Depending on options, they average $300.
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.5Ghz highpass/lowpass filters?
What do you charge for BPF's?
I still have my hooks and belt.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] old utility poles
Climb? I bought a bucket truck so that I'd never have to do that
Around here it takes a geotechnical soils report ($600-1200)
Wet stamped foundation drawing showing a foundation design for this area,
wind load and siesmic conditions ($800-$1200)
Then paying for the building permit showing the licensed general
contractor's license number.
We can have more
We always did 5 feet plus 10% of all poles longer than 20 feet.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wood Pole Towers (Was: Re: Trylon Titan Foundation
Work)
Nanostations.
- Original Message -
From: Cooper Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 8:42 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Recommendations for equipment to create 15 mile 20 Mbit
PtPlink?
What unlicensed gear would you suggest to create
think the Nanostation has the horsepower to do 20Mbps, do they?
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Nanostations.
- Original Message -
From: Cooper Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 8:42 PM
Subject: [WISPA
I think I would fire the bad ones off to the manufacturer for a failure
analysis. Sounds like a nasty trend developing.
If they are honorable and actually care about remaining in the business they
would cooperate and offer to repair or replace all your other ones before
they all fail (assuming
Looks like Tim Hogard's basement to me.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:00 AM
Subject: [WISPA] NOC
Here's a NOC...
Dang, so the rumor IS true. What a great idea... ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Drew Lentz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Damn, Ubiquiti
I saw Wu running around with something like this at WiMax
Sorry, forget which list I am on at times.
AF09 == AnimalFarm '09
Motorola Canopy Users Groupie bash in January.
- Original Message -
From: Ben Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Damn, Ubiquiti
I would ask them what a permissible level would be, then I would give them
some average levels of exposure due to cell phone and microwave oven leakage
(and wireless routers, maybe) showing them to be thousands of times higher
than the wisp gear. You could always put up an AP and use a
customers
How does Canopy fix a customer satisfaction problem? If they are used to
getting 5Mbps download speed and you have to cap them at 1Mbps, it doesn't
really matter what platform you are using.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Canopy...
- Original Message -
From
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 12:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
Our Canopy customers are used to getting 10.2 Mbps download speed. If the
start a huge file transfer they get wide open throttle
You must not have competitors. I have both Qwest and Comcast giving away multi
megabit starting at $15.95
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
I guess that's
installs
than we can keep up with each month.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
You must not have competitors. I have both Qwest and Comcast giving away
multi megabit starting at $15.95
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Sunday
complete (including PoE, antenna).
Canopy seems to work well for many people... but I've never been one to
follow the norm. And I get to put $50 in my pocket on every install, and
$1,000 for every AP we put up. ;)
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Well that is a testimony to your
interference from a new provider and all those
people get 100ms latency?
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
All of the complaints are easily overcome with the proper management
software, DHCP reservations etc. You can easily force the SM to connect
to the exact AP you want
snmp is a wonderful thing...
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
Our front end tech support only needs the phone number or account
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 8:29 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
All of the complaints are easily overcome with the proper management
software, DHCP
if a customer gets
8ms? And how do they test that measurement? And what happens when a
customer completely clobbers an AP and 160 customers are getting 20ms
latency? Or you have interference from a new provider and all those
people get 100ms latency?
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote
McCown - 3 wrote:
Can the 802.11 folks make that claim?
Next comes the Hitler? Take it offlist, guys.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwins_law
--
* Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation*
* http
Be nice to email the guy to tell him the dishes could be sold on ebay for
more than the tower is worth.
What a shame.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 7:33 AM
Subject: [WISPA] How
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 11:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
snmp is a wonderful thing
What exactly didn't we win?
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wyble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 5:08 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Looks like we didn't win
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/110408-fcc-whilte-spaces.html
:(
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looks like we didn't win
Useful power levels in the whitespaces.
B UT, we've not seen the actual rules from the FCC yet. It's entirely
possible that the rules will be better than what's being reported so far.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3
, and lobby
for
4watts.
But I'm gonna stop talking, as I'm getting all worked up, before I have
all
the facts posted to the public tommorrow.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED
the facts posted to the public tommorrow.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looks
We have an FCC attorney in Virginia do it for us.
- Original Message -
From: Randy Cosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] My favorite quotes from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
Speaking of that,
So I guess satellite earth station minimum size requirements would really
make a barrier to entry.
I think we had to have a 21 foot dish minimum for an inmarsat uplink...
By the same logic should I be pissed at that requirement?
If you interfere with my 6 GHz system, E-911 links die, critical
Moreover, 6 GHz hardware is my most expensive stuff. I can get 11 GHz
dragonwave at a much lower cost and it will do more than 6 GHz for most
applications. Plus have all the perqs of license and exclusivity etc.
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA
: Re: [WISPA] My favorite quotes from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Shouldn't the standard for critical life safety infrastructure be a
bit higher than that used to surf porn?
If you've ever manned the phones during an outage, you'd understand
from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Shouldn't the standard for critical life safety infrastructure be a
bit higher than that used to surf porn?
If you've ever manned the phones during an outage, you'd understand
that internet access IS that critical
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] My favorite quotes from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
I believe all of Trango's licensed equipment (6ghz, 11ghz, 18ghz, 23ghz) is
the same price.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Moreover, 6 GHz hardware is my most expensive stuff. I can get 11 GHz
board... so that isn't much of a reason either.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
So I guess satellite earth station minimum size requirements would really
make a barrier to entry.
I think we had to have a 21 foot dish minimum for an inmarsat uplink...
By the same logic should I
I think we keep it alive for $5/month.
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:12 PM
Subject: [WISPA] cancelled customer email
OK guys. I've never had this happen before so I'm not usre what to
Yep. Thats why many folks use a lower gain for their sectors and omnis.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS coverage
16dB by 120* won't
The licensed stuff is not frequency hopping or spread spectrum. It is
generally big time QAM with tons of margin. Like 40 dB+ of margin. Part 90
and Part 101 radios have been around for a very long time, way back before
microprocessors. So spectral efficiency is not the name of the game
And their distributors are?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquity Bullet
Nope they have not shipped the first batch out yet expected to ship next
week to their
We pay rent to one county to be in their building and on their tower.
The sheriff's office might be on some paperwork somewhere. Not unheard of.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday,
, it is all
consideration.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] County
Yes, but he is on their tower for free in exchange for transporting traffic.
Travis
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote
BPL on HV was and is a stupid idea. HV infrastructure was not built with
the idea of being a transmission line for RF. To get any kind if speed you
have to use lots of power, even then it is very very short range. You might
as well set up a whole bunch of dragonwaves in a drop and insert
at 4:21 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
BPL on HV was and is a stupid idea. HV infrastructure was not built with
the idea of being a transmission line for RF. To get any kind if speed
you
have to use lots of power, even then it is very very short range. You
might
as well set
interference - I saw it with my own eyes
along with dozens of skeptical ham operators. Theory does not matter,
those issues are conquered. Seeing is believing.
-RickG
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One huge reason, powerlines are not constant
,
those issues are conquered. Seeing is believing.
-RickG
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One huge reason, powerlines are not constant impedance to RF. Nor are
they
balanced. This is like trying to pump natural gas down the water lines.
Pipe, right
This summer I had a couple of junior year EE interns in the shop to do some
dirtywork. They got very very familiar with antenna range measurements by
the end of the summer. But I had to laugh when I would ask them to measure
the return loss on a new design. They would look confused and then
I would buy one today if I could.
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 6:42 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Need a power supply?
http://www.hyperionpowergeneration.com/
PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 9:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Need a power supply
I think that if you want to use WISPA to mine market data, then the results
should be made public for all to share.
You are not the only vendor member of WISPA that has TVWS product in the
pipeline you know.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Suitor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General
Wonder why it attached the reply...
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul
For adjacent channel use, we don't have to use a 6 MHz channel. We could
use 5 or 4 or whatever it takes to make it work.
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV
You could have a lower gain omni as just a sense antenna.
- Original Message -
From: John Valenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TVBD height requirement
Mike,
Where are you reading this on
I would use a 100 watt panel minimum.
And a one month battery. 5watts * 24hours * 30 days = 3600 watt hour
battery
If you are running a 24 volt system then you need 3600/24=150 aH battery.
If you are running a 12 volt system, you need a 300 aH battery.
You will pay about 30 cents per watt hour
Here is a note I posted several days ago on the Motorola list about solar
powering.
From: Chuck McCown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:17 AM
To: Dave Crim
Subject: Re: solar
Continuing on a bit, lets say you have 5 lousy days and one good sunny day
followed by 5
We buy batts that are rated to give you the energy down to -20F.
Survive being at-20F while discharged to a stone cold state.
And recover when the next available bit of sunlight hits the panel (perhaps
days later).
And last 2000 cycles.
For that you pay 30 cents per watt hour. And can sleep at
total
battery size so we never discharge them below 60%
Sounds like you are in a much more inaccessible environment than we are! And
in that kind of location, I'd likely be looking for the same thing.
But, for us, inaccessibility won't last more than a week or so...
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote
panel. Also 30 days or 360AH of
usable capacity at 12V?
Thanks for the clarification, and the pics that make your experience
clear!
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 60% depth of discharge they freeze at 0F. Once frozen they are dead.
Liquid
We tried with a bulldozer one year. Never made it. One of our guys almost
went over the edge of a switchback trying. We gave up, waited till the storm
blew over and hired the helicopter.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday,
One source:
http://tnrbatteries.com/genesis.html
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont
http://www.enersysreservepower.com
Did I interpret your data correctly to mean that if you had a sustained
256Kbps it would work?
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 2:42 PM
Subject: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth
OK, but if you look at Dennis's data, it appears to me that the average was
in the hundreds of K.
But maybe I didn't read it correctly.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Baird [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:07 PM
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 3:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information
Did I interpret your data correctly to mean that if you had
I think the canopy 450 will do something like 30 down and 10 up. So that could
give you 20 simultaneously which statistically could work if you had 50-100 on
an AP.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 7:30 AM
All the stations were given an extra set of channels to fire up and operate
the DTV transmitters. Mostly on UHF. This happened years ago and in this
are we have been receiving a digital TV signal for about 8 years. Once the
VHF analog transmitters are switched off, the broadcasters I know
I had a physics professor that would allow solutions to problems to be
submitted in any unit measure. Since he had TAs and grad students doing the
grading it was no skin of his nose. Lots of furlongs per fortnight velocity
measurements. Units of photon energy to describe frequency. But when
are building out our
network.
- Original Message -
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
I think
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
I deliver 100 mbps wholesale to many rural areas for $3-4K/month
type of figure. That includes transport. And stastically
will not work. So then
what?
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
I deliver 100 mbps wholesale to many rural areas for $3-4K/month type of
figure.
That includes transport.
And stastically, you can oversub it, even with streaming content.
You are never going to have all 20 streaming
Where do you rate Ubiquity Nanostations or the Bullet?
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:32 PM
Subject: [WISPA] WiMax delays?
I don't think this is entirely true. For us, it becomes a value decision.
If
PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
What I have done, you can do too. Just takes lots of time and work
and bootstrapping.
Ok..so
If you hang out over at [EMAIL PROTECTED] you will find more than a hundred
WISPs, many of them very small operations from 100-1000 subscribers that are
100% canopy. And generally speaking they are kicking butt and taking names
in their markets. I disagree that Canopy is not marketed to the
Amen, nobody ever said you could build it and rest on your laurels.
No small business is safe from changes that come with time.
Evolve or die. I am not going to sit around complaining the sky is falling.
So the cost to meet the future needs of our subscribers is real, it's
not as hard to
just because my competitors are using it. And really, any
more, the customer doesn't care HOW the bandwidth gets delivered. So why not
use a product that can deliver twice the bandwidth for 1/3 the price? ;)
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
If you hang out over at [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 12:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WiMax delays?
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
If you hang out over at [EMAIL PROTECTED] you will find
more than
a hundred WISPs, many
?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 11:17 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WiMax delays?
The very best
the bandwidth gets delivered. So
why
not use a product that can deliver twice the bandwidth for 1/3 the price?
;)
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
If you hang out over at [EMAIL PROTECTED] you will find more than a
hundred
WISPs, many of them very small operations from 100-1000
I had the same question. The main difference is that we know before the
roll in most cases the frequency and color code and if that ap is blocked by
trees we generally have several others in different directions that the tech
can switch to on the fly. Most importantly, 6 months later it is
LEDs lack resolution.
While you can bracket the signal and guess at the center, with more significant
digits you don't have to guess.
Both methods work, but bracketing takes some skill.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, November
NS5
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] stopgap for congested wi-fi channel
Well, speaking as one of the most experienced wireless
I am certain you can do much better than that.
And you don't even have to be in Chicago or Detroit.
- Original Message -
From: Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth and costs...
--
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 10:53 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth and costs...
I am certain you can do much better than that.
And you don't even have to be in Chicago or Detroit
There deals clear down to $7/meg.
Ask vendors for a 2 year contract, GigE 100 Mbps burstable.
- Original Message -
From: John Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the guy that compiled the article. Write him and educate him. I
did.
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The
This is what his autoresponder sent. So, email both of them.
I will be out of the office December 3rd - 5th, returning Monday December
8th. For answers to any questions regarding PCMag.com content, talk to Vicki
Jacobson: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown
amen
We love Plat.
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing and process management system
Platypus
Been using it for years, does everything.
PC is much more spendy than Plat. That is one of the reasons we did not go
with PC.
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Billing and process management system
With any internet technology, aggregation is happening somewhere. DSL you have
a pipe to the C.O. but then there may be limited overhead. Cable modems
aggregate in various branches of their distribution. Wireless aggregates at
the AP. Satellite... big AP in the sky. Even FTTH has shared
You are doing it. Just keep bootstrapping. Once you get 1000 subscribers
things will be a bit better.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 7:32 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Client Speeds
I have
I agree, you just need to be as good as or better than the competition. And
in many places the competition is still dialup.
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
AnimalFarm converts Sheep to Pigs!
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Article
I'm not saying we should do what Mark says, I'm not even saying Mark is
right
Maybe he took his frog meds...
- Original Message -
From: Bob Moldashel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 6:33 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Do you provide backup services?
Wow
Bitch and complain about WISPA's position and
aren't upside down
on
every new customer.
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
You are doing it. Just keep bootstrapping. Once you get 1000
subscribers
things will be a bit better.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
of the network).
Heck Chuck... your above 5,000 wireless subs aren't you?
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 7:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Yes, they are there for the asking. As a telco, the only thing we have over
non telcos is the right to condemn. Even the railroads have a very
straightforward procedure for crossing the tracks or running along side
them.
- Original Message -
From: D. Ryan Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
still deployed?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Client Speeds
Digis
Insurance and bonds are not really all that expensive. Your insurance
company will help you out.
We have to have metered service now. That is no different. Engineering
review is not something the local govt charges for here.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA
] Public ROW
Chuck,
I assume you are self insured... but if not, who do you use?
ryan
On Dec 5, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Insurance and bonds are not really all that expensive. Your insurance
company will help you out.
We have to have metered service now
for 2second to scrap or sell
their Canopy line.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:25:37
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Client Speeds
Digis was 100% Canopy. I
Maybe travelers.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Public ROW
No, not self insured, but very high deductibles.
I'm on the road right now, not sure
I put up a survey of type of technology used and number of subs at survey
monkey.
I didn't pay for the premium version so you cannot immediately see results.
I will post results periodically over the next day or two.
If anyone doubts the veracity of what I post, I will give you the username
I screwed up. Results are coming in but no way can I tie the technology to
the sub count.
Anyone know survey monkey well enough so that the result is how many subs on
each type of technology?
What I did will not be very meaningful. Sorry.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3
101 - 200 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
