it, being on the jury is a boring task and little fun.
Why are you (plural) trying so hard to make it even less fun...
These are indeed assertions, and I agree to focus on responding to factual
questions instead.
So again: Thanks for spending all this effort and time!
Lodewijk
2014-09-30 14:35
Forwarding this here, as Sumana's role seems relevant to a wider audience
than just wikitech-l :)
Thanks Sumana for all your work!
Lodewijk
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sumana Harihareswara
Date: 2014-09-12 18:09 GMT+02:00
Subject: [Wikitech-l] I'm leaving the
started a separate thread about it than hijack this one
which had some serious time-sensitive and open questions.
And yes, discussing whether we should discuss the color of the bikeshed is
distracting too. I suggest we use 'the Oompa Loompa discussion meeting' and
be done with it.
Best,
Lodewi
/me mumbles something about a bikeshed that has a beautiful shade of blue.
2014-09-11 20:06 GMT+02:00 James Forrester :
> On 11 September 2014 10:52, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
>
> > On 11.09.2014 18:42, James Forrester wrote:
> >
> >> On 11 September 2014 09:27, Anh Chung wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear al
usual request.
Maybe it woudl be more constructive continue this conversation if there is
a flatout refusal or acceptance? I am confident that you will also update
us if you receive a positive response.
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-08-22 17:06 GMT+02:00 Fæ :
> I wrote the email below to Lila and the W
the problem is all projects use a different format :)
Maybe it is worth the effort to investigate if we can come to a single
format... at least on the input side.
Lodewijk
2014-08-04 3:43 GMT+02:00 Gryllida :
> Does the same apply to other sister projects? It could make sense to make
>
Contrary to an individual request for information (who did ABC) I guess
that such a process question would be perfect for the ombuds committee (was
this process correctly followed) or by extension the board.
Lodewijk
2014-08-03 21:45 GMT+02:00 Richard Farmbrough :
> I have to say that there
Welcome Egypt! :)
2014-07-29 0:05 GMT+02:00 Richard Symonds
:
> Congratulations from the United Kingdom!
> On 28 Jul 2014 22:32, "Andy Cruz y Corro" wrote:
>
> > Congratulations! May great things come for you
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Enock Seth Nyamador <
> kwadzo...@gmail.
That explains it very well, thank you.
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-07-22 17:36 GMT+02:00 Pavel Richter :
> Hi Lodewijk,
>
> let me try to answer that:
>
>
> On 22 July 2014 10:52, Lodewijk wrote:
>
> >
> > Tim, I'm afraid that in your email you didn't q
world that you're looking for talent.
Is that a correct extrapolation/interpretation?
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-07-22 10:02 GMT+02:00 Tim Moritz Hector :
> Hi all,
>
> A few weeks ago, the Transition Team, which the Supervisory Board of
> Wikimedia Deutschland has tasked with orga
Thank you for the update, and thanks to Pediapress for the collaboration! I
always liked to have the option, but indeed never was tempted enough to
actually order something.
Good to learn that the pdf function remains, that's great too!
Lodewijk
2014-07-11 0:38 GMT+02:00 Thomas Gries :
e
can summarize some discussion outcomes.
Thanks for your help!
Best,
Lodewijk / effeietsanders
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists
The question is whether that is implicit, and whether that is necessary at
all. I find the argument that for government works we only have to bother
about the law of the source country, very persuasive.
2014-06-23 14:27 GMT+02:00 geni :
> On 23 June 2014 13:00, Ilario Valdelli wrote:
>
> > In m
Wiki Loves
Monuments probably some 200-400 volunteers were involved too - but there is
some overlap. All in all, I guess that we may end up around a thousand
volunteers quite easily.
Lodewijk
2014-06-22 17:43 GMT+02:00 Benjamin Lees :
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Alice Wiegand wrote:
>
do get
a better understanding of some of the frustration.
Lodewijk
2014-06-22 12:26 GMT+02:00 Russavia :
> Craig, et al
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Craig Franklin
> wrote:
> > Pardon me if this has already been covered, but as I understand it the
> > problem is not the l
I cannot help but wonder, what good you hope to accomplish with this rant.
Seriously, if you insist on making personal attacks like this, just send a
private email.
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-06-19 15:48 GMT+02:00 MZMcBride :
> Austin Hair wrote:
> >It's true that there have been peri
insinuated requests by Tomasz and Fae that other people
should be held to the same standards in the future, and they be moderated
too when a pattern of uncivil behavior develops.
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-06-19 1:31 GMT+02:00 Nathan :
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Fæ wrote:
> >
> >
would that become Wikimedia Uncommons or Unwikimedia Commons? Or do we
avoid this question by leaving it to an outside party?
Lodewijk
(who is btw not so much charmed of an uncommons at all)
2014-06-17 21:06 GMT+02:00 Samuel Klein :
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:19 PM, George Herbert
>
already put for the WMF legal team as a
question, but I wasn't able to find so quickly whether a useful reply
resulted from that consultation.
Lodewijk
2014-06-17 1:34 GMT+02:00 Yann Forget :
> Hi,
>
> Some Commons contributors like to ask impossible requirements, and
> threaten
Hi Anders,
for my understanding, could you give a few examples of what kind of
datatypes are still missing that you would need (ideally datatypes I can
actually understand).
Thanks!
Lodewijk
2014-06-16 16:20 GMT+02:00 Anders Wennersten :
> Just a few examples.
> *It takes up to 6 mont
Great to hear! I remember that you shared with us 'it might take a while'
but I never took it so excessively! Thanks for sticking through, and all
the best with the earned status. I hope it will help you a lot in your
activities.
Lodewijk
2014-06-10 19:33 GMT+02:00 Vishnu :
> E
dy think a bit about them.
This is not a matter of caring or not caring - this is a matter of being
effective and efficient.
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-06-01 2:06 GMT+02:00 Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <
rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com>:
> Well Lodewijk, they announce the values during the WLE, not bef
email got delayed a bit :)
Lodewijk
2014-05-31 17:17 GMT+02:00 Anasuya Sengupta :
> Hi all,
>
> It's been pointed out to us that the deadline for the Letter of Intent in
> one place on the FDC portal (undergoing redesign) was June 8 rather than
> June 1, and that caused some c
nless I'm missing something (what you're actually trying to accomplish)
this is probably the least impactful moment to have this discussion - a few
months earlier or later would have been.
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-05-31 3:50 GMT+02:00 Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <
rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com&g
in 2013) competitions.
That being said, I think I could agree wholeheartedly if the conclusion
were to be "money is usually not the bottle neck" (although there are
exceptions).
Best,
Lodewijk
(member of the (international coordinating) team of Wiki Loves Monuments
2010-2013)
2014-0
Thanks for the much more detailed reasoning and feedback! This actually
gives a good insight why decisions were taken as they were and a major
improvement compared to previous rounds.
Lodewijk
2014-05-25 0:12 GMT+02:00 Tonmoy Khan :
> Hello everyone,
>
> I thank you all for your en
Thanks Philippe for the pointer. Sounds like an interesting angle, she has
been hired very recently it seems? I'm looking forward to the slightly more
details description on the user page that is apparently forthcoming :)
Lodewijk
2014-04-28 4:39 GMT+02:00 Philippe Beaudette :
>
next year. I suggest that people who
have good ideas for alternative organizations bring that up with that in
mind for next year (in a few months or so, when the FDC is less swamped
with work).
Lodewijk
2014-04-27 23:51 GMT+02:00 Risker :
> On 27 April 2014 17:23, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
thing like a decision will be taken
:) I think an organized way to facilitate community discussion beyond the
mailing list we're writing on now, and simple fora like meta pages, would
be very welcome and could result in more constructive input of high
quality.
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-04-21 21:49
;just donating money' - i think we should be
able to explain at all time why we are donating, and why that specific
amount. We owe that to our donors, and we owe that to the volunteers whose
grants are being rejected/reduced.
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-04-17 23:39 GMT+02:00 Chris Keating :
congratulations for really existing now :)
it feels like you have been around already for a long time ;-)
2014-04-08 11:59 GMT+02:00 Patricio Lorente :
> ¡Felicitaciones, Wikimedia México!
>
>
> 2014-03-26 5:39 GMT-03:00 Salvador A :
>
> > El martes, 25 de marzo de 2014, Cristian Consonni <
> k
Welcome on board Katherine! I'm looking forward to see you at work.
Lodewijk
2014-03-28 15:10 GMT+01:00 Nurunnaby Chowdhury :
> Hi Katherine, Congratulations & Welcome!
>
> --
> Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive
> User: nhasive
> Sent from my Android Tablet
> On Mar 28
please hold your tongue and be civil. Even if you don't understand
something. Thanks! (and thanks Mike for the link!)
2014-02-25 22:32 GMT+01:00 Huib Laurens :
> What the fuck are you doing?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Alexandros Kosiaris <
> akosia...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
, please leave a note on
https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/The_coolest_projects_of_Wikimedia_Chapters_-_be_inspired.
Looking forward to an awesome presentation, but this time with me in the
comfortable seats,
Lodewijk Gelauff
___
Wikime
eep the discussion streamlined.
Best,
Lodewijk
2014-02-21 0:12 GMT+01:00 Luis Villa :
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Lodewijk >wrote:
>
> > Maybe I missed something, but could you please explain why the Terms of
> Use
> > would be the best place to make this kind of d
e way. The community (both language and project) might want to derive
from it - either way.
Kind regards,
Lodewijk
2014-02-19 23:06 GMT+01:00 Stephen LaPorte :
> Hello all,
>
> We are asking for community input on a proposed amendment to the Wikimedia
> Terms of Use regarding undiscl
Thanks for sharing! I'm amazed by the great work done!
Lodewijk
2014-02-17 21:37 GMT+01:00 Salvador A :
> Dear community:
>
> By means of this mail and on behalf WMMX Board and volunteers i share with
> you the monthly report of our chapter corresponding to January
for is that the board members will finally commit to actually ask
input to all stakeholders before taking major decisions like this, and not
just the staff (and the committee if you really had that illusion).
Best,
Lodewijk
(I write this email entirely in a personal capacity)
2014-02-11 19:27 GMT+01:
valid here.
Lodewijk Gelauff
(While a member of the Affiliations Committee - I write this email entirely
in a personal capacity)
2014-02-11 14:36 GMT+01:00 Jan-Bart de Vreede :
> Dear Frederic,
>
>
> On 11 Feb 2014, at 10:44, Frédéric Schütz wrote:
>
> > On 11/02/14 09:03,
That sounds awesome! Glad it has come to be. Too bad it's so far and
expensive to join or I'd have loved to :)
Lodewijk
2014-01-28 Pharos
> I am very pleased to announce that Wikimedia NYC and Wikimedia DC are
> working in collaboration to host the first national Wikimedia con
until Sarah is able to respond to these accusations which
were published without following proper procedures.
Lodewijk
2014/1/6 Kevin Gorman
> Sarah used to be a DJ in Indianapolis. I don't find it very surprising
> that she'd write an article about a nightclub in Indianapolis.
sumed that files would be treated differently from texts
anyway in this kind of stuff. Just plain curiosity.)
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/12/11 María Sefidari
>
> 11/dic/2013 21:07 "Lodewijk" ha escrito:
>
> > > Hi Maria, thanks for sharing. To appreciate the resolution in
Hi Maria,
thanks for sharing. To appreciate the resolution in its proper context, I
was wondering if you could share if there was a specific trigger to this
amendment?
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/12/11 María Sefidari
> Hi everyone,
>
> We'd like to draw your attention to our recent am
very much.
Lodewijk
2013/12/3 Tilman Bayer
> Note that this solution is still based on proprietary software, in that it
> requires users to install a Flash plugin.
>
> It would be interesting to learn about the experiences of Wikimedia France,
> who has been replacing Skype wi
I would guess either national press, or a change in how the popular search
engines work?
Are we running & recording certain defaulted random queries from time to
time to compare?
Lodewijk
2013/11/22 Erik Zachte
> Hi Strainu,
>
> We noticed and are investigating. It surely loo
ontribute to
this. This is already happening in most countries.
In some countries (like Germany ;-) ) politicians are doing the work for
us, explaining how evil plagiarism is and how it works by firing government
ministers over it :)
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/11/13 Marco Chiesa
> On Wed, Nov 13,
June 2009 was indeed Wiki Loves Art /NL. But wasn't that also already based
on the (different in scope and way it was organized though) New York
edition earlier that year? Smaller in number of organizations, but I
believe not very small in number of photos.
Lodewijk
2013/11/11 Hay (
e sure I'm still up to date on the
latest state of affairs)
Thanks,
Lodewijk
2013/10/15 Katy Love
> Dear members of the Wikimedia community,
>
> I write to remind Wikimedia-affiliated entities interested in
> submitting an annual plan grant proposal to the Funds Dissemination
> C
oard
availability and laying the focus on topics a bit more that are current.
Also, this is much easier :) Lets focus 5 or 6 big topics which can have 2
or 3 sessions each. Lets define desired outcomes for those topics.
Just a thought,
Lodewijk
2013/10/14 Nicole Ebber
> Thanks a lot! And n
It seems like the account has been removed already?
Lodewijk
2013/10/10 Sarah Stierch
> Someone send me a link to this, articles being generated about Wikipedia
> articles:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIafRDt88NQ
>
> based on this:
>
>
> ht
I just wanted to mention I'm very positively surprised by the Indian bid!
It seems at first glance that they are even cheaper than a Berlin
conference - totally unexpected :)
Lodewijk
2013/9/26 Jon Davies
> thanks
> On Sep 26, 2013 3:24 PM, "Nicole Ebber" wro
emark, and re-apply the logo to
its original use.
Tomasz, I hope you will keep the wider community updated on progress being
made in this case.
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/9/21 Tomasz W. Kozlowski
> Hello community,
> this is to inform you that in response to the trademarking of the
> Wikimedia
This was definitely mentioned at Wikimania. What I understood is that it
will be hosted externally for performance and reliability reasons, but that
the rest should remain the same.
Anyway, I'm not an expert here, just what I understood from Matthew Roth &
friends
Lodewijk
2013/9/
27;re
not teaching them bureaucratic tools that are very useful in the US, or
even the Netherlands or France, but might be less... welcomed in South
Africa or Bangladesh.
Lodewijk
2013/8/14 Dariusz Jemielniak
> hi,
>
> I believe that more than external training (useful, but possibly
edits, because it is just quicker
(less clicks, but also faster loading).
Lodewijk
2013/7/31 rupert THURNER
> Am 30.07.2013 20:14 schrieb "David Gerard" :
> >
> > On 30 July 2013 17:03, Erik Moeller wrote:
> >
> > >If the overwhelming community s
#x27;d be able to arrange that
somehow?
We could then flag those discussion topics during the Q&A even.
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/7/29 phoebe ayers
> Hi all,
>
> Every year at Wikimania the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees hosts a
> panel where they take questions from the a
y?
Thanks!
Lodewijk
2013/7/24 Romaine Wiki
> I don't get it... What is the purpose of a temporary opt-out? I don't see
> what that would solve. Power users still don't have a reason to use the VE,
> performance is worse, handy tools are missing and a lot of things can&#x
to
what would exactly be the problems. The poll gives more specific examples
(although I myself don't really agree this weighs against the advantages,
clearly for many they are significant enough).
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/7/22 Samuel Klein
> Hello Romaine,
>
> Speaking only for myself
Hi Oona,
did you already try to contact Wikimedia South Africa about this?
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/7/21 Oona Castro
> Hi all,
>
> I've received an email from the organizers of the 3rd Global Congress on IP
> & OpenAir Conference on Innovation & IP in Africa (
&g
before.
Anasuya: My apologies for being confusing. I was of course referring to the
approval of the WMF 2013/2014 non-core activities, not so much to the
2013/2014 FDC process. I understand from your email that you're confirming
the clear explanation by Anders Wennersten. Thank you for that
ecision, a week after the term was effective.
If such a long preperation is required to communicate the decision, perhaps
it would make sense to adjust the effectivity date accordingly in the
future.
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/7/9 Jan-Bart de Vreede
> Hey
>
> I am also very happy to publicly
does this
have on the available funds for the FDC? (this is probably covered in the
annual plan - apologies for not getting around to reading that yet, I saw
little point yet as it is after the fact anyway)
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/7/17 Anders Wennersten
>
> Seb35 skrev 2013-07-17 15:55:
&g
resending, was bounced.
2013/7/16 Lodewijk
> Maybe this has been asked elsewhere already, apologies in that case, but
> could someone clarify why the Wikimedia Foundation is not eligible any more
> (and did not seem to send a letter of intent) for the FDC process? Does
> this m
ong Kong!
Best,
Lodewijk Gelauff
2013/7/9 Delphine Ménard
> Dear Ana,
>
> I am extremely excited to see you join the Board of the Wikimedia
> Foundation, I know the experience you bring in international
> organisations is going to be invaluable to our movement.
>
> An enormou
Foundation etc? Knowing that would
make it a bit more insightful.
Lodewijk
2013/6/12 Craig Franklin
> Given that this is an assessment that is being performed by paid staff, I
> think it's unreasonable to think that the staff would issue more than very
> mild criticism ("You
ean I
will not include it in my google calendar because it would float the whole
thing too much.
Somehow it would be nice if there would be a menu selection option - what
kind of parts do you want to receive. But that is much harder to maintain I
guess...
Lodewijk
2013/6/7 Nicole Ebber
> Hel
Hi Praveena,
is there a general google agenda feed where this kind of meetings could be
mentioned/announced too? In the past office hours were scheduled that way
(unfortunately someone decided to discontinue that apparently), and that
was very helpful.
Lodewijk
2013/6/6 Praveena Maharaj
and the report following that
appeal on [2], but that is mostly a matter of convenience and having the
information together of course.
Best,
Lodewijk
[1]:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Frequently_asked_questions#complaint
[2]:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Board_decisions/20
first time such complaints
have been filed?
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/6/1 Patricio Lorente
> Dear members of the Wikimedia community,
>
> As you know, on April 28, the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) made
> its Round 2 funding recommendations to the WMF Board of Trustees. [1]
> Fro
ly at longer texts. At short texts there is not enough critical mass to
be precise.
Lodewijk
2013/5/22 MZMcBride
> Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
> >When you're trying to write a blog.wikimedia.org entry or
> >wikitech-ambassadors email about a technical topic, but you want to
mpare
different categories of events with each other.
Lodewijk
2013/5/14 Balázs Viczián
> I see a few misunderstanding here: I do not wish to compare them to each
> other, but to the previous one(s). At least I hope this is what I've
> written because this is what I was ment. So compare
assuming good faith, and think that everyone will be going to
meetings with the best of intentions, and not simply to play tourist.
Lodewijk
2013/5/14 Balázs Viczián
> 40k for a single meetup can be justified if the results worth that much
> money. (I've already argued about this r
2013/5/14 Lodewijk
> I don't think it is trivial either, and having a discussion is fine.
> However, the bigger discussion is perhaps more relevant - because AffCom is
> simply following WMF policy here, which is in place for many employees,
> board members (and others? not sure
for their work. But maybe I'm the only one in thát opinion
though...
Lodewijk
2013/5/14 Andrea Zanni
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:30 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_law_of_triviality
>
>
> I don't really think this
Thank you for taking this step! I am glad that the board now involves the
community in its bylaw changing process.
Lodewijk
2013/4/22 Risker
> Just in case others had problems with the links (thanks gmail...)
>
>
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_byla
isation%20du%20b%C3%A9n%C3%A9volat%20sur%20Wikip%C3%A9dia%20-%20AGWMFR%2027MAI2012.pdf
> >
> > Don't hesitate to ask questions !
> >
> > Plyd
> >
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Seb35
> > Date: 2013/4/8
> > Subject: V
methods.
Lodewijk
[1]: http://www.librijournal.org/pdf/2002-2pp78-87.pdf
[2]:
https://www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index.php/nlasp/article/viewArticle/1213/1498
2013/4/8 Alex Peek
> Clay Shirky talks about the importance of online collaboration:
>
> http://www.ted.
(sorry, this came off a bit too sharp :) Thanks for all the input, anything
is better than nothing of course!)
2013/4/8 Lodewijk
> However, those numbers are not exactly what I'm looking for. I do not want
> to know what it would be worth as a company, or how much people are willi
cs/21573091-how-quantify-gains-internet-has-brought-consumers-net-benefits>
>> http://www.economist.com/**blogs/freeexchange/2013/03/**technology-2<http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/03/technology-2>
>>
>> - of approximately $50m "value" to readers. It
dia worth to society, the way it currently runs.
Alternatively, are there similar studies to other knowledge compendiums, or
even 'the internet'?
Thanks for any pointers!
Lodewijk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lis
either ask the WMF to drop it, or we could simply
design a new one. But before we do that, we should probably create a good
RfC, and get a clear overview of what exactly are all the benefits and
downsides of a registered trademark versus an unregistered one.
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/3/20 Tomasz Gani
Thanks Fae indeed for the hard work. It is a pity that things went as they
went - and that you had to work under tough circumstances. Of course it is
the council as a whole that bears responsibility, but when things go wrong,
you get the heat of it...
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/3/19 Delphine Ménard
great :)
Please note that 'we don't know yet, check back later' is also a helpful
addition to the page regarding travel budget :)
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/3/7 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov
> Hi Lodewijk,
>
> I cannot answer the travel aid quesiton as there is no dedicated, c
Nobody stops you of course to have a 'meeting over lunchtime' but I think
the expectations by the organizers were set a little higher than that.
Lodewijk
(who has some experience with the 'success' of international Wikimedia
over-lunchtime meetings)
2013/3/7 Balázs Viczián
pter. Also, can we already sign up somewhere?
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/3/7 Balázs Viczián
> Hi Jan,
>
> Typically this is what pre conference events are for and quite frankly I
> see more possibilities in it if this would be implemented into the Milan
> event both in the schedule and as
7;s a hostel).
In the region there are not many cheap places (yay european civil
servants!). Their meeting facilities seemed at the time indeed the easiest
too - but perhaps you find something better.
Lodewijk
2013/3/6 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov
> Hey Christophe,
>
> Since I am on lo
t law?
Lodewijk
2013/3/3 Fae
> On 3 March 2013 06:50, James Alexander wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Tobias Oelgarte <
> > tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The problem are not the European laws. It are the US laws that don't
As a true Dutch, I shouldn't even consider to share... it is only to get
through the days and survive without having to touch local cuisine...
(French and Germans will probably be able to confirm this) :P
Lodewijk
2013/2/18 Theo10011
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Lodewijk
As a true Dutch, I should bring potatoes, peanut butter and hagelslag.
Lodewijk
2013/2/18 Deryck Chan
> No, because you haven't described what you're bringing :)
>
> On the other hand, a detailed, grammatically correct description of
> stroopwafels will almost certainly g
oh... so replying with "I will bring my own food" wasn't such a good idea
after all? ;-)
2013/2/18 Liam Wyatt
> On Monday, 18 February 2013, Abbas Mahmood wrote:
>
> > > From: liamwy...@gmail.com
> > > Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:47:06 +
> > > To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Subjec
d the committee since 2010, and Damian was the longest serving member,
being appointed in 2007! Thanks a lot for your time and effort in the past
years.
I look forward to an exciting time, with many applicants in the pipeline to
be (hopefully) approved!
Best regards,
Lodewijk Gelauff
selection coordi
And I'm also unsure all the upload wizards have the same text?
2013/1/22 David Gerard
> On 22 January 2013 17:41, Philippe Beaudette
> wrote:
>
> > FYI, each and every edit on Commons has this text above the edit box:
> > "...You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the
ed on for example
September 1 (launch) and October 1 (results). We didn't find a perfect
solution yet though, and input on how to manage that properly is always
welcome.
If it is an announcement that is less tied to a specific/symbolic day, this
is of course all less important.
Best,
Lodewijk
confusing this way. We faced the same problems at Wiki Loves Monuments
(where we mostly used European timezones, as the vast majority of the
countries was in that), and some good thoughts about the general issue
would definitely be welcome. Maybe not today though.
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/1/15
Hi all,
this is the last reminder that the call will be closing on January 12 -
this is four days from now.
Please share the call for candidates on relevant fora.
Best regards,
Lodewijk Gelauff
2013/1/2 Lodewijk
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to take this opportunity to remind you
short style and consistent pace of the
Dutch reports - a compliment should be made where appropriate!
Best,
Lodewijk
2013/1/7 Cornelius Kibelka
> I agree as well. At least at short list of the main topics would help a
> lot.
>
> Regards,
> Cornelius
>
>
> Cornelius Kib
organizations to get started? Then please apply! I hope
for many high quality applications!
Best,
Lodewijk
2012/12/12 Bence Damokos
> Dear all,
>
> The Affiliations Committee [1], the committee that is responsible for
> guiding volunteers in establishing Chapters, User Groups and Thematic
>
scopes of these organizations) I would
appreciate suggestions in how clarity can be achieved.
Best,
Lodewijk
2012/12/28 Thomas Dalton
> Very nice! I'll expect a performance in Hong Kong!
>
> On a serious note, have you seen Geoff's comments on naming of affiliate
> organisa
Thanks!
2012/11/27 Zack Exley
> One more thing I should have mentioned: We'll still be testing from time to
> time around the world during the rest of November and December. So don't be
> alarmed if you see banners up. We're still actively trying to improve
> donation processing and translations
se 10%, 40%, 70% or 90% of the whole movement budget? (I know I could
probably look up last years numbers and guess some myself, but you probably
already did this :) ).
Best,
Lodewijk
2012/11/26 Zack Exley
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Thomas Dalton >wrote:
>
> > On Nov
201 - 300 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
