No, they
are going to use 3-phase
that it is
intentional.
-Mark
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 12:15 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:new hypothesis to confute regarding input energy in Ecat
test
MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
The first test used 3-phase power, the second
Fellow Vorts,
In reading the comment section here:
http://cassandralegacy.blogspot.com/2013/05/ethics-of-e-cat.html?showComment
=1369733204626#c7691737630487135094
I came across a posting by a Jim Phelps (May28, 5:04pm), in which he states:
Experimenters have been tripping over the
I think there is some confusion on the issue of cables, what cables, and
'bringing your own cables' and I want to make sure we are all on the same
page. correct any misunderstandings in the following so we all understand
the details and importance of each.
First, the cable Andrew is referring
, 2013 7:54 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Of NAEs and nothingness...
On May 28, 2013, at 1:58 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
Ed replied:
Yes, the void is very different from the lattice. That is the whole point
to the idea behind the NAE. A nuclear reaction
be
calculated using conventional theory. Does this answer your question?
Ed Storms
On May 28, 2013, at 3:07 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
Ed:
Thanks for the additional explanation, but it wasn't necessary.
Obviously, there's a disconnect as to what my point was in this thread, and
how you
times now, is the
other one - the one between the control box and the device.
Good Grief.
- Original Message -
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint mailto:zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 1:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put
mg:
I've responded offlist.
-mi
From: mark.gi...@gmail.com [mailto:mark.gi...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Gibbs
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:07 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:More delusional scientists, and over 60,000 publications!
Mark,
If I get a chance may I quote
Harry/Dave:
Andrew is borderline pathological skeptic. when challenged by Dave to do a
Spice model so they could compare them to see if they get the same results,
and if not, why, what does Andrew do? He starts with the insults and name
calling. Typical for a pathoskep who is called out on the
AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
And JC is WELL aware of this, yet asks the question as to why they used
3-phase power in their tests. the second test was SINGLE phase power, so JC
is misleading people. but he has a very long history of taking some
questionable issue in one test
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 8:41 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:new hypothesis to confute regarding input energy in Ecat
test
Morning Vorts,
Can I have a little time to look into it?
I do have a life and other
Eric/JC:
I've read the report twice fully, and a few other times only to verify a
specific statement.
I still did not catch the significance that it was the output of the control
box that was changed from 3ph to 1ph, not the input side. I posted as soon
as I could to correct my error.
Josh:
I
Jed asked:
Question: assuming it really is 0.3 g, what is the likely volume?
Nowhere near enough to fill the cylinder.
*Why such a large cylinder?*
- most likely would be to get the necessary surface area to adequately
transfer the heat from interior to exterior.
-mark
From: Jed
EM stimulation was discussed at length last week. Here is a summary:
There is evidence and statements from Rossi that RF was used *at one time*,
but we have NO evidence of that with the current design.
The consensus last week was that the internal stainless steel cylinder is a
Faraday
We know that Ni powder sinters at the temperature being produce
What about adding some small amount of some other element to raise the
sintering/melting temp; commonly done in alloying.
OOTB suggestion...
Anyone ever tried an alloy of Ni and Pd??? Ni and Ti???
LENR works with both, NAE possible
the cavity ?
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 4:33 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Speculation about hotCat
Jed asked:
Question: assuming it really is 0.3 g, what is the likely volume?
Nowhere near enough to fill
I agree with DaveR.
Andrew and Duncan had only been actively contributing (and yes, mostly
useful) for a week or two and the insults and snide remarks had already
started... not one, but several. That is not disputable.
BOTH parties could be right, and the difference is in a
. the carcass was so well preserved that it still had blood and muscle
tissue.
http://phys.org/news/2013-05-russian-scientists-rare-blood-mammoth.html#nwlt
An expedition led by Russian scientists earlier this month uncovered the
well-preserved carcass of a female mammoth on a remote island
The small bit of powder that came out when the reactor was cut open was likely
the hydride that, when heated, pressurized the reactor with H2 gas…
From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 9:17 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Speculation
Thx for the heads-up Lou.
Overall I think it was a fair, objective article, however, I have one nit to
pick...
MarkG, R U listening???
The same old argument (not by MGibbs, he's just the messenger) that uses the
example of hot fusion theory to justify the 'impossibility' of LENR, is on
thin
Ruby:
I don't think Jed was criticizing your statement,
Cold fusion has no definitive theory - as yet, but the experimental
evidence is overwhelming: anomalous heat and transmutations can occur within
metallic-hydrides systems contained in small cells that sit on a table-top
it was
Axil,
Thanks for the reference; yes, I've scanned it and it is of interest.
Charge and dipoles shapes the vacuum and also the speed that light travels
through it.
And that 'shaping' of the vacuum is what we know of as E and B 'fields'. and
I would bet that the B field is perpendicular to the
Josh:
Eric's comment about not needing a battery to keep spark plugs going was
referring to a DIESEL engine, and diesels don't have spark plugs. The
compression ratio is high enough to cause ignition of the diesel fuel when
the piston reaches TDC. They do have 'glow' plugs for starting the
Josh:
If you genuinely want an explanation of how the eCAT is positive feedback,
which Dave is trying to do, backed up by his model, then it requires
following a line of reasoning. Dave is NOT asking you for an acceptance
that Rossi's device does have COP1; he is only asking that we temporarily
Robert,
Dave Roberson has challenged anyone to do a spice model RE: at least one of
the concerns over DC input power. Do you know how to use Spice, and would
you be willing to try to duplicate his model in order to determine if its
valid, and if not, why?
-Mark
From: Robert Lynn
Why do entangled proton pairs pass through the coulomb barrier of a heavy
element nucleus with high probability in collisions with energies well below
those required to breach this barrier?
Those who have been hangin' out in the Dime Box Saloon for a few years know
of my descriptions of
My complements to Duncan for stepping up to the plate and taking time to do
this. and of course to Dave Roberson for making the model in the first
place.
Thank you Dave/Duncan!
-Mark Iverson
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 7:22 AM
To:
I would think that most of the $20K went to airfare, hotels and meals. you
can't expect the scientists to work for free.
-Mark
From: James Bowery [mailto:jabow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 9:42 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:A Couple Hundred Bucks Maybe...
I've seen it
a couple hundred
bucks would be 10% of the available budget. Are you trying to say that
adequate calorimetry wouldn't be worth even 10% of the budget allocated for
equipment?
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:12 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
I would think that most of the $20K went
Jed,
you admit that you haven't read most of his postings so you haven't a clue.
He is a liar. His goal is to debunk. That should be obvious. He has
violated a number of rules, and we have been quite tolerant. 10% of his
verbal diarrhea is useful, but the rest is sweeping generalizations,
Vorl:
You haven't a clue either...
When it comes to LENR, there is overwhelming evidence, and most of the
people on this forum who 'appear' as TBs, have read the literature, so to
call them TBs is in error; they are basing their decision on having read the
evidence themselves. To someone who
Dave:
Your interaction with Cude on the DC power issue has been most illuminating in
two ways:
1- since Cude has admitted that the estimate of output power was probably
reasonable, that only leaves in question the input power. If this forum can
help to eliminate possible, and
From one ignoramus to another, that's a very interesting observation!
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 3:27 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Cude and the Ethics String
Take a look at the posting times of JC's
301 - 400 of 664 matches
Mail list logo
