lectromagnetically
stimulated). And then you suddenly have transmutation, and fusion, the
whole range of effects, just as the direct result of a new kind of
reaction, which is the reverse of beta decay. It could be called reverse
beta decay or, better, (neutrino based) hadron synthesis.
Mauro
On Sun,
On 09/27/2015 04:19 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
No matter where the experiment is performed, neutrinos are not a
stimulant or a causation of of muon production: light is.
Neutrinos are everywhere, so, they are always available. They very well
can be a needed ingredient, because they are ubiquitous.
On 09/27/2015 11:23 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
RE: [Vo]:Revelations
To summarizethepresent LENRsituation, ifLeifHolmlid’s workis accurate:
The importantspecificdetail which is easy to overlook, since
manygroupshave pursuedmuon catalyzed fusion “MCF”for decades, is
thatnowin 2015,thereappears to
On 07/17/2015 12:29 PM, Frank Znidarsic wrote:
Here is the thing that's coming and that was holding me back.
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/05/android-m-embraces-usb-type-c-midi-devices/
Interesting. Here's a detailed explanation of the underlying cause
is abigstory for Mauro Lacy,if he is still tuned into Vortex, or
anyone else withcosmology credentials…
_http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-02/anu-afi022415.php_
This“impossible”object presentsus withthedistinctpossibility of a new
version of the Big Bangwhich can explainUniversalexpansion
Hi Jones, Terry,
I just saw the subject's message
(http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg66408.html)
yesterday, while searching the vortex-l archives. I unsubscribed from
vortex-l months ago, because I was unable to keep up, mostly because of
the amount of Rossi related stuff.
Mark Jurich wrote:
FYI: arXiv of this paper:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1106/1106.0847.pdf
Interesting paper, thanks.
I found it odd that nobody mentions the *positions* of the planets
(Jupiter, mainly), during solar max. Maybe to try to avoid the
association with astrology, the
On 09/30/2013 08:53 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
...
Assuming that the event took place at the beginning of AD 774, we obtain
(1870.6-774)/5.539 = 197.978, which is in excellent agreement. And
assuming the end of 774, we get (1870.6-774.9)/5.539 = 197.815, which is
still in good agreement.
Needless
On 09/30/2013 11:47 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
mailto:ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
I found it odd that nobody mentions the *positions* of the planets
(Jupiter, mainly), during solar max. Maybe to try to avoid the
association
On 09/30/2013 12:20 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
Are these the same guys that missed the mass/energy of the universe by
1900% (95/5)...:)
The point being, in any case, that the effect of the planets on the Sun
can't be explained by a *conventional* tidal effect, that is, the ones
depending on
On 09/22/2012 02:57 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
There are two kinds of ethers.
Better said, those are two notions of the ether, that are of historical
value and of customary use.
When I say ether I refer to the also customary notion of 'light carrying
medium', but in general terms, that is,
Because the idea of the ether they were after (i.e. were trying to
confirm) was completely mechanicistic. They never expected light would
sink or shorten into the direction of movement. That is,
*longitudinally*.
Corolarium 1: The Universe is not mechanicistic. Light, at least,
completely
On 09/22/2012 09:04 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/22/2012 08:39 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/22/2012 08:29 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Because the idea of the ether they were after (i.e. were trying to
confirm) was completely mechanicistic. They never expected light
would sink or shorten
On 09/01/2012 04:24 PM, David L Babcock wrote:
An excerpt from Giza Dearth Star, link below:
[seen]..in two separate experiments in two different labs.
It isn't just solar flares that seem to induce changes in
radioactive decay rate. Changes in solar rotation and
activity,/and
On 08/16/2012 01:19 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
FYI: this forwarded to me by a colleague...
-Mark
Trouble with Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory:
Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?
http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0083v5.pdf
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to point out that Maxwell's
On 08/13/2012 03:56 PM, Bastiaan Bergman wrote:
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/90
specifically:
The finding revealed that the solar corona was a few million degrees
kelvin, more than three hundred times hotter than the surface of the
sun below, and flew in the face of what was expected
Scroll down on this page:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/22/1112509/-The-Gentleperson-s-Guide-to-Forum-Spies
I think the first article is kind of silly, but I like the Twenty-Five
Rules . . .
Indeed. They are a fine classic, author anonymous, from the Usenet times.
The original version
Scroll down on this page:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/07/22/1112509/-The-Gentleperson-s-Guide-to-Forum-Spies
I think the first article is kind of silly, but I like the Twenty-Five
Rules . . .
Indeed. They are a fine classic, author anonymous, from the Usenet times.
The original
Any takes on this?
http://www.ufodigest.com/article/official-et-disclosure-nsa-document-admits-et-contact-kevin-w-smith
I did some basic checks, and it's real (plus, the original document is
posted in the NSA website).
My takes, in descending order of likelihood, are:
- An internal NSA
regards,
Mauro
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
Any takes on this?
http://www.ufodigest.com/**article/official-et-**disclosure-nsa-document-*
*admits-et-contact-kevin-w-**smithhttp://www.ufodigest.com/article/official-et-disclosure-nsa-document-admits-et
Advanced Civilizations are currently operating up in space in a whole
complete highly sophisticated capacity. Not only can they read us like a
book
inside out, but also all matter energy that makes up our world.
Eons
Ago Eons To Go
No, no, Ordinary Space Aliens from the Equis
Advanced Civilizations are currently operating up in space in a whole
complete highly sophisticated capacity. Not only can they read us like a
book
inside out, but also all matter energy that makes up our world.
Eons
Ago Eons To Go
No, no, Ordinary Space Aliens from the Equis
O freddled gruntbuggly thy micturations are to me
As plured gabbleblochits on a lurgid bee.
Groop, I implore thee my foonting turlingdromes.
And hooptiously drangle me with crinkly bindlewurdles,
Or I will rend thee in the gobberwarts with my blurlecruncheon, see
if I dont.
-Prostetnic
:14 PM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar
mailto:ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
”O freddled gruntbuggly thy micturations are to me
As plured gabbleblochits on a lurgid bee.
Groop, I implore thee my foonting turlingdromes.
And hooptiously drangle me with crinkly bindlewurdles,
Or I
On 05/09/2012 04:45 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Beautiful Alien Verses (yes, that; also known as BAW). Freddled is
Vogon for star, by the way. I've modestly attempted a translation,
years ago, but it got lost somehow.
I specially like when the Improbability Drive turns everything as
On 02/26/2012 06:58 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Most readers on this list are more concerned with anomalous energy on earth
than astrophysics. We pay attention to solar energy as a clean alternative -
and to solar sunspots as a general areas of interest - but hardly ever do we
consider an
On 02/20/2012 10:32 PM, zer tte wrote:
Well if they use some kind of quantum entanglement transmission, how
could we eavesdrop on them ?
So far our RF cone extends 100 light years behind us ( 0
Quite a catch for a random alien in our galaxy to be at the receiving
end, anyway if by chance
On 02/21/2012 07:01 PM, lorenhe...@aol.com wrote:
Uhh... they're currently up in space, as in numerous vehicle/craft, that
are utilizing an altogether highly developed new form of sophisticated
energy-field, that is tapped into all mass-matter/energy, and/or the earth's
gravity magnetosphere.
On 02/12/2012 10:33 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
I'll perform a power spectral density analysis of sunspot number/solar
activity data. If there's a 5.52 year cycle in solar activity,
it'll show up, along with the main 11 year cycle. I don't think
something that big can be easily overlooked
for the opportunity to chitchat a little bit,
Mauro
*From:* Mauro Lacy
I'll perform a power spectral density analysis of sunspot number/solar
activity data. If there's a 5.52 year cycle in solar activity,
it'll show up, along with the main 11 year cycle. I don't think
something that big can
On 02/12/2012 02:47 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
As recently as last summer, it looked like our sun had gone into a sleep
mode.
http://www.space.com/11960-fading-sunspots-slower-solar-activity-solar-cycle
.html
If you are new to Vortex, you may not realize that we have a unwanted and
powerful
I'll perform a power spectral density analysis of sunspot number/solar
activity data. If there's a 5.52 year cycle in solar activity,
it'll show up, along with the main 11 year cycle. I don't think
something that big can be easily overlooked,
but nevertheless... it bodes well with my modest
On 01/29/2012 07:55 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2012-01-29 09:17, Wolf Fischer wrote:
On the LENR Facebook page, someone wrote that it perhaps is not a bad
thing but more of a joke:
http://www.facebook.com/EnergyCatalyzer
Giuliano Bettini
On 01/28/2012 04:55 PM, Vorl Bek wrote:
I have been reading Mary's stuff since the early Steorn days and
if she is not a woman I will eat my hat.
I always suspected Mary was a man. I was almost sure, in fact. I
expected he to be around 50, not 70, though. I suspect he must be in
good
On 01/11/2012 11:28 PM, James Bowery wrote:
The only way to get capitalism to work is to shift the tax base from
economic activity to the liquidation value of assets, and set the tax
rate to the interest rate used to calculate liquidation value.
But no one with wealth wants that to happen
On 01/14/2012 09:21 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
I think the problem is not with Capitalism (you cannot find anything
better or more realistic, it is with Moneytheism- the most popular
and destructive religion today.
I think the same. The problem is in the way money is taken as a value in
itself,
On 01/09/2012 11:13 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Thanks Mauro,
Would you say that the number of protons and electrons being ejected from
the sun remains relatively equal?
I was just thinking about that. I think that the total number of
expelled protons must be greater
From Mauro:
I was just thinking about that. I think that the
total number of expelled protons must be greater
than the number of electrons, to effectively establish
an overall electric current with the surroundings,
which tries to compensate for the charge disbalance.
...
If something
On 01/09/2012 02:41 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Thanks, Jones.
I read the paragraph. I'm not surprised read that the paper states
...The global stellar electrostatic field is 918 times stronger than
the corresponding stellar gravity... More on that later.
Meanwhile, yes, I am
On 01/08/2012 05:19 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Speculation alert: Will development of the technology of hydrogen-loaded
nickel usher in a new paradigm for going small - the pico age?
The mention of Cooper pairing brings up potential correlations between high
temperature superconductivity, matrix
The problem is not only actual agriculture and related problems
(desertification, water and energy use, etc.)
but also the society of consumption in which we are immersed.
It's misleading to think in terms of efficiency in production, when a
significant part of the world is being absurdly
On 01/08/2012 07:28 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
The problem is not only actual agriculture and related problems
(desertification, water and energy use, etc.)
but also the society of consumption in which we are immersed.
It's misleading to think in terms of efficiency in production, when a
significant
On 12/29/2011 12:14 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Christmas comet, named Lovejoy no less:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2398066,00.asp
http://www.space.com/14045-spectacular-christmas-comet-amazes-skywatchers-ch
ile.html
This kind of thing had staggering importance a few thousand years ago ...
On 12/27/2011 07:13 PM, James Bowery wrote:
A young Nebraska farmer's son went to war against Germany and came back
with code-breaking skills, as well as good DoD contacts. His name was
William Norris. He started Control Data Corporation with a young engineer
named Seymour Cray and, with 34
On 12/27/2011 05:37 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jones Beenejone...@pacbell.net wrote:
A contrarian opinion: DoE will never relent nor alter its stance against
LENR ... at least not so long as there is a DoD.
* I assume you mean as long as there is a DoE. I agree.
No, I mean DoD - DoD
On 11/24/2011 03:13 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
I wonder if Rossi will change his tune on testing if Defkalion starts
conducting public tests.
A little competition is worth a million MYs
And a new measurement unit is born. Let this be my modest attempt at a
definition:
One MY is defined as the
On 11/22/2011 11:14 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Jed Rothwelljedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
It is not possible that Yugo has made calorimeters
yet she cannot follow this paper. I have no idea whether she actually knows
anything about calorimeters since she has not
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
Sometimes it's inconvenient not to be able to use one's own identity.
Then, use your own identity. If your arguments stand on their own, you
can
surely stand by them.
If the arguments stand on their own, why would you
I am sorry to be a pedant but you people are using the term appeal to
authority to mean the opposite of what it should mean. I have mentioned
this before. Here's the definition:
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-authority.html
Also Known as: Fallacious Appeal to Authority,
On 11/23/2011 04:34 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
You must have said: I,insert real name here, think that it's still one
of the dumbest and lowest common denominators of junk science.
I have no idea what that means.
You should.
On 11/23/2011 06:48 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
An appeal to authority, regardless the credentials of the authority,
can only affect one's judgement of the probability of truth. It is
thus non-Aristotelian. It is a sales tool. It is not a logical
That's an important distinction, and
On 11/06/2011 12:58 AM, Man on Bridges wrote:
Hi,
Don't know if this is of any help at all, but take a look at the
following page.
How to tell if someone is telling a lie or lying: Viewzone
See: http://viewzone2.com/liarx.html
I wouldn't mind she lied to me a couple of times :-D Although,
On 11/06/2011 09:31 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 13:19, schrieb Peter Gluck:
OK, as far as you refer to science; can you tell a few absolute truths
re Cold Fusion or LENR except they exist?
If you have time please continue with lists of absolute truths
from technology, management,
On 11/06/2011 02:49 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
I am not sure which, if any, nickel isotopes admit isomeric states.
Perhaps, electrodes, container walls, or contaminants in nickel (or
palladium) could be the source of some yet unidentified isomers.
I am quite perplexed that
On 11/06/2011 12:09 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 11/06/2011 02:49 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
I am not sure which, if any, nickel isotopes admit isomeric states.
Perhaps, electrodes, container walls, or contaminants in nickel (or
palladium) could be the source of some yet unidentified
On 11/06/2011 11:41 AM, John Harris wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Harrisjohnharri...@dodo.com.au
To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Vo]:INFORMAVORE's SUNDAY
- Original Message - - Original Message - From:
On 11/06/2011 12:49 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 11/06/2011 11:41 AM, John Harris wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Harrisjohnharri...@dodo.com.au
To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Vo]:INFORMAVORE's SUNDAY
- Original
On 11/06/2011 05:07 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 06.11.2011 18:36, schrieb Peter Gluck:
What I wrote is connected to a subject more popular here these days.
The future is unknown, but perhaps it could be useful to )re) read the
play OXYGEN by Djerassi and Hoffman
On 10/08/2011 03:47 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-10-08 20:41, Horace Heffner wrote:
I don't see any charts. What am I doing wrong? Is there a link there I
am missing?
You are not doing anything wrong. It looks you need to subscribe to that
discussion board to see the charts.
On 10/04/2011 08:27 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
We don't allow faster than light neutrinos in here,
says the bartender.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
It made its way to the news
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/gone-in-60-nanoseconds/2011/10/06/gIQAf1RERL_story.html
Regards,
Mauro
On 10/07/2011 10:31 AM, Mattia Rizzi wrote:
Stremmeson was a physics/chemistry professor from university of bologna.
He made several error inside this report. That’s not a typo, is a conceptual
error, a big one.
No, it isn't. He's talking about energy (Kwh) flow (/h).
into the discussion.
On 11-09-23 07:32 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
I'll probably tell you too that for me science, real science, is about
knowledge of the way things really are.
Wrong on the face of it. Language is for communication, and
communication using language requires a previously
On 09/24/2011 09:57 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/24/2011 11:04 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
The New Scientist article, Dimension-hop may allow neutrinos to
cheat light speed, here:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957-dimensionhop-may-allow-
neutrinos-to-cheat-light-speed.html
suggest
On Sep 25, 2011 8:56 PM, Mauro Lacyma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
On 09/24/2011 09:57 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/24/2011 11:04 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
The New Scientist article, Dimension-hop may allow neutrinos to
cheat light speed, here:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957
On 09/24/2011 11:04 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
The New Scientist article, Dimension-hop may allow neutrinos to
cheat light speed, here:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957-dimensionhop-may-allow-
neutrinos-to-cheat-light-speed.html
suggest dimension hops as the means for neutrinos
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
If nothing else, this shoots down the old canard (often claimed by
those trying to argue that SR is just a big conspiracy) that any
scientist who actually measured a particle going faster than light
would suppress the result to avoid going against the
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
If nothing else, this shoots down the old canard (often claimed by
those trying to argue that SR is just a big conspiracy) that any
scientist who actually measured a particle going faster than light
would suppress the result to avoid going against the
Don't bury Einstein yet:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957-dimensionhop-may-allow-neutrinos-to-cheat-light-speed.html
Sher also mentions a third option: that the measurement is correct.
Some theories posit that there are extra, hidden dimensions beyond the
familiar four (three of
At least he calls the finding enigmatic rather than delusional or an
error.
In my opinion, the findings are probably the result of unknown neutrino
properties, or of new neutrino flavors, colors, whatevers. We'll
have to patiently wait to know more, I suppose.
In any case, the findings per se
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/22/scitech/main20110236.shtml
Taking the numbers on the article as a basis, and doing some quick
calculations, that's a difference in speed of roughly 7.4 km/s
If I'm not mistaken, that's equivalent to the null result obtained in
the Michelson-Morley
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/22/scitech/main20110236.shtml
Taking the numbers on the article as a basis, and doing some quick
calculations, that's a difference in speed of roughly 7.4 km/s
If I'm not mistaken, that's equivalent to the null result obtained in
the Michelson-Morley
Vorts,
So, when I first heard about zero point energy years back, I assumed
it was something I had already theorized myself when struggling with
the concepts of relativity (which still bugs me, for the reasons I'm
about to list) as I was mentally using the term Zero Point already.
Imagine
enough now?
Best regards,
Mauro
On 11-09-23 01:53 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Vorts,
So, when I first heard about zero point energy years back, I assumed
it was something I had already theorized myself when struggling with
the concepts of relativity (which still bugs me, for the reasons I'm
about
Yes, the idea was mentioned and discussed on this list. I wrote a paper
on the subject. See
On absolute movementhttp://vixra.org/abs/1105.0032
Regards,
Mauro
On 08/10/2011 03:54 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The article mentions using entanglement to synchronise clocks.
This possiblity was
On 08/10/2011 08:05 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Yes, the idea was mentioned and discussed on this list. I wrote a paper
on the subject. See
On absolute movementhttp://vixra.org/abs/1105.0032
And here are the archived discussions:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg45437.html
On 08/10/2011 03:54 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
[snip]Albert Einstein might be astonished to learn that NASA physicists
have applied
his relativity theory to a concept he introduced but later disliked
namely
that
two particles that interact could maintain a connection even if
separated
by
a
On 08/07/2011 05:53 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Ron Kitachiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings Vortex-l
I am not sure IF my thoughts on Rossi and DKL are even
logical
BUT what if a major world entity wants all of Rossi s
On 08/07/2011 06:34 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Mauro Lacyma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
Instead of continuing with the research, he decided to announce it, making
waves as big as possible, to sell his discovery to the best bidder. Who will
probably bury it, by the
On 08/07/2011 07:34 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Mauro Lacyma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
Any references for Swartz?
Sure. That was a reference to discussions by Michael Swartz, who publishes:
http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html
He sponsors the MIT
On 07/20/2011 03:16 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
...
PS: This struck me as funny What we're suggesting is that something that
doesn't really interact with anything is changing something that can't be
changed.
Hi, you might be interested in previous discussions of this subject. In
particular:
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26943/
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1106.5301: Optimizing And Controlling Functions Of
Complex Networks By Manipulating Rich-Club Connections
:-)
Regards,
Mauro
On 07/02/2011 04:24 PM, Wm. Scott Smith wrote:
I have written to Turtur several times and he has generally replied. I have
been unable to persuade him to replicate his experiment with the metal rotors
buried in oil, perhaps on a raft as is presently done, or simply connected to
the underside
I got a message from a friend I know really well and is the president of
the local ski club.
It stated he wanted me to join Linkendan. I hit yes yes, yes and it sent
out invites from me to everyone on my email list. Please ignore such
invites. I don't want anyone to join this.
You can
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
The
fact
that you have an explanation, and that it seems to coincide with my
ideas
about both, the electric and magnetic fields,
and the aether, does not mean that that explanation is accepted and
mainstream.
You might
Sorry, I was away during the weekend.
I think the same as you about the electric and magnetic fields(they both
are aspects of the same thing). And I have stated it clearly in other
mails, by the way.
I just wanted to hear, and was trying to understand, the standard
explanation. If you think
On 05/27/2011 07:50 PM, Charles Hope wrote:
I suppose we are all somewhere on the conservative/crank spectrum. I think
physics is a difficult place for novel thought because the current models are
so excellent. Yet mysteries do remain. However I didn't know that Cooper pairs
was one of them.
On 05/26/2011 06:33 PM, John Berry wrote:
Seems to give some support to the claims that HAARP is being used to create
earthquakes.
Certainly it is interesting that these atmospheric anomalies have only been
reported with the recent earthquake spate.
Of course maybe this is valid as an
On 05/26/2011 05:09 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Mark Iversonzeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Robin hits the nail on the head... Anything mathematical is the MODEL, and
is supposed to reflect physical reality. My question was about the physical
world -- what
On 05/26/2011 01:33 PM, Wm. Scott Smith wrote:
I realize that this is routinely trivialized, rationalized away and ignored;
nonetheless, those who do so are merely dancing around the real question here!
Why are em fields perpendicular (when one is inducing the other, purely
speaking?)
Are
Just wanted to throw out a question to the Vort Collective...
In an EM wave, why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular to
each other?
Because the electric and magnetic *effects* manifest perpendicularly?
The fields are an abstract(mental) construction.
In reality, there isn't an
On 05/22/2011 12:33 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Just noticed something ... and this may appeal to Mauro Lacy and others who
have mentioned or commented on Reginald Cahill's gravity addition or
Extra Quantum Gravity Term ... which as I understand it - is based on
one-half alpha, the fine structure
Very interesting article on energy policies, the energy of the
ether(ZPE), and more:
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/05/14/nuclear-catastrophe-how-the-lack-of-fundamental-research-on-alternative-energy-led-to-a-wrong-energy-policy/
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton:
Harry Veeder wrote:
google translation: The principle on which are based generators and 'has
been compared to cold fusion, but it is actually' a fission process much
attenuated.
TB: I find that incredibly untrue.
Well, it would be a big
On 05/18/2011 11:53 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Mauro Lacyma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
In short: What if Rossi is triggering cold fusion via cold fission? Has
this been completely ruled out?
Now it's sounding like an H-Bomb. All you need is a hohlraum.
But
On 05/18/2011 07:25 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 05/18/2011 11:53 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Mauro Lacyma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
In short: What if Rossi is triggering cold fusion via cold fission? Has
this been completely ruled out?
Now it's
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Sun, 15 May 2011 19:02:45 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
On 05/15/2011 06:14 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Sat, 14 May 2011 15:49:13 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Most probably, the reason is comets are charged bodies. The electric
field of
On 05/14/2011 09:37 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Mauro:
...
Most probably, the reason is comets are charged bodies.
The electric field of the comet interacts with the electric
field of the Sun, and a CME occurs. The electric interaction
is also the reason for
On 05/14/2011 06:12 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
Superrotation is shear flow on gas planets and stars and it requires an
explanation since there appears to be no force or stress to drive them.
Recently I came up with the following idea after having tried two others
with limited success.
Assume that
On 05/14/2011 06:12 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
Superrotation is shear flow on gas planets and stars and it requires an
explanation since there appears to be no force or stress to drive them.
Recently I came up with the following idea after having tried two others
with limited success.
Assume that
On 05/15/2011 06:14 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Sat, 14 May 2011 15:49:13 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Most probably, the reason is comets are charged bodies. The electric
field of the comet interacts with the electric field of the Sun, and a
CME occurs. The
1 - 100 of 339 matches
Mail list logo
