Jack Pivac wrote:
on 17/03/06 15:04 R Walker (RMW Web Publishing) said the following:
Try page-break-inside: avoid; on your divs.
Yeah am using that at the moment but it doesn't seem to do anything...
As much as I have tested, this only seems to work in Opera.
Maybe you should just try
Dear Kevin
I'm a .net developer, working entirely in web standards and producing
semantically correct xhtml output from server side code. There is little
or no exra effort required to produce output on a web page (in ASP.NET -
a web form) that meets web standards. Your developer can output data
I'm an ASP.NET programmer, so I know. I actually have the reverse
problem. The designer I work with doesn't have the faintest idea about
standards and I'm the one cleaning out the layout tables.
Nice one Ben! Sack the designer!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On 3/17/06, Peter Goddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm an ASP.NET programmer, so I know. I actually have the reverse
problem. The designer I work with doesn't have the faintest idea about
standards and I'm the one cleaning out the layout tables.
Nice one Ben! Sack the designer!
Awww, I'm
on 17/03/06 23:46 Rene Saarsoo said the following:
As much as I have tested, this only seems to work in Opera.
Maybe you should just try to force page-break after every third
office-div (it seems that three of those fit nicely on one page...
especially when you remove the header). Probably
Me.
On 14/03/2006, at 11:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is an extremely subjective question to ask... However...
Does anyone have an opinion (ha!) regarding who they believe to be
the most
creative/impressive standards-based Web interface designer/s in
Australia
Peter Goddard wrote:-- I would even suggest that you-- consider picking up the basics of aspx page development, not the code,-- but the web controls that are available in .net and see if you can
-- suggest how you can work more closely ...a great informative post Peter.Another vote here for the
Thanks Ben
ASP.NET 2.0 makes this so much easier!
ATB
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Wong
Sent: 17 March 2006 10:38
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] .net question
On 3/17/06, Peter Goddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grant Bissett wrote:
Me.
I agree. Indeed, to coin a phrase, me too!
- mark
(who's not even Australian)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
Hi Peter
Its pleasing that mysuggestion seems to be making
sense, given that i am a stand alone developer in a small company and its my
first .net role!
I think you are absolutely right, Peter, and your clear
example illustrates that collaboration wins every time!
Lets all wish Kevin the
Dejan Kozina wrote:
[...] phone owners just do not upgrade their browsers. They're far
more likely to buy a new phone that to mess with the handset's
preinstalled software. [...]
Very interesting and informative reply Dejan, thank you. We've been
discussing mobile content publishing for
Thanks Peter, and Ben, for great insight.
I will try to a collaborative aproach with the developer.
I know that a in a previous situation with another developer we used
repeaters to output standards code,
i would like to be able to stick css possitioning into a form repeater for
him. im not
No worries. You might find some useful articles at
www.aspnetresources.com. Milan is _the_ man when it comes to ASP.NET
and web standards.
Agreed, Peter. ASP.NET 2.0 is a big step forward in the right direction.
On 3/17/06, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Peter, and Ben, for great
Title: Out of Office AutoReply: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office, returning 21 March. Please contact Brian Milne or Catherine McLeavey for assistance.
A new monthly electronic newsletter covering all aspects of MED's work is
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Can I get a consensus that this is actually the right way to do it?
It feels right, but I'd like the opinion of my venerable peers :o)
Looks right to me. Note that in a large site with a lot of form pages
(online banking, for example) putting meaningful IDs for all
Does anyone know if there is a stand alone IE6 installer
anywhere? Similar to IE4 and IE5. I am running IE7 and I really dont want
to uninstall just to test couple of sites on IE6.
...helmut
Helmut Granda wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a stand alone IE6 installer anywhere?
Similar to IE4 and IE5. I am running IE7 and I really don’t want to
uninstall just to test couple of sites on IE6.
...helmut
Helmut,
What you are running is a preview release of IE7 Beta 2 not
Wow that was fast!
Thanks I had been looking for this for days now.
...helmut
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Christian Montoya
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:30 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Stand alone IE6
Jay,
Thanks for your explanation and your recommendation, I didn't think of using
IE7 as SA (I didn't even knew it was available). I am aware that I'm running
a Beta and all of the technical difficulties that could come with using Beta
software. But I'm not too concerned since I don't use IE as
Helmut Granda wrote:
Jay,
Thanks for your explanation and your recommendation, I didn't think of using
IE7 as SA (I didn't even knew it was available). I am aware that I'm running
a Beta and all of the technical difficulties that could come with using Beta
software. But I'm not too concerned
20 matches
Mail list logo
