Of Trinklein, Jason R
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 2:27 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac
We are upgrading from 802.11n to 802.11ac and have increased our AP count by
25%-33% to move from coverage to density. We are moving to Aruba
Of Trinklein, Jason R
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 3:27 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac
We are upgrading from 802.11n to 802.11ac and have increased our AP count by
25%-33% to move from coverage to density. We are moving
We are upgrading from 802.11n to 802.11ac and have increased our AP count by
25%-33% to move from coverage to density. We are moving to Aruba, ripping out
our old gear and we have seen big improvements in bandwidth in our expanded and
upgraded buildings. 1:1 replacements are sufficient
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:34 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac
Hi,
We are looking at a campus wide wireless upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac. Just
wondering for
his e-mail.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ying Zhang
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:44 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac
Thanks
stserv [mailto:
> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Ying Zhang
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:34 PM
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are looking
ess Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ying Zhang
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:34 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac
Hi,
We are looking at a campus wide wireless upgrade fr
: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 1:38 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac
You're really going to want to have a survey done and a proper design built.
I recommend Aruba networks, their products have worked very well for us and
their support
RELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ying Zhang
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:34 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac
Hi,
We are looking at a campus wide wireless upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac. Just
wondering for anyone out there wh
Hi,
We are looking at a campus wide wireless upgrade from 802.11n to 802.11ac. Just
wondering for anyone out there who has done this before, do you have an
approximate number (in percentage) with regards to # of additional APs in a
mainly coverage-based design.
Thanks in advance.
Ying
Information Technology Services
Truman State University
100 E. Normal Ave.
Kirksville, MO 63501
Office - (660) 785-4165
Cell - (660) 341-7869
On 07/20/2017 10:03 PM, Dustin Howard wrote:
I think the following would be interesting to share...
To recap - I found when I disable all 802.11N data
I think the following would be interesting to share...
To recap - I found when I disable all 802.11N data rates on the Cisco
1602i, 1602e, or 1702i radios and force these client to use B/G, they
work as expected. Once I enable any MCS data rates the problem presents
itself. I think
half Of Dustin Howard
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 3:28 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Older Apple devices and issues with 802.11N(2.4Ghz)
I'm having an issue with some Apple devices and was wondering if anybody has
experienced similar or if you have a similar environ
ject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Older Apple devices and issues with 802.11N(2.4Ghz)
I'm having an issue with some Apple devices and was wondering if anybody has
experienced similar or if you have a similar environment and all is working
well...
My environment is 5508 controllers (8.0.140.17) with 1600 se
What MBR do you have set for the 2.4 Ghz?
*--Jeremy L. Gibbs*
Sr. Network Engineer
Utica College IITS
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Dustin Howard wrote:
> I'm having an issue with some Apple devices and was wondering if anybody
> has experienced similar or if you
http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/38234/hacking/802-11n-flaw.html
Fortunately, there are several methods to mitigate the attacks, including
MAC layer encryption, disabling Aggregated Mac Protocol Data Unit (A-MPDU)
frame aggregation, configuring the system to drop corrupted A-MPDUs, the
http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/38234/hacking/802-11n-flaw.html
Fortunately, there are several methods to mitigate the attacks, including MAC
layer encryption, disabling Aggregated Mac Protocol Data Unit (A-MPDU) frame
aggregation, configuring the system to drop corrupted A-MPDUs, the use
...@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Issues with recent Intel chipsets with 5GHz 802.11n Greenfield?
Reply-To: Wireless Issues in the JANET community
wireless-ad...@jiscmail.ac.ukmailto:wireless-ad...@jiscmail.ac.uk
Afternoon all,
We've recently identified an problem with the Intel Dual-Band Wireless-AC 7260
chipset
Ekahau has a built in selection of client adapters that simulate end user
results - you can select various laptop, IPphones, etc. Still waiting for
an ipad/droid selection. You can manually reduce client power to customize.
As user densities increase - shift your process to creation of small
Hello,
we've had trouble reports from laptops with the Realtek RTL8191SE
chipset (2.4ghz only) when using 802.11n. The card appears to be able
to connect to an SSID, get an IP address, but not pass traffic in a
stable fashion for a meaningful length of time. After disabling
802.11n support
___
___
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew Clark
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 5:56 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] RTL8191SE and 802.11n
Hello,
we've had
Dear Stan,
My editor has me researching a story for Monday's print issue on 802.11n trends
in the market and the enterprise especially. A key part of the story is getting
some feedback from large-scale 11n sites.
I have a few details on Emory's recent 11n upgrade, based on our previous
emails
Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of David R. Morton
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:43 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any issues with iPhone 4 and 2.4GHz 802.11n?
John,
We are just beginning
Network World
From: Chris Murphy [mailto:ch...@mit.edu]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 7:28 PM
To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Cc: John Cox
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any issues with iPhone 4 and 2.4GHz 802.11n?
John,
I don't think there is much of an issue here, unless
John,
At Emory University, we've just completed upgrading our ResHalls to 802.11n and
are now working on our academic buildings as part of a system-wide upgrade to
802.11n. We've moved from single radio b/g APs to dual radio a/b/g/n APs. We
are running 802.11n (backwards compatible to b/g
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any issues with iPhone 4 and 2.4GHz 802.11n?
John,
At Emory University, we've just completed upgrading our ResHalls to 802.11n and
are now working on our academic buildings as part of a system-wide upgrade to
802.11n. We've moved
approximately 1/3 of our total ResNet users running 802.11n in 5GHz,
1/3 running 802.11n in 2.4GHz, and 1/3 running 802.11g. I don't have any
breakout for the iPhones specifically but can say that iDevices (iPads,
iPhones, iPod Touches) accounted for a little over 8% or our total clients
registered over
] On Behalf Of Brooks, Stan
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:00 AM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any issues with iPhone 4 and 2.4GHz 802.11n?
John,
At Emory University, we’ve just completed upgrading our ResHalls to 802.11n
@listserv.educause.edu; John Cox
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any issues with iPhone 4 and 2.4GHz 802.11n?
John,
I think the only issue is that .11n devices will loose some performance having
to share the band with .11g/b devices. Currently we run about a 50-50 split on
the 2.4 band between .11n
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any issues with iPhone 4 and 2.4GHz 802.11n?
Good point, John.
The iPhone is only a 1x1 MiMo, so no special stream boost. There is still the
reduced guard time and frame aggregation that will give better performance
compared to 802.11b/g.
I'm still digging
. Morton
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:37 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any issues with iPhone 4 and 2.4GHz 802.11n?
John, Yea Apple isn't always the best at providing detailed stats. The iPhone 4
does do .11n in the 2.4GHz space with a 1x1 antenna (at least
John,
On my Cisco 802.11n deployment, both an iPhone 4 or iPad average about
28Mbs against various bandwidth testers.
Jeff
Jeffrey D Sessler
Director
Information Technology
Scripps College
08/24/10 2:20 PM
Thanks, Chris.
Any idea what kind of WLAN throughput your iPhone 4 clients
Folks,
I was talking to a higher education IT guy last week; they have a lot of
iPhones, and are rollling out iPhone 4's to new freshman and to faculty. As
part of this, they upgraded the campus WLAN to 802.11n.
BUT, after iPhone 4 was announced, they realized its 11n support was ONLY
...@nww.commailto:j...@nww.com
j...@nww.commailto:j...@nww.com wrote:
Folks,
I was talking to a higher education IT guy last week; they have a lot of
iPhones, and are rollling out iPhone 4's to new freshman and to faculty. As
part of this, they upgraded the campus WLAN to 802.11n.
BUT, after
also have concerns if bonded channels are deployed on N near standard
A APs.
-jim
On 6/3/2010 9:03 AM, Steve Hess wrote:
For anyone who has done a phased deployment of 802.11n gear to replace b/g/a,
what have you found to be most effective, a whole building (or floor perhaps)
approach
of 802.11n gear to
replace b/g/a, what have you found to be most effective, a whole
building (or floor perhaps) approach or putting N in strategic
locations with nearby b/g/a AP's? Any gotcha's or learning
experience with either approach? We're an Alcatel (Aruba) shop so
direct experience
Of James F Eyrich
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:43 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n phased deployment approaches
With Meru it is strongly suggested to do entire buildings at a time.
Beyond Meru's suggestions based on how their tech works I still think
I should have been more specific - I was talking about Meru ...sorry
about that!
Original Message
Subject:
Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n phased deployment approaches
Date:
Thu, 3 Jun 2010 11:02:10 -0400
From
Is the AP configured with 2 transmit antennas? Try rebooting/
resetting the AP to factory default? Toggling ClientLink?
Bruce T. Johnson | Network Engineer | Partners Healthcare |
617.726.9662 bjohns...@partners.org
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Mike King m...@mpking.com wrote:
Ok. I
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Johnson, Bruce T.
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 3:15 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n configuration on Cisco
Is the AP configured with 2
Ok. I had my controller tweaked to where I liked it, but I forgot to hit
the save configuration settings button, and the controller got rebooted in
my test lab.
I've replicated my tweaks, (40 Mhz 802.11a channels, Client Link enabled
on both bands, disabled 1, 2, 5.5, 6Mbps on the 802.11b/g
Mike,
Make sure WMM Policy is set to allowed for the WLAN config.
-Chris
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Mike King m...@mpking.commailto:m...@mpking.com
wrote:
Ok. I had my controller tweaked to where I liked it, but I forgot to hit the
save configuration settings button, and the controller
Yep, I have that set to allowed.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Chris Murphy ch...@mit.edu wrote:
Mike,
Make sure WMM Policy is set to allowed for the WLAN config.
-Chris
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be
Wireless 802.11a/n or 802.11b/g/n High Throughput (802.11n)
Also, have you made sure that the APs are actually using 40Mhz channels?
WirelessAccessPointsRadios802.11a/n
Finally, what channels have you selected? Remember that some clients
don't support UNII 2 and UNII-2e bands.
Hector
We have a robotics research group that wants the highest-speed wireless
connections possible. All the equipment is in the same room -- approximately
50'x 50'.
Many consumer grade 802.11n APs seem to top out at well below 100Mbps. If
anyone can recommend equipment that can achieve higher
Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Lowry
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 2:41 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n AP recommendations
We have a robotics research
Sorry- meant to say early 11n Mac, not early Mac.
-Original Message-
From: Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:21 PM
To: 'The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv'
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n AP recommendations
Tom, I have played with Cisco 11n
Hello,
We needed to wireless enable a math lab for a 100 workstations and we ended up
using 4 Aruba A/P's and controller running 802.11N. We are seeing throughput in
excess of 200meg at the workstations and they have experienced no issues with
them. We have them secured with Certificates
-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n AP recommendations
We have a robotics research group that wants the highest-speed wireless
connections possible. All the equipment is in the same room -- approximately
50'x 50'.
Many consumer grade 802.11n APs seem to top out at well
50'x 50'.
Many consumer grade 802.11n APs seem to top out at well below
100Mbps. If anyone can recommend equipment that can achieve higher
throughput, please let me know. I won't say price is no object, but
we need to consider the options.
Thanks,
Tom Lowry
Department of Computer Science
:40 PM, Tom Lowry wrote:
We have a robotics research group that wants the highest-speed
wireless connections possible. All the equipment is in the same
room -- approximately 50'x 50'.
Many consumer grade 802.11n APs seem to top out at well below
100Mbps. If anyone can recommend equipment
Frank,
We have running Aruba's centralized 802.11n solution here at Liberty University
for the past year. Early on, there were some stability scalability issues,
but they have been resolved.
I know that this summer, during our testing for Video over wireless, we had 20
clients simultaneously
The feature gaps you mention suggest that despite all the years that this
solution has had to bake, it does not have feature parity with its
competitors. It appears to be more than just a difference in architecture.
I find it interesting that 2+ years after the introduction of 802.11n APs
Pablo,
We here at Liberty University recently migrated to Aruba's 802.11n solution. I
am sure that we have a larger, more complex deployment than you have, but Aruba
has solutions for various sized deployments.
Aruba's technical support is dedicated, thorough, and very customer focused
Hi,
We are looking for 802.11n solutions. I would like know more about
Enterasys and HP solutions experience.
Best regards,
Pablo J. Rebollo
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu
-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Pablo J. Rebollo-Sosa
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 5:55 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
Hi,
We are looking for 802.11n
: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 6:55 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
Hi,
We are looking for 802.11n solutions. I would like know more about
Enterasys and HP solutions experience.
Best regards,
Pablo J. Rebollo
**
Participation and subscription
University, UITS
812-856-5720
jasmu...@indiana.edu
**
On Dec 16, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Pablo J. Rebollo-Sosa wrote:
Hi,
We are looking for 802.11n solutions. I would like know more about
Enterasys and HP solutions experience.
Best regards,
Pablo J. Rebollo
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
Hi,
We are looking for 802.11n solutions. I would like know more about
Enterasys and HP solutions experience.
Best regards,
Pablo J. Rebollo
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group
, December 16, 2009 6:55 AM
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
Hi,
We are looking for 802.11n solutions. I would like know more about
Enterasys and HP solutions experience.
Best regards,
Pablo J. Rebollo
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Listserv
[wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Pablo J. Rebollo-Sosa
[pablo.rebo...@upr.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:24 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
He Lee,
We currently own a wireless system with over a 150
[
pablo.rebo...@upr.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:24 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Solutions
He Lee,
We currently own a wireless system with over a 150 autonomous APs. Now
we are working to move the infrastructure to 11n and to have
are early in the test but it looks promising.
Thanks,
Fred
Nathan Hay wrote:
Is anyone use the 802.11n MIMO antennas from TerraWave?
http://www.terrawaveonline.com
I'm particularly interested in the outdoor patch antenna and the
outdoor omni antenna that has 6 leads for the 6 antennas inside
Is anyone use the 802.11n MIMO antennas from TerraWave?
http://www.terrawaveonline.com
I'm particularly interested in the outdoor patch antenna and the outdoor omni
antenna that has 6 leads for the 6 antennas inside of them.
The application is outdoor 802.11n coverage. If you are doing
As a reporter for Network World, I'm putting together this week a package of
stories in anticipation of the expected all-but-final ratification of the
802.11n standard by week's end.
Campuses have been leading the way both in large-scale WLAN adoption in general
and in 11n in particular
-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Johnson, Bruce
T
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:36 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Toivo et al,
Great comments. Does
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Hi Bruce,
We didn't have a formal test plan, but have had many experiences I am
more than willing to share.
Surveying was pretty interesting, as we deployed before there were any
11n capable tools available. Back in the summer
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Thank you Matt,
I appreciate the feedback and may want to get more of your Meru
experiences
offline. A 5GHz RSSI (PHY) survey seems to be the common denominator
for legacy
and .11n clients. Its likely this provides adequate coverage for 2.4GHz
-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Johnson, Bruce
T
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:25 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Thank you Matt,
I appreciate
Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:42 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
I had an interesting exchange with Ekahau (we use them and AirMagnet)
about how 11n should change
...@partners.org
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of
Barber, Matt
Sent: Thu 1/29/2009 11:07 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Yeah, that is something I should have mentioned
Toivo et al,
Great comments. Does anyone have any 802.11n testplans they are willing to
share?
802.11n Survey experiences? Has it turned the traditional survey methodology on
its head, or do we still have to consider legacy and so the n simply stands
for Nice (if you have it).
Anyone
One benefit of N is improved radio performance thanks to more antennas
and MIMO, even with legacy clients. Especially in difficult buildings,
with a lot of cast concrete utility chases and such this can be pretty
helpful, based on our testing. That being said, in Cisco-land we can
buy about three
We have 1,300 + APs with a mix of 1131AGs, 1242s, and 1250s. We
broadcast our SSIDs and one of them is using Layer 2 security WPA +
WPA2. WPA is set for TKIP only and WPA2 is set for AES only. We have
not had any problems even in limited 802.11n testing. We are running
WCS 4.2.81.0 and WiSM
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paynter,
Jeffrey
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:32 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n and WPA/WPA2...
We have 1,300 + APs with a mix of 1131AGs, 1242s, and 1250s. We
broadcast our SSIDs and one of them is using Layer 2 security WPA +
WPA2
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n and WPA/WPA2...
Jeffrey,
Can you confirm that your setup has worked with Vista and Windows
mobile?
I did find out that at least on two Vista machines, upgrading to SP1
solved the issue.
Hector
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE
So, we've been testing 802.11n with a couple of Cisco 1250 radios. In
order to support it on our 802.1X/WPA/TKIP WLAN, we had to add WPA2 to
our layer 2 security parameters. So now we support either WPA or WPA2.
We are finding out that some systems don't like this. Specifically,
Windows Vista
] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:06 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n and WPA/WPA2...
So, we've been testing 802.11n with a couple of Cisco 1250 radios. In
order to support it on our 802.1X/WPA/TKIP WLAN, we had to add WPA2 to
our layer 2
We are deploying some 802.11n this summer and have converted our WPA SSIDs over
to WPA2, except for one SSID that supports devices like the Wii, iPod Touch,
iPhone, etc. We also offer a clear SSID for students who can't do WPA2 or
choose not to use that network.
Nathan
Nathan P. Hay
] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:06 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n and WPA/WPA2...
So, we've been testing 802.11n with a couple of Cisco 1250 radios. In
order to support it on our 802.1X/WPA/TKIP WLAN, we had to add WPA2 to
our layer 2
From my testing and from the systems engineer of the vendor's equipment
that I was testing, an 802.11n client with WPA2/AES can connect at
802.11n rates, but if that same 802.11n client connects using WPA/TKIP,
it gets a/b/g rates even though client and AP are both 802.11n. So yes,
an N client
Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Moores
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 4:05 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n WPA2/AES requirement
Just wondering what encryption type those of you that have started
moving to (testing with) 802.11n APs
: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n WPA2/AES requirement
From my testing and from the systems engineer of the vendor's equipment
that I was testing, an 802.11n client with WPA2/AES can connect at
802.11n rates, but if that same 802.11n client connects using WPA/TKIP,
it gets a/b/g rates even though client and AP
Just wondering what encryption type those of you that have started
moving to (testing with) 802.11n APs are using?
I'm trying to confirm that N clients connecting to N APs must use WPA2/
AES to connect with encryption.
If an N AP accepts both WPA/TKIP and WPA2/AES can an N client connect
+matchallpartial
Nu=P_RollupKey
-Original Message-
From: Jonn Martell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:02 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
I won't speak for Bret but considering the cost differential of 11xx and
12xx models
PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
Jonn:
According to Cisco, if you have particular models of the 3750E, 4500, and
6500, you may be able to power their new 802.11n APs with full features. If
that's not workable solution in a customer's environment
Bret:
What do you perceive the risks to be?
There's no doubt that the price is higher, though the price/Mbps is lower.
The standard is already viable, there's no question in my mind regarding
that, though 2008 won't be the year that 802.11n APs match the price of
enterprise 802.11b/g APs today
I won't speak for Bret but considering the cost differential of 11xx
and 12xx models in Cisco, I'm not sure there is a cost/benefit value
of deploying the 1250 at this point?
Fundamentally, the biggest hurdle I see for Cisco's 802.11n strategy
is the fact that you can't use installed 802.3af (POE
My question to you: how many of you will go with a single-radio
802.11n-capable AP? That appears to make a $200+ difference, per AP.
Do you mean just one radio for the AP total, or just one n capable for the
AP and a non n capable as well?
one radio to serve b/g clients (not n capable
gear.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Hanset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:48 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
My question to you: how many of you will go with a single-radio
802.11n-capable AP
Just to emphasize on what Dave is saying here - we're already seeing a
feature gap between generation 1 and generation 2 802.11n chipsets/APs in
regards to power consumption. We know that they'll continue to improve
power consumption, IEEE 802.3at will be added to the APs, another spatial
stream
Wondering who is taking the early plunge on 802.11n, who's system you
are going with (beyond small pilots), and if you are requiring
commitment from the manufacturer that if the standard does change in
ways that make pre-standard hardware incompatible, free replacements
would be provided
: Friday, January 11, 2008 10:45 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
I'd be interested in results being posted on-list...I've not yet
heard of any manufacturer who is guaranteeing free upgrades to the
finalized standard...only,...'should
: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
Actually, we did get a verbal commitment to that very notion yesterday
from one of the more visible 11n vendors, but would have to see if that
would be put in writing if we ever did proceed down that road.
Lee
From: Jamie Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
University
From: Jamie Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:26 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n
exactly!...that's why I doubt any manufacturer would sign an
agreement
Doug Payne wrote:
I wonder if you'll have more issues now that Aruba has acquired AirWave?
http://www.arubanetworks.com/company/news/release.php?id=56
Hopefully not, but in 2 years or so I won't have a multivendor wireless
network, so it may not matter if Meru can improve their management
On Jan 11, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Lee H Badman wrote:
Actually, we did get a verbal commitment to that very notion
yesterday from one of the more visible 11n vendors, but would have
to see if that would be put in writing if we ever did proceed down
that road.
For hardware or software
understand this, that's when competition
starts to look really interesting! Forcing maintenance on the small
stuff is ridiculous especially for thin APs that are controlled by the
controllers (these APs aren't autonomous anymore).
If you want to stay with Cisco, then waiting for the WiFi 802.11n
Do any of the bands have lesser/no DFS requirements? If so, those are will
be more attractive.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 6:32 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied
, 2007 5:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at
Do any of the bands have lesser/no DFS requirements? If so, those are
will
be more attractive.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo