DirecTV that include the channels they are after and be done
with it.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 8:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IPTV
Brad Belton wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IPTV
Brad Belton wrote:
We have (off and on) been looking for the same solution, however we came
to
a conclusion years ago. Why not just re-sell Direct TV or Dish
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 8:43 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IPTV
Brad Belton wrote:
Correct, we see the same requests. However, why try re-inventing the
wheel
when DirecTV already has a solution in place? Every time this issue has
popped up the client was more than happy
for ultra-rural WISPs because of
really low densities and so forth. In areas with higher densities
(definitely MDU), it is viable and deployable
-Clint Ricker
Kentnis Technologies
On 9/10/07, Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, but IMO just not quite ready for prime time . yet
Butthe world does revolve around the Good 'ol United States! Nothing
new about that!
lol...ducking
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Carl A jeptha
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 2:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
McD's!!
Sheesh, don't sell yourself short. If they want to be an ISP then they need
to pay for a T1 and pay T1 prices.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 8:47 AM
To: WISPA General
...
been there done that, long story.
Frank Muto
President
FSM Marketing Group, Inc.
Postini Gold Partner
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 10:12 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA
BTW we've been there done that with a long story too, but were successful.
grin
As with anything your mileage will vary.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 10:42 AM
To: 'WISPA
I agree the oozing gel can be a mess, but it should be nonconductive and
have no adverse effects to an Ethernet port.
Years ago I found an eight port Netgear switch nearly flooded with the oozed
gel mess. Didn't seem to affect it in the least.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From:
I could swear I detect a slight jubilation in your tone Patrick. Is this
rule change really in the best interest of the UL fixed wireless operator?
What better excuse could Alvarion ask for in not offering an UL dual or
tri-band product? Now you are comfortably able to hang your hat on the FCC
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 4:08 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Witching hour looms for 5.3 GHz - Can't buy any
moreaftertomorrow
I could swear I detect a slight jubilation in your tone Patrick. Is
this
rule change
moreaftertomorrow
Rumor has it that Trango is just waiting FCC approval for a new triband
5ghz AP (5.3ghz, 5.4ghz and 5.8ghz). It will also have more horsepower
than the current 5830, but still be backward compatible with existing
SU's. Same 10Mbps bandwidth limit however.
Travis
Microserv
Brad Belton
This topic has come up many times over the years. I don't recall any real
consensus was ever reached based on a multiple due to the wide variation of
one operation to another.
How is it that one operation with 500 users is worth the same as another
operation with 500 users?
Would you pay the
that is. I
don't think they (HD) sell them without installation.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 9:26 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Low cost generator
Brad Belton wrote:
So, you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 10:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Low cost generator
You could just add a line conditioner.
Brad Belton wrote:
We have found many (most all?) 10kW job
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Low cost generator
Brad,
You can adjust the sensitivity of the APC UPS's to handle just about any
type of incoming power. We have run a tower off a cheap Home Depot 2000watt
by adjusting the APC so it would not keep switching off an on.
Travis
Microserv
Brad Belton
So, you bought this LP Natural Gas generator for $1460 delivered,
including tax and transfer switch?
http://www.electricgeneratorsdirect.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id
=370
That is an amazing deal! Maybe Lowe's made a mistake on the price?
Brad
-Original Message-
From:
That was probably for Rev3 gear. I believe that deal is no longer
available, but I could be wrong.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 11:11 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
Agreed, but I think all the excitement was anticipating a new low price
point that Trango was promising. Trango did come in a bit cheaper, but not
cheap enough to really create any street parties.
Basically the money is the same between DragonWave and Trango, but Trango
gives you 100MB for
Hey Charles,
I tried contacting you off list, but got a reply from your filter
application. Just making sure you got my email.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 9:10 AM
To: WISPA
I didn't until nowgrin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder_code#Transponder_codes
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Kerns
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 10:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] LIST
Wasn't there an ISP in Puerto Rico that was fined because they had set their
gear (Aperto I think) to a higher power than they should have? The
manufacturer's manual clearly stated it was up to the user to follow the
rules and regulations of the country the gear is deployed.
So, if this is the
Or maybe it was Adaptive Broadband gear that allowed the end user to break
the rules? Anyone remember?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Brad Belton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:56 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: Not Babble: WAS Re: [WISPA] MT
How would the number of customers I had on my network have any bearing on
this discussion?
Well, it's a lot like having a medical intern weigh in on what a resident is
more qualified to answer. Certainly the intern is not to be considered a
dummy, but the intern's general lack of tenure, real
The issue you are seeing with minor packet loss may be due to the RB44G
cards. I know they initially had issues, but I haven't personally had the
time to test the RB44G again since my post on the MT forum back in March.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2t=14316hilit=
If you need GigE
Correct. The RB44g had issues with earlier MT OS versions. I haven't
tested the RB44g yet again, but I think they have resolved the issue.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=14316highlight=rb44gsid=479f896a
017421b1fc3b34a37f5135e6
The RB44 is a solid performer. We've ever had any
Hello Tom,
Interesting...we've never seen this problem before with countless RB44s
deployed. I suspect it isn't solely a RB44 issue, but probably a hardware
combination of some sort.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom
Very cool video Stephen!
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephen Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 10:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Nifty new tool for the cable ops
Zack, you flatter us!
BTW, how is the 80GHz system coming along? Any information you can share
yet?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephen Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 10:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP]
All,
I really don't think Travis is trying to insult anyone, but simply stating
the facts.
Everyone here that has scaled to any level understands the complexities of a
network and the business are compounded as it grows.
Nothing against Marlon, but his argument of comparing multiple upstream
You make it sound like that can happen in a matter of minutes or even
seconds. Not likely the case. All the while your clients are getting hosed
due to the negligence of another.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adam
This is exactly what we have done. We brought two DS3's out to a rural area
and have broken off parts of that bandwidth to other ISPs. In fact as I
type we have failed over part of one ISP's network over a geographically
diverse third backhaul we have back into town.
I believe we extended an
Hello Sam,
Curious if both DS3 cards have the lockup problem? You do still have two of
them, right? If so, it is unlikely you have two bad DS3 cards. Especially
because if they are the ones you bought from me I know they are good!
grin
We never had any trouble with them interfacing our ATT
Wow, then it has to be a MikroTik issue. We ran them under v2.8.x for
better than a year (or two?) can't remember that far back these days it
seems! sigh
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Saturday, April
Surely you don't see this as any kind of surprise?
Like I've been saying all along, the Cellular guys will dominate the Mobile
User market. Muni-Networks are, IMO, largely a get rich quick scheme for
the few that are talented enough to sway overeager city counsels into
writing big checks for a
In order for the license to be enforced it has to be in use. There are
obvious exceptions; building the link, link is down for maintenance etc.
For the most part if the link isn't up for a consecutive period of time (and
demonstrated as such) then it could be passed on to someone else. Seems
include American Tower,
Crown Castle and SpectraSite. I can't believe that those companies
would want to do anything to screw up either the availability of
frequencies or the sale of vertical real estate on their tower
properties.
Have a good day,
jack
Brad Belton wrote:
Hello
. I am not trying to stop you from helping, quite the contrary. You
obviously feel strongly about this issue so please send us what you find
so we can make an informed decision on how best to proceed.
Scriv
Brad Belton wrote:
... I am sure we could setup a committee to work on 11 GHz dish size
the policy for our industry in the future as opposed to rapid
fire commenting on other people's work all the time.
Scriv
Brad Belton wrote:
Agreed. Just getting caught up on some of my email readings and strongly
believe Jack and John are off the mark here.
6GHz, 11GHz, 18GHz, 23GHz, 24GHz
Or possibly called BGP...
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan Langseth
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 9:41 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] McCaw losing money?
Yea there is, its call DNS
Ryan
On Wed,
. THEN, IF
there's a problem, figure out how to deal with it.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 10:00 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC requests comment on smaller dishes for 11 GHz
Marlon,
11GHz
I don't think you would select 11GHz to go 100'. That's the whole
point...let's hope FCC doesn't screw up 11GHz by allowing it's use for
short haul applications.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent:
as it leads to an understanding of what the real issues are and
builds our credibility with the FCC, the manufacturers, and the public
at large. Real understanding benefits everybody.
Best Regards,
jack
Brad Belton wrote:
Agreed. Just getting caught up on some of my email readings
)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 6:08 AM
Subject
Agreed. Just getting caught up on some of my email readings and strongly
believe Jack and John are off the mark here.
6GHz, 11GHz, 18GHz, 23GHz, 24GHz, 60GHz and 80-90GHz should all be important
to us as a group. Any frequency that can be used by fixed wireless
operators should be important
Hello Tom,
Got any pictures?
Good to hear they improved the mounting design. The old design was too
small for many of the pipes we use. If the new design will accommodate 3
1/2 - 4 pipes then that is a nice improvement.
Wow, they changed the CAT5 weather seal and now a terminated CAT5 cable
Oh dear, please keep the off topic comments off list and under your tinfoil
hat.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 11:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Spring has sprung!
In the event we need to extend a CAT5 cable we use the 3M UY connectors.
Keep the twist of each wire as close as possible and then tape, Coax-Seal
and more tape. We've never had a problem with this method...knock on wood.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Correct and that I believe is what Matt's point is. Too early to kick CLWR
to the curb for at least two reasons:
(1) short term market downturn
(2) additional 4M shares issued
Both of these items can and often will soften a stock value.
All that said I think $20 - $24 a share is ridiculous
to be made for a company to survive long term,
when they are kept alive by the stock market?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent
money sitting
around to invest, shouldn't we be investing it in ourselves for a higher
return and less risk?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent
The McKinney, TX address doesn't come up as a good address using Yahoo or
Google maps. Can you confirm the address, provide coordinates or possibly
identify the closest major intersection?
What type of service are they looking for?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
No kidding.
So...in one breath you're saying WISPA isn't playing the FCC Cop, and in
another you make a completely unfounded comment like this? shaking head
I must have missed where Travis said he was deploying 5.4GHz APs and
thumbing his nose at the FCC.
Geesh, what an outlandish and
Somebody turn the flip'n moderation back on!
Patrick, let's be clear; you're motivation is driven only by pushing more
Alvarion boxes off the shelf. Don't try to play the white knight here under
the guise of looking out for everyone. You're a company man simply after
what puts food on your
Agreed. Crazy.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:51 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Disagree with me and I won't buy your product
I've been following the increasingly
Crazy as an astronaut with a BB gun in a diaper on a road trip on a mission
to kill someone. grin
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE:
Appears to be a manual thing...
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I'm gonna do the honors without permission--
Simple, you price it for what your market will bear. 15Mbps handed off via
a few feet of CAT5 inside a CoLo center is obviously less costly than 15Mbps
several miles from the central business district.
Per MB prices can range from several hundred (or more) dollars a MB to less
than a few bucks a
grin...read my mind.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Have you thought about selling the customer a
Holy cow! Stepped away from the 'puter for a bit and see that everyone's
beating up on poor 'ol Matt for making a perfectly correct statement!
No surprise as to some of the people commenting here that largely promote
best effort gear, but others that have commented should know better.
Rick,
I'll agree with Mark on this. There are many that are exploiting city
counsel's across the country to only line their own pockets. I have read
about one muni-wifi failure after another...point me to a real success
story. As a percentage my guess is the failures far, far outweigh the
successes.
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Muni networks, the good, bad and ugly
Brad,
Here is a link you might want to read up on.
http://muniwireless.com/municipal/1556
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Brad Belton wrote:
I'll agree with Mark on this. There are many that are exploiting city
counsel's across the country to only
Nice job.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 8:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Scrivner's story
*A WISP with Vision *
Ahh ok, neither do I or the people I've spoken with about this. In another
post I illustrated the Alvarion VL pin out is simply inverted. Don't see
how that could make any difference in cross talk rejection.
So, can we expect Alvarion will at some point begin to adhere to industry
wiring codes?
Hello Tom,
First let me saydamn Cowboys...sigh
I'm not sure I follow exactly what you are saying, but we have pushed better
than 800Mbps HDX and more than 700Mbps FDX aggregate between GigE MT
routers. Checking the router Interfaces show a 1500MTU setting. Is that
what you are talking
Hello Patrick,
Thanks for the explanation, however I'm not sure how simply reversing the
pin-outs will improve cross talk.
The Alvarion VL Manual doesn't specify the function of each Pin/Wire color.
I assume Green Orange pairs are still used for Data and the Blue Brown
pairs are used for
Nope on both accounts.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 6:33 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] US Wireless Online Sells 50.1 Percent
Are they the company that bought Allen
Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:39 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] US Wireless Online Sells 50.1 Percent
Nope on both accounts.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Tuesday, January 02
Yes, Mobilepro bought ShreveNet along with a payphone company and a variety
of other small companies. Bottom of this webpage http://www.nationwide.net
lists some of the companies they have acquired.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:51 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] US Wireless Online Sells 50.1 Percent
I
lol...gotta love it! I'd argue it doesn't have to be only $300 to sell.
I'd pay two or three times that for such a product.
But honestly that isn't that much to ask as many products are already so
close...Alvarion VL being one of the closest, but still no cigar.
I like what you said about
and over and
over to this list. I do not need to be told every day that VL is bad in
the world according to Brad Belton. We have all heard you say it 100
times I think. (Maybe several time that if we look at your posts to
other lists about the same issues) Please change the record. There are
many
haven't personally had direct
experience. But the constant bashing that some product will guarantee
business class services in interference and another won't is tiresome, and
just turns people off from the good content that people appreciate.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton
My thoughts exactly.
If the VL had a mechanism to tune out noise and a few other tools (dual
pol - dual band) that would enable the user avoid noise then it is possible
there simply would not be a better PtMP LE product available today. Without
those critical elements the VL is just not able
I don't think Marlon is asserting the VL is simply another wifi radio
(even though it does use a wifi Atheros chip with CSAM), but more so that
the VL offers no method for a user to avoid or overcome noise. Simply
lowering modulation, slowing down and retransmitting over and over until the
packet
I don't think Marlon is asserting the VL is simply another wifi radio
(even though it does use a wifi Atheros chip with CSAM), but more so that
the VL offers no method for a user to avoid or overcome noise. Simply
lowering modulation, slowing down and retransmitting over and over until the
packet
Sorry for the double post...compoooter issues today I guess!
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Hello Patrick,
With all due respect I don't think anyone here doubts the Alvarion VL is not
simply a plain vanilla CSMA product. However, unfortunately the end result
is the same when deployed in a RF hostile environment.
All the items you list below while impressive are of little use in RF
This is a bit misleading and doesn't answer Marlon's question.
Entering a 0 value in the VL contention window algorithm setting will
indeed turn off the VL contention mechanism, but it will do little for the
client behind the VL radio trying to pass data.
Glossy advertisement buzz words like
Give the VL dual polarity via software control and you might have something
worth taking note about. Throw in dual band ability and now you're on the
right track.
As it sits now Alvarion is requiring you to visit every site you have a VL
radio and rotate it 90* in the event you need to do so.
: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:36 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] once again, several of the key
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:41 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived
Give the VL dual polarity via software control and you might have
something
worth taking note about. Throw in dual band ability
] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 12:41 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived
Give the VL dual polarity via software control and you might have
something
worth taking note about. Throw in dual band ability and now you're on
the
right
Hello Tom,
Alvarion's strength is it empowers an operator to engineer a more durable
link, based on antenna quality and flexibility.
Antenna quality I'll give you. Alvarion uses MTi antennas which by most all
accounts builds a quality product.
Flexibility? Not a chance.
No Dual Polarity +
really
needed? And what areas of your business or network also prevent the CIR Full
QOS guarantee from being realized?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless
Correct. Any medium used to deliver broadband can be broken. However,
frankly due to the fewer points of failure we typically see less downtime on
unlicensed wireless links than we do conventional LEC T1 circuits.
Like many things it all comes down to the geographic area. Would you expect
a
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived
Hello Marlon,
VL won't be a good choice as a committed rate business grade product
Wow back at ya there, Mike! grin
Never said the product was less in quality in any form. Simply stating the
gear doesn't perform well under load in unfriendly RF environments.
Alvarion Techs themselves acknowledge the radios back off modulation speeds
in the face of noise. Do you know
Agreed, Trango is far from immune from interference, but they do give you
a few more tools in your bag to combat it.
(1) RX Threshold
(2) Dual Polarity
(3) Dual Band
Alvarion VL offers none of these. If they did they would hands down be the
best PtMP LE gear available today IMO. However, I
: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 12:26 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived
Wow back at ya there, Mike! grin
Never said the product was less in quality in any form. Simply stating the
gear doesn't
packets
dropping to the tune of 5-25%...not a good thing.
Love to continue with this discussion, but I have a few more last minute
Christmas errands to run!
Merry Christmas!
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Brad Belton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 2:45 PM
Of Brad Belton
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 2:15 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived
Yep, the cable is pre-terminated in some odd non-code compliant pin
configuration. Oh, and pre-terminated due to the fact that the RJ45
connector doesn't fit through
]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 11:15 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived
Yep, the cable is pre-terminated in some odd non-code compliant pin
configuration
Wow...impressive! A city counsel that didn't fall for the snake oil
salesman...
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dawn DiPietro
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Council rejects
Wholly agree that there are many other religions than Christianity and
fortunately here in the great 'ol USA we have many freedoms including
freedom of religion. However, without dispute the reason for the season is
Christmas. The world stops during these times for no other reason than
That's an easy one; never.
Continue upgrading and if necessary push older gear further out on the
network.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino A. Villarini
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 12:51 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
instead of 66 blocks. That is what I was always told in
the past. I have no proof other than what others told me. Can anyone
else confirm or deny?
Scriv
Brad Belton wrote:
Yep, standard 25pr 66 blocks mounted inside NEMA4 enclosures. Works
well.
I've attached a snapshot.
Best,
Brad
find the mfg/part number I'll post it.
BTW: I owe you a phone call.
-B-
Brad Belton wrote:
I have been told the same regarding terminating pairs on a 110 block vs. 66
block. 110 blocks were made with CAT5 in mind whereas 66 blocks were
around
probably long before CAT5 was widely implemented
Yep, works nicely. We've run several hubs with 25pr CAT5 outdoor cable.
Gobs and gobs of goo inside...have a few hand rags ready!
I believe the cable brand is Mohawk. Good stuff.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian
Yep, standard 25pr 66 blocks mounted inside NEMA4 enclosures. Works well.
I've attached a snapshot.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 3:29 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
401 - 500 of 583 matches
Mail list logo
