Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source?
good points igor, and remember: spindle is only T3... no more for T4, and the other projects to create Tools for T4 arent mature yet... Regards Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Igor VaynbergGesendet: Mittwoch, 30. August 2006 22:43An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netBetreff: Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source? - Java code is MUCH cleaner with WO, you keep in code only data pushed in thepresentation layer and actions. No need to add components and configure them in java code.how is this MUCH cleaner? just because there is no code? you can say code for a framework that is configured via xml is also cleaner because there isnt any configuration code. - Components are declared in HTML, configured in another file, binding(configuring) the component with the java class. This approach need tools, WOhas some nice tools for this. That's why Tapestry is not even close to WO here. tapestry has spindle which is a pretty cool eclipse plugin that takes care of java/component declaration/html and validates all three as well.but this is for me where the problem is - if your components are delcared declaratively then you cannot have dynamic page structures. eg switching panels around, moving panels. this was one of the reasons i switched away from tapestry. -Igor - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Tri-state checkbox
I am glad that so many people start to debate in this topic. First of all I need to explain my usecase: it is indeed about a tree... I have a tree containing Roles (hierarchical structure). There is a screen in which the user must select the Roles which he want to assign to a user. The logic is simple: if you check a node - the checked Role is added to the list of selected Roles, otherwise it is removed from the list. At the same time, if you check a child - all the ancestors changes theirs state to intermediate (if their current state is unchecked, otherwise it doesn't change it's state). The intermediate state has the same meaning as unchecked state (its only purpose is to visually inform user about the implicit Roles are assigned to the list of selected Roles). This kind of usecase is not singular. I am sure it would be very usefull in many more situations, depending on applications needs. Why I thought it would be a good ideea to extend the Checkbox FormComponent, is because it has almost the same functionality excepting the existence of the intermediate state. The model object in this case should be a Boolean object, holding the following values : [null, true, false] (the same ideea was posted by someone earlier)... Another problem which must be taken in consideration is if the change of state of this component should cause the form submition or not (see the Igor and Korbinian Bachl posts)... The way I thought to use it in my use case was pro submiting the form updating the whole tree, but Igor is right - this involves a lot of data being sent to the server, which for a large tree structure can become unacceptable... I think, there can be different approaches (each having its pros and cons)... Anyway, if you have any thougths regarding the way this component can be implemented - they are welcome and thank you all for your posts! Eelco Hillenius wrote: That's an interesting Widget! How would it work on the server side though... what kind of model would it need. I'd be interested to hear about how you plan to use it. It seems this is a component you'd always use with a tree, correct? If so it would just be a matter of letting the tree render the proper node images. Eelco Maybe I was not clear enough in my specification. If I would not say that I need a tri-state checkbox, but a formComponent which looks like checkbox (see here: http://www.indigorose.com/webhelp/vp20/Program_Reference/Misc/Tri-state_Checkbox.htm) would it make sense? At the end, it is a component like any other component and it has nothing to do with the w3c.org specification... - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tri-state-checkbox-tf2188974.html#a6074389 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source?
Igor Vaynberg wrote: but this is for me where the problem is - if your components are delcared declaratively then you cannot have dynamic page structures. eg switching panels around, moving panels. this was one of the reasons i switched away from tapestry. Like this? http://developer.apple.com/documentation/WebObjects/Reference/DynamicElements/WOSwitchComponent/chapter_34_section_1.html - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Protecting Bookmarkable Pages
On 8/30/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: exactly. iauthstrategy is geared more towards declarative security and more towards components not pages. if your usecase does not match then doing the check in the base page's constructor is the way to go - clean and simple. thats why we have all those RestartResponseAtFoo exceptions :) Well the confusion started because all the sample code that does PAGE authorization is build on top of IAuthStrat. Wicket is pretty flexible and there are fortunately always multiple ways to do things :-) S. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] filtertable and checkgroup cannot work together
final CheckGroup group=new CheckGroup(group, new ArrayList()); ... group.add(new CheckGroupSelector(groupselector)); .. SortableWapSrcDataProvider provider = new SortableWapSrcDataProvider(); DefaultDataTable table = new DefaultDataTable(table,columns,provider,30); table.addTopToolbar(new FilterToolbar(table,provider)); group.add(table); form.add(group); http://www.nabble.com/user-files/235815/Snap1.gif the html file is: form wicket:id=form span wicket:id=group nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;input type=checkbox wicket:id=groupselector全选/清除/inputbr/ table class=dataview cellspacing=0 wicket:id=table[table]/table /span input type=submit value=确定 / /form when I click the 'groupselector', the theckbox in filtertable cannot be checked. If the filtertoolbar is removed,all works fine. I suppose it is the filterform in filtertable that blocks the groupselect javascript. How can I do? very thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/filtertable-and-checkgroup-cannot-work-together-tf2195268.html#a6075049 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source?
WO is free since about 1 year and may be about to become open source. Try it and learn what some really talented people designed more than 10 years ago. ...and if you want to ask questions about technical details - ask the people who know. WO has a very good on-line community. http://www.omnigroup.com/developer/mailinglists/ http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/ /Anders Frank Silbermann wrote: Igor has already mentioned one advantage of declaring and configuring components in code -- it is easy to make the presentation very dynamic. For example, when displaying products from a catalog, the page constructor can vary the display-components used depending upon the type of product chosen by the user. (You could have different types of panels for different types of products, any one of which is embedded into the same basic page object.) But I have another consideration in mind. The advocates of Extreme Programming argue that it is naïve to think one can always design first and then implement. They argue that it is more realistic to start coding a few use cases and refine the design along the way, as experience adds insight and as the user's requirements become clearer. To refine the design of existing code they recommend _refactoring_ (see Martin Fowler's book on that topic). Suppose I've built a page and later decide, in view of the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle that a portion of my page should be refactored into a custom component. With Wicket I can move some of the page's Java code into my new panel class, and move HTML snippets from the page's associated HTML to the panel's HTML file. This process seems not too far removed from Fowler's Extract Class refactoring. To me, the ability to easily refactor is one advantage of having the components added and configured in code. To do such a refactoring in Web Objects, I am guessing that one would have to work with the generated tag files (a mixture of HTML and component configuration tags), which I doubt is practical to do by hand. So unless the tool implements this kind of refactoring directly (which I doubt), you would create the re-usable component _from_scratch_ using the display-painting tool again, throwing away components that were painted earlier. I fear that this wasted effort may be a disincentive against presentation-layer refactoring -- with the result that final designs won't be as tight as they could have been. (On the other hand, if the Web Objects tool makes re-doing the work sufficiently easy, the waste of redoing work may be insignificant.) I can see that some applications might be easier to build with Web Objects, just as for building certain types of fat clients Visual Basic 6 is easier to use than Swing. But for more sophisticated presentation logic, the Wicket approach will facilitate the use of design patterns, refactoring, and other modern OO techniques. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 3:15 PM To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net - Java code is MUCH cleaner with WO, you keep in code only data pushed in the presentation layer and actions. No need to add components and configure them in java code. - Components are declared in HTML, configured in another file, binding (configuring) the component with the java class. This approach need tools, WO has some nice tools for this. - Both frameworks make creation of custom components easy (unlike JSF!!!) - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 -- http://ojalgo.org/ Mathematics, Linear Algebra and Optimisation with Java - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source?
yes that could be interesting ! To add on the subject, the binding file of WO
uses what they call KeyValueCoding to move back and forth values in
components
exemple, to declare a Label component :
myString : WOString { value = myObject.toString } or myLoginString :
WOString { value = session.login.name }
In this simple case with wicket, this could be converted at runtime with a
Label + PropertyModel...
I'm not sure if that would be relevant for all of core components though.
In fact without tools to edit this binding file, adding components in code
is easier.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Can you expand on where/ why you think that difference comes from? Are
some of the default components of WO better abstracted for the kind of
things you do?
For example, I'm thinking of some pages sometimes that contains tons of
little
dynamic label (or WOString ;)). In a declarative way, you don't need to
factorize these in a new component. With Wicket, we usually factorize
these in a
custom Panel to keep the page class clean.
We have wicket:message for such cases. And there is the non-advertised
wicket:component tag, of which we are still unsure whether we should
totally ditch it or not.
A WO (or Tapestry, for that matter) kind of approach, where the
structure is defined in a third file or inferred somehow should be
doable if someone is willing to take that up. I'm not sure whether
you'd get a lot of additional help from the core team, but we're
certainly not against customizations if people feel alternatives work
better. One of the advantages of Wicket being a non-declarative
framework, is that it is still open for building the declarative part
on top of it if you want.
For instance, look at how WicketMessageResolver is implemented
(IComponentResolver). And add to that the fact that you can let any
component dynamically build itself (or rather it's children), e.g.
using a factory pattern using that declarative file, and a world of
possibilities opens up.
If you'd ever endeavor on that, please keep us (this list) informed :)
Eelco
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WebObjects-open-source--tf2177391.html#a6075051
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Ajax to toggle visibility require two WebMarkupContainers
Hi all, As I tried more Ajax in my new project, I frequently encounter one feature:use ajax to toggle specific block of tag visible/invisible. To do this, one may use:div wicket:id=domIdHolderComponent
div wicket:id=componentForVisibility actual content here a wicket:id=foo ... span wicket:id=bar.
/div/div outer webMarkupContainer domIdHolderComponent is ajax target to re-render, inner componentForVisibility is just to toggle visibilty of content in certain condition.
It is quite anony to I have to add two layers of WebMarkupContainers for this. This makescode hardly readable. It would be better we have a new component, so we can do this:div wicket:id=domIdHolderAndToggleBodyVisibility
actual content here
a wicket:id=foo ...
span wicket:id=bar./divI tried to write a reusable Border component to simulate but it is not work as I expectCould I write a component do reverse of setRenderBodyOnly:
class NewComponent { public isRenderTagOnly() { return // if false just render the tag without body, else render full body }}With this it may save time to struggle with ajax dom id place holder.
Any hint to do this ? or a simpler way to solve ajax toggling visibility ?Thanks in advance!-- Ingram ChenJava [EMAIL PROTECTED]Institue of BioMedical Sciences Academia Sinica Taiwanblog:
http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source?
In fact, we prefer not deploy WO app in a servlet container. A WO web app tool (called JavaMonitor) is used to deploy WO app, tweaking params, numbers of instances, monitoring of sessions, load balancing. You can also easely deploy instances on different servers... that's why we haven't felt the necessity of deploying in Tomcat for example. I heard they're working on making WO multithread for future versions though. igor.vaynberg wrote: it really sucks that WO forces threadsafety onto the user when deployed as a java app. that is something we work hard on in wicket - to shield the users - because lets face it threadsafety is one of the most error prone tasks in coding. For example, I'm thinking of some pages sometimes that contains tons of little dynamic label (or WOString ;)). In a declarative way, you don't need to factorize these in a new component. With Wicket, we usually factorize these in a custom Panel to keep the page class clean. if it is not really reusable and you just want to tidy things up you can use an inner WebMarkupContainer class instead of a panel - that way no need for a separate html file. if you have something small that is reused within the page/panel often then you can use a Fragment - also no need for a separate markup file. Off topic, are there other Web Mailinglist reader than gmane, its posting form is driving me crazy. try http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-f13974.html -Igor - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WebObjects-open-source--tf2177391.html#a6075884 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Ajax to toggle visibility require two WebMarkupContainers
Hide:
target.addJavaScript(document.getElementById(' +
component.getMarkupId() + ').style.display='none';);
Show:
target.addJavaScript(document.getElementById(' +
component.getMarkupId() + ').style.display='';);
It doesn't remove the component from the output stream, it just
manipulates the style of the tag itself.
Martijn
On 8/31/06, Ingram Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
As I tried more Ajax in my new project, I frequently encounter one
feature:
use ajax to toggle specific block of tag visible/invisible. To do this, one
may use:
div wicket:id=domIdHolderComponent
div wicket:id=componentForVisibility
actual content here
a wicket:id=foo ...
span wicket:id=bar.
/div
/div
outer webMarkupContainer domIdHolderComponent is ajax target to re-render,
inner componentForVisibility is just to toggle visibilty of content in
certain condition.
It is quite anony to I have to add two layers of WebMarkupContainers for
this. This makes
code hardly readable. It would be better we have a new component, so we can
do this:
div wicket:id=domIdHolderAndToggleBodyVisibility
actual content here
a wicket:id=foo ...
span wicket:id=bar.
/div
I tried to write a reusable Border component to simulate but it is not work
as I expect
Could I write a component do reverse of setRenderBodyOnly:
class NewComponent {
public isRenderTagOnly() {
return // if false just render the tag without body, else render
full body
}
}
With this it may save time to struggle with ajax dom id place holder.
Any hint to do this ? or a simpler way to solve ajax toggling visibility ?
Thanks in advance!
--
Ingram Chen
Java [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institue of BioMedical Sciences Academia Sinica Taiwan
blog: http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Download Wicket 1.2.2 now! New Ajax components: Tree, TreeTable and ModalWindow
-- http://wicketframework.org
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Ajax to toggle visibility require two WebMarkupContainers
Well, it is good for small portion of tags. One of our feature is togglevisibility by each link in grid (may be 10x10), use _javascript_ to toggle will waste some bandwidth...anyway, thank for adivse.
On 8/31/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hide:target.addJavaScript(document.getElementById(' +component.getMarkupId() + ').style.display='none';);Show:target.addJavaScript(document.getElementById(' +component.getMarkupId
() + ').style.display='';);It doesn't remove the component from the output stream, it justmanipulates the style of the tag itself.MartijnOn 8/31/06, Ingram Chen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all,As I tried more Ajax in my new project, I frequently encounter one feature: use ajax to toggle specific block of tag visible/invisible. To do this, one
may use: div wicket:id=domIdHolderComponent div wicket:id=componentForVisibility actual content here a wicket:id=foo ...
span wicket:id=bar./div /div outer webMarkupContainer domIdHolderComponent is ajax target to re-render, inner componentForVisibility is just to toggle visibilty of content in
certain condition. It is quite anony to I have to add two layers of WebMarkupContainers for this. This makes code hardly readable. It would be better we have a new component, so we can
do this: div wicket:id=domIdHolderAndToggleBodyVisibility actual content herea wicket:id=foo ...span wicket:id=bar.
/div I tried to write a reusable Border component to simulate but it is not work as I expect Could I write a component do reverse of setRenderBodyOnly: class NewComponent {
public isRenderTagOnly() {return // if false just render the tag without body, else render full body} } With this it may save time to struggle with ajax dom id place holder.
Any hint to do this ? or a simpler way to solve ajax toggling visibility ? Thanks in advance! -- Ingram Chen Java [EMAIL PROTECTED] Institue of BioMedical Sciences Academia Sinica Taiwan
blog: http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user--Download Wicket
1.2.2 now! New Ajax components: Tree, TreeTable and ModalWindow-- http://wicketframework.org-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-- Ingram ChenJava [EMAIL PROTECTED]Institue of BioMedical Sciences Academia Sinica Taiwanblog:
http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] DatePicker problem - java script stack overflow error
Hi, I've upgraded my current application to 1.2.2 wicket version. The only problem that occured is related to DatePicker. Shortly I have the following use case : if a panel with a DatePicker inside is added to the target after a ajax request, DatePicker component is opened but cannot be close. The reason is an javascript error - stack overflow (calendar.js line 1796). If the page is refreshed then DatePicker works propely. This use case worked when I was using previous version on wicket. How this problem can be avoided or which is the exact cause ? Btw, wicket is a great stuff ! Regards, Iulian -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DatePicker-problem---java-script-stack-overflow-error-tf2195736.html#a6076494 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source?
Frank Silbermann wrote: Suppose I've built a page and later decide, in view of the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle that a portion of my page should be refactored into a custom component. With Wicket I can move some of the page's Java code into my new panel class, and move HTML snippets from the page's associated HTML to the panel's HTML file. This process seems not too far removed from Fowler's Extract Class refactoring. To me, the ability to easily refactor is one advantage of having the components added and configured in code. To do such a refactoring in Web Objects, I am guessing that one would have to work with the generated tag files (a mixture of HTML and component configuration tags), which I doubt is practical to do by hand. So unless the tool implements this kind of refactoring directly (which I doubt), you would create the re-usable component _from_scratch_ using the display-painting tool again, throwing away components that were painted earlier. I fear that this wasted effort may be a disincentive against presentation-layer refactoring -- with the result that final designs won't be as tight as they could have been. (On the other hand, if the Web Objects tool makes re-doing the work sufficiently easy, the waste of redoing work may be insignificant.) How you do it with WO : WOLips (eclipse plugin) create a new component (juste give it a name), open in WOBuilder (WYSIWYG editor for editing simlessly both HTML template and binding file, in fact you don't have to know there's 2 files), cut (or copy) past the part of your existing page you want to be isolated in the new component. Define the component API with WOBuilder. That's it, drop it in your existings pages, set the bindings. That's why the tools are here. (read the manuals about WObuilder if your interested) Now another question for wicket and refactoring, how can you keep in sync HTML file and Java code without tools ? I'm not only talking about wicket:id attributes, but also all the component hierarchy ? If you doing big refactoring, that's 2 files to maintain. By the way, yes HTML is difficult to read, but i prefer reading HTML + bindings in WOBuilder where you could see in 5 secondes the hierarchy than only Java where you have to look for comp.add(...) all flatened. That would be awesome if the eclipse (or netbeans) plugin could synchronize this, that might be tricky to do but interesting. That's also the reason why i like WO, you open a large page or component and within 1 mins you have a good idea of his behaviour. Now with Wicket, you must have some computer brain to understand in 1 mins what a page is doing. Now don't get me wrong, i appreciate a lot of good stuff about wicket and the efforts you guys are putting in it. And let's face it, WO's core developpers are/were not doing it for free :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WebObjects-open-source--tf2177391.html#a6076647 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] extension demos broken
Just noticed that all extension demos are broken. http://wicket.sourceforge.net/ - Wicket extensions - demo* Joni - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Ajax to toggle visibility require two WebMarkupContainers
Ingram Chen wrote: As I tried more Ajax in my new project, I frequently encounter one feature: use ajax to toggle specific block of tag visible/invisible. To do this, one may use: I was attempting a similar action. Attached is my first cut of the solution. It is a Border that shows a row of text that can be cliked to show/hide the body. It is not finished, but it should work reasonably well. http://www.nabble.com/user-files/235819/collapsableBorder.jar collapsableBorder.jar -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-to-toggle-visibility-require-two-WebMarkupContainers-tf2195506.html#a6077669 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source?
The WOLips Eclipse plugin sounds pretty impressive! Yes, keeping the Wicket component hierarchy in sync between the Java file and the HTML file can be annoying. (That's one reason I am intrigued by the Echo2 approach -- treat HTML as machine language and eliminate it from the application definition completely!) My approach for Wicket is to work in terms of panels and to keep the nesting in any single component or page trivially simple. (It's analogous to the principle of keeping function/method definitions short enough to fit on one screen.) If you don't like the way Java flattens the component hierarchy with a series of comp.add(...) instead of tag nesting, you can use nonstandard indentation to show the hierarchy: ... Build components ... page.add(cI); cI.add(cIA); cIA.add(cIA1); cIA.add(cIA2); cI.add(cIB); page.add(cII); cII.add(cIIA); cIIA.add(cIIA1); cIIA.add(cIIA2); cIIA2.add(cIIA2i); cIIA2.add(cIIA2ii); cII.add(cIIB); -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexis Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 5:16 AM To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source? How you do (refactoring) with WO : WOLips (eclipse plugin) create a new component (juste give it a name), open in WOBuilder (WYSIWYG editor for editing simlessly both HTML template and binding file, in fact you don't have to know there's 2 files), cut (or copy) past the part of your existing page you want to be isolated in the new component. Define the component API with WOBuilder. That's it, drop it in your existings pages, set the bindings. That's why the tools are here. (read the manuals about WObuilder if your interested) Now another question for wicket and refactoring, how can you keep in sync HTML file and Java code without tools ? I'm not only talking about wicket:id attributes, but also all the component hierarchy ? If you doing big refactoring, that's 2 files to maintain. By the way, yes HTML is difficult to read, but i prefer reading HTML + bindings in WOBuilder where you could see in 5 secondes the hierarchy than only Java where you have to look for comp.add(...) all flatened. That would be awesome if the eclipse (or netbeans) plugin could synchronize this, that might be tricky to do but interesting. That's also the reason why i like WO, you open a large page or component and within 1 mins you have a good idea of his behaviour. Now with Wicket, you must have some computer brain to understand in 1 mins what a page is doing. Now don't get me wrong, i appreciate a lot of good stuff about wicket and the efforts you guys are putting in it. And let's face it, WO's core developpers are/were not doing it for free :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WebObjects-open-source--tf2177391.html#a6076647 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] filtertable and checkgroup cannot work together
HELP! HELP! wq wrote: final CheckGroup group=new CheckGroup(group, new ArrayList()); ... group.add(new CheckGroupSelector(groupselector)); .. SortableWapSrcDataProvider provider = new SortableWapSrcDataProvider(); DefaultDataTable table = new DefaultDataTable(table,columns,provider,30); table.addTopToolbar(new FilterToolbar(table,provider)); group.add(table); form.add(group); http://www.nabble.com/user-files/235815/Snap1.gif the html file is: form wicket:id=form span wicket:id=group nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;input type=checkbox wicket:id=groupselector全选/清除/inputbr/ table class=dataview cellspacing=0 wicket:id=table[table]/table /span input type=submit value=确定 / /form when I click the 'groupselector', the theckbox in filtertable cannot be checked. If the filtertoolbar is removed,all works fine. I suppose it is the filterform in filtertable that blocks the groupselect javascript. How can I do? very thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/filtertable-and-checkgroup-cannot-work-together-tf2195268.html#a6078904 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Set required to false on button press
Hello everbody, I have a nice working form with multiple FormComponents. Now our client wants to have a preview button, where you can save a record without entering all normally required data. So I'm asking where to call setRequired(false) for all the form components? The form should be submitted after that just like with the other button, so that the data can be saved in the database. Thanks for your attention :) -- greetings from Berlin, Rüdiger Schulz - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Ajax to toggle visibility require two WebMarkupContainers
Wow! your code give me a big hint: there is a method: setBorderBodyVisible()With this method, it's quite simple to solve this problem!AjaxBox.java-public abstract class AjaxBox extends Border { public AjaxBox(String id) {
super(id); setOutputMarkupId(true);
} @Override protected final void onAttach() { setBorderBodyVisible(isBodyVisible()); } @Override public final boolean isVisible() { return true; } //subclass to implement to change body visibility:
protected abstract boolean isBodyVisible();}AjaxBox.html - nonthing :-)wicket:borderwicket:body//wicket:borderNow I can write my template as:a wicket:id=toggle toggle visiblity/a
div wicket:id=ajaxBox
actual content here
a wicket:id=foo ...
span wicket:id=bar./divwith source code: final AjaxBox ajaxBox = new AjaxBox(ajaxBox) { @Override protected boolean isBodyVisible() {
return toggleStatus; }; add(ajaxBox); add(new AjaxLink(toggle) {
@Override
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
toggleStatus = !toggleStatus;
target.addComponent(ajaxBox);
}
});
The java code now is much simpler!On 8/31/06, ChuckDeal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingram Chen wrote:As I tried more Ajax in my new project, I frequently encounter one feature: use ajax to toggle specific block of tag visible/invisible. To do this, one
may use:I was attempting a similar action.Attached is my first cut of thesolution.It is a Border that shows a row of text that can be cliked toshow/hide the body.It is not finished, but it should work reasonably well.
http://www.nabble.com/user-files/235819/collapsableBorder.jarcollapsableBorder.jar--View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-to-toggle-visibility-require-two-WebMarkupContainers-tf2195506.html#a6077669Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-- Ingram ChenJava [EMAIL PROTECTED]Institue of BioMedical Sciences Academia Sinica Taiwanblog:
http://www.javaworld.com.tw/roller/page/ingramchen
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] DatePicker problem - java script stack overflow error
Yup I have experienced this same problem. Hope it get addressed soon before our QA nails us down! Iuly wrote: Hi, I've upgraded my current application to 1.2.2 wicket version. The only problem that occured is related to DatePicker. Shortly I have the following use case : if a panel with a DatePicker inside is added to the target after a ajax request, DatePicker component is opened but cannot be close. The reason is an javascript error - stack overflow (calendar.js line 1796). If the page is refreshed then DatePicker works propely. This use case worked when I was using previous version on wicket. How this problem can be avoided or which is the exact cause ? Btw, wicket is a great stuff ! Regards, Iulian -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DatePicker-problem---java-script-stack-overflow-error-tf2195736.html#a6080405 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source?
not a lot of docs on that is there? here is what i infer - its a switch - that means you have to have all possibilities predefined and then at runtime choose which one to display. this is not dynamic because all choises are predefined. in wicket i can create any panel on the fly and swap it in for any other panel - in fact i can build my entire application with a single page and just switch certain parts of it out. -IgorOn 8/31/06, Anders Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote: but this is for me where the problem is - if your components are delcared declaratively then you cannot have dynamic page structures. eg switching panels around, moving panels. this was one of the reasons i switched away from tapestry.Like this?http://developer.apple.com/documentation/WebObjects/Reference/DynamicElements/WOSwitchComponent/chapter_34_section_1.html -Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimohttp://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Set required to false on button press
that preview button should set the:setDefaultFormProcessing(boolean defaultFormProcessing)to false. So that no default processing is done (validation)johanOn 8/31/06, Rüdiger Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everbody,I have a nice working form with multiple FormComponents. Now ourclient wants to have a preview button, where you can save a recordwithout entering all normally required data. So I'm asking where to call setRequired(false) for all the formcomponents? The form should be submitted after that just like with theother button, so that the data can be saved in the database.Thanks for your attention :) --greetings from Berlin,Rüdiger Schulz-Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] filtertable and checkgroup cannot work together
filter toolbar was not meant to be embedded in another form because it uses a form of its own, so for right now i would say that usecase is not supported. please add an rfe for it.if you want one right now then you have to create your own variant that doesnt use an embedded form. it would be pretty much a copy and paste job of the current toolbar but w/out the form. -IgorOn 8/31/06, wq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HELP! HELP!wq wrote: final CheckGroup group=new CheckGroup(group, new ArrayList()); ... group.add(new CheckGroupSelector(groupselector)); .. SortableWapSrcDataProvider provider = new SortableWapSrcDataProvider(); DefaultDataTable table = new DefaultDataTable(table,columns,provider,30); table.addTopToolbar(new FilterToolbar(table,provider)); group.add(table); form.add(group);http://www.nabble.com/user-files/235815/Snap1.gif the html file is: form wicket:id=form span wicket:id=group nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;input type=checkbox wicket:id=groupselector全选/清除/inputbr/ table class=dataview cellspacing=0 wicket:id=table[table]/table /span input type=submit value=确定 / /form when I click the 'groupselector', the theckbox in filtertable cannot be checked. If the filtertoolbar is removed,all works fine. I suppose it is the filterform infiltertable thatblocks the groupselect _javascript_. How can I do? very thanks!--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/filtertable-and-checkgroup-cannot-work-together-tf2195268.html#a6078904Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Set required to false on button press
try thisinstead of calling setrequired, override isRequired() to return false based on some varthen make preview button .setdefaultformprocessing(false)and in onsubmit call form.process() yourself-Igor On 8/31/06, Rüdiger Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everbody,I have a nice working form with multiple FormComponents. Now ourclient wants to have a preview button, where you can save a recordwithout entering all normally required data. So I'm asking where to call setRequired(false) for all the formcomponents? The form should be submitted after that just like with theother button, so that the data can be saved in the database.Thanks for your attention :) --greetings from Berlin,Rüdiger Schulz-Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Tri-state checkbox
If I were to create that component, I probably would not extend from CheckBox as both the model is semantically different and the rendering is done a different way. Instead, I would extend FormComponent directly. I also would not choose for a model that has true/false/null, which would imo be no less than a hack. I think I would go for having a model with values none/all/some (enum) to represent what you're actually modelling, and I'd use an element with three images that when clicked uses Javascript to do an ajax call (if you can use ajax) and replaces the image with another. Eelco On 8/31/06, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am glad that so many people start to debate in this topic. First of all I need to explain my usecase: it is indeed about a tree... I have a tree containing Roles (hierarchical structure). There is a screen in which the user must select the Roles which he want to assign to a user. The logic is simple: if you check a node - the checked Role is added to the list of selected Roles, otherwise it is removed from the list. At the same time, if you check a child - all the ancestors changes theirs state to intermediate (if their current state is unchecked, otherwise it doesn't change it's state). The intermediate state has the same meaning as unchecked state (its only purpose is to visually inform user about the implicit Roles are assigned to the list of selected Roles). This kind of usecase is not singular. I am sure it would be very usefull in many more situations, depending on applications needs. Why I thought it would be a good ideea to extend the Checkbox FormComponent, is because it has almost the same functionality excepting the existence of the intermediate state. The model object in this case should be a Boolean object, holding the following values : [null, true, false] (the same ideea was posted by someone earlier)... Another problem which must be taken in consideration is if the change of state of this component should cause the form submition or not (see the Igor and Korbinian Bachl posts)... The way I thought to use it in my use case was pro submiting the form updating the whole tree, but Igor is right - this involves a lot of data being sent to the server, which for a large tree structure can become unacceptable... I think, there can be different approaches (each having its pros and cons)... Anyway, if you have any thougths regarding the way this component can be implemented - they are welcome and thank you all for your posts! Eelco Hillenius wrote: That's an interesting Widget! How would it work on the server side though... what kind of model would it need. I'd be interested to hear about how you plan to use it. It seems this is a component you'd always use with a tree, correct? If so it would just be a matter of letting the tree render the proper node images. Eelco Maybe I was not clear enough in my specification. If I would not say that I need a tri-state checkbox, but a formComponent which looks like checkbox (see here: http://www.indigorose.com/webhelp/vp20/Program_Reference/Misc/Tri-state_Checkbox.htm) would it make sense? At the end, it is a component like any other component and it has nothing to do with the w3c.org specification... - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tri-state-checkbox-tf2188974.html#a6074389 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
Re: [Wicket-user] Error: too much recursion for Date Widget
I'm trying to reproduce it, but so far without luck. What I did was add a datepicker to the ajax tabs example... but whatever I do, I can't get it to stall. Also, what's strange about your case is that you shouldn't see any ajax header contribution; that is done dynamically and thus should never show up as actual page source. Can you tell us more about the context you're using it? I can see from the source that you're using modal window - a very new component that might have some unforseen issues. Eelco On 8/30/06, samyem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I keep getting this error on the Date Picker: Error: too much recursion Source File: http://localhost:8081/mm/app/resources/wicket.extensions.markup.html.datepicker.DatePicker/calendar.js Line: 1796 See my source code for the HTML generated in my browser: problem.txt I can see that the calendar.js is included several times, probably each one for every time I ajax-refresh the panel with the date picker. Also, there is a big mess generated in the HTML with tons of nbsp; . Is this my fault or something wrong with wicket? I am using the latest wicket from SVN. View this message in context: Error: too much recursion for Date Widget Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] DatePicker problem - java script stack overflow error
I was trying to reproduce it by placing a datepicker on an ajax tab of the ajax tabs example. But that works just fine and I can't get it to stall. I replied on another thread earlier. Would you mind describing which components you use/ what your context is in that thread? Eelco On 8/31/06, Iuly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've upgraded my current application to 1.2.2 wicket version. The only problem that occured is related to DatePicker. Shortly I have the following use case : if a panel with a DatePicker inside is added to the target after a ajax request, DatePicker component is opened but cannot be close. The reason is an javascript error - stack overflow (calendar.js line 1796). If the page is refreshed then DatePicker works propely. This use case worked when I was using previous version on wicket. How this problem can be avoided or which is the exact cause ? Btw, wicket is a great stuff ! Regards, Iulian -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DatePicker-problem---java-script-stack-overflow-error-tf2195736.html#a6076494 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Error: too much recursion for Date Widget
The modal windows are our own implementation as we had it since before wicket had support of modal windows. We are thinking of porting to the new modal that wicket has once we get some time. Eelco Hillenius wrote: I'm trying to reproduce it, but so far without luck. What I did was add a datepicker to the ajax tabs example... but whatever I do, I can't get it to stall. Also, what's strange about your case is that you shouldn't see any ajax header contribution; that is done dynamically and thus should never show up as actual page source. Can you tell us more about the context you're using it? I can see from the source that you're using modal window - a very new component that might have some unforseen issues. Eelco On 8/30/06, samyem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I keep getting this error on the Date Picker: Error: too much recursion Source File: http://localhost:8081/mm/app/resources/wicket.extensions.markup.html.datepicker.DatePicker/calendar.js Line: 1796 See my source code for the HTML generated in my browser: problem.txt I can see that the calendar.js is included several times, probably each one for every time I ajax-refresh the panel with the date picker. Also, there is a big mess generated in the HTML with tons of nbsp; . Is this my fault or something wrong with wicket? I am using the latest wicket from SVN. View this message in context: Error: too much recursion for Date Widget Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Error%3A-too-much-recursion-for-Date-Widget-tf2191447.html#a6084535 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Tri-state checkbox
you don't have to use ajax or somethingthe click can just be a img src tag replace You do need a hidden field and update what value is set on the backend the component should have a renderer something like the IChoiceRenderer where you map the 3 states to your real object that you want in a modelwhat ever that is.johanOn 8/31/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:If I were to create that component, I probably would not extend from CheckBox as both the model is semantically different and the renderingis done a different way. Instead, I would extend FormComponentdirectly. I also would not choose for a model that hastrue/false/null, which would imo be no less than a hack. I think I would go for having a model with values none/all/some (enum)to represent what you're actually modelling, and I'd use an elementwith three images that when clicked uses _javascript_ to do an ajax call (if you can use ajax) and replaces the image with another.EelcoOn 8/31/06, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am glad that so many people start to debate in this topic. First of all I need to explain my usecase: it is indeed about a tree... I have a tree containing Roles (hierarchical structure). There is a screen in which the user must select the Roles which he want to assign to a user. The logic is simple: if you check a node - the checked Role is added to the list of selected Roles, otherwise it is removed from the list. At the same time, if you check a child - all the ancestors changes theirs state to intermediate (if their current state is unchecked, otherwise it doesn't change it's state). The intermediate state has the same meaning as unchecked state (its only purpose is to visually inform user about the implicit Roles are assigned to the list of selected Roles).This kind of usecase is not singular. I am sure it would be very usefull in many more situations, depending on applications needs.Why I thought it would be a good ideea to extend the Checkbox FormComponent, is because it has almost the same functionality excepting the existence of the intermediate state. The model object in this case should be a Boolean object, holding the following values : [null, true, false] (the same ideea was posted by someone earlier)...Another problem which must be taken in consideration is if the change of state of this component should cause the form submition or not (see the Igor and Korbinian Bachl posts)... The way I thought to use it in my use case was pro submiting the form updating the whole tree, but Igor is right - this involves a lot of data being sent to the server, which for a large tree structure can become unacceptable... I think, there can be different approaches (each having its pros and cons)... Anyway, if you have any thougths regarding the way this component can be implemented - they are welcome and thank you all for your posts! Eelco Hillenius wrote: That's an interesting Widget! How would it work on the server side though... what kind of model would it need. I'd be interested to hear about how you plan to use it. It seems this is a component you'd always use with a tree, correct? If so it would just be a matter of letting the tree render the proper node images. EelcoMaybe I was not clear enough in my specification. If I would not say that I need a tri-state checkbox, but a formComponent which looks like checkbox (see here: http://www.indigorose.com/webhelp/vp20/Program_Reference/Misc/Tri-state_Checkbox.htm) would it make sense? At the end, it is a component like any other component and it has nothing to do with the w3c.org specification... - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tri-state-checkbox-tf2188974.html#a6074389 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
Re: [Wicket-user] Error: too much recursion for Date Widget
Do you think the problem might be related to that modal window? What is the simplest case you can get the problem reproducible? Eelco On 8/31/06, samyem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The modal windows are our own implementation as we had it since before wicket had support of modal windows. We are thinking of porting to the new modal that wicket has once we get some time. Eelco Hillenius wrote: I'm trying to reproduce it, but so far without luck. What I did was add a datepicker to the ajax tabs example... but whatever I do, I can't get it to stall. Also, what's strange about your case is that you shouldn't see any ajax header contribution; that is done dynamically and thus should never show up as actual page source. Can you tell us more about the context you're using it? I can see from the source that you're using modal window - a very new component that might have some unforseen issues. Eelco On 8/30/06, samyem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I keep getting this error on the Date Picker: Error: too much recursion Source File: http://localhost:8081/mm/app/resources/wicket.extensions.markup.html.datepicker.DatePicker/calendar.js Line: 1796 See my source code for the HTML generated in my browser: problem.txt I can see that the calendar.js is included several times, probably each one for every time I ajax-refresh the panel with the date picker. Also, there is a big mess generated in the HTML with tons of nbsp; . Is this my fault or something wrong with wicket? I am using the latest wicket from SVN. View this message in context: Error: too much recursion for Date Widget Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Error%3A-too-much-recursion-for-Date-Widget-tf2191447.html#a6084535 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Tri-state checkbox
On 8/31/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you don't have to use ajax or something the click can just be a img src tag replace Technically, you don't have to, but as this typically is tree functionality, it is wise - imho - to do so. Furthermore, on a click you should update, as this not only effects that one node in the tree, but also it's children. Eelco - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Tri-state checkbox
i dont think it is typically a tree functionality i would use such a componentfar most often in another area. Especially required checkboxes..I would like such a more general component (core or extentions) johanOn 8/31/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/31/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you don't have to use ajax or something the click can just be a img src tag replaceTechnically, you don't have to, but as this typically is tree functionality, it is wise - imho - to do so. Furthermore, on a clickyou should update, as this not only effects that one node in the tree,but also it's children.Eelco- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Tri-state checkbox
I would like such a more general component (core or extentions) I'm looking forward to whatever you come up with :) Eelco - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Tri-state checkbox
Alex Objelean wrote: The logic is simple: if you check a node - the checked Role is added to the list of selected Roles, otherwise it is removed from the list. At the same time, if you check a child - all the ancestors changes theirs state to intermediate (if their current state is unchecked, otherwise it doesn't change it's state). The intermediate state has the same meaning as unchecked state (its only purpose is to visually inform user about the implicit Roles are assigned to the list of selected Roles). It sounds to me like the model (data) is that of a standard checkbox, True or False. The intermediate state is only a visual cue for the user to represent a 'True' value higher up the hierarchic. If this is the case, why don't you use standard HTML Checkbox components and use javascript to 'color', 'shade' or otherwise 'mark' the ancestors of a checked parent? - Jason B. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] DatePicker problem - java script stack overflow error
Thanks for the reply. I will detail below the ajax context and also component hierarchy involved. So in my page I have a main container which extends Border component. I’ve set on this container setOutputMarkupId(true). Let’s name this container A. Panel(extends Panel component) that contains DatePicker component is child of A. This child defines a form component that has 2 DatePicker components inside and associated inputs and also other inputs. Let’s name the child of border container B. I’ve called also on form on B setOutputMarkupId(true). First time when the page is rendered all inputs from B are disabled(using AttributeModifier) and both DatePicker components work properly. I have also a AjaxSubmitButton that enables all the inputs from B. Clicking on it inputs became enabled (I am using here AttributeModifier), but both DatePicker component generate that java script error. What I’m doing in onSubmit method of that AjaxSubmitButton is the following : target.addComponent(A); As I told you this worked on the previous version of wicket. Regards, Iulian Eelco Hillenius wrote: I was trying to reproduce it by placing a datepicker on an ajax tab of the ajax tabs example. But that works just fine and I can't get it to stall. I replied on another thread earlier. Would you mind describing which components you use/ what your context is in that thread? Eelco On 8/31/06, Iuly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've upgraded my current application to 1.2.2 wicket version. The only problem that occured is related to DatePicker. Shortly I have the following use case : if a panel with a DatePicker inside is added to the target after a ajax request, DatePicker component is opened but cannot be close. The reason is an javascript error - stack overflow (calendar.js line 1796). If the page is refreshed then DatePicker works propely. This use case worked when I was using previous version on wicket. How this problem can be avoided or which is the exact cause ? Btw, wicket is a great stuff ! Regards, Iulian -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DatePicker-problem---java-script-stack-overflow-error-tf2195736.html#a6076494 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DatePicker-problem---java-script-stack-overflow-error-tf2195736.html#a6087102 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Error: too much recursion for Date Widget
I've repoduced also this java script error in the following context : Here is the ajax context and also component hierarchy involved. So in my page I have a main container which extends Border component. I’ve set on this container setOutputMarkupId(true). Let’s name this container A. Panel(extends Panel component) that contains DatePicker component is child of A. This child defines a form component that has 2 DatePicker components inside and associated inputs and also other inputs. Let’s name the child of border container B. I’ve called also on form on B setOutputMarkupId(true). First time when the page is rendered all inputs from B are disabled(using AttributeModifier) and both DatePicker components work properly. I have also a AjaxSubmitButton that enables all the inputs from B. Clicking on it inputs became enabled (I am using here AttributeModifier), but both DatePicker components generate that java script error. What I’m doing in onSubmit method of that AjaxSubmitButton is the following : target.addComponent(A); samyem wrote: I keep getting this error on the Date Picker: Error: too much recursion Source File: http://localhost:8081/mm/app/resources/wicket.extensions.markup.html.datepicker.DatePicker/calendar.js Line: 1796 See my source code for the HTML generated in my browser: http://www.nabble.com/user-files/235808/problem.txt problem.txt I can see that the calendar.js is included several times, probably each one for every time I ajax-refresh the panel with the date picker. Also, there is a big mess generated in the HTML with tons of amp;nbsp; . Is this my fault or something wrong with wicket? I am using the latest wicket from SVN. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Error%3A-too-much-recursion-for-Date-Widget-tf2191447.html#a6087296 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] HeaderContributor on page works for one request only? (1.2.2)
HeaderContributor.forCss(Class c, String path) is NOT working for me in 1.2.2 after the first request to a page. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of landtuna Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:14 PM To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] HeaderContributor on page works for one request only? (1.2.2) I said: Nathan Hamblen-2 said: Can anyone confirm if header contributors to pages are working properly? This works for me. I'm using a StringHeaderContributor that is added in each constructor of the page. I take that back. It worked in 1.2.1, but it's broken in 1.2.2. -- Jim Hunziker -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/HeaderContributor-on- page-works-for-one-request-only--%281.2.2%29-tf2186030.html#a6047857 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] DatePicker problem - java script stack overflow error
Would you mind sharing some of that code? And open up a bug report please? It probably has to do with last week's refactorings of header contributions. Sorry it broke your app, you're probably best off rolling back to 1.2.1 until we fix this. Thanks, Eelco On 8/31/06, Iuly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the reply. I will detail below the ajax context and also component hierarchy involved. So in my page I have a main container which extends Border component. I've set on this container setOutputMarkupId(true). Let's name this container A. Panel(extends Panel component) that contains DatePicker component is child of A. This child defines a form component that has 2 DatePicker components inside and associated inputs and also other inputs. Let's name the child of border container B. I've called also on form on B setOutputMarkupId(true). First time when the page is rendered all inputs from B are disabled(using AttributeModifier) and both DatePicker components work properly. I have also a AjaxSubmitButton that enables all the inputs from B. Clicking on it inputs became enabled (I am using here AttributeModifier), but both DatePicker component generate that java script error. What I'm doing in onSubmit method of that AjaxSubmitButton is the following : target.addComponent(A); As I told you this worked on the previous version of wicket. Regards, Iulian Eelco Hillenius wrote: I was trying to reproduce it by placing a datepicker on an ajax tab of the ajax tabs example. But that works just fine and I can't get it to stall. I replied on another thread earlier. Would you mind describing which components you use/ what your context is in that thread? Eelco On 8/31/06, Iuly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've upgraded my current application to 1.2.2 wicket version. The only problem that occured is related to DatePicker. Shortly I have the following use case : if a panel with a DatePicker inside is added to the target after a ajax request, DatePicker component is opened but cannot be close. The reason is an javascript error - stack overflow (calendar.js line 1796). If the page is refreshed then DatePicker works propely. This use case worked when I was using previous version on wicket. How this problem can be avoided or which is the exact cause ? Btw, wicket is a great stuff ! Regards, Iulian -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DatePicker-problem---java-script-stack-overflow-error-tf2195736.html#a6076494 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DatePicker-problem---java-script-stack-overflow-error-tf2195736.html#a6087102 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
