On Jul 5, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
However, not everyone on the project is comfortable with git (or is
willing to give up svn), so I don't see a near-term solution at the
moment other than improving the existing tools (prepare-ChangeLog,
resolve-ChangeLogs, etc.).
I have h
On Jul 6, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
So, what you end up with is after a couple of years, the slowest
test in the suite is the most significant part of the score.
Further, I'll predict that the slowest test will most likely be the
least relevant test, because the truly impor
I see Darin already answered. But for future reference, questions like
this that are requests for help, rather than about the development of
WebKit itself, should be posted on webkit-help rather than webkit-div.
On Jul 1, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Jack Wootton wrote:
Hello,
I'm interested in usi
-eric
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
On Jul 1, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
We generally wouldn't accept WebKit features that only work with V8,
even if
other ports may not immediately plan to
10:59 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
We generally wouldn't accept WebKit features that only work with
V8, even if
other ports may not immediately plan to use them.
I support this principle.
I haven't thought through whether this pa
On Jul 7, 2009, at 4:01 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
I'd like benchmarks to:
a) have meaning even as browsers change over time
b) evolve. as new areas of JS (or whatever) become important,
the benchmark should have facilities to include that.
Fair? Good? Bad?
I think we can't rule ou
On Jul 7, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
When SunSpider was first created, regexps were a small proportion of
the total execution in what were the fastest publicly available at
the time. Eventually, everything else got much faster. So at some
point, SunSpider said "it might be a go
On Jul 7, 2009, at 4:19 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
For example, the framework could compute both sums _and_ geomeans,
if people thought both were valuable.
That's a plausible thing to do, but I think there's a downside: if you
make a change that moves the two scores in opposite directions, t
On Jul 7, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
(There are other benchmarks that use summation, for example iBench,
though I am not sure these are examples of excellent benchmarks. Any
benchmark that consists of a single test also implicitly uses
summation. I'm not sure what other benchma
On Jul 7, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
- property access, involving at least some polymorphic access patterns
- method calls
- object-oriented programming patterns
- GC load
- programming in a style that makes significant use
On Jul 7, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
I also don't buy your conclusion -- that if regular expressions
account for 1% of JavaScript time on the Internet overall, they
need not be optimized.
I never said that.
You said the regular expression test was "most likely... the least
On Jul 8, 2009, at 10:45 AM, RDC wrote:
Would you be willing elaborate on why you want this?
Of course; I would like it for benchmarking page rendering times--
something I believe would be possible with Web Inspector, but I'm
after a cross-browser way of achieving it.
At the moment I hav
I didn't solve every possible problem with prepare-ChangeLog, but I
tried to make it a bit less shouty.
If you don't provide the --bug argument, it includes text like this:
-
2009-07-08 Maciej Stachowiak
Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!).
Need a short descr
Now that my attention has been called to it, it's starting to bug me
that everyone formats their ChangeLog entries slightly differently.
How about this as the canonical format (with prepare-ChangeLog
encouraging it)?
2009-07-08 Maciej Stachowiak
Make prepare-ChangeLog
I discussed with Mark Rowe on IRC a bit and it seems like it would be
nice if the bug URL could be short enough to just go on one line with
the summary. Which turns out to be totally doable. Thus the latest
format proposal (the /b/ URL is a redirect):
2009-07-08 Maciej Stachowiak
This mailing list is for discussing the development of WebKit. For
help in using WebKit, please post to .
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:45 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
Hello,
I have a requirement to create a MarkUp(HTML) to PDF generator. The
mentioned component is to be deployed as a java class API
This mailing list is for discussing the development of WebKit. For
help in using WebKit, please post to .
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Suk Zhong wrote:
Hi All:
I want to understand the javascript grammar from Grammar.y in
JavascriptCore,for the script "var a=9;",we find the following co
On Jul 9, 2009, at 4:33 AM, David Kilzer wrote:
2009-07-08 Maciej Stachowiak
- <http://webkit.org/b/27098> Make prepare-ChangeLog less shouty
Reviewed by Mark Rowe.
Hypothetical long description goes here. Yeah. Very long and
detailed it is.
* Scripts/p
On Jul 9, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
(the /b/ URL is a redirect):
I'm like most everything suggested in this thread.
But I'm a little sad that these new shorter URLs are redirects. I
really like to copy URLs
On Jul 9, 2009, at 8:55 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
Ditto. The last time I wondered about this, I grepped through the
code and found [1] to be the most prevalent. So, in code reviews I
have been recommending people do [1].
I think that's the nicest style (just like a variable, no special
p
I think our number of different build systems is getting out of hand.
Since gyp is being successfully used to build across platforms, and
maintained by people who also work on some WebKit ports (and can thus
likely be adapted to our needs), I'd like to consider whether we can
use it for A
Hi everyone,
One common topic for discussion has been how to make our process
around patch submission better. As the project grows, it's becoming
more important for this process to work really smoothly, and we are
seeing some breakdowns. I've been doing a lot of thinking about this,
and d
On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
On Jul 10, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Hi everyone,
One common topic for discussion has been how to make our process
around patch submission better. As the project grows, it's becoming
more important for this proce
On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Jan Michael Alonzo wrote:
Hi Maciej
=== Action Plan ===
* Phase 1 *
C) Improve the way we get attention from reviewers. I think we
should do three things here:
C.1) Split review queues, based on our emerging [Bracket]
convention for patches needing spec
On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
Eric and I spent some more time this afternoon looking at this. We
don't think the ExecState::thisValue() approach is going to work. We
implemented hacky version to experiment with, but the problem is with
cases like this:
document.body
In eval
(Trimming Cc's since the relevant people are on webkit-dev anyway.)
On Jul 10, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
Is it definitely right for document.body to make a wrapper using
prototypes
from the document's host wind
On Jul 11, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Perhaps we should make update-webkit (or some new wrapper type
tool) run resolve-ChangeLogs automatically.
Dave Kilzer had the same idea when he created resolve-ChangeLogs, so
update
Hi everyone,
Recently Adam Barth turned on an exciting new feature, the XSS
Auditor, by default. This provides a browser-side defense against
sites that are vulnerable to reflexive XSS attacks. Because this
feature operates by blocking script execution, it has the potential to
break legi
Hi Luke,
I think your webkit-dev emails are becoming disruptive. Sending
profanity-laced walls of text is not an appropriate use of this list.
Please find a way to communicate without annoying the rest of the
list, or I will ask the list administrators to "censor" you from the
mailing lis
One belated comment on this topic. It would be neat if some port
agreed to be the guinea pig to see if gyp could plausibly work for
more than Google's ports. The Wx port probably has the lowest
resources of any complete port in the tree, so they might not be the
best choice of experimenta
On Jul 13, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
One belated comment on this topic. It would be neat if some port
agreed to be the guinea pig to see if gyp could plausibly work for
more than Google's ports. The Wx port pro
On Jul 13, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Sam Weinig wrote:
I discussed this a bit with Darin and Geoff, and we came to the
conclusion that the correct fix is to have each JS DOMObject store a
JSGlobalObject pointer and augment the toJS methods to pass a global
object instead of an ExecState (close t
On Jul 13, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
I discussed this a bit with Darin and Geoff, and we came to the
conclusion that the correct fix is to have each JS DOMObject store
a JSGlobalObject pointer and augment the toJS methods to pass a
global object instead of an ExecState (close
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:57 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:40 AM, David Hyatt
wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, David Hyatt
wrote:
I agree. We should formalize t
On Jul 13, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
I discussed this a bit with Darin and Geoff, and we came to the
conclusion that the correct fix is to have each JS DOMObject store
a JSGlobalObject pointer and augment the toJS methods to pass a
global object instead of an ExecState (close
On Jul 13, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Geoffrey Garen
wrote:
Our current behavior is buggy, unpredictable, and out of spec. This
has led to security bugs in the past and will lead to security
bugs in
the future.
I don't disagree with you, but I'm
On Jul 13, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
Built-in classes work somewhat differently. I believe they use the
calling
function's global object ("lexical global object") rather than
having some
notion of hom
On Jul 13, 2009, at 4:11 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Geoffrey Garen
wrote:
That's correct. Other browser's get this case right. Here are a
couple test cases you might find interesting:
http://webblaze.org/abarth/tests/protoconfused/test1.html
http://webblaze.org/
On Jul 13, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
CVE-2009-1702 is an example of such as security hole. I'm sure that I
can find more if I look for them.
I think objects attached to the global object and accessible cross-
origin are a special case here. (The advisory cited is about Location
On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
If security is one motivation for this work, then I'd like us to
understand
the pattern we want to use for cross-origin-accessible objects.
Should they
use the "home glo
On Jul 13, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Juan Madrigal wrote:
Any chance HTMLTidy will be integrated into Safari?
http://zappatic.net/safaritidy/
Firebug is also a must: http://getfirebug.com/
Those are the only things keeping me from ditching Firefox, well
aside from the Web Developer Toolbar: http:/
For help with porting or similar questions, please direct your queries
to .
- Maciej
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:25 PM, Naveen Pal wrote:
Hello All,
I have created webkitgtk browser on OpenSuse. Now I want to port
this on PXA270 board.
Following are the h/w and s/w details.
- Hardware sp
I'll try to get bugs filed for any part of the plan that isn't done by
tomorrow, and I'll tag them with a keyword so we can track progress.
On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
On Friday 10 July 2009 06:55:59 pm Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
* Phase 1 *
A) Make it
On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:13 PM, David Kilzer wrote:
On Saturday, July 11, 2009 11:55:36 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Jul 11, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Perhaps we should make update-webkit (or some new wrapper type
tool
If you're willing to give it a shot, then that sounds like a fine idea.
- Maciej
On Jul 15, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Ryan Leavengood wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
One belated comment on this topic. It would be neat if some port
agreed to
be the guine
On Jul 19, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
I think we should do what Firefox does in the window.onload case. :)
I'm not familiar with the history through. Is there some particular
reason we have our current behavior?
The current behavior is an accident of implementation, but I think t
On Jul 21, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Sam Weinig wrote:
I believe it is quite well established that a space should not be
allowed before a ; or , in such circumstances. (I have r-ed for it
even ;) ). I think we should definitely explicitly call this out in
the guidelines if it is not already.
T
On Jul 22, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜) wrote:
Hi,
I proposed exposing the values of the Accept-Langauge list via
window.navigation.acceptLanguages at
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27555
This email is to get opinions (for and against) on that in case the
bug is
Jumping in late here, but a couple of points:
1) Instead of JSClassSetPropertyGetterSetter, it might be more in line
with the class design to be able to define getters and setters in the
class struct, just as functions are. In addition to being more
convenient, this API may also provide fu
On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:24 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov
wrote:
22.07.2009, в 22:36, Darin Fisher написал(а):
Firefox and Chrome send very similar A-L headers. Given FF's
marketshare, I'm surprised you observed compat problems with doing
Responding to review comments should be done in the relevant bugzilla
bug, not on the mailing list. It's ok to post here if you think an
issue needs wider input from the community, but that doesn't seem to
be the case with this issue.
Regards,
Maciej
On Jul 23, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Luke Ken
On Jul 23, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
It seems all lookups of the current globalObject go through the frame.
document()->frame()->script()->globalObject() is one example.
Another:
JSValue toJS(ExecState*, DOMWindow* domWindow)
{
if (!domWindow)
return jsNull();
Frame* fr
Maciej
-eric
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
On Jul 23, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
It seems all lookups of the current globalObject go through the
frame.
document()->frame()->script()->globalObject() is one example.
Another:
JSValue toJS(Exe
On Jul 24, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Brian Barnes wrote:
This:
"
2) There's not currently a performance penalty for re-checking the
property name in the catchall getter that you currently have
available, because it gets called without JavaScriptCore doing a
property lookup first.
"
Pretty much
On Jul 24, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Jul 24, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
Do you have specific areas you're concerned about that we can be on
the lookout for?
I tried to think this through, but only had a few minutes free:
A minor concern is that Frame has a constell
On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
In JavaScriptCore, some structures have integer members that must be
32bits in size, regardless of processor type. In those places,
int32_t
and uint32_t are useful.
Less clear to me is whether clients of such structures should also
use
i
On Jul 25, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
I've just noticed that there have been a few purely style related
patches being landed in the tree recently, I don't believe these are
a good idea and that any further reformatting only patches be
rejected.
Historically we have avoided pure
Let me put it even more strongly.
Luke, you need to stop sending long, rambling emails to the list. Many
people have complained about both the form and content of your
messages, and no one but you has spoken up that they find these emails
useful. If you don't have the judgment to determine
On Jul 27, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
Hi,
by default, gc::collect() is triggered by a timer at regular
intervals. In
QtLauncher, gc::collect() is not called in any other way, so the
remaining
JS objects cause memory leaks when QtLauncher exits. Although this
approach may not
On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
Personally i like the idea of having type system/compiler enforced
null checking.
Note that eseidel's proposal is still a runtime check. One could
use template specialization to write a
I think parallel layout is an interesting topic to explore, in light
of where CPUs are going. We probably can't use code in Cilk++
directly, but there might be useful ideas. It also seems to me from
their paper that they are only handling some of the more basic aspects
of CSS layout so fa
On Jul 31, 2009, at 10:25 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
681.70s total testing time
That's 11.5 minutes for every patch I want to land. (because I run
the layout tests before landing anything, as part of bugzilla-tool).
I'm very interested in any suggestions folks have to make that
number small
On Aug 2, 2009, at 2:44 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
In any case:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27931
I'll have a patch shortly. Please let me know if there are other
call
sites you'd
On Aug 1, 2009, at 8:41 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 1:13 PM, David Kilzer
wrote:
Either we should change the review process to only set the review+
flag if the patch is ready to go with zero modifications, or we
should use the commit+ flag to signify that.
I could go eit
On Aug 7, 2009, at 4:03 PM, David Levin wrote:
Running check-webkit-style automatically as an fyi -- maybe during
prepare-ChangeLog -- would be cool.
Personally, I thought it would be good to let it have a little more
time to bake before doing this.
Seems like a good idea to run it in an
On Aug 8, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Harry Underwood wrote:
Thanks for the link. Didn't even know that WebGL is being considered
by WebKit.
What Oliver showed you is patches to pretty much fully implement it,
done by an Apple employee. So we're doing more than considering it. I
expect there will
09 at 10:02 PM, Jeremy Orlow
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
On Aug 8, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Harry Underwood wrote:
Thanks for the link. Didn't even know that WebGL is being
considered by WebKit.
What Oliver showed you is patches to pretty much fully i
Hi Jeremy,
On Aug 8, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
I'm not personally involved in the WebGL or O3D efforts, but I can
speak to some of this.
I agree that O3D and WebGL are more similar to each other than the
CSS 3D transforms. Both are fairly low level, though they take
fairl
On Aug 8, 2009, at 11:58 PM, Harry Underwood wrote:
Thanks very much for the explanations, everyone. Sorry about the
long chain of questions, but I wanted to form a FAQ-type basis for
future questions regarding the difference between what Apple and
WebKit are doing with SVG+CSS and what Go
On Aug 11, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
In reviewing patches, I feel like I'm commonly pointing out
DOMWindow::frame and Document::frame, etc, can be null in some
circumstances. Would it be useful to have a diagram of the major
objects (Page, Frame, DOMWindow, Document, etc) somewhere o
Hi Mark,
I think this was a needlessly rude way to address the issue. Please
try to keep things courteous on webkit-dev.
Your most important point, i.e. that 'bugzilla-tool land-diff' is
really at "early adopter" maturity and not at "everyone should use it"
maturity, was much more clear i
On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Michelangelo De Simone wrote:
Hi,
I've been working to add support for the checkValidity() method on
(#27452); in order to complete that check I need to understand whether
or not a specific event (invalid), previously fired from an element,
has been canceled.
Now,
On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Joseph Pecoraro
wrote:
On Aug 21, 2009, at 8: 32PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I’m a little irritated that we’re changing our Subversion scripts,
svn-create-patch, svn-apply, and svn-unapply into WebKit-specific
sc
Hi Adam,
I think it's probably possible to change the default on all platforms
other than Mac. I do not believe the compatibility issues we're
concerned about for Mac affect any other port. I think this would be a
good choice.
For what it's worth, NFS/AFS automounting also affects many Ma
Hi everyone,
Recently at Apple we've been considering our plans to implement new
HTML elements from HTML5. I'd like to share our thoughts with the
WebKit community and see if we are in sync before passing this on to
the HTML Working Group. Does anyone have thoughts to add to the below:
--
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
- new element types
These seem generally useful, and we already have some implemented
to various extents (search, range, email, url tel). The only concern
is the sheer number
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Hi everyone,
Recently at Apple we've been considering our plans to implement new
HTML elements from HTML5. I'd like to share our thoughts with the
WebKit community and see if we are in sync before passing this on to
the HT
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:43 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
I'm trying to update MessageEvent to match the current HTML5 spec.
Currently, MessageEvent has two references to MessagePort:
readonly attribute MessagePort messagePort;
void initMessageEvent(in DOMString typeArg, in boolean
gards,
Maciej
- Leo
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Hi everyone,
Recently at Apple we've been considering our plans to implement
new HTML elements from HTML5. I'd like to share our thoughts with
the WebKit community and see if
Web, and align
with ARIA landmark roles. So I don't entirely agree with your
feedback, but I think you should bring it up in the appropriate forum.
- Maciej
- Leo
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 26, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Leo Meyerovich wrote:
These are unnecessary features wrt
On Aug 26, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
On Aug 25, 2009, at 11:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Hi everyone,
Recently at Apple we've been considering our plans to implement new
HTML elements from HTML5. I'd lik
? Sam?
-atw
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Cameron McCormack
wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak:
> We probably need special support for Web IDL array types in the
> bindings generator. Sam can probably comment n more detail. As a
> stopgap, we could make the relevant IDL attributes be JS o
On Aug 26, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Michelangelo De Simone > wrote:
speaking about type=email a UI element which fetches
email addresses from user's address book seems a happy choice to me.
Consider that if the user uses a web mail app (e.g. Gmail
On Aug 26, 2009, at 3:37 PM, David Hyatt wrote:
If the files could just merge properly, I would not be so annoyed,
but the fact that you basically have to re-resolve conflicts every
time anyone beats you to a checkin is just horrible. Surely other
people run into this. It wastes time for
On Aug 26, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
I'd like to see the Mac port of WebKit offer completion based on the
system address book. I think a lot of the times when you enter an
email address on the Web, it's o
On Aug 26, 2009, at 5:38 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
Detailed descriptions, bug links, test instructions, and a link
back to the entire original review history are all part of Chromium
commits, yet we don't use ChangeLogs. I think discipline about
what to include + tooling to support it are
On Aug 31, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Dmitry Titov wrote:
Hi WebKit-dev,
I'm hoping to get your advice on Global Script proposal and how to
start implementing it as an 'experimental API' since it's not
standardized yet.
As part of work on Workers in WebKit and Chromium, we discussed them
with o
On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
How about this as the canonical format (with prepare-ChangeLog
encouraging it)?
2009-07-08 Maciej Stachowiak
Make prepare-ChangeLog less shouty
https://bugs.webkit.org
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
On Aug 31, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Dmitry Titov wrote:
Hi WebKit-dev,
I'm hoping to get your advice on Global Script proposal and how to
start implementing it as an 'experimental API' since it's not
standardized
On Sep 1, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
The debugger is not API, and should not be depended upon. If you are
interacting with the debugger you are not using the JSC API, and so
you will not be able to rely on JSC not changing and breaking your
API.
That's perfectly understanda
On Aug 27, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
I think it's very hard to know, a priori, what will and will not be
efficiently supportable going forward. Personally, I've been very
surprised more than once. The advantage of the C API is that we've
already signed up to support it. So,
On Sep 7, 2009, at 10:00 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
Python starting with v2.6 has reasonable built-in support for SSL
servers. This is the version that ships with Mac OS X 10.6. Mac OS
X 10.5 ships with Python 2.5 (predating this built-in support) but
includes pyOpenSSL. Mac OS X 10.4 ship
On Sep 7, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Yuzo Fujishima wrote:
Building and installing some Apache modules doesn't seem like that
big a
deal to me, if it would really make testing more practical.
However, it seems like using a premade websocket server
implementation
would
make some forms of testin
On Sep 8, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Jian Li wrote:
In WebKit, XMLHttpRequest.send() supports sending single file. It
would be better if we can support sending multiple files, like
FileList (see bug 25923).
In addition, XMLHttpRequest.send() only sends the raw content of the
file, without includi
On Sep 8, 2009, at 10:49 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
On Sep 8, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Jian Li wrote:
In WebKit, XMLHttpRequest.send() supports sending single file. It
would be better if we can support sending multiple files, like
On Sep 9, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
-Many are designed to do the same work in the pagehide handler under
Firefox.
Does Firefox apply back/forward caching to pages with an "unload"
listener?
Regards,
Maciej
___
webkit-dev mailing
On Sep 9, 2009, at 7:11 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Brady Eidson wrote:
-Many are designed to do the same work in the pagehide handler
under Firefox.
Does Firefox apply back/forward caching to pages with an
On Sep 10, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Chris Campbell wrote:
Hi All,
I had it in mind to implement support for passing data structures
through postMessage() using the "structured clone" algorithm laid out
in the HTML5 spec:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#posting-messages
http://dev.w3.org/h
On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:55 PM, Alex Milowski wrote:
I'm curious to see if there is someway an "plugin" or "extension"
can be
added to a WebKit-based browser to add additional semantics for
certain
content without going over to the "browser host" side of things?
For example, I'd like users t
On Sep 16, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
Given some of our (Chromium-team) recent investigation into the
contents of unload handlers, I'm not sure how much this move will
help users, even if you don't revert it. Lots of unload handlers
busy-wait while doing async XHR in order t
701 - 800 of 1611 matches
Mail list logo
