In RouterOS you can disable IPv6 by uninstalling the IPv6 package.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> At 10/27/2012 10:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> >IPv6-only networks aren't far out in ARIN land. Well, unless you
> >like paying out of the nose for third party blocks. I'd s
2012 at 3:38 PM, Jeromie Reeves
> wrote:
> >> The resistance of the length of wire.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Greg Ihnen
> wrote:
> >>> A voltage difference with no load? What's causing the drop?
> >>>
> >>
rote:
> > The resistance of the length of wire.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Greg Ihnen
> wrote:
> >> A voltage difference with no load? What's causing the drop?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Justin Wilso
A voltage difference with no load? What's causing the drop?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Justin Wilson wrote:
> We see 27.3 volts at the battery. And 27.1 volts at the top with
> no load.
> Obviously load will have an impact on this.
>
> Justin
>
> -Original Message
ifi.com/>
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Greg Ihnen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2012 7:35 AM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Another Ubiquity question
>
> ** **
>
Doesn't UBNT gear take up to 30v?
Greg
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
> Why not run the NSM5 on 24v? Just add a diode or two to the + side,
> the 1v drop on them will protect the NSM from
> the charge voltage of the bank. $2 fix
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Olufe
e
> advice.
>
> Regards,
> - - -
> *Olufemi Adalemo*
> M: +234-803-5610040
> M: +234-809-8610040
> f...@adalemo.com
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>
>> My two cents: If you discharge part of your battery bank unevenly (p
I have a PS2 wired to the 12 starting battery of a generator which starts
and stops a few times a day with no issues. The PS2 doesn't even reset when
the gen starts and the battery pulls down to around 8~9 volts while the
starter is cranking. When the gen runs the batt voltage goes to ~14.6.
Greg
My two cents: If you discharge part of your battery bank unevenly (pull off
just half of your 24v bank to get 12v for some loads) you will have trouble
with part of the bank getting over charged and part of the bank not getting
charged enough. If you were charging the bank with an AC charger that
c
t;
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>
>> I believe the rogue countermeasures *could* be configured to
>> disassociate the other tenant's clients from the other tenant's AP.
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Za
e by the tenant on the fourth floor. Would this be a
>> violation of Part-15 if all the other tenants were to file a formal
>> complaint with the FCC?
>> **
>> *---Original Message---*
>>
>> *From:* Greg Ihnen
>> *Date:* 9/22/2012 5:34:47 AM
>&
reless system and deploys the Cisco
> or Motorola system and squashes all the other tenants APs. All the other
> tenants APs now do not work because of the system which
> has been put in place by the tenant on the fourth floor. Would this be a
> violation of Part-15 if all the other tena
just a knob that turned on because it was there ;-)
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>
>> There's a current debate raging right now on the NANOG list about the ins
>> and outs of setting up large temporary networks for things like c
There's a current debate raging right now on the NANOG list about the ins
and outs of setting up large temporary networks for things like conventions.
This one post caught my attention. Has anyone heard of a WiFi AP that will
spoof neighboring networks to intentionally interfere with them, not by
I think they mean no variables pertaining to pigtail cables, loose miniPCI
cards and other things which can go wrong in the build-it-yourself CPE
(antenna, enclosure, cpu, radio card, pigtail, etc.) which can't go wrong
with the one piece CPEs because they don't have those components (internal
pigt
Are people going to be able to tolerate the bleeding-edge cycle of
bugs/firmware updates that has been the history with their wireless gear?
Once again they're breaking new ground, this time with low cost/high pps
throughput. Will they be able to make it powerful (rich feature set) *and*easy?
It'
I heard that simple queues are a trickle down list like mangle, and that
can lead to folks higher up on the list having an advantage over those
further down, and that the tree queue is a more fair system. Maybe that's
only a consideration if you have a whole lot of simple queues.
Greg
On Wed, Sep
The MT wiki has some good info and examples to get you going.
There's also MT consultants who hang out on this list who can set it all up
for you for a fee.
Greg
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Eduardo wrote:
> **
>
> Hi,**
>
>
>
> Does someone know how to control the upload and down
mmett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Greg Ihnen"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 8:11:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Guidance for mounting gear on an AM tower
>
That was my first thought too, the possible pattern change. The antenna might
have to be resurveyed after the install.
Greg
On Aug 30, 2012, at 9:27 AM, lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:
> The station engineer should be the lead information contact. If he is
> clueless most AM stations have engineerin
mmett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Greg Ihnen"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 8:11:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Guidance for mounting gear on an AM tower
>
The tower is the AM antenna correct? If you ground your gear to the tower,
aren't you connecting your gear directly to the "antenna"? It seems like if to
try and avoid RF you connect to the thing that is energized with RF it's a step
in the wrong direction.
Is the tower a grounded-base or insul
I think UBNT approach is very smart - sell the best product they can make as
inexpensively as they can. But because it's built in China and UBNT doesn't
have the strength of say an Apple Computer to control shenanigans there's a
chance they're basically just handing their inner most secrets and
If there hadn't just been a downward revision of the outlook by the UBNT
management I'd be looking for conspiracy theories.
Did anybody take a look at the volume was involved in the drop?
My guess is the drop is the response of investors who follow the
fundamentals and outlook from management.
G
The market never closes now
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> Exactly my thoughts! I sold in May. (Sell in May and go away) and I'm
> just waiting for the right time to buy a load.
>
> Someone explain to me how after hours price drops happen? Isn't the
> market closed? What
In the article
http://www.thestreet.com/story/11659630/1/ubiquiti-disappoints-nvidia-delights-tech-roundup.html?puc=TSMKTWATCH&cm_ven=TSMKTWATCH
UBNT management mentions the negative effects of counterfeit UBNT gear on their
bottom line. Yikes! Imagine how that's going to effect us! I guess that
On the first tab on the left. They should have put it with the other
wireless settings.
Greg
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:31 PM, lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:
> How do I turn off Airmax. I don't see a setting for it
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "timothy steele"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> S
Is airmax on or off?
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Bob Moldashel wrote:
> OK Quick question
>
> Have a unit new out of the box will not connect to any subs. Set up as
> an AP, 20 Mhz channel, 2.4 Ghz channel 1.
>
> What am I missing???
>
> Any input is appreciated.
>
> -B-
> ___
Upconverted?
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Canopy? Next to none.
>
> Ubiquiti? Watch out - 900 is downconvertered 2.4 =(
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:00 PM, ~
I couldn't see it either. I just get taken to a page with 1 album and 0
pics, and a spinning wheel.
I'm assuming it's a pic of some marginally legal device some ham had for
sale, probably something pulled from scrap or military surplus.
Greg
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Eric Williams {WISP}
A good thing to know about the UBNT gear is if for some reason supplying PoE
via the "main" port stops working, you can supply PoE via the "secondary" port
whether or not the PoE passthrough option is enabled.
Greg
On May 29, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Carl Shivers wrote:
> Is this on the advanced tab?
That and AirMax got me more than once. I think it would be more intuitive if
the AirMax selection box was on the Wireless tab.
Greg
On May 26, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Carl Shivers wrote:
> Thanks. The 20 MHz change did the trick. Good thing to remember.
>
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:
I use a ControlByWeb X301(two inputs, two outputs) for remote control and
monitoring. It can do SNMP as well as email alerts (not via SSL). They have
other products that are just monitoring as well but they have multiple inputs.
It may be more than you're looking for. However their support is gr
Just replace it. It's probably failing. They're a pain when they start failing
but when you get a good one they're fine.
Greg
On Mar 16, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Troy Settle wrote:
> Ok, so to keep to code, we have a GFCI outlet for most of our towers. One of
> them tripped last night, causing me to
2¢ from the peanut gallery: Build for speed and future growth. Put the best you
can up now, save a tower climb later.
Greg
On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe wrote:
> Thanks. At what point does it start to affect performance? Ie would there be
> a difference on a 2mile 20MB back
I'm not familiar with them but that service has got to have bandwidth caps like
DirecWay. Also it's hard to believe that Skype and Vonage would work well
because they must be over-sold (high contention ratio) at that price.
Greg
On Feb 29, 2012, at 8:58 PM, ~NGL~ wrote:
> Anyone run into Excede
Something I've heard talked about in ham/engineering circles is don't have
cable runs that are near a half wavelength or multiple half wavelengths of the
frequency that's giving you trouble. It's a last ditch effort but it might be
worth thinking about. Ferrites are great. When you put them alon
Dude,
That sounds really bad. Maybe you should word that differently?
Greg
On Feb 22, 2012, at 5:28 PM, Marlon K. Schafer (509-982-2181) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone service my sister? I'd hate to send her to the cable co or
> telco.
>
> thanks!
> marlon
>
> - Original Messa
oking at the tower, I don't think there is anything new, but I
> will
>>> ask the tower owner tomorrow.
>>> We changed everything at one end and all but the cable at the other.
>>> Other 5GHz links we have for either tower do not show symptoms of
>>> inte
If you replaced all gear and even tried a different coax in place of the 60' of
LMR then it would have to be some kind of noise, coming in via the power lines
or radiated. Who else is on the tower?
Did you only replace/try different gear on one tower or did you try both ends?
Have you done any
Something about the ringing signal sent by the base to the handsets is
different. My dad had wireless headphones that received a horrible pop when the
cordless phone rang, but there was no interference when talking on the phone.
That same phone used to interfere with 2.4 wifi. We switched to dec
He joined a mission or a missionary? He got a missionary position?
Greg
On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:33 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I heard you left to join a missionary. ;-)
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> On 11/29/2011 12:52 PM, Rick Kunze
It might be better to use an even less frequently used block of RFC1918/IANA
reserved address space. I'd avoid the ones that most home routers use
out-of-the-box which is usually in the 192.168.x.x range. The 10.x.x.x and
172.16.x.x are more virgin territory.
Greg
On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:28 AM, D
For clarity I think your statement needs to be expanded on just to make sure
the strong points of GPS isn't lost.
For a single AP/PtP/PtMP link that's not geographically close to another AP
which could cause mutual interference, performance with GPS on will be less
than without GPS.
For a situ
They both have separate feeds. The folks doing OSCAR feed the two antennas with
splitters and phasing lines to feed the same signal to both antennas. To
achieve the phase shift some use the antennas in the same plane and feed them
out of phase with phasing lines. Another approach is to feed them
I did the cardboard cut-out covered in aluminum foil parabola on Linksys rubber
duckies back in the dark ages.
Greg
On Oct 24, 2011, at 8:25 AM, Cliff Leboeuf wrote:
> http://dsc.discovery.com/gear-gadgets/boost-your-wifi-signal-using-only-a-beer-can.html#mkcpgn=otbn1
>
>
>
>
Do you apply it only in special cases or would you do it as standard procedure
on CPEs? It seems like something that when you need it it's too late to put it
in.
Greg
On Oct 7, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Kristian Hoffmann wrote:
> On 10/07/2011 12:59 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>> Is that en
Is that enough to keep a bad CPE from taking down the AP?
Greg
On Oct 7, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Kristian Hoffmann wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 05:52 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
>> Two reasons for the post:
>> 1) Clients can cause the whole AP to misbehave.
>> 2) Anyone have any trouble shooting tips on
It could have been a total scam from the start, but if it was on the up and up
then they were probably betting that with enough money and time they would
perfect the technology or manufacturing or what ever it would take to work the
kinks out and become profitable.
The allure of solar is the im
r
> wrote:
> I thought like +/- $200.00
>
>
>
>
>
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:40 PM
>
>
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Power for to
om: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:40 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Power for tower sites
>
> How much do you want to spend?
>
> Greg
>
> On Sep
How much do you want to spend?
Greg
On Sep 20, 2011, at 2:17 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
> What’s a good model to look for? They seem kind of pricey.
>
>
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
> Sent: Tuesday,
I was going to mention Xantrex as a contender. They used to be Trace
Engineering. They make a decent inverter. Tripp Lite makes some special high
quality high reliability inverters for things like ambulances if you need
something a cut above. The cream of the crop is the Outback.
Greg
On Sep 20
Do you need 120vac? I have a fair amount of experience with inverters, which
basically is a UPS that doesn't come with a battery. I find them to be much
better quality than a UPS. I would definitely use an inverter before I'd use a
UPS. I realize the UPS have monitoring and remote control featur
Well for us it's "a blessing". We live in the jungle and have only a satellite
internet connection for contact from the outside world. No landlines, no cell
coverage, nada.
On a poor connection where Skype works great Vonage breaks down. I've tried a
few other VoIP services. So far Skype out pe
y then you'll need to come up with a layer 7 rule.
>>
>> Where did you get the rules you have now?
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
and not Skype. :-)
>
> Skype is absolutely terrible, it's just a P2P system that moves live
> content.
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> On 9/14/2011 2:28 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>>
eed to come up with a layer 7 rule.
>
> Where did you get the rules you have now?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> Yeah,
affic_shaping_based_on_layer-7_protocols
>
> Do you have to prioritize Skype?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> Guys,
&g
Guys,
I've gotten so much out of these forums. I appreciate you letting me be
a part of them. I had an idea which I don't know if it would be of interest to
anyone here but I hope it is. It has to do with bandwidth management and P2P
and Skype and their interaction in MT's RouterOS.
Thanks! That seems to be the consensus.
If I could capture the DNS cache even that would be something. We know more or
less who the culprit is.
Thanks!
On Sep 7, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 15:43, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> Anyone have a script to log dns or http
Anyone have a script to log dns or http/https requests for a given IP? Sort of
like a quick and dirty evidence collector?
Greg
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
What are people using as a Mac OS X SNMP client?
Thanks!
Greg
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless L
That will attract moisture and deer
On Aug 23, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Marco Coelho wrote:
> sprinkle some salt inside?
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Patrick Shoemaker
> wrote:
> Ew!
>
> Break off the tabs where the Ethernet cables pass through the base of the
> protector. Then the lid will
It's good to be cautious. Android has had some issues with renegade apps. Their
app environment is not the walled garden the Apple "App Store" is.
Greg
On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:03 PM, Matt wrote:
>> Which permissions don't you like? We can remove some, but obviously some are
>> required.
>
> Your
3, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Brian Webster
> wrote:
> No they are producing RF engineering maps and studies using RF propagation
> tools.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank You,
>
> Brian Webster
>
> www.wirelessmapping.com
>
> www.Broadband-Mapping.com
>
>
&
;
>
> Thank You,
> Brian Webster
> www.wirelessmapping.com
> www.Broadband-Mapping.com
>
> From: Greg Ihnen [mailto:os10ru...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:21 PM
> To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com; WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Providi
They're conducting RF propagation studies? Is that not already cut and dried?
How will their findings be presented? Will they be published?
Greg
On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Brian Webster wrote:
> Brett,
> I am the mapping data coordinator for the Illinois portion of the
> National Map. T
3
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> I've got a short backhaul (.1 mile) PtMP and it definitely works better with
> AirMax on. I forget if I'm using the no-ack feature.
>
> Greg
> On Jul 25, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>
>
I've got a short backhaul (.1 mile) PtMP and it definitely works better with
AirMax on. I forget if I'm using the no-ack feature.
Greg
On Jul 25, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr
> wrote:
>> Ok, so WDS fixed the latency. At 20mhz channe
Isn't -53 a little too hot?
Are you using WDS? I don't know if AirMax has changed this but I know one used
to need to run with WDS on for a purely transparent bridge.
Greg
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote:
> We are working on deploying a pair of M5 dishes on our network b
Faisal,
If I understand history correctly, there was a time when the country
was best served by a monopoly. In it's infancy fierce competition wouldn't have
led to a strong nationwide phone system. But then times changed and the country
was best served by the divestiture (breakup) of Ma
+1 on point number 1. I've heard the phrase many times "nobody every got fired
for buying Cisco".
Greg
On Jul 7, 2011, at 3:02 AM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
> To clarify.
>
> 1) Linux routers are plenty good for Enterprise. My point was that its a
> harder sell to sell them a product they dont
t;
> Steve Barnes
> General Manager
> PCS-WIN/RC-WiFi
>
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 1:30 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] PC Air Link Wireless?
>
>
Does anyone have anything good to say about PC Air Link Wireless?
I'm not just trying to bash them on this forum, I'm just trying to find out if
I should cross them off my list of suppliers.
I sent a friend there and it was only for an RB-750 and a Picostation M2-HP,
not a thousand dollar order
I asked this on the UBNT forum but received no answer.
The 802.11n specification states that when an AP is set to 40MHz channels it
should allow older gear that's only capable of 20MHz channels to connect in
that mode as well.
With 2.4GHz UBNT gear I'm finding that if the AP is set to 40MHz the
On May 8, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Rogelio wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Jerry Richardson
> wrote:
>> MikroTik RouterOS will give you quite a bit of QoS control.
>>
>> However if the traffic is on prot 80, it's a little trickier as you need to
>> manage traffic based on patterns rather tha
mismatch here, and not
> sure what he can really get on a budget
>
> Rog
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> Well the 3db "loss" really isn't. 3db is half. Since you're splitting it,
> it's halved, but you get both halves.
I'm presently using UBNT M gear as 2.4GHz APs. I've found that all client
devices can connect on 20MHz channels and only some clients can connect on
40MHz channels. I also found that when the UBNT gear is in 40MHz channel mode
it doesn't fall back to 20MHz for the clients that can't do 40MHz cha
My experience was only with their bottom of the line content filter, but would
you believe it didn't filter web proxies, the first think a kiddie is going to
go to to get past the SonicWall. I contacted the company a number of times and
their only response was "upgrade your filtering package to
ative permittivity is close enough to 1 to neglect (should be), the
> velocity factor is close to 1.
>
> --
> Patrick Shoemaker
>
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 21
In space (vacuum). Cables have a velocity factor.
On Apr 13, 2011, at 8:42 PM, Patrick Shoemaker wrote:
> And speed of light (c) = 300,000,000 m/s
>
> --
> Patrick Shoemaker
>
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Patrick Shoemaker
> Sent: Wed
stein
> Prime Access
> (877) 333-1003
>
> Works flawless
> NGL
>
> --
> From: "Greg Ihnen"
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:54 PM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Subject: [WISPA] Can 900MHz do this?
>
>> I&#x
I've been asked by the powers that be in a nearby small municipality to remote
control their generators as I have done on our own, so they can quickly shut it
down when lightning approaches. They just lost one of their 500KVA generators
to lightning. I'd be volunteering my time and expertise in
ot still seeing week old DrudgeReport pages.
Greg
On Apr 11, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>> Rubens,
>>
>>Thanks for the reply!
>>
>>I'm using a 5GHz AirMax back haul (PtMP) to two 2
Rubens,
Thanks for the reply!
I'm using a 5GHz AirMax back haul (PtMP) to two 2.4GHz APs (All UBNT
gear). The 5GHz back haul has never broken a sweat. Our "upstream" is a 1M/256K
high latency connection so there just isn't that much data to move.
You got me thinking abo
Rubes,
Thank you very much! That's great info and ideas.
Greg
On Apr 7, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>> I was running Butch's script with PCQ queues but I started wondering about
>> "buffer bloat" (yeah, I follow NANOG too) on the router. I thought about
>> trying RED on the o
On Apr 7, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 06:23 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>> My little network is a wireless network with about 20 user devices
>> (computers, iPads, iPods, Wiis, Blackberries etc). Our "upstream" is a
>> 1Mbps/256KBps.
>>
My little network is a wireless network with about 20 user devices (computers,
iPads, iPods, Wiis, Blackberries etc). Our "upstream" is a 1Mbps/256KBps.
I was running Butch's script with PCQ queues but I started wondering about
"buffer bloat" (yeah, I follow NANOG too) on the router. I thought a
wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 05:25:33PM -0430, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>>> I posted this on the MT forum but I wanted to throw it out here too. Thanks.
>>>
>>> First I exported in imported the RB-750's config into the RB-750G but
>>> the RB-750G did
address. But the RB-750G was getting random IPs
each time I would have it put online. Once I figured that out everything worked
out.
Thanks for the comments.
Greg
On Apr 2, 2011, at 9:42 PM, Dedhi Sujatmiko wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:25:33 -0430
> Greg Ihnen wrote:
>
>>
n? I'm going to try
forcing the port speed to 100Mbps and use the cross over cable just to see.
Thanks!
Greg
On Apr 2, 2011, at 6:06 PM, Chris Hudson wrote:
> Some cable provides latch onto the Mac address of the device being plugged
> into it. And you have to reset the cable m
I posted this on the MT forum but I wanted to throw it out here too. Thanks.
I've got an RB-750 that I want to replace with an RB-750G and I can't get any
connectivity between the RB-750G and the Motorola Surfboard cable modem.
First I exported in imported the RB-750's config into the RB-750G bu
I think I just documented a bug in the GUI
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=50471&p=256637#p256637
Greg
On Mar 31, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed that running commands from the CLI on the 5.0 full
> release does not work? I've tried this on 2 route
insert your sarcasm here
Greg
On Mar 1, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> I'm still waiting for someone to invent sarcasm font.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:54 AM, John Scriv
On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Scott Lambert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:23:03AM -0430, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Yes. Ether2 is master port for the switch by default configuration.
>>> Cable should be pl
Everyone,
I had a problem with a remote RB-750 (I'm in the Amazon, the RB-750 is
in NY). Every time I'd upgrade to ROS v5.0rc10 from rc9 DHCP would stop
working. I upgraded and out of necessity downgraded three times and finally
sent supout.rifs to MT and opened a ticket. The reply is b
On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:38 PM, Ryan Spott wrote:
> Be aware that the xmas firmware was not compatible (at least for me) with
> radios running 5.3f7782!
>
They let the programmers have too much eggnog.
Greg
WISPA
On Jan 18, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
> Que? Not sure what you mean.
>
> - Jerry
I just signed my parents up for Netflix. They have "22,000" titles.
Amazon has over "70,000". Netflix is $9 a month unlimited, Amazon is $3.99 and
up per title. Amazon does have the newer
Butch,
No, I'm not on the IPv6 mailing list. I'll check it out. Thanks!
Greg
On Jan 16, 2011, at 12:35 AM, Butch Evans wrote:
> On 01/13/2011 05:54 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
>> No, I'm not offended at all. I appreciate your comments and the privilege of
>> bei
1 - 100 of 380 matches
Mail list logo
