Dear friends,
Our colleague User:Khalid Mahmood, the most prolific contributor to the
Western Punjabi Wikipedia[1], has died earlier this month, after long
illness.
Khalid was an educator from Pakistan who was passionate about creating and
sharing free knowledge. He had great plans for
Thank you for letting us know, Asaf. Rest in peace, Khalid.
/a
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> Our colleague User:Khalid Mahmood, the most prolific contributor to the
> Western Punjabi Wikipedia[1], has died earlier this month,
On 31.10.2015 12:12, Fæ wrote:
On 31 Oct 2015 11:00, "Ilario Valdelli" wrote:
On 31.10.2015 11:46, Fæ wrote:
Hang on. Could I have an independent reality check; is that really $7
per photograph?
Fae
30.000 is exact, but they are 30.000 Real which means 11.000 USD.
Cool.
We have many years of running these very similar projects. It should
be possible to compare the value of outcomes against each other to see
if some use better practices than others, and then to help assess
future grant proposals for their potential value against estimated
costs.
I agree that
On 31 October 2015 at 02:26, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
wrote:
...
> And this money, more then 30'000 USD, come from WMF for the WLE 2014/15 and
Hang on. Could I have an independent reality check; is that really $7
per photograph?
Fae
--
fae...@gmail.com
On 31.10.2015 11:46, Fæ wrote:
On 31 October 2015 at 02:26, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
wrote:
...
And this money, more then 30'000 USD, come from WMF for the WLE 2014/15 and
Hang on. Could I have an independent reality check; is that really $7
per photograph?
Fae
I totally agree with Ilario here. We have yet to put a financial value on a
Wikimedia contributor time unit, but I would venture to say that if such
projects manage to procure even one Wikimedia contributor for the projects
then that is money well spent.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Ilario
On 31 Oct 2015 11:00, "Ilario Valdelli" wrote:
>
> On 31.10.2015 11:46, Fæ wrote:
>> Hang on. Could I have an independent reality check; is that really $7
>> per photograph?
>>
>> Fae
>
> 30.000 is exact, but they are 30.000 Real which means 11.000 USD.
Cool. So about $2.50
Funny.
Gerald: "What do YOU hope" [again YOU*] Me: "My point is not important
here" Gerald:" When your point of view is that other people spending money
is wrong because it does not conform to your ideas"
???
I don't have a point, I'm asking "Success for whom?" I asked that, and "you
did not
We did a long research in 2014 to define the prizes as described in the budget
request and reports to WMF.
A lot of contests in Brasil pay prizes around R$10.000-R$60.000, the value of
the prizes that we gave in Brasil are considered low by many participants and
professionals in that field.
> On 31 Oct 2015, at 18:34, Rodrigo Padula
> wrote:
>
> A lot of contests in Brasil pay prizes around R$10.000-R$60.000, the value of
> the prizes that we gave in Brasil are considered low by many participants and
> professionals in that field.
Isn't that
I hope you had a great party! !!!
sent from mobile. please excuse typos.
On Oct 29, 2015 12:44 PM, "Redon Skikuli" wrote:
> Happy Birthday Wikidata, from the growing Albanian community!
>
> *---*
>
> *Redon Skikuli*
> *e-mail: **re...@skikuli.com *
> *web:
Congrats guys. It's 3 years now. :)
--
User:Titodutta (En WP)
On 31 October 2015 at 22:53, Lila Tretikov wrote:
> I hope you had a great party! !!!
>
> sent from mobile. please excuse typos.
> On Oct 29, 2015 12:44 PM, "Redon Skikuli" wrote:
>
> > Happy
Again, and again.
"Success for whom"?
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:PEG/Wikimedia_Community_Brazilian_Group_of_Education_and_Research/Wiki_Loves_Earth_Brasil_2015#Measures_of_success
The section "measure of success" reports:
at least 400 participants uploading one photograph or more;
"this is a normal budget for any WLM or WLE in several countries."
WLE Brazil prizes: 3'300 EUR (2014) 3'000 EUR (2015) WLM 1800 EUR (2015)
[1]
WLE Thailand: 510 EUR (2014) Tunisia: 558 EUR (2015) Spain and Portugal: 1400
EUR (2015)...
WLM: Ireland: 550 EUR (2015) Latvia 500 EUR (2015)
I see a lot of good results and contributions here and as pointed by Ilario, we
reached great part of our measures of success
WLM 2015
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Campaign:wlm-br
- 4.453 photos
- 411 uploaders
- 325 new users registered on commons
WLM 2014+2015
Hoi,
So you did not answer the question. What is it that you aim to achieve. I
get words, no ideas, nothing. Only negativity.
Money is there to burn as long as it probably leads to results. The results
should not be compared with what is done elsewhere when elsewhere is
incomparable. When your
Maybe it is time to reconsider some of our standard metrics for wiki loves
monuments.
One of the big gains in several countries has been to get a list of monuments
into Wikipedia maybe in future direct into wikidata. I think that the standard
metrics should reflect that, OK it is metadata,
I cant see any relation in the "literature" regarding photo contests prizes and
monthly average wage :-)
So our study was based on local photo contests prizes, international prizes and
a reasonable value for a non-profit organization in a way that the value is
interesting for a amateur or a
On 31.10.2015 21:13, Luiz Augusto wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <
rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com> wrote:
(...)
[5]some samples of local community interacting with Padula's "ideas":
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <
rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (...)
>
> [5]some samples of local community interacting with Padula's "ideas":
>
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Brazilian_Group_of_Education_and_Research/User_Group_Proposal
>
I'm not fighting against anybody here, I'm just defending myself and moving
forward keeping my ideas and our projects running as I proposed to do during
and after the Brazilian Catalyst Program!
As a good Petyr Baelish, I'm just trying to keep my head connected to my neck
:-)
Best regards,
WereSpielChequers,
I talked about that in the thread, if WLM and WLE would be closer (some
countries are) to communities WP, Commons,... the result would be better.
" I would like to see Wikimedia Commons volunteers be involved in the
process, to create more clear, précised, and aligned rules
Hello Illario and Jane,
Thanks by your comments. That is exactly the point!
WLM and WLE are not only about the number of pictures loaded and the general
quality of the pictures. It's about our mission and new users engagement too.
That is what our group is trying to do here, teach people about
Argentom, only to demonstrate how wrong and misinformed you are, the guy you
cited on your email is a very active contributor with more than 50.000 edits on
the main domain of pt.wikipedia and near 100.000 edits including all domains.
Thinking in personal privacy, it is not a good approach to
Gerard,
This "you" is for me? Right?
Well I'm really asking here for whom this was successful, and tried to
explore the several layers that could be impacted by this.
My point is not important here, but this is a conversation, so:
Measure of success:
Wikimedia Commons receiving a good impact
Happy birthday, Wikidata. Greetings from Bengali Wikipedia.
Bodhisattwa
On 31 Oct 2015 23:03, "Tito Dutta" wrote:
> Congrats guys. It's 3 years now. :)
> --
> User:Titodutta (En WP)
>
> On 31 October 2015 at 22:53, Lila Tretikov wrote:
>
> > I hope you
Please slow this conversation down and do not personalise it.
Regards, Richard
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
28 matches
Mail list logo