Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:27:25 -0600
From: James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Wiki Travel Guide
Message-ID:
caf1en7ubs8eabne-3l_mzxwc8tcwq3o5sblwmcvho3fyixr...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Yes
such a condescending and
passive-aggressive response.
I'm sure you're all very busy but that's no excuse for not continually
striving for a higher standard of transparency and accountability (within
the obvious restrictions that your work imposes).
Regards,
Craig Franklin
Firstly, let me say this is very very cool news.
I went to go and have a browse though, and it's all tied up in a
massive (around 3gb) archive file rather than being easily browsable.
I know that WikiData is the obvious place to put it, but perhaps it
would be useful as a reference work on
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 20:08:44 -0700
From: Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] IRC office hours with Sue Gardner, 5/11 at
17:00 UTC
Message-ID:
Can I second this one, we've run into it occasionally in WMAU outreach
sessions as well, and it's always fun explaining why it's said no to
someone without a foundation in computers or internet culture. A brief
explanation of why it's happened and what to do in order to not lose your
edit, made
, and don't try to bang a wiki-shaped peg into a bugzilla-shaped
hole.
(single sign-on across to bugzilla would be very cool though!)
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
What a dreadful loss. I never knew Aaron except through his work and his
writings, but he always came across as a confident person who was truly
passionate about the work that he did. We're all the poorer for his
passing. My condolences to everyone on this list who knew him.
Regards,
Craig
to a good start if the project still a
rather limited set of rules, and wishes to remain so.
Kind Regards,
Craig Franklin
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
.
Regards,
Craig Franklin
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:00:21 +0100
From: Manuel Schneider manuel.schnei...@wikimedia.ch
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia (Foundation) endowment
Message-ID: 5141bbd5.8050...@wikimedia.ch
Content-Type
that
after a consultation period with our members, the committee at our meeting
yesterday approved the changes. The new committee is as follows:
President: Craig Franklin
Secretary: Graham Pearce
Treasurer: John Vandenberg
Members: Kerry Raymond, Steve Zhang
Observers: Charles Gregory, Ross
Sue DID seem to enjoy herself when she was here recently. Hell, I'd settle
for Premier of Queensland at this rate. Whaddaya say, Sue?
Cheers,
Craig
On 28/03/2013 8:02 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Mathias Schindler
mathias.schind...@gmail.com
pitfalls with this
model that have been discussed many times - there are many potential COI
issues, and paid editing in some areas may discourage unpaid editing in
others. However, I think it would be unwise simply to dismiss those sort
of possibilities out of hand.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 30
got this secured we’ll let you know
straight away. At the moment it is planned to be an all day event, but if
you can’t spare the entire day feel free to drop in whenever.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
Wikimedia Australia
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
to see many of you there!
Regards,
Craig Franklin
Wikimedia Australia
On 2 April 2013 21:33, Craig Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:
Hi Sydneysiders,
As the WMAU committee will be in Sydney this weekend for the Wikimedia in
Higher Education
symposiumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
by noboard_chapterswikimedia though - what is this for?
To those wondering what sort of mysterious secrets are held on them, the
answer is not much interesting. Mainly contact details and a
semi-out-of-date listing for the internal-l mailing list, as far as I can
see.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 3
...and ensuring its translated into as many languages as possible!
On 06/04/2013 7:10 AM, Peter Southwood peter.southw...@telkomsa.net
wrote:
Well that's one way of drawing attention to the site...
- Original Message - From: Tomasz W. Kozłowski
odder.w...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia
Excellent idea Ziko! I have added the WMAU strategic plan (
http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/Strategic_plan ) to the list on Meta also.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
President - Wikimedia Australia
On 23 April 2013 09:21, Everton Zanella Alvarenga t...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Great idea. [2]
I think
Ting,
I don't think that Itzik has said anywhere that the election committee is
doing a bad job. I think he is simply saying that you shouldn't have to
commit to having a meeting every week since February just to have an
opinion on the topic that is taken seriously.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
in preparing their application, but also help them set realistic goals on
what could be achieved would no doubt increase the quality of FDC
applications and also focus chapters on delivering useful programme work,
without causing any bitterness about the Foundation at the same time.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
If the Register hates it, that usually indicates to me that it is a
fantastic idea.
On 02/05/2013 1:07 PM, shi zhao shiz...@gmail.com wrote:
see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/
The Act contains changes to UK copyright law which permit the
commercial exploitation of
salary
going.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 11 May 2013 21:15, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the email that got sent out to everyone,
---
Dear XXX,
Thank you for your work with the Foundation wiki. At this time, we
are formalizing a new requirement, which is that administrator
Yes, this.
I must admit, it's tremendously demotivating and makes me quite upset that
people like Aphaia, Anthere, Danny B. and Thehelpfulone, people who have
put hundreds if not thousands of hours of effort into this movement without
asking for a single cent, over many many years, are treated as
Well, perhaps there was extensive consultation from Phillippe and Gayle if
it had been planned over a long period of time and I just missed it. If
that's the case, I'm sure that one of them will point it out for us first
thing on Monday morning, at which point I'd have to start removing egg from
Thanks for clarifying this Phillippe.
I must say that I think this discussion is becoming unpleasantly personal
(and my initial email on the topic probably didn't help there, I concede).
How about we stop pointing fingers at each other and conduct an honest and
transparent appraisal of what has
Upon reading Gayle's response, and reflecting on some of the comments I
made on Saturday night, I have come to the conclusion that some of the
things I said may have come across as a little harsh and condescending.
While that was my intention (my point was that sometimes the community
can bite,
All other things aside, misspelling the person's name and then calling them
an asshole is hardly likely to lead to an amicable solution, peace, love,
or understanding, is it?
On 13 May 2013 21:09, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
Tillman,
For the record, the time between your e-mail
and not
onerous to implement, and I urge the FDC to accept and implement these
recommendations as quickly as possible.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
2013/5/15 Susana Morais susana.mor...@wikimedia.pt
Hello,
For all of you who are interested, I posted on Meta a report concerning an
appeal regarding
Wow, I'm on the road, bur suggesting that someone ought to leave after one
public error? That's brutal. Hope I never come across you while doing my
day job!
Cheers,
Craig
On 26/05/2013 5:35 AM, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 20:33:57 +0200
From: Federico Leva
and easily replaced logo of ours does not offer a very good risk/reward
ratio in my view.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 1 June 2013 19:59, Peter Southwood peter.southw...@telkomsa.net wrote:
Has anyone done a search on other logos with similar characteristics, to
see how much they differ? I think
On 2 June 2013 00:22, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Craig Franklin wrote:
I'm sure that the legal team has done their homework on this and would not
have made this recommendation unless they felt that the WTO had a credible
argument. Asking the Foundation to play chicken
with
next will be very fortunate indeed!
Regards,
Craig Franklin
On 8 June 2013 02:32, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
I am leaving the movement. I thought to leave it quietly, with just a
bit more than a few words to stewards and Wikimedia Serbia, but after
the first question why I am
at the database or OS layers.
I wouldn't say that there's nothing to worry about, but at the same time I
doubt we're near the top of the spooks' priority list.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 10 June 2013 13:05, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Benoit Landry benoit_lan
If the NSA, CIA, or some other spook agency is getting information off of
Wikimedia servers, they don't have a CU account or anything like that.
They'd have a program running at the operating system level that extracts
the data in a standardised format and sends it off to some secret server
think may have the unfortunate side-effect of
encouraging entities to go after easily measurable activities rather than
the most effective and worthwhile activities. Hopefully this will be taken
into account on future assessments.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 12 June 2013 20:52, Federico Leva
Thanks SJ for these thoughts, it's gratifying and encouraging that we have
a WMF trustee on the case :-)
While getting chapter staff to likewise review reports is a good idea,
there are two potential problems that I can see with it:
1. Chapter staff may be unwilling to criticise the reports of
This is a really wonderful project, I am a big believer in producing
educational opportunities to gaoled prisoners so that they can lead more
productive lives upon their release, and hopefully this project goes a
little way towards making that happen.
Bravo, Wikimedia CH!
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
I think what's really offensive here is the implication that having a tat
means that you're not professional. I don't have any ink myself, but I
respect the choice of those who do.
To be honest, I like the occasionally goofy pictures and profiles on the
WMF staff page; it shows that there are
As SJ and John have pointed out, there are many good reasons to wikify
documents like this, not in the least to allow deep linking, and make
reading more convenient on mediums that don't play nicely with PDF (like
smartphones). So long as the wikified version is protected so as to
maintain its
Did she get permission to use the trademark in that way by WMF legal? :-)
On 17/07/2013 1:41 AM, Steffen Prößdorf steffen.proessd...@wikimedia.de
wrote:
Hi there,
2013/7/15 Melanie Brown mbr...@wikimedia.org
Hello Everyone,
As for the insights on staff photos, thank you for your
in this
case, although I understand the political pressures in getting the product
shipped on time.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
if we got a bit of direction on how
we could be the most useful.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
* Keeping in mind that my chapter probably wouldn't have the capacity to
start anything in this space for at least another twelve months.
On 27 July 2013 09:57, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed
in
the tab so people know what they're getting), so there's not much left
except to say thanks and I appreciate it.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 2 August 2013 03:05, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Kevin Wayne Williams
kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com wrote
If we make it easier for people to contribute, we're also making it easier
for people to contribute stuff we don't want.
The tradeoff is definitely worth it though.
Cheers,
Craig
On 26/08/2013 10:56 AM, Kevin Wayne Williams kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com
wrote:
It does, however, get its share of
Hi,
A few people asked me with varying degrees of seriousness about this in
Hong Kong, so I'll just put this out there and say that Wikimedia Australia
will not be in a position to host this event in 2014.
Regards,
Craig Franklin
President - Wikimedia Australia
On 16 September 2013 22:11
Hi All,
Folk interested in Wikisource and/or libraries might be interested in this
update from an interesting project being run with WMAU at the moment.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
Date: 21 September 2013 20:09
Subject
Hi All,
Just a quick thought: I'm disappointed by the way that both sides in this
dispute seem to have resorted to conducting a debate via press release.
I think the community expectation would be that rather than this weird
passive-aggressive way of communicating, that all parties would arrange
,
Craig Franklin
On 22 October 2013 22:52, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Craig Franklin
cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:
Hi,
I've been aware of this brewing, but can only say that I'm pleased to
finally reach the surface. There is no good reason for part
,
unfortunately.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 26 November 2013 07:50, Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
My team is doing some background research in to Wikipedia article creation
right now.[1] One question I'd like answer is which Wikipedias are
currently (i.e. this year
to bed.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 8 December 2013 11:05, Geoff Brigham gbrig...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
The consultation
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Logo/Request_for_consultation
has
been closed on the question about the community logo registration.
Many thanks to everyone
Hi Jane,
I am concerned about the issue surrounding the comment the real BLP
problems happen when heavyweight (in edit count terms) Wikipedia users
swing their weight around
I think the problem is that if you ask ten different people about the
reason why we have BLP problems, you'll get ten
On 15 December 2013 02:54, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Craig Franklin
cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:
Hi Jane,
I am concerned about the issue surrounding the comment the real BLP
problems happen when heavyweight (in edit count terms
Jasper has tried to give you honest, useful information based on his actual
experience and expertise in the matter, without drawing too much attention
to your clear lack of knowledge on this topic. He deserves better than
sarcasm and insults from you.
Regards,
Craig
On 30 December 2013 17:53,
There seems to be some pretty heavy assumptions in Odder's article - it all
just seems to be speculation based upon one very vague comment in her work
history. Was she contacted before the blog post was made and brought to
this list to ask for clarification?
Cheers,
Craig
On 6 January 2014
On 12 January 2014 02:58, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Craig Franklin wrote:
I think it's actually foolish to try and split hairs over what is
acceptable paid editing and what is unacceptable paid editing. The facts
of the matter are that paid editing is taking place right now
12:29, Craig Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.netwrote:
On 12 January 2014 02:58, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Craig Franklin wrote:
I think it's actually foolish to try and split hairs over what is
acceptable paid editing and what is unacceptable paid editing. The
facts
to look
for a replacement? Does the BoT have a contingency plan in case Sue does
decide to leave before a permanent replacement is found?
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 21 January 2014 21:09, Jan-Bart de Vreede jdevre...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Hey Frederico
I will write an update for the meta page
or may not be involved in a confidential
hiring process in a public forum such as this. I suspect you're wasting
your metaphorical breath in continually asking for these sorts of details.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 31 January 2014 16:08, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
My suggestion
The Foundation. Which is why WMFI shouldn't try to reply to this except to
refer them on.
Cheers,
Craig
On 08/02/2014 11:11 AM, Isarra Yos zhoris...@gmail.com wrote:
Who exactly would the webmaster of fi.wikipedia.org even be?
On 08/02/14 00:24, Kevin Gorman wrote:
My Finnish is hardly
Awful, awful news. My condolences to his family, friends, and the WMUA
community =(.
On 24 February 2014 09:01, Maryana Pinchuk mpinc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
For those of you who don't read Ukrainian, a quick ad-hoc translation of
the blog post. So sorry for the loss of a fellow Ukrainian
Hear that sound?
That's the sound of a million data miners working to figure out what juicy
bit of info has been redacted.
Cheers,
Craig
On 25 February 2014 09:48, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
The archives were rebuilt (and then restored up to January) under request
of a
In addition to Risker's comments, which I agree with 100%, I would further
request that any future survey of users be designed and supervised only by
someone with extensive expertise and experience in the field of survey
methodology. Many previous surveys that have been done by the Foundation
wish you all the very best in your future endeavours.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 31 March 2014 03:59, Ziko van Dijk vand...@wmnederland.nl wrote:
Dear colleagues, collaborators and friends of free knowledge,
After three eventful years I left the board of Wikimedia Nederland;
yesterday
Thankyou from me as well, it's refreshing to see such a candid summary of
the failings that occurred in this case, and to see the Foundation taking
responsibility for those. I hope that the opportunity can be taken for all
of us to learn from this so that it does not happen with future projects.
I agree with Ziko's point entirely here. The two people who have taken
part in this discussion so far who were present at the time have not given
anything to indicate it was more than a flippant remark made in a stressful
situation. Not that I agree with the sentiment of course, but I'm glad
I find myself in furious agreement with Charles here. For years the
Foundation has been insisting (and quite rightly so) that allied
organisations consider only the stark benefit-per-dollar that they can
extract for each piece of movement funding, as measured by KPIs and
metrics. Handing out
that don't share our particular mission.
Cheers,
Craig
On 16 April 2014 22:05, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 April 2014 13:03, Craig Franklin cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:
Grants directed to the development specific functionality that Wikimedia
can use and which can later
On 16 May 2014 15:09, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
But of course, you, with a grand total of 303 edits on Commons going
back to 2007 (most of which comprises of voting on Picture of the
Year) are speaking from a position of experience when you say you
understand Commons and
Look, we have quite enough non-constructive passive-aggressive stuff going
on here without it being added to with thinly veiled threats like this.
Please stop.
I think the main issue that people have here is that Sue was very private
about her private life, at least in public. Now we have the
On 29 May 2014 07:13, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
Child Protection- I'd like to hear about ways that policy might be
changed here to better protect children, especially given some of the
content on Commons. I'd also like to hear about specific examples of
content
Hi Wil,
I think the advice in this thread from John and Dariusz is excellent, and
well worth taking on board.
Energy is good, and disruption to shake us out of our status quo is good.
But at the moment, your communication style is swamping this list and
that's getting people's backs up. The
it
started to become more responsive to community expectations, more
transparent, and all around effective as a governance group. I am sure
that this is not a coincidence.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 4 June 2014 02:17, Alice Wiegand me.ly...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to the organizers and facilitators
As someone who usually wears a suit and tie to Wikimedia events when I go
(Hong Kong last year was the exception to that for the most part, way too
humid), my advice to people would be to wear whatever the hell you feel
comfortable in, subject to the normal standards of decency and the local
Indeed. The thing that I like about this is that it shows these PR firms
are aware of our rules and the controversy around paid editing. If they
now get busted, they can hardly say that they didn't know.
Regards,
Craig Franklin
On 13 June 2014 00:17, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu
I must agree with the frustration over the quality of discussion on this
mailing list lately, but I did want to make clear my appreciation to the
list admins, who have decided to avoid playing semantic word games over
what is and is not appropriate, and started moderating people who want to
use
On 22 June 2014 09:53, Dan Rosenthal swatjes...@gmail.com wrote:
I might point out that I've perhaps needled GerardM more than most people
on this list (and even been moderated for it once years ago), but I find
his posts about WikiData interesting and I read them when I can. I think
Thomas
Pardon me if this has already been covered, but as I understand it the
problem is not the legal status of the files in Israel, the problem is with
the legal status of the files in the United States, where the Israeli
Government may still have some copyright protections. So while the
contents of
russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
Craig, et al
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Craig Franklin
cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:
Pardon me if this has already been covered, but as I understand it the
problem is not the legal status of the files in Israel, the problem is
with
the legal
I've spent a half hour or so going through this, and it looks like Nathan
is on the money here. If RCOM is as inactive as it seems (except where it
concerns the research of RCOM members) then it is no great surprise that
external parties eventually try to do an end-run around it. Unless an
like what happened on de.wp?
Thanks,
Craig Franklin
On 10 August 2014 23:27, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi folks,
Admins are currently given broad leeway to customize the user
experience for all users, including addition of site-wide JS, CSS,
etc. These are important
I agree with this wholeheartedly. When I think back to when I was new on
Wikipedia, pretty early on I got an honest-to-god personal message from
someone to thank me for correcting a typo (
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lankiveildiff=5647166oldid=5629943
).
It made me feel
be
intelligently reasoned with, they only harden feelings on both sides and
make a suitable arrangement being found less likely. No employee should be
made to receive that sort of harassment in the course of their job, no
matter how much you disagree with them.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 1
,
Craig Franklin
On 5 October 2014 18:04, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Itzik,
If I understand you correctly, you are asking about whether WMF and
thematic organization bylaws should allow employees to vote in trustee
elections for their own orgs.
I can see how this could create
eyes will
assist the engineering team in pushing through the present difficulties
with software deployments.
Regards,
Craig Franklin
On 7 October 2014 11:02, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello and welcome, Damon.
One thing I've long appreciated about the Wikimedia movement
of chapter
and user group press contacts being the last people to find out about
potentially controversial issues like this.
Regards,
Craig Franklin
(personal view only)
On 13 November 2014 10:07, Joseph Seddon josephsed...@gmail.com wrote:
I would hate to preclude any answer from
and the
community, and it would be a shame if that was undone through more moments
of carelessness like this one.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 14 November 2014 11:16, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Geoff Brigham wrote:
In that context, we feel that laws in Russia offer a number of possible
of a factor.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia
Forget that, I'd like WMUK to fly me to Scotland so that I can, uh,
research and write about various types of whisky.
Cheers,
Craig
On 25 November 2014 at 18:59, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
And next the wine project? Count me in.
On 24 November 2014 at 18:22, Christophe
in Megan Hernandez, the Director of Online Fundraising in the
hope of getting a comment, just in case she's not aware of this discussion.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 27 November 2014 at 21:44, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
This notwithstanding, I think the issue *yet again*, is a lack
Am I the only one that sees the irony in asking folks not to pick on the
Commons community, then immediately asserting that enwp is the source of
all drama?
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 12/12/2014 4:56 PM, Pipo Le Clown plecl...@gmail.com wrote:
As you said, the first issue of Commons
very much, but needed more to
build cool new tools, improve the quality of the project content, and
implement more innovative projects to meet our movement's goals.
Regards,
Craig Franklin
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https
rules for
the content, and make your own rules about what is and is not allowed.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 5 January 2015 at 23:42, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
This sounds like a Wikisource idea - do we have any wikisourcerers who can
give their thoughts?
Richard
Hi Pine,
That's great to hear, I was really pleased with how Xero worked for our
organisation and I hope it's just as good for you. If you (or any other
user group) need a hand with it, please feel free to drop me a line as I've
a few years experience with it now.
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On 16
On 24 February 2015 at 09:40, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Philippe Beaudette wrote:
Five years ago, I was part of the work on a strategic plan for the
Wikimedia movement. Much has changed since then. Now, I’m back...and
we’re working on strategic direction again. :-)
Hi.
I
Indeed.
Unfortunately I'm just heading out so i can't waffle at length, but there
are two active projects in Australia in Fremantle and Toodyay.
Cheers,
Craig
On 01/05/2015 7:45 AM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe Wikimedia AU did some work with this type of stuff…
On
this particular egg, as relocating now would probably end up costing more
than would be saved by moving to a lower cost centre, which is unfortunate.
Regards,
Craig Franklin
On 10 April 2015 at 01:47, Garfield Byrd gb...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi Fae,
We have 215 staff in total, with a hub of activity
Hello,
Might I suggest that if folks want to continue talking about this, they
rename this thread, as it is no longer about Kourosh Karimkhany, and it is
just creating background noise for those of us who have no desire to
discuss the whole Wikipedia Zero freedom thing yet again?
Cheers,
Craig
I think this is dancing around the perceived problem. You can either have
open, democratic, and fair elections with a result that represents the will
of the electorate, or you can have a group of people who are diverse in
terms of nationality, gender, ethnicity, etcetera. Not both. And I don't
It has been my experience that site banners are the best way to reach
casual readers who are not already integrated into the projects and
existing communication channels. This is why the Fundraising team run
banners, rather than begging for money through Facebook and targeted talk
page messages,
On 12 August 2015 at 14:41, Bohdan Melnychuk bas...@yandex.ru wrote:
... It has a trail of bad usage it is connected with. ...
I'm not sure I agree with that. There are two known uses. The first one,
where a software tool was locked in over the consensus of the community was
a bad usage I'll
Indeed, as Kirill says, the grants process is owned by the WMF (albeit one
hosted on Meta), not by the community, so I'm not sure why the Meta
community needs to get involved. It actually seems to me that the
foundation wiki would be a better home for processes like this so that
community
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
