Does your amplifier go up to 11?
On Fri, June 17, 2011 9:03 am, Grant Bailey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I can barely believe that CSS2.1 has only just become an official
> recommendation (see
> http://www.css3.info/css2-1-and-the-css3-color-module-become-official-w3c-recommendations/).
>
> Could anyon
Hi Mike
Transitions work on both the iPhone 4 and Android (HTC Desire HD).
FYI - The iPhone displays the page full width so I need to zoom in to see the
menu however on the android the menu is great but I needed to scroll right to
see the the contact form.
Regards
Stuart
From: Andrew Maben
Possibly you could use:
so they're not indexed in the first place.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 10:14 am, Bob Schwartz wrote:
> I have several sites where i use pop-up windows to present certain types
> of information.
>
> When someone does a Google search sometimes Google lists results from
> these p
so I can’t comment further.
Heavy use of graphics and gradients would make the site slower to download,
especially if the end user was accessing the site over a cellular network.
Just my two cents.
Stuart
From: Birendra
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 1:08 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE
ent should also relate to the topic.
The "keywords" you wish to obtain search engine results for, for any
particular page, are presumably the page topic.
Stuart
On Tue, April 19, 2011 8:30 pm, Stevio wrote:
> When it comes to search engine optimisation, are you better to list the
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:10:03 -0800, tee wrote:
One of my clients did an implementation on his site, year ago the
usage of IE6 was over 15%; he had me put up an IE6 no more banner, 6
months later, the usage only dropped some 3%. Then I read news about
Google got hacked and that Microsoft asked
Might get some ideas from CSS Drop Shadows @
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/cssdropshadows/
On Wed, December 8, 2010 9:01 pm, cat soul wrote:
> I hope I'm not bending/breaking the purpose of the list but wanted
> opinions on best practices for preparing images for use on web pages
> where t
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/#tools
On Fri, November 26, 2010 11:25 pm, Daniel Anderson wrote:
> G'day Everyone,
>
> I was wondering if any of you have done any work on sites for the visually
> impaired? I have just started a projet for a school for the visually
> impaired and the
Or rather, start with the the semantic structure of the page, then insert
the image into the structure appropriately.
On Sat, November 13, 2010 1:46 am, Christian Montoya wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Patrick H. Lauke
> wrote:
>> On 13/11/2010 01:23, cat soul wrote:
>>>
>>> Right..I
I agree, traditional frameset layouts should be buried somewhere alongside
, however I have no issue with iframes and I suspect we're going to
see a lot more of them based on articles like this one -
http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/07/new-way-to-embed-youtube-videos.html
S
On Sat, October 23, 2010 3:46 am, tee wrote:
>
>
>
> Now I feel like the simpleton who tried enter the room with a long stick
> holding horizontally.
>
> tee
>
Is that horizontally, perpendicular to the entrance
or horizontally, parallel to the entrance?
But then again, how it displays is dependent on the fonts available on the
site visitor's system not what some graphic designer wants.
That's why many graphic designers make poor Web Designers - they can't get
their head round the flexibility that needs to be designed into a Website.
On Tue, Se
On 14 May I received this from MS as part of a mass mail-out
Subject "You wouldn't drink nine year old milk"
"The internet is a lot more advanced now.
So is Internet Explorer 8.
When Internet Explorer 6 was launched in 2001...
... To keep yourself safe, don't use an out-of-date browser."
So ye
Any bets we'll still be using HTML5 in 2018?
On Sat, June 12, 2010 4:16 pm, Sam Sherlock wrote:
>>
>> Any bets for it being done in time to watch the 2018 World Cup on an
>> HTML 5
>> video feed?
>
>
> in a ie browser without any fudging?
>
> my initial response was only if Google are in position
Really?
12.44%(IE6)of 67.11%(IE overall) is 8.3% (8.348484 truncated).
How do you get 9.64%?
Stuart
On Fri, June 11, 2010 1:57 pm, Foskett, Mike wrote:
> Quote: "ie IE 6 is at 8.3% overall - lower than your numbers, but still
> worth
> testing for."
>
> Sorry,
No, it's proprietary approach, not a standards approach.
It's like when people said that the very "popularity" of IE means we don't
need to deal with other browsers. I don't think that was healthy.
On Thu, April 1, 2010 8:57 pm, tee wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
>
nks with duplicate link-text pointing to different
anchors which contravenes accessibility standards.
You already have the anchor , so "Top of page" links
should point to this,
Top Of Page
Stuart
***
List Guideli
I have a chicken - explain how to make it into an egg.
On Sun, January 31, 2010 11:46 pm, Andrew Stewart wrote:
> Sorry to ask again, but please explain how the site could be made
> accessible whilst maintaining the same ease of use?
>
> On 1 Feb 2010, at 10:31, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
>
>>> From:
yes
On Wed, January 20, 2010 8:58 am, Marvin Hunkin wrote:
> hi.
> last page for this site.
> still getting errors.
> am i stupid or some thin.
> marvin.
>
> Markup Validation Service
> Check the markup (HTML, XHTML, .) of Web documents
>
> Jump To:Validation Output
> Errors found while checking
n the header, as well, to see if it
works then.
If that does not work, maybe it only reads out the header font-family if
it differs from the rest. Try defining a different font-family for the
headers.
Just an idea,
Stuart
On Sun, January 17, 2010 4:14 am, Marvin Hunkin wrote:
> hi.
> wel
Why,oh why, don't people validate their code and remove their own errors
before complaining about some browser or other doing it wrong.
This is supposed to be Standards list.
On Wed, January 13, 2010 2:34 am, stephanie campanella wrote:
> Hey Guys,
> I'm experiencing an issue with IEUn comm
It might be that xml requires lowercase only and that the problem is the
"H" in the id "div_Heading".
On Thu, December 17, 2009 8:41 am, Grant Bailey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently started serving my web pages as xml pages using the MIME
> type application/xhtml+xml rather than text/css as pr
Hi Marvin,
The semantics of the headers on your recipe page are wrong.
Headers show the structure of the underlying document with the numbering
indicating the position of importance and order.
Thus,
recipe name
Ingredients
Directions
Country
would relate the country, , to the previous recipe's
What you're trying to do is alter the display of the native list structure
- not the links.
That is you want to display the list-items inline and floated left. (
e.g.
.navlist li {
display: inline;
float: left;
list-style-type: none;
}
On Wed, November 18, 2009 10:2
A good start would be to validate your coding and correct the errors.
On Mon, November 16, 2009 1:38 pm, Prisca schmarsow wrote:
> Hello everyone :)
>
> Would you be willing to evaluate a website which is a resource for web
> designers and developers on the topic of web accessibility and
> intel
Since links are inline elements, they shouldn't contain block elements,
such as and .
Why not use (native) inline elements? You should then be able to
use CSS to display them as you wish (including display: block if you want)
using the classes you have ascribed.
On Wed, November 4, 2009 12:3
I'd recommend backing files up.
On Tue, October 20, 2009 2:57 am, Luke Hoggett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry you lost your file.
>
> As a precaution in the future I'd recommend installing some sort of
> version control e.g. svn can seem a bit daunting to install or overkill
> for 1-2 people but in the lo
;Try onload() event handler"
>
> Alternatively place the script at the bottom of the page?
>
>
> mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
> Behalf Of Stuart Foulstone
> Sent: 09 October 2009 11:00
Try onload() event handler, see:
http://javascript.about.com/library/bltut31.htm
On Fri, October 9, 2009
6:55 am, Western Web Design wrote:
> Kepler Gelotte wrote:
>>> In IE6, although the image fades and replaces etc, the #header is
>>> enlarged to accommodate all 4 images though three remain h
Perhaps you could use separate lists for each sub-heading then use the
appropriate start value for each list.
Using something similar to:
http://www.arraystudio.com/as-workshop/make-ol-list-start-from-number-different-than-1-using-css.html
(maybe an unordered list(definition list?) of subheadin
Hi Marvin,
I am interested in your angle on regarding the repeating alt attribute
values in your menu, e.g. alt="Closed Banana".
This would appear to be against basic WCAGC accessibility guidelines, and
also totally unnecessary verbiage for the listener.
What is your reasoning for doing this?
On Sun, August 9, 2009 3:53 am, tee wrote:
>
>
...
> However, seeing that HTML 5 has given hr tag a new purpose:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-hr-element
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#flow-content-0
>
> quote:
> The hr element represents a paragraph-level thema
Hi,
if the different links are in clearly defined different areas there should
be little confusion, even with using the same colors reversed. If you mix
them in the same menu, then there's obviously a problem of consistency of
the meaning.
However, what you should NOT do, from a usability poin
sine qua non = indispensible
On Thu, July 2, 2009 9:27 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
>> It is the sine qua non of accessibility
>
> And that's exactly the point I'm trying to make...just addressing the
> font-size issue
> is the most basic form of accomodation possible. We can do better.
>
> On Thu,
Try http://www.expresspdf.com/ConvertHtmlToPdf.aspx
with page orientation set to LANDSCAPE.
On Mon, March 30, 2009 2:30 pm, agerasimc...@unioncentral.com wrote:
> I have a problem converting my web pages, which are CSS driven into PDFs
> (users usually do Right Click - convert page to PDF) - the
The point of the introduction of Web standards was so that user-agent
manufacturers can create browsers that render them as intended by the
designer.
And that, yes, in 10 years time the browsers that exist then (whatever
form they may take)will still render them as intended because they are
writ
The Web Standards Group is for web designers & developers who are
interested in web standards (HTML, XHTML, XML, CSS, XSLT etc.) and best
practices (accessible sites using valid and semantically correct code).
We aim to:
* Provide web developers and designers with a forum to discuss issues
a
This list is aware of many "marketing practices" that are against Web
Standards.
On Wed, March 25, 2009 3:46 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
> No, previous arguments still miss the point.
>
>
>
> Having a button on a browser for booksmarks is not comparable
>
> to having a "Bookmark this page" link on
it"
should match part of the title content (which of course it doesn't).
Try removing the tagline so it just reads "Welcome" and test again.
On Sat, March 14, 2009 12:35 am, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>
> possibly something to do with:
>
> #websemantics a {di
Err... sorry about my initial confusion - I've had a long day.
Perhaps,
"The text content of each h1 element should match all or part of the title
content. "
means that ALL the h1 text content,
"Welcome - work, you're welcome to it"
should match PART of the title content - which of course it
possibly something to do with:
#websemantics a {display:none}
producing an empty ?
On Fri, March 13, 2009 10:33 am, Foskett, Mike wrote:
> An excellent tool.
>
> I'm intrigued as to why this code would flag an error:
>
> Welcome to siteName - blah blah blah
> ...
> siteName
>
No contradiction.
"WCAG 2.0 Recommendation is the normative document."
"Not all techniques can be used or would be effective in all situations."
Therefore, any particular TECHNIQUE is not REQUIRED for conformance.
That is to say, if you have some other technique that meets the WCAG
recommenda
Which IS semantic and separates content (the link) from presentation (a
button).
On Mon, February 23, 2009 10:56 pm, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, John Horner wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the discussion so far. It seems I'll have to re-code.
>> I will definitely not be using Java
Which IS semantic and separates content (the link) from presentation (a
button).
On Mon, February 23, 2009 10:56 pm, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, John Horner wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the discussion so far. It seems I'll have to re-code.
>> I will definitely not be using Java
Possibly
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990321.html
On Fri, February 20, 2009 3:25 am, Chris Vickery wrote:
> Thanks. Not really what I'm looking for. I know the principals myself...
> I'm looking for a site, a guide... something more substantive or with some
> authority. If it's in relatively pl
Also take account of results in published surveys of actual users.
For example, see screen-reader user survey:
http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/
On Sat, February 14, 2009 11:35 pm, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
> On 11/2/09 05:59, Henrik Madsen wrote:
>> What similar software / onl
Another clue... If you position the text cursor (as opposed to the mouse
cursor) on the text just before a link... then use the right-arrow key to
move this cursor over the link... then the link works as it should.
On Fri, February 6, 2009 11:53 pm, Kristine Cummins wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'm havi
Mmm.. something strange happening with line spacing, cursor positioning or
something in this column.
If you try and "block" (as in block and paste) a piece of text you
actually have to move the cursor along the line above. Weird???
This could mean that you can never actually position the cursor
See:
http://accessites.org/site/2007/02/graceful-degradation-progressive-enhancement/4/
On Fri, January 30, 2009 12:29 pm, kie...@humdingerdesigns.co.uk wrote:
> Agreed - people certainly aren't getting any smarter as far as web
> technologies go. Particuarly as the web is now viewed as a common
I think it's a clash between microformats VS html AND accessibility
standards.
On Mon, January 19, 2009 12:48 am, Ben Rowe wrote:
> on microformats.org, it suggests the ABBR element and title attribute
> for machine code. however, title attribute for this element will be read
> out to a screen re
As I said - the coding errors.
On Sat, January 17, 2009 8:03 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
> What did you find to be so bad about the site, Stuart?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Stuart
&
Perhaps the students should code the site - they couldn't do much worse!
On Fri, January 16, 2009 7:00 pm, Fred Ballard wrote:
> Take a look at Sullivan High School's http://www.sullivanhs.org/. As you
> can
> see in the homepage's lower right corner it's from the Chicago Public
> Schools, http:/
If the text in Flash is accessible SEs will index it.
Search robots are in effect blind readers.
If text in Flash is accessible, screen readers can read it.
However, sensible screen-reader users disable Flash.
On Wed, January 14, 2009 7:21 pm, Christie Mason wrote:
> It seems that SEs are be
which could easily be a standard but is effectively not
> one. However, complying with WCAG confers added benefits which
> standards compliance creators strive for.
>
> On 29/11/2008, at 09:22 , Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>
>> It may validate, but valid code is just a pre-requi
Am I confused? I thought was a block-level element.
On Mon, December 1, 2008 6:32 pm, Andrew famiano wrote:
> I'm trying to set a background color on a . I want the background to
> be
> the same width as the header. Since inline-block isn't supported by all
> browsers, is there another trick in
It may validate, but valid code is just a pre-requisite to achieving
standards compliance.
On Fri, November 28, 2008 8:43 pm, Dave Hall wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 13:07 +0000, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>> Blinking text is against standards in itself, so how can you do it in a
>
Blinking text is against standards in itself, so how can you do it in a
standards compliant way?
On Fri, November 28, 2008 10:45 am, Dave Hall wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 23:11 -0600, Brett Patterson wrote:
>> What Dave?
>
> I was simply illustrating how to make text blink in a standards
> com
n assistive
technology, but to provide a basis upon which assistive technologies may
be developed and improved.
Stuart
On Thu, November 27, 2008 11:29 pm, tee wrote:
> Hi Steven, thanks for the two links.
>
> I am replying in a new thread because, after reading the "Too much
>
Hi,
could used named ampersand character codes.
http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/text/specialcharacters.html
eg ‘SOAP’
On Wed, November 19, 2008 4:05 pm, James Jeffery wrote:
> Never had a problem with character encodings on web pages, but since I
> reinstalled the OS on my iMac I have had an iss
Actually, the label tag wrapped around form input is the "old traditional"
method.
The "for" attribute method was introduced later to allow designers greater
flexibility in positioning/styling forms whilst maintaining accessibility.
On Fri, October 17, 2008 12:53 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> T
Hi,
Early screen-readers were not very good at differentiating links and would
run together the text of two adjacent links so it was necessary to use a
"separator" character.
The vertical line (pipe) became the preferred character to separate
adjacent links because, whilst it is quite verbose -
Hi,
The WCAG guidelines state:
[Priority 1]
A Web content developer must satisfy this checkpoint. Otherwise, one
or more groups will find it impossible to access information in the
document. Satisfying this checkpoint is a basic requirement for some
groups to be able to use Web documents.
[P
Section 508 is a minimum standard required for Websites of US Government
contractors, etc. and so has been adopted by many other Websites too. It
is not law, as such.
Disability Discrimination legislation in Europe, the US and Oceania are
all very similar and require Website owners to take "reaso
On Mon, August 11, 2008 10:38 am, James Jeffery wrote:
> Disagree.
>
>...
>
> Again, just because something is a list does not mean it should be in a
> list. Take for example students grades. The school needs to list the name,
> the subject, the expected grade, the outcome (30/30) and a percenta
A list is the most appropriate for a list.
The fact that "price list" states "list" DOES mean a list should be used -
when you use the term "list" that's what the user then expects it to be.
If you don't want to use a list (for whatever pedantic reason) then don't
call it one. If you want to use
--
Stuart Foulstone.
On Fri, August 8, 2008 11:29 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To my mind, one of the most pressing questions that needs to be answered
> in any particular case is: "How is the fieldset labelled?"
> If it specifically says something like 'postcode'
If it's not a field it shouldn't be in a fieldset - which is a set of fields.
On Thu, August 7, 2008 10:07 am, Paul Collins wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is one I've never been sure of; should the submit button be in a
> seperate fieldset, or should it even be in a fieldset at all because it is
> not
I have no problem with elementary questions about Web standards.
But there are perhaps too many posts about how to write basic HTML mark-up
and elementary CSS. This is especially true when the 'poster' has
apparently not even tried to validate it (and, therefore, not seriously
tried to solve the
A is a LIST of definition terms and their description.
is a definition term to be described (not title).
is description of the definition term.
See http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/lists.html#h-10.3
On Mon, August 4, 2008 4:20 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was under the i
Another problem is that there are organisations which still have large
investments in a legacy O/S (MS included) on which IE7/8 cannot run.
So it's not just a time issue for downloading the browser, but upgrading
to a new O/S.
On Mon, August 4, 2008 8:03 am, James Ellis wrote:
> Hi
>
> Not wanti
A drop down list with a "Go" button is better than a jump menu for
accessibility standards.
If a user [can't use a mouse and] has to use the arrow keys for navigating
the menu you will find that jump menus tend to open the second option
automatically (i.e. when the user first uses the arrow key) a
Incidentally, the second part of the postcode should have maxlength="3"
(it is always three characters long).
On Wed, July 9, 2008 9:49 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have created a form which acts as a interface to a system outside of my
> control. This takes UK postcode in two parts (postcod
Please unsubscribe me
-Original Message-
From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 9:25 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: WSG Digest
*
WEB STANDARDS GROUP MAIL LIST DI
Flaming is definitely off topic!
On Fri, June 6, 2008 9:38 am, Ted Drake wrote:
> Damn, this is refreshing to hear for a change! Enough said.
> Ted
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mark Harris
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:13 AM
>
For discussion on usability of "breadcrumb" trails see Nielsen,
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/breadcrumbs.html
On Fri, June 6, 2008 7:45 am, libwebdev wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> My organisation manages around 7000+ pages for 100s of departments,
> using a CMS. Mine is the only department outside th
But, CSS changes presentation - displaying something as "block" doesn't
stop it being an inline element, just it's presentation.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 11:18 pm, Adam Martin wrote:
> img is only an inline element by default. Some simple css fixes that. An
> inline element does not have to be conta
But the Webpage (or the entire site for that matter) is not be about "The
Sun" or "The Times" - it's about the news. And the news is what the user
is looking for.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 9:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My take on this, is that IT ALL DEPENDS !
> Every site is different.
> For
I seem to remember someone in a previous thread, about similar problem,
suggested using,
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
On Sat, May 17, 2008 3:39 pm, Darren Lovelock wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I've been trying to find a solution that will allow me to vertically
> center
> all the items
But that's not because lots of people don't know how to use the address
bar, its because MOST PEOPLE find it easier to type partial URL's into
Google rather than typing the whole URL into the address bar - plus if you
make a slight error you get prompted for the correction rather than just
told i
This point originally concerned which character to use IF you use a
character to separate links. It did NOT say that this was the preferred
method.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 2:18 am, Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
>> Screen-reader users have said that the vertical bar is THEIR preferred
> character
>
> Really?
The reason for putting the character there in the first place is
explicitly to help screen-reader users distinguish between links.
Screen-reader users have said that the vertical bar is THEIR preferred
character (even though this means repeating "vertical bar") since it is
not used for anything el
>From a usability/accessibility point a view.
The most common separator used in such circumstances (and therefore that
most expected by screen-reader users) is the vertical bar.
i.e. IF you add extra characters for accessibility, use the ones they are
familiar with (usability).
Addition: apparen
. Here is how
you can do it with styles:
p.right {text-align: right}
p.center {text-align: center}
You have to use the class attribute in your HTML document:
This paragraph will be right-aligned.
This paragraph will be center-aligned.
On Sun, May 4, 2008 1:12 pm, Chris Price wrote:
> Stu
happens when you go
against the natural order of things.
On Sat, May 3, 2008 7:15 pm, Dean Matthews wrote:
> On May 3, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
>
>
> To be clear, I have a 1pixel bottom border on hover (It looks better
> than the default underline).
>
> The pro
use your css selectors to isolate
> the elements you wish to style.
>
> In the end, either choice will create the same effect. This one is a
> little more "future proof".
>
> Joseph R. B. Taylor
> /Designer / Developer/
> --
> Sit
PS
As someone mentioned earlier you should also remove borders from the image,
a img {
border: 0;
}
(since some browsers will treat border as underline in these circumstances)
On Sat, May 3, 2008 10:11 am, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
> Yes there is a simple way.
>
> Set up the anchor h
Or use a CSS class to do the same,
and
.centre {
text-align: center;
}
On Sat, May 3, 2008 10:22 am, Diego La Monica wrote:
> What about ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Diego La Monica
>
> Web 2.0 - Standards - Accessibilità
>
> mobile: +39 3337235382 - skype: diego.la.monica
>
> web: http://diegolamonic
Yes there is a simple way.
Set up the anchor hover rule using,
text-decoration: underline;
An image is NOT text so it will not underline the image.
The image should be given an alt text description for when the image is
not available. This text WILL be underlined on hover which is as it
should
Your problem is probably because your CSS converts the normally inline
span elements to floating block elements.
On Sun, April 27, 2008 10:41 am, Naveen Bhaskar wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have a table like this. Each table cell has two values which has put
> inside a span. I want this two values come ho
Why The Fuss?
On Fri, April 25, 2008 9:28 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
> Chill, out... and watch the language...
>
> Rick
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of ?? ?
>> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 3:54 PM
>> To: wsg@webstand
Depending on the circumstances, the cite tag may be appropriate.
Stuart
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Hi,
>From a usability and accessibility point of view doing this is a very bad
idea, so is way OT for Web Standards Group.
On Thu, April 10, 2008 11:54 pm, Laert Jansen wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> Well there´s something I want to do but I have no idea if it´s possible to
> be done and how would
title tag anyway - it shouldn't make
too much effort and may help in the design process semantics.
On Wed, April 2, 2008 11:30 pm, Anat Katz wrote:
>
> thanks for that Stuart.
>
> We have already implemented frame titles, we were actually referring to
> the page titles (found wit
Hi,
You might find the following link useful:
See http://www.webaim.org/techniques/frames/
Stuart
On Wed, April 2, 2008 1:13 am, Anat Katz wrote:
>
> Hi team,
>
> Just a general question - is there any value from a screen reader point of
> view, to have a specific title to t
While yet another 50+ age group, who invented the Internet and the World
Wide Web, continue to set the standards which stop it descending into
chaos.
On Mon, March 31, 2008 3:39 pm, Michael Horowitz wrote:
> I find most do. I think there is a wide disparity depending on who you
> work with.
But the bold text titles in this situation are usually at the same level
in the document structure so should have the same , say h3, heading level.
On Fri, March 28, 2008 7:08 pm, tee wrote:
> ... it's more than a challenge for a
> complicated columned layout that designer tends to use h3 for
d with any of the above, dependent on intention.
>> >
>> > I am one of those severely frustrated people who want to click
>> > underlined text so keep it out please...
>> >
>> > I like underline on hover as useful feedback that it is in fact, a
&g
Hi,
Usability.
Users expect link-text to be underlined. Many user studies found that
when you underline other text users try to click on it and get quite
annoyed when nothing happens (some users would click on the underlined
text several times before they gave up).
Originally links were to have
sided rather than browser/user agent?
>
> /Svip
>
> On 25/03/2008, Stuart Foulstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> RE:
>>
>> "When I hid the using display: hidden; the list would render
>> something like this"
>&g
Hi,
RE:
"When I hid the using display: hidden; the list would render
something like this"
I can't say I've ever felt the need to use these tags, but isn't hiding
the content supposed to be the job of the browser/user agent - rather than
you using CSS.
On Sun, March 23, 2008 12:43 pm, Thomas Th
1 - 100 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
