Hi,
could used named ampersand character codes.
http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/text/specialcharacters.html
eg ‘SOAP’
On Wed, November 19, 2008 4:05 pm, James Jeffery wrote:
> Never had a problem with character encodings on web pages, but since I
> reinstalled the OS on my iMac I have had an iss
Hi,
The guidelines state:
"Guideline 12.3: Divide large blocks of information into more manageable
groups where natural and appropriate. [Priority 2]
Content developers should group information where natural and appropriate.
When form controls can be grouped into logical units, use the FIELDSET
Blinking text is against standards in itself, so how can you do it in a
standards compliant way?
On Fri, November 28, 2008 10:45 am, Dave Hall wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 23:11 -0600, Brett Patterson wrote:
>> What Dave?
>
> I was simply illustrating how to make text blink in a standards
> com
It may validate, but valid code is just a pre-requisite to achieving
standards compliance.
On Fri, November 28, 2008 8:43 pm, Dave Hall wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 13:07 +0000, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>> Blinking text is against standards in itself, so how can you do it in a
>
Am I confused? I thought was a block-level element.
On Mon, December 1, 2008 6:32 pm, Andrew famiano wrote:
> I'm trying to set a background color on a . I want the background to
> be
> the same width as the header. Since inline-block isn't supported by all
> browsers, is there another trick in
which could easily be a standard but is effectively not
> one. However, complying with WCAG confers added benefits which
> standards compliance creators strive for.
>
> On 29/11/2008, at 09:22 , Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>
>> It may validate, but valid code is just a pre-requi
If the text in Flash is accessible SEs will index it.
Search robots are in effect blind readers.
If text in Flash is accessible, screen readers can read it.
However, sensible screen-reader users disable Flash.
On Wed, January 14, 2009 7:21 pm, Christie Mason wrote:
> It seems that SEs are be
Perhaps the students should code the site - they couldn't do much worse!
On Fri, January 16, 2009 7:00 pm, Fred Ballard wrote:
> Take a look at Sullivan High School's http://www.sullivanhs.org/. As you
> can
> see in the homepage's lower right corner it's from the Chicago Public
> Schools, http:/
As I said - the coding errors.
On Sat, January 17, 2009 8:03 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
> What did you find to be so bad about the site, Stuart?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Stuart
&
I think it's a clash between microformats VS html AND accessibility
standards.
On Mon, January 19, 2009 12:48 am, Ben Rowe wrote:
> on microformats.org, it suggests the ABBR element and title attribute
> for machine code. however, title attribute for this element will be read
> out to a screen re
See:
http://accessites.org/site/2007/02/graceful-degradation-progressive-enhancement/4/
On Fri, January 30, 2009 12:29 pm, kie...@humdingerdesigns.co.uk wrote:
> Agreed - people certainly aren't getting any smarter as far as web
> technologies go. Particuarly as the web is now viewed as a common
Mmm.. something strange happening with line spacing, cursor positioning or
something in this column.
If you try and "block" (as in block and paste) a piece of text you
actually have to move the cursor along the line above. Weird???
This could mean that you can never actually position the cursor
Another clue... If you position the text cursor (as opposed to the mouse
cursor) on the text just before a link... then use the right-arrow key to
move this cursor over the link... then the link works as it should.
On Fri, February 6, 2009 11:53 pm, Kristine Cummins wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'm havi
Also take account of results in published surveys of actual users.
For example, see screen-reader user survey:
http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/
On Sat, February 14, 2009 11:35 pm, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
> On 11/2/09 05:59, Henrik Madsen wrote:
>> What similar software / onl
Possibly
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990321.html
On Fri, February 20, 2009 3:25 am, Chris Vickery wrote:
> Thanks. Not really what I'm looking for. I know the principals myself...
> I'm looking for a site, a guide... something more substantive or with some
> authority. If it's in relatively pl
Which IS semantic and separates content (the link) from presentation (a
button).
On Mon, February 23, 2009 10:56 pm, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, John Horner wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the discussion so far. It seems I'll have to re-code.
>> I will definitely not be using Java
Which IS semantic and separates content (the link) from presentation (a
button).
On Mon, February 23, 2009 10:56 pm, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, John Horner wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the discussion so far. It seems I'll have to re-code.
>> I will definitely not be using Java
No contradiction.
"WCAG 2.0 Recommendation is the normative document."
"Not all techniques can be used or would be effective in all situations."
Therefore, any particular TECHNIQUE is not REQUIRED for conformance.
That is to say, if you have some other technique that meets the WCAG
recommenda
possibly something to do with:
#websemantics a {display:none}
producing an empty ?
On Fri, March 13, 2009 10:33 am, Foskett, Mike wrote:
> An excellent tool.
>
> I'm intrigued as to why this code would flag an error:
>
> Welcome to siteName - blah blah blah
> ...
> siteName
>
Err... sorry about my initial confusion - I've had a long day.
Perhaps,
"The text content of each h1 element should match all or part of the title
content. "
means that ALL the h1 text content,
"Welcome - work, you're welcome to it"
should match PART of the title content - which of course it
it"
should match part of the title content (which of course it doesn't).
Try removing the tagline so it just reads "Welcome" and test again.
On Sat, March 14, 2009 12:35 am, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>
> possibly something to do with:
>
> #websemantics a {di
This list is aware of many "marketing practices" that are against Web
Standards.
On Wed, March 25, 2009 3:46 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
> No, previous arguments still miss the point.
>
>
>
> Having a button on a browser for booksmarks is not comparable
>
> to having a "Bookmark this page" link on
The Web Standards Group is for web designers & developers who are
interested in web standards (HTML, XHTML, XML, CSS, XSLT etc.) and best
practices (accessible sites using valid and semantically correct code).
We aim to:
* Provide web developers and designers with a forum to discuss issues
a
The point of the introduction of Web standards was so that user-agent
manufacturers can create browsers that render them as intended by the
designer.
And that, yes, in 10 years time the browsers that exist then (whatever
form they may take)will still render them as intended because they are
writ
Try http://www.expresspdf.com/ConvertHtmlToPdf.aspx
with page orientation set to LANDSCAPE.
On Mon, March 30, 2009 2:30 pm, agerasimc...@unioncentral.com wrote:
> I have a problem converting my web pages, which are CSS driven into PDFs
> (users usually do Right Click - convert page to PDF) - the
sine qua non = indispensible
On Thu, July 2, 2009 9:27 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
>> It is the sine qua non of accessibility
>
> And that's exactly the point I'm trying to make...just addressing the
> font-size issue
> is the most basic form of accomodation possible. We can do better.
>
> On Thu,
Hi,
if the different links are in clearly defined different areas there should
be little confusion, even with using the same colors reversed. If you mix
them in the same menu, then there's obviously a problem of consistency of
the meaning.
However, what you should NOT do, from a usability poin
On Sun, August 9, 2009 3:53 am, tee wrote:
>
>
...
> However, seeing that HTML 5 has given hr tag a new purpose:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-hr-element
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#flow-content-0
>
> quote:
> The hr element represents a paragraph-level thema
Hi Marvin,
I am interested in your angle on regarding the repeating alt attribute
values in your menu, e.g. alt="Closed Banana".
This would appear to be against basic WCAGC accessibility guidelines, and
also totally unnecessary verbiage for the listener.
What is your reasoning for doing this?
Perhaps you could use separate lists for each sub-heading then use the
appropriate start value for each list.
Using something similar to:
http://www.arraystudio.com/as-workshop/make-ol-list-start-from-number-different-than-1-using-css.html
(maybe an unordered list(definition list?) of subheadin
Try onload() event handler, see:
http://javascript.about.com/library/bltut31.htm
On Fri, October 9, 2009
6:55 am, Western Web Design wrote:
> Kepler Gelotte wrote:
>>> In IE6, although the image fades and replaces etc, the #header is
>>> enlarged to accommodate all 4 images though three remain h
;Try onload() event handler"
>
> Alternatively place the script at the bottom of the page?
>
>
> mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
> Behalf Of Stuart Foulstone
> Sent: 09 October 2009 11:00
I'd recommend backing files up.
On Tue, October 20, 2009 2:57 am, Luke Hoggett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry you lost your file.
>
> As a precaution in the future I'd recommend installing some sort of
> version control e.g. svn can seem a bit daunting to install or overkill
> for 1-2 people but in the lo
Since links are inline elements, they shouldn't contain block elements,
such as and .
Why not use (native) inline elements? You should then be able to
use CSS to display them as you wish (including display: block if you want)
using the classes you have ascribed.
On Wed, November 4, 2009 12:3
A good start would be to validate your coding and correct the errors.
On Mon, November 16, 2009 1:38 pm, Prisca schmarsow wrote:
> Hello everyone :)
>
> Would you be willing to evaluate a website which is a resource for web
> designers and developers on the topic of web accessibility and
> intel
What you're trying to do is alter the display of the native list structure
- not the links.
That is you want to display the list-items inline and floated left. (
e.g.
.navlist li {
display: inline;
float: left;
list-style-type: none;
}
On Wed, November 18, 2009 10:2
Hi Marvin,
The semantics of the headers on your recipe page are wrong.
Headers show the structure of the underlying document with the numbering
indicating the position of importance and order.
Thus,
recipe name
Ingredients
Directions
Country
would relate the country, , to the previous recipe's
It might be that xml requires lowercase only and that the problem is the
"H" in the id "div_Heading".
On Thu, December 17, 2009 8:41 am, Grant Bailey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently started serving my web pages as xml pages using the MIME
> type application/xhtml+xml rather than text/css as pr
Why,oh why, don't people validate their code and remove their own errors
before complaining about some browser or other doing it wrong.
This is supposed to be Standards list.
On Wed, January 13, 2010 2:34 am, stephanie campanella wrote:
> Hey Guys,
> I'm experiencing an issue with IEUn comm
Hi Marvin,
I don't have any experience with screen-readers, but here is a suggestion.
It seems the only place you have defined a font is on "body".
Maybe it just reads out the explicit attributes you give the header, as in
"center".
Try defining the same font-family on the header, as well, to s
yes
On Wed, January 20, 2010 8:58 am, Marvin Hunkin wrote:
> hi.
> last page for this site.
> still getting errors.
> am i stupid or some thin.
> marvin.
>
> Markup Validation Service
> Check the markup (HTML, XHTML, .) of Web documents
>
> Jump To:Validation Output
> Errors found while checking
I have a chicken - explain how to make it into an egg.
On Sun, January 31, 2010 11:46 pm, Andrew Stewart wrote:
> Sorry to ask again, but please explain how the site could be made
> accessible whilst maintaining the same ease of use?
>
> On 1 Feb 2010, at 10:31, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
>
>>> From:
Hi Marvin,
On Wed, February 3, 2010 11:50 pm, Webb, KerryA wrote:
> You should check the "Top of page" links on the Recipes page. They each
> seem to go to the start of the previous recipe rather than to the top of
> the Web page.
>
> Kerry
>
That is, you have links with duplicate link-text po
No, it's proprietary approach, not a standards approach.
It's like when people said that the very "popularity" of IE means we don't
need to deal with other browsers. I don't think that was healthy.
On Thu, April 1, 2010 8:57 pm, tee wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
>
Really?
12.44%(IE6)of 67.11%(IE overall) is 8.3% (8.348484 truncated).
How do you get 9.64%?
Stuart
On Fri, June 11, 2010 1:57 pm, Foskett, Mike wrote:
> Quote: "ie IE 6 is at 8.3% overall - lower than your numbers, but still
> worth
> testing for."
>
> Sorry, no.
> The percentage was calculate
Any bets we'll still be using HTML5 in 2018?
On Sat, June 12, 2010 4:16 pm, Sam Sherlock wrote:
>>
>> Any bets for it being done in time to watch the 2018 World Cup on an
>> HTML 5
>> video feed?
>
>
> in a ie browser without any fudging?
>
> my initial response was only if Google are in position
But then again, how it displays is dependent on the fonts available on the
site visitor's system not what some graphic designer wants.
That's why many graphic designers make poor Web Designers - they can't get
their head round the flexibility that needs to be designed into a Website.
On Tue, Se
On Sat, October 23, 2010 3:46 am, tee wrote:
>
>
>
> Now I feel like the simpleton who tried enter the room with a long stick
> holding horizontally.
>
> tee
>
Is that horizontally, perpendicular to the entrance
or horizontally, parallel to the entrance?
Or rather, start with the the semantic structure of the page, then insert
the image into the structure appropriately.
On Sat, November 13, 2010 1:46 am, Christian Montoya wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Patrick H. Lauke
> wrote:
>> On 13/11/2010 01:23, cat soul wrote:
>>>
>>> Right..I
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/#tools
On Fri, November 26, 2010 11:25 pm, Daniel Anderson wrote:
> G'day Everyone,
>
> I was wondering if any of you have done any work on sites for the visually
> impaired? I have just started a projet for a school for the visually
> impaired and the
Might get some ideas from CSS Drop Shadows @
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/cssdropshadows/
On Wed, December 8, 2010 9:01 pm, cat soul wrote:
> I hope I'm not bending/breaking the purpose of the list but wanted
> opinions on best practices for preparing images for use on web pages
> where t
Hi,
Search engines are "blind" readers - design for accessibility.
Each page on the Website should be on a specific topic (except,
perhaps,for the Homepage). Put the topic first in the title tag, so that
it is easily identifiable from the other pages.
The top header in the page content should
Possibly you could use:
so they're not indexed in the first place.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 10:14 am, Bob Schwartz wrote:
> I have several sites where i use pop-up windows to present certain types
> of information.
>
> When someone does a Google search sometimes Google lists results from
> these p
Does your amplifier go up to 11?
On Fri, June 17, 2011 9:03 am, Grant Bailey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I can barely believe that CSS2.1 has only just become an official
> recommendation (see
> http://www.css3.info/css2-1-and-the-css3-color-module-become-official-w3c-recommendations/).
>
> Could anyon
hed to make it more standards compliant,
>
> before moving on to the accessibility "layer" I would appreciate it
> if you guys could check it out for any errors or "wrong practices"
>
> Thanks,
>
> bob
>
>
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bi
be marked
> up, but some clarity in the matter would help my work.
>
> Regards
>
> Lee Powell
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandards
that speech synthesizers will pronouce it correctly and
braille generators will be able to substitute the appropriate control
codes.
I was thinking more in terms of Web standards, rather than the standards
of other Websites (Danone - 260 coding errors errors on home page; Armani
- Flash!)
mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
69 Flockton Court
Rockingham Street
She
ed/fife.xml";>http://
> www.fifeweb.org/feed/fife.xml id="xmlfeed" alt="RSS Feed" title="FIFe RSS feed" width="72"
> height="15">
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Bob
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
69 Flockton Court
Rockingham Street
Sheffield
S1 4EB
Tel.
algorithm.
If the algorithm (semantics) don't make sense the it's visual presentation
(flowchart) won't either.
Nobody mentioned nesting flowcharts (whatever that means: a flowchart is a
flowchart).
Stuart
flow c
On Mon, March 26, 2007 9:38 am, Joshua Street wrote:
> On 3/26/07
On Mon, March 26, 2007 2:25 pm, Joshua Street wrote:
> On 3/26/07, Stuart Foulstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nobody mentioned nesting flowcharts (whatever that means: a flowchart is
>> a
>> flowchart).
>
> Well, no, but you'd have to nest *L's t
e at the top, and then
> for C you'd have . That'd be fun.
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
ECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/u
; Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
69 Flockton Court
Rockingham Street
Sheffield
S1 4EB
Tel. 07751 413451
**
p.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *******
>
>
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
69 Flockton Court
Rockingham Street
Sheffield
S1 4EB
Tel. 07751 413451
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tee G. Peng
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 5:13 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Need help with CSS breadcrumbs and navigation
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2007, at 12:53 AM, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
budge it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Chris Rahe
> Executive Director of Marketing and Development
> 1020 High Road - P. O. Box 8
> Bremen, IN 46506
> Telephone 574.546.8011
> Facsimile 574.546.4312
> Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> -Original
received this message in error or there are any
> problems with the transmission, please immediately notify us by return
> e-mail. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, or alteration of this
> message is strictly forbidden. The sender will not be liable for any
> damages arising from alt
ility to scan this email and any files transmitted
> with it for viruses or any other
> defects.
> education.au limited will not be liable for any loss, damage or
> consequence caused directly or indirectly by this email.
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org
lds so I
> wouldn't say they are purely accessibility oriented in nature.
>
> Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The labels are there for accessibility reasons, if you don't want to
>> design for accessibility, don't pretend to.
>>
>>
easing the "target area" (particularly useful for checkboxes and radio
buttons).
Stuart
On Thu, April 12, 2007 10:29 am, Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
> I would refer to that as usability.
>
> Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since the ability to click on the labe
/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
69 Flockton Court
Rockingham Street
Sheffield
S1 4EB
Tel. 07751 41
a.
Better to design to Web standards rather the standard of other Websites.
Stuart
On Thu, April 12, 2007 11:51 am, Patrick Lauke wrote:
>> Stuart Foulstone
>
>> If you're only concerned about providing form accessibility for
>> screenreaders, and no other disability,
*
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
&
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *******
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Desig
n your user testing :)
>
> Kat
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
Metropolitan Health Group, its subsidiaries or associates do not accept
> liability for any personal views expressed in this message.
>
> **********
>
>
> **
; opening any attachment you should check for viruses. The ABC's liability
> is
> limited to resupplying any email and attachments
> ==
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: ht
rg/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
69 Flockton Court
Rockingham Street
Sheffield
S1 4EB
Tel. 07751 413451
**
eem to be
> politically correct, it has become so common that even non-sighted users
> get
> it - it's like my blind friends saying "see you later": no harm, no foul.
>
> Cheers!
>
> JF
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ***
delines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
69 Flockton Court
Rockingham S
> Cheers!
>
> JF
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ******
>> IE7.
>>
>>
>>
>> Any and all assistance greatly appreciated!
>>
>>
>>
>> Cole
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ***
>> List Guidelines: http
uired to be
> forgiving of minor errors and several omissions.
>
> Cordially,
> David
> --
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.o
**
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *******
>
>
--
Stuart Foulst
well-formed
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.1
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#wellformed
>>
>>
>> Kat
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsub
language (which they then valdate).
As well as validating the code, they should also ensure that their markup
do not alter the well-formedness of the underlying document.
Stuart
On Sat, April 28, 2007 8:02 am, David Dorward wrote:
> Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>> Validation concerns the correctne
Hi,
sorry, I was thinking of a well formed document in general, rather than
specifically to a (X)HTML/XML markup document.
I seem be at cross purposes.
Stuart
On Sat, April 28, 2007 6:45 pm, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
> On 28 Apr 2007, at 18:18:00, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>
>> An
===
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
rsonified.com/2007/04/definitive-guide-to-semantic-markup.php
Stuart
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
69 Flockton Court
Rockingham Street
Sheffield
S1 4EB
Tel. 07751 413451
***
Lis
stion mark:
acronym {
font-weight: 800;
border-bottom: 1px dotted black;
cursor: help;
}
(For the semantics debate see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym - if
you have a few hours to spare)
Yours
Stuart
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Desi
aster.com
>
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>
>
> *********
--
> http://www.wolkinsphotography.com
> http://www.catscape.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTEC
group.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
>> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ***
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ---
>
> Paul Collins
> Ph: +44 (0) 793 9038 249 (UK)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED
ubmit=Submit
On Fri, May 18, 2007 3:47 pm, Jamie Collins wrote:
> Ive only recently started
> to understand that alot of disabled people use the internet, and its only
> fair that they should get the same usability as everyone else. All Web
> Developers should keep this in mind, a
e a table?
>
> --
> Bob
>
> www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
&
es: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
>
>
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ***
--
Stuart Foulstone.
http://www.bigeasyweb.co.uk
BigEasy Web Design
> having AAA standard or someting.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> regards
> Puneet
>
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [
101 - 200 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
