On 20 December 2011 13:09, Alex Mironov
alexmiro...@graphicdesignservices.ato.gov.au wrote:
[snip]
I was wondering if anyone had any views/resources as to whether users should
remain in the same window or should be taken to a new window/tab when they
click on an external link?
Short answer:
Marvin,
I believe someone mentioned it earlier, but removing the br / tags just
prior to the /ul tag should resolve the issues that you are having with
xhtml validation.
Cheers,
Matt
***
List Guidelines: http
Absoutely, I'll echo that. There are some real gems in there. Thanks, Russ.
2009/9/23 Susie Gardner-Brown susi...@uq.edu.au:
Hi there
I’d just like to send a big thank you to Russ Weakley for taking the time to
collate and send this to WSG Announce each week! I always find really
2009/7/8 Dennis Lapcewich dlapcew...@fs.fed.us:
Dennis Lapcewich wrote:
While I agree with your general sentiment, I have to say I find
the assertion that all people aged 35-40 or more are for all
intents and purposes [...] web disabled and [...] in immediate
need of web accessibility
2009/7/3 Matijs mat...@gmail.com:
For what it's worth.
Microsoft have—for several years now—offered free Windows
XP images with IE6/7/8RC and now IE8 as well in Microsoft Virtual PC format.
Microsoft Virtual PC (the application) is also available for free, making
this the most acurate and
2009/7/2 Dennis Lapcewich dlapcew...@fs.fed.us:
If you are unsure that web accessibility should play a role, take this test.
In a group of people have everyone stand up. Those who are unable to stand
may remain seated. Now pose these three requests, in order:
1) If you are wear glasses,
2009/6/15 raven rav...@mail.ru:
Keep in mind as always that a JavaScript solution will not work in
user agents not running JavaScript,
which can include search engines,
mobile devices, assistive technology, browsers in certain corporate
contexts in which JavaScript is globally turned off or
On 3/25/09 12:12 PM, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
The correct design (and web standards that are adhered to or not)
is that design for which the client is paying.
Sorry, but that just reads to me like a way to excuse slipshod work. It is
one thing to figure out any old way to
Try ies4osx. I haven't, but have heard it works:
http://www.kronenberg.org/ies4osx/
As for software, I'm partial to Dreamweaver. And Contribute. And Flex Builder.
:) But I've also heard good things about Aptana, and I've been happy with
TextWrangler, which did all I used BBEdit for, free.
-
m
As someone who's on the working group producing ARIA, I have to say the
editors have done a pretty remarkable job in terms of documenting a
specification that hasn't even advanced past Working Draft.
First, there's the spec itself:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/
Then there's the User Agent
On 3/2/09 2:02 AM, Mathew Robertson mat...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
Its been possible to do ARIA style accessibility since about 1995 - its just
now that people are starting to care.
Not sure what value you were hoping to add to the conversation, but MSAA,
the Windows accessibility API, didn't
On 3/2/09 3:15 PM, Hassan Schroeder has...@webtuitive.com wrote:
Matt Morgan-May wrote:
Look at the Atlas project that was unveiled this week, as an example.
ref?
http://www.280atlas.com/
One of the developers is actually talking about ARIA right now:
http://rossboucher.com/2009/03/01
Andy's technically correct, and it's true that pointing to the main content of
the document is good for accessibility, though not because of semantics so much
as that you can point to it in a Skip to main content link.
id='mainContent' doesn't communicate any semantics by itself. (That's
On 2/5/09 1:30 PM, Carolyn Diaz carolyn.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I know this is an old school type question, but we are very divided about
this. The people on our usability team are with Nielsen, but others (like me)
are not so sure. Isn't accessibility to new windows a problem as it changes
the
2009/1/27 Patrick H. Lauke re...@splintered.co.uk:
As good as it is to hear anecdotal evidence from expert users such as list
members here, I'd say it's much more important to bring some actual live
user stats to the table.
Last time I checked JS stats (around 12 months ago) at the site I work
On 1/14/09 5:38 AM, Christie Mason cma...@managersforum.com wrote:
Plus, I'd be curious as to availability of the Flex server in
remote hosts. I haven't seen any offer it, is it still so pricey(?), but I
also haven't been looking for it.
Flex hasn't been sold on a server basis since 1.5, which
On 1/10/09 8:26 AM, Alan C Whiteman acwhite...@visualis.us wrote:
In the end, Flash is not only an obnoxious medium in 90% of its usage
...which is not a problem owing to the platform but rather its authors...
(Besides, that's consistent with Sturgeon's Law: 90% of everything is
crap.)
it's
On 1/12/09 2:20 AM, michael.brocking...@bt.com
michael.brocking...@bt.com wrote:
Quote: The fact is that many educators have found that they can use
Flash to teach their students effectively.
I think you (and those teachers that you refer to) are mistaking an
effective lesson, for effective
Hi,
Excuse me for jumping in here, especially (in this case) as a Flash
partisan. But I fail to see how this kind of project can be anything other
than a good thing overall.
What I don't understand is why people are instantly critical of projects
that are actually attempting to increase access
to default# (or 0).
For a select element you can add the attribute selected=selected the
the option you want set by default. As for text inputs, you can just
use value=Some Default Text in the input and that will show when the
page loads, or is reloaded.
HTH
-Matt
poster.
The software this list uses actually seems pretty bad at filtering out stuff
like this.
Good list management software strips out read-receipt headers [1] as well as
blocking the automated out-of-office messages that seem to plague this list.
Regards,
Matt
[1] For example
Standards even when it hits me in the face.
I'll now go back to my corner...
Cheers,
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http
Sorry, Grant, this is off topic for this list.
Everyone, if you have a response for Grant please send it off list.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Matt Fellows
WSG Core Member
http://www.onegeek.com.au/
***
List Guidelines: http
I completely understand everyone's comments on image enlargement using
professional graphic applications vs. browsers using their cheesy routines.
What I didn't know was if I had missed any use of proper techniques within
CSS to achieve what I needed.
My first post exposes the approaches I am
,
*Kepler Gelotte*
Neighbor Webmaster, Inc.
156 Normandy Dr., Piscataway, NJ 08854
www.neighborwebmaster.com
phone/fax: (732) 302-0904
--
*From:* Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Sunday, July 06, 2008 12:37 AM
*To:* Kepler Gelotte
*Cc:* wsg
was in favor of tables.
What is the standards compliant way to handle this ?
Thanks,
Matt
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL
;
}
div.footer {
clear: both;
}
I had tried chaning the width and overflow. No visible effects were
observed.
Have I logically omitted or overlooked something here ?
Thanks again,
Mathew
On 7/5/08, Kepler Gelotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
If you stretch the img (you can't
of structuring comes at a cost because a number of
requests need to be made to the server.
You're certainly right with the cost in terms speed, by increasing the
number of CSS files, but what about the cost of development time,
readability and re-usability?
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au
position though - I would agree with Jakob Nielson in
the general sense, keeping my audience in mind. But knowing your
user's will give you more insight into what you _should_ do.
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au/
[1] - http://www.useit.com/alertbox/screen_resolution.html
[2] - http
It should be href=xxx.css not href(xxx.css)
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help
, then there is no need for the surrounding p
tag. Some people (including myself) feel uncomfortable with the img
floating by itself, so wrapping it in a div id=header or something
is a nice alternative.
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au
/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au/
***
List Guidelines: http
PROTECTED]
***
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http
lol I think I will leave this one alone, I think i'm making you're job
more difficult instead of the other way around!
Please do send through your solution when you find it so I can have
that 'light bulb' moment.
Cheers,
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au
A demo would be helpful, but have you tried something along the lines
of the following:
div id=footer
ul
lia href=/link1Link1/a/li
lia href=/link2Link2/a/li
...
/ul
/div
div#footer{text-align:center;}
div#footer ul li{display:inline;list-style-type:none; }
Cheers,
--
Matt Fellows
http
other.
Or am i still missing something?
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL
server logs/analytics, you might be able to see that only
.07% (~500 of about 700,000 on our site) actually use MSIE 5.0. Then
you can make the argument that it is not worth it.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au
I humbly suggest my own:
http://www.onegeek.com.au/articles/programming/javascript-form-validation.php:)
Completely unobtrusive and requires only valid XHTML. If you have a little
bit of JS knowledge you can easily extend the functionality.
Cheers,
Matt
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Casey
]
***
--
Matt Fellows
http://www.onegeek.com.au/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help
a
similar approach that integrates access key's into these menu's as
well.
Is there a reason for not using 'accesskey' at all?
Cheers,
Matt
On 3/12/08, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nice job! has the feel of web 2.0.
dwain
Web 2.0? Am I looking at the wrong site (http://lflegal.com
Interesting. Thanks Thierry!
On 3/12/08, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Fellows
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 4:33 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] WCAG 2
that of the surrounding content.
I am unsure as to if it is more important that the label? But I can
see a clear benefit for blind users. So what do we do?
Cheers,
Matt
P.S. Although a while away, we do have these sorts of things to look forward to:
* http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-diff-20080122
if the form is broken over several pages (have I
already entered this information?).
Cheers,
Matt
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help
In some cases that's an excellent solution (what I've been using for a
while) but unfortunately power users will dial down verbosity so much that
they will quiet legends as well.
A blind power user I know told me * is best. He also told me nothing else is
needed, but he's a person and that
statistical significance however so it might be a while before I have
something useful.
Cheers,
Matt
On 2/26/08, Mike at Green-Beast.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
that the following legend is
superflous and prevents logical grouping.
fieldset
legendRequired/legend
If you have Adobe CS, you can try exporting the PNG image as PNG-8.
Cheers,
Matt
http://www.onegeek. http://www.onegeek.com.aucom.auhttp://www.onegeek.com.au
On 2/21/08, Amrinder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I looked for the working of .png image in internet explorer and found two
.
Cheers,
Matt
[1] - http://www.askthecssguy.com/2006/12/showing_hyperlink_cues_with_cs_1.html
On 2/16/08, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/16/08, Joe Ortenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Icons also help people make quick choices and allow you to provide the
documents in a tabular format when
on a limb here - does anybody else feel the same? If so, do you have a
suggestion as to how we can better the quality of the list?
Matt
On 2/15/08, John Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please can this be closed? It's far off any standards related topic.
Possibly the only thing I can see
and implementing your
specific needs. I've still got a bit of work to do on it, but you can
certainly get an idea.
The url is:
http://www.onegeek.com.au/articles/programming/javascript-form-validation.php
I'd be happy to help you if you need, just shoot us through an email.
Cheers,
Matt
On 2/12/08
,
Matt
On 2/13/08, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt, thank you very much! Your JS library looks very interesting
and I certainly will play with it. I see that the radio group has not
been implemented, is this something coming out soon?
The web form has radio buttons with multi-selection
Forms should be marked up as you would anything else; If you are placing a
paragraph in the form you should use a p. If you are placing a list inside
the form you should use a ul/ol, if you are placing headings inside the
form you should use h1-h6 etc. etc.
The inputs should be arranged using
A great point Casey. MS have taken the first major step in moving towards a
standards compliant industry and we, the web designer, are complaining that
it's going to break our old sites hacked up for IE6/IE7. The saying says 'we
can't have our cake and eat it too', but in fact we can. We have
A JavaScript function that you might be interested in is called the
'Suckerfish' technique. It is a well known problem that IE is difficult at
best in these situations so to avoid lots of css hacks etc. you can use a
little bit of JS instead. It's accessible, standards compliant and easy to
use.
This is not the appropriate forum to be raising these types of issues.
There are plenty of places elsewhere from which you can find more
information about spam detection and filtering. My suggestion would be to
start with Google, as they are your particular email host.
Cheers,
-- Matt
OneGeek
I have a 2 pixel wide page border that needs to maintain its autostretched
limit to the browser window, as it gets filled with content. The code I've
supplied below *apparently* does what's needed in IE6. It doesn't work
the same with Firefox 2.0. Resizing the browser window behaves expectedly in
objects and several other inherent delays. However,
the current approach is more for prototyping purposes as well as
settling an off-topic pending point.
Could you show me how to correctly position the image overlay in
the content-reserved portion in my example.
Thanks,
Matt
On 8/1/07
to
acheive the same effect.
Matt
On 8/1/07, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt wrote:
I guess there were a couple of concerns raised. One of them was the
justification of the table's use. I chose it only because it
is currently the only way I know to put pretty borders (outer
this without resolving to a
Javascript or CSS hack ?
Matt
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
of
this, several such tables will form part of a bigger table (this concept is
quite similar to a thumbnail view of a slide show)
If you perceive the general idea, perhaps you might have examples that
illustrate this using CSS ?
Matt
On 7/31/07, Mark L Hedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just use CSS
almost all of my needs, except for the fact that the image won't fit
completely within the table background defined space.
Matt
On 7/31/07, Daniel Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,
Give me more details. What type of border is this around your page
content?
like if you had a square you have
standards within the
context of Web Content Management at universities and other large
organisations.
Apologies for late notice, but for those in Brisbane (or who might be in
Brisbane on Saturday!) if you're interested, would be great to see you
there.
Best Regards,
Matt
QUT is hosting
at large (!)
I greatly appreciate insights from educators (or former educators) such as yourself - because it gives other web design professionals a greater sense of what the educational establishments are teaching to the next generation of potential web professionals.
Regards,Matt
On 10/02/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Angus at InfoForce Services wrote:
Most people have JAVAScript turned off,
According to what statistics? I think you'll find most people actually
have it turned on.
Indeed. I can report from some recent testing on the sites I work on
On 10/02/06, Angus at InfoForce Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lachlan and Matt
Thank you for the information. I should recheck. Do you have information
about International web users?
For the sites I referred to as having less than 0.1% of members with
Javascript turned off, the users
On 01/02/06, russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a far-from-guru-status Web Standards supporter/coder (I try) I have
witnessed, on this list and on another css-specific list, quite a bit of
condescending and 'forced-opinion' type of replies. It doesn't make for a
nice atmosphere
On 31/01/06, Kat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kat wrote:
Their answer was that they used the table-based layout because they did
not like the way style sheets render in IE, and that encoding is not
utilised for search engine reasons.
Wow. Those guys *really* have some catching up to do.
Jose - Probably a margin padding issue. Try reducing the padding margin
and position the bullets with the xy positioning on the background rule
for the li or a:li.
I'm not that great with css, you'll probably get some better answers.
Have a nice holiday.
Matt
Hello,
Does anyone can help me
On 12/12/05, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I'm just not sure it makes really good sense to add any kind of
separators between links since they don't add any value from a usability
point of view. They are just visuals that may come out as noise.
I agree with you, Georg. My
On 12/12/05, Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, so (to go along with the Google debate), we can save more
bandwidth by omitting html, head and body? Interesting.
Indeed, and Rimantas did just that in his version:
http://rimantas.com/bits/google/google.html
I'm slightly wary of doing
On 10/12/05, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/9/05, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/2005, at 1:20 AM, matt andrews wrote:
Hi Lea, I completely agree. Google have somehow developed a blind
spot when it comes to meeting even the basics of current web
On 09/12/05, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08/12/2005, at 10:29 PM, James Ellis wrote:
Having a valid frontend has nothing to do with whether an
organisation attempts to be socially responsible. I'm sure there
are heaps of slightly dodgy organisations out there that hire
to the home page. (:
Best regards,
-Matt Harris
www.focusontheclouds.com
On 30/11/05, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the question remains, does a release version profile with web dev
installed work without doing anything special when upgrading the release
version from 1.0.x to 1.5?
And the answer is: yes. (for me, on WinXPSP2, from 1.0.7, with
planets in
mostly on the PC, so Mac users, let me know if you
run into any obvious problems. Everything should be working good in
Firefox and Opera - only thing that is missing in IE is the hover
effect for photo lists.
Looking forward to your input and thanks for your help!
-Matt Harris
On 23/11/05, Geoff Pack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Bert - use the start attribute and a transitional dtd. It's
cleaner, more concise, and captures exactly the semantics of what you are
doing. You don't need the div around the text info though.
Of course you could always write
On 21/09/05, Blank Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/05, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not on this don't use verbs boat at all because I haven't yet
found (or just missed :( ) a justification for it. While I don't by
default, or even often, use a verb in a link,
up-to-date reviews of the latest and greatest WYSIWYG editors?
Best regards,
Matt Harris
www.focusontheclouds.com
a link to the list?
Thanks!
Matt Harris
www.focusontheclouds.comOn 8/26/05, scott reston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:you're probably about to get an invitation to join the CMS list from
about 5 people... that's probably a better forum for the question...that said, i've been happy with XStandard
Does anyone have any good iCalendar resources to share? Other than
hCal, I can't find many good iCal examples, let alone tutorials.
I hope this is an appropriate question for the WSG -- if not, where
else could I look for answers?
Matt Hampel
I'll second the Textpattern reccomendation. It's free, and the
learning curve is very reasonable. It's easy for complete beginners to
use the system. And it cuts development time by a siginifigant ammount
because it uses a logical, non-constraining template system.
Matt
On 8/16/05, morten
Nicely done! I have a quick question for you (or anyone)... what is the purpose of this code?
#content-ctr:after{ display:block; visibility:hidden; content:.; clear:both; height:0; }/* \*/* html #content-ctr{height:1%}/* */
--
Thanks!
Matt Harris
www.focusontheclouds.com
On 8/2/05, David Laakso
Thanks, David!On 8/2/05, David Nicol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,I'm reliably informed by our in-house CSS 'guru' that you'll find youranswer here@http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
Hope this makes some sense.CheersDavid
On 27/07/05, Hope Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/7/05 8:00 PM, Jorge Laranjo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the bottom of the page, you have a p class=clear/p
make that p class=clearnbps;/p
p class=clearnbsp;/p
Note, nbsp; and not nbPS;
When I've needed to clear a floated,
On 28/07/05, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, where I got confused is with the static attribute which
does not take top, right, bottom and left values(http://
www.w3schools.com/css/pr_class_position.asp). So if an item is not
positioned when using fixed, it is fixed
CSS specificity,
not asking for a change in markup.
Suggest you read Russ' earlier reply closely.
cheers,
matt andrews.
On 25/07/05, John Yip wrote:
When the ID and the CLASS have the different value on the same
attribute, the ID always wins. However, you can use span/span to
achieve what you
On 22/07/05, Rob Unsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I need some help in checking the following page is rendering Ok in IE 5.x
and IE 6.
I am unable to test in these browsers due to a hd crash and the subsequent
decision it was time to refurbish my system. Until finished I have no
Is there any reason at all to ever use small, and big?
I know they are visual elements, but I thought I heard somewhere
that small represents a tonal adjustment, for screen readers - such
as *lowering* the tone of voice.
em and strong provide levels of emphasis - but is there an
opposite to
Quick question, I have a client with lots of HTML file that have inline CSS.
(Over 300 docs)
Good Lord, what was that previous author thinking!??
There's no escaping this problem - you're just gonna have to start
from scratch. Don't waste your time with export/import methods.
MATTHOM
I know in CSS, there is a method to select the 'first child' of an
element, as well as the 'first adjacent element', within an element.
However, is there a way to select the 'next adjacent element' - within
the same parent?
Example:
div class=picture
/div
h3Headline/h3
pParagraph text/p
Do you mean something like
div.picture + h3 {...}
I'm pretty sure I mean that - I am, perhaps, confused on what the plus
(+) sign does.
I was under the impression that your example meant this:
div class=picture
h3.../h3
/div
.. rather than this:
div class=picture
...
/div
h3.../h3
I've noticed that the CSS 'line-height' property provides extra
spacing between list items, such as in an ordered list, unordered
list, as well as definition lists.
In the past, I've always used the 'margin' property to add spacing
between list items.
IE:
ul li
{
margin-bottom: 5px;
}
However,
I would use Flash to play the audio and provide an alternative link to
the sound file as alternative content
Yes, I agree. Flash is extremely versatile with handling audio files -
and if you have even just a little experience with Flash, you can
easily export a SWF file with an MP3 embedded.
Do you have a link to the table in question so we can see whats not
working (and the way you want it to work?)
hint :
border-collapse : collapse; gets rid of the need for cellpadding and
cellspacing in the html
Yes, it's better to put all your presentational code in the CSS.
I am
Thanks for all of your help!
MATTHOM
On 5/7/05, James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
The WDG HTML 4.0 reference is a good guide to determine these things:
http://htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/block/blockquote.html
Cheers
James
Hello, I'm having some trouble deciding if certain blockquote
scenarios are valid, or semantically correct.
Example 1:
pblockquoteTEXT/blockquote/p
OR
blockquotepTEXT/p/blockquote
OR
blockquoteTEXT/blockquote
- Is the p even necessary? If so, does it go INSIDE or OUTSIDE the
blockquote?
Why do you want all those header tags in there- for display purposes?
I don't think it's invalid - I just don't see the purpose yet
It's probably better to just class the ul or li, such as ul
class=heading1, and then style all those headings for the correct
appearance.
Matthom
matthom.com/
I experience this vertical line problem quite a bit. It only happens
on my Mac - using Firefox.
It's something to do with Firefox, because it doesn't seem to happen
in any other browser.
Also, I don't recommend Firefox for the Mac. For the PC, it's great.
The Mac version has issues.
MATTHOM
wondered if there is a standards compliant way
that I can wrap an A HREF around the flash object, so that the
hyperlinking is controlled by the web page, not the flash file?
That way users without Flash can still link through to the target page.
Any Ideas?
Cheers,
Matt
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:54:59 +1000, Gary Menzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are plenty of accesible free webmail clients available.
Explan to me why GMail has to make it's product accessible to everyone?
It's not that Google *has to* make GMail accessible, semantic,
minimal, and all the
ignore the fact that
i might have heavy CSS (its much better than my old nested table tag
soup).
Cheers,
Matt
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
