I am currently away from the office until Wednesday the 24th of September and
will reply to your email then.
All the best,
Steve Dangerfield.
0403 895050
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
I am currently away from the office until Wednesday the 24th of September and
will reply to your email then.
All the best,
Steve Dangerfield.
0403 895050
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
I am currently away from the office until Wednesday the 24th of September and
will reply to your email then.
All the best,
Steve Dangerfield.
0403 895050
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
I am currently away from the office until Wednesday the 24th of September and
will reply to your email then.
All the best,
Steve Dangerfield.
0403 895050
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
-compliance on IE's part, but I'm
not clever enough to fix it...
Oh, and does anyone know a fix for the non-compliant id's
Movable Type puts in?
Steve
- --
Stephen Collins
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W http://stephencollins.blogdns.org
ICQ 1014940
MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Y! trib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Hi Steve, IE commonly has problems with 100% width. Thisll fix it.
Magic! Awesome. Thanks a bunch.
Steve
--
Stephen Collins
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W http://www.stephencollins.org
ICQ 1014940
MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Y! trib
at the moment. Localized 16 ways.
It's certainly just the beginning for standards based web
development and design here at McAfee and as I mentioned to
Tim in my email to him, we're just getting started. :-)
Regards,
Steve Ganz
McAfee, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Iza Bartosiewicz
and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Regards
Steve Avery
[e]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[w]: www.steveavery.net
Jason,
I can't offer any suggestion, but I can advise that on XP SP 2, in both
FireFox 0.8 and IE 6.0 uarr; and darr; both render fine, and seem to
scale okay too...
Cheers
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Jason Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:42
Lyn,
It may be worth your taking a look at the site with a reasonably high
resolution set...some of the background images don't work so well (IMO) at
high resolutions (eg 1280 x 1024)
Cheers
Steve
Hi everyone
Would very much appreciate feedback as to any problems or mistakes.
Thank you
to the
document (eg http://myserver.com/mypage.php) as well as it's title...
TIA
Frustrated Fred (a.k.a Steve)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
other than that,
the overall user interface works well.
steve
fisher
los angeles,
ca
Original
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of James
GollanSent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:57 AMTo:
'Wsg'Subject: [WSG] FW: Site review
Would anyone have the ti
this extra bit of code. The major drawback is
that you have to be certain that this code executes before your script
(something you don't have to worry about with method 1).
Hope that helps!
Steve Bryant.
Bryant Web Consulting LLC
http://www.BryantWebConsulting.com/
http://steve.coldfusionjournal.com
Another nice approach that I have seen is FlashObject:
http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/03/31/proper-flash-embedding-flashobject-best-practices/
It uses JavaScript, but it looks like it degrades nicely.
Steve Bryant.
Bryant Web Consulting LLC
http://www.BryantWebConsulting.com/
http
that lets you
view a screen capture as a gray scale image without writing a file. Not
as handy as a FF extension would be but much better than using Photoshop.
--
Steve Clason
Web Design and Development
Boulder, Colorado, USA
www.topdogstrategy.com
(303)818-8590
. I use it
a lot as well but it's very different from DW except in general layout.
It's much better, for instance, for editing CF (or any other) code
than DW, not as good (IMO) for editing mark-up.
Just my USD0.02.
--
Steve Clason
Web Design and Development
Boulder, Colorado, USA
--
Steve Clason
Web Design and Development
Boulder, Colorado, USA
www.topdogstrategy.com
(303)818-8590
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
I expected the manual inputs to accept hex values since that's typically how we work with colors on the web. Perhaps you could offer the option of using hex or decimal?Steve Ferguson - Illumit L.L.C. http://illumit.comOn Oct 8, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Christian Montoya wrote:Hey all, Thanks
Nice! I wish I had thought of scaling screenshots to percent width, it looks better and would have saved me a lot of trouble.When I view the site using Safari it briefly renders the unstyled page. I haven't noticed this behavior before. Perhaps it's the @import?Steve Ferguson - http
It does appear that you've killed the Safari FOUC.
You should document this as appears to be somewhat of a mystery.
Nicely Done!
Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com
On Oct 10, 2005, at 11:31 PM, Christian Montoya wrote:
Safari FOUC
;}
a:visited {text-decoration: none;}
a:hover {background: #fc3;color: #fff;}
/style
--
Steve Clason
Web Design and Development
Boulder, Colorado, USA
www.topdogstrategy.com
(303)818-8590
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org
they lack full support for
setAttribute.
Or at least that was my experience--when I played around using Opera it
was much more fun.
--
Steve Clason
Web Design and Development
Boulder, Colorado, USA
www.topdogstrategy.com
(303)818-8590
).
--
Steve Clason
Web Design and Development
Boulder, Colorado, USA
www.topdogstrategy.com
(303)818-8590
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
What don't you want to use the W3C one?
On Nov 23, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Geoff Pack wrote:
Does anyone know of a downloadable CSS validator (other than the
W3C one) that I can install on an local server to batch check files
on my local network? We currently use the WDG html validator, but
On Nov 27, 2005, at 7:44 PM, Peter Williams wrote:
Geoff Pack wrote:
...install on an local server to batch check files
on my local network?
From: Steve Ferguson
What don't you want to use the W3C one?
...files on my local network, if you're working on an intranet
you can't use
validator with
WebLight for quite some time. That would give you what you want a
crawling css validator. Wish it was done now.
I just built the validator, it's kind of a pain. I'll post a binary
tommorow.
Cheers,
Steve Ferguson - Developer WebLight http://illumit.com/weblight
cheers,
Geoff
) and one broken link. See http://illumit.com/
reports/donkeymagic.html
Hope that helps,
Steve Ferguson - WebLight Developer - http://illumit.com/Products/
weblight/
Thanks,
Richard Stephenson
--
DonkeyMagic: Website design development
http://www.donkeymagic.co.uk
://help.joomla.org/content/view/805/125/
Cheers,
Steve Ferguson - http://illumit.com/
Regards,
Lloyd
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
-highlighting (color coding), it will make your life easier. I
like jEdit[2], but I'm sure other people's favorites are just as good.
[1] http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CssEditors
[2] http://www.jedit.org/
--
Steve Clason
Web Design and Development
Boulder, Colorado, USA
www.topdogstrategy.com
are interest running the css-validator locally take a look
at http://illumit.com/css-validator/. I'd appreciate your feedback.
Sincerely,
Steve Ferguson - Illumit http://illumit.com
cheers,
Geoff
**
The discussion list for http
looks OK in IE and Firefox, although the
difference in font size remains.
--
Steve Clason
Web Design and Development
Boulder, Colorado, USA
www.topdogstrategy.com
(303)818-8590
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
my five cents for the kitty.
Steve - WebLight Developer http://illumit.com/weblight
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
paragraphs, hypertext links, lists, tables, images, etc.
Steve Ferguson - Illumit http://illumit.com
It removes any confusion for both technical history buffs and
newcomers I feel. Let me know if that works for you or not.
Regards,
--
Karl Dawson
Crusader for Web Standards and Accessibility
/ShetlandCoffee.html if you are interested.
Hope that helps,
Steve Ferguson - Illumit http://illumit.com
On Jan 11, 2006, at 3:09 PM, David Nicol wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd appreciate it very much if you could take a quick look at:
http://www.shetlandcoffee.com/
All comments welcome. In particular
but with pressure from staff and students the required applications
have been installed because it is the teaching that is important.
Keep up the pressure about standards compliance - it is important and
will save businesses large sums of money (just ask Target USA).
Regards,
Steve
On 14
Web Developer
These are available for Windows. OS X and Linux versions of Firefox.
The Web Developer and HTMLTidy extensions can review web pages and
make/suggest the corrections needed for standards compliance.
Regards,
Steve
On 15/02/2006, at 2:59 PM, Zulema wrote:
Samuel/Ted/Jay,
Wow
I would recommend using the XHTML 1.0 Transitional DTD instead of HTML 4.01 - for the simple reason that there is a bit more tolerance for user-friendly options but you are following the XML standards of lower case tags and attributes, all tags being closed, preferably CSS for positioning but
it's just a matter of trying to keep up the good ideals and getting more designers on board with XHTML served as XHTML HTML. I'm actually surprised how many tutorials I see that use HTML 4.01 in computer magazines in 2006. If we can't convince these people to code to XHTML 1.0 Transitional standards we have real problems.Regards,Steve
default text - it depends on
the target audience.
Regards,
Steve
On 20/02/2006, at 10:57 PM, Patrick Lauke wrote:
Lachlan Hunt
but lot's of people (mostly designers) who prefer smaller
font-sizes.
It's unfortunate that so many designers prefer small font
sizes. They
fail to realise
;-)
Steve Olive
Bathurst Computer Solutions
Web: www.bathurstcomputers.com.au
_
... (0)
... / /\
.. / / .)
.. V_/_
Linux Powered!
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
and
browsers. ;-)
Steve Olive
Bathurst Computer Solutions
Web: www.bathurstcomputers.com.au
_
... (0)
... / /\
.. / / .)
.. V_/_
Linux Powered!
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org
and dropping
below nav bar from the top blue nav bar when screen resized/font size
increased in Firefox 1.5, Opera 8.0.1 Safari 2.0.3 - but mostly in
Safari only when applied to extremes. (Tested on
Very clean simple site.
Steve Olive
Bathurst Computer Solutions
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
=firefox
These are just a few of the developer tools available but make
validating HTML/XHTML and CSS quick and easy. The accessibility with
TAW3 takes some getting used to ;-)
Hope this helps!
Steve Olive
Bathurst Computer Solutions
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: 0407 224 251
Web
On 03/03/2006, at 8:09 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
On 06/03/03 02:27 Steve Olive apparently typed:
Epiphany/Galeon which both use the Firefox rendering engine.
There is no Firefox rendering engine. Epiphany,
Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox, Galeon, K-Meleon, Mozilla, Netscape 6.x
7.x,
SeaMonkey
://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Much more consistent across the browsers ;-)
Steve Olive
Bathurst Computer Solutions
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile
On 04/03/2006, at 10:41 AM, Rob Mientjes wrote:
On 04/03/06, Steve Olive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Much more consistent across the browsers ;-)
Is that good or bad? Your wink makes me wonder.
It does look like font resizing allows for much more change than
before, if you mean that. I played
=Inlinesp=1verbose=1
If you search for epicorp you can see the mangled href and srcless img.
Can anyone explain to me why the validator isn't flagging the in
the href?
Thanks,
Steve Ferguson - WebLight Developer http://www.illumit.com/weblight
On Mar 2, 2006, at 7:31 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote
visit our AdSense Support
site at
https://www.google.com/support/adsense . If you're unable to find an
answer to your question on our site, please feel free to reply to this
email.
Sincerely,
David
The Google AdSense Team
==
Steve Olive
**
The XHTML tags are hr /, the same as other tags like br / that
don't have a closing tag.
Steve Olive
Bathurst Computer Solutions
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: 0407 224 251
Web: www.bathurstcomputers.com.au
_
... (0
could detect.
Steve Olive
Bathurst Computer Solutions
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: 0407 224 251
Web: www.bathurstcomputers.com.au
_
... (0)
... / /\
.. / / .)
.. V_/_
Linux Powered!
**
The discussion list for http
to the XPEyetrack page.
If this is the most useable page from AIMIA members I wouldn't want
them designing web pages for me.
Steve Olive
Bathurst Computer Solutions
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: 0407 224 251
Web: www.bathurstcomputers.com.au
_
... (0)
... / /\
.. / / .)
.. V_/_
Linux
would have to explain what it was for, and at that point the
user has no way of deciding whether to turn it off or not.
The way you implement this could affect other user groups too. Can you be
more specific about what you want to do?
Steve Green
Director
Test Partners Ltd / First Accessibility
will be in a different document
format or will open in a new window. So my advice is to avoid non-HTML
document types and to avoid opening new windows unless there is genuinely no
option.
Steve Green
Director
Test Partners Ltd / First Accessibility
www.testpartners.co.uk
www.accessibility.co.uk
This sounds like a perfect application for Ajax. Have the TOC on the left,
the actual document on the right... opens as you click through the TOC?
Just a thought...
Or frames! Only kidding, even though they would be way more accessible than
an AJAX 'solution'.
Steve
Not everyone has a user agent that supports multiple windows or in-page
popups (e.g. JavaScript or CSS). How would you provide the additional
information to these people?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Faulds
Sent: 07 March
can't make this functionality accessible to
certain user agents. Much as we strive to avoid it this does happen, and we
should explore all the options on a case by case basis before reaching this
conclusion.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Last time I looked at various implementations of lightbox none were
accessible to the JAWS screen reader. I would be interested to know if
things have improved since then.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Dixon
Sent: 07 March
Your assumption is wrong. Screen readers read the text enclosed by the
label element, not their 'for' attribute.
I am not aware of any circumstances under which any screen reader reads the
'for' attribute for a label element, so it should be safe to use your
colleague's solution.
Steve Green
don't consider Word documents to be an accessible alternative either. It's
got to be text or HTML, or RTF at a pinch.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Webb, KerryA
Sent: 10 May 2007 00:08
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE
are fine, but if you really want it to be more accessible,
put the form controls at the end of the sentences.
Steve
www.testpartners.co.uk
www.accessibility.co.uk
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greg
Sent: 14 May 2007 21:23
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
am sceptical but have not used it so I can't say for certain. This
version may be good enough to do the automatic transcription but I still
suspect it won't.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rebecca Cox
Sent: 22 May 2007 11:02
I don't see how using a table is any worse than using a definition list.
Both are wrong. Any spurious argument you use to justify a definition list
can equally apply to a table. CSS can usually achieve anything you want
visually.
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
of inappropriate ways. To paraphrase the
previous message, a definition list is for lists of definitions, and if
you're using it to style your page you need to take a strong look at what
you're doing.
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jamie Collins
Sent
. And they wonder why they're getting
sued!
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Fitzsimons
Sent: 23 May 2007 03:04
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Photo gallery markup semantics
On 23 May 2007, at 02:15:30, Patrick H
.
--
Regards,
Steve
Bathurst Computer Solutions
URL: www.bathurstcomputers.com.au
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: 0407 224 251
_
... (0)
... / / \
.. / / . )
.. V__/_
Linux Powered!
Registered Linux User #355382
*
If you read the same things
customisation. I
understand that Freedom Scientific are working on a means of making the
customisation portable, which will at least partially resolve that problem.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Fitzsimons
Sent: 25 May 2007 14:01
. Hands up anyone who has done any user testing
this year. Or ever.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stuart Foulstone
Sent: 25 May 2007 22:53
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] screen readers repeated legends (was dl v
levels as low as 4x, given that magnifier users also tend to use 800x600
resolution.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Fitzsimons
Sent: 26 May 2007 18:53
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] semantic HTML for intro
text at 18 pt Times New Roman - any
larger and he could not see all of the individual letters, any smaller and it
got too hard to read.
Just my $0.02 worth - the most important point is that we are aware of the
issues, even if we can't agree on the perfect solution.
--
Regards,
Steve
Bathurst
the legend when it reads each label in the fieldset. It only does this
in 'forms mode'
2. Not all screen readers have a separate mode for interacting with forms.
FireVox is one such product.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike
with the client and try each one out.
--
Regards,
Steve
Bathurst Computer Solutions
URL: www.bathurstcomputers.com.au
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: 0407 224 251
_
... (0)
... / / \
.. / / . )
.. V__/_
Linux Powered!
Registered Linux User #355382
*
If you
On Tue, 29 May 2007 06:20:05 am Mark Hedley wrote:
Hi everyone.
I am currently looking for a cost-effective (preferably opensource)
solution to run our companies UK based web site.
Have you looked at the e-Commerce section at http://www.opensourcecms.com?
--
Regards,
Steve
Bathurst
I'll be there. Anyone else?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Swan, Henny
Sent: 29 May 2007 17:19
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Web Accessibility Update from Shawn Henry, London, Tuesday 5
June
Hi All,
Shawn Henry
say don't even think about it.
Day after day in this forum some people seem to be hell-bent on abusing the
standards like this? Why? It's not big, it's not clever and it's not
necessary.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lucien Stals
coding
decisions. Mark up your content in a manner that is unambiguous to other
users, and don't adopt a bizarre interpretation of the standards that no one
other than a handful of 'imaginative' coders will understand.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
can only move between links and form controls so the legends won't be
read unless there actually is a form control in a fieldset.
The bottom line is that there will be no adverse behaviour but all the
benefits of using headers (e.g. navigation and indication of structure) will
be lost.
Steve
could argue that JAWS should handle definition lists better,
and I would agree. I still say that the use of the fieldset it entirely
wrong and that apart from the visual effect it provides no semantic value to
any user agent.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
want to come early. We are scheduled to finish at 5:30pm but
you are welcome to stay afterwards to get some hands-on experience or look
at some more websites.
If anyone would like to attend this demo or a future one please fill in the
form at http://www.accessibility.co.uk/free_jaws_demo.htm.
Steve
or not. However, I suspect that most people will not know that you
can do this even if they routinely use keyboard navigation.
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sander Aarts
Sent: 09 June 2007 05:30
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Accessible
is a bit shambolic, and it is not clear that
comments are particularly welcome. There is no stated process, so people
have been commenting in various places in the blogs of the two peer
reviewers so they are very fragmented.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
to provide headings to indicate the primary, secondary and
tertiary menus then you can hide them off screen. They are not essential but
they can help the user build a mental model of the page and they provide
landmarks that aid navigation.
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
level
pages are just linked from within the body of second level pages.
We have done the same at www.testpartners.co.uk, which has about 60 pages
but don't look at the coding - it's more than 4 years old and in desperate
need of a rewrite.
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
easily be used to continue surfing the Internet.
IMHO this should become a web convention in the way the Internet has been
commercialised. All online transactions should be conducted in their own
window that is killed once the transaction is complete.
--
Regards,
Steve
Bathurst Computer
The argument must be why you are using the XHTML Strict DTD, not about one
small component of XHTML Strict.
What is interesting though is that HTML 5 is keeping the target attribute:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#valid8
--
Regards,
Steve
is diminishing, or the default appearance is hard
to see, do yourself a favour - get yours eyes checked. You will be amazed at
the lack of eye strain and headaches after getting glasses - even using your
new found skills customising the monitor appearance.
--
Regards,
Steve
Bathurst Computer
making
compromises. I so wish it was otherwise because this is a battle I don't
want to have.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph Taylor
Sent: 14 August 2007 15:33
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Usability
cannot be changed. sIFR is still too flaky (at
least all the examples I have seen are).
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Palac
Sent: 14 August 2007 23:02
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Usability Accessibility Over Design
nothing to lose. Is it
any wonder they are sceptical?
Steve
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank Palinkas
Sent: 15 August 2007 12:14
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Usability Accessibility Over Design?
Hi,
IMHO I
of accessible,
standards-compliant design to show our clients what is possible.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Designer
Sent: 15 August 2007 13:20
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Usability Accessibility Over
good for their respective purposes, but they
still fall short of the 'stunning visuals' that both Accessites and our
customer are looking for. There's no escaping the fact that you can create
very engaging forms of interaction with Flash that you just can't achieve
with W3C technologies.
Steve
if I select Yes when prompted to continue. If I select No, I get a
message An unexpected error occurred..., which is actually to be expected.
I don't have any 'funny settings', AV, firewall software or anything like
that, and suspect your presumption is correct.
Steve
-Original Message
using one).
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tony Crockford
Sent: 27 September 2007 09:58
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessible Adobe Photoshop and flash With Jaws
On 27 Sep 2007, at 09:48, James Jeffery wrote
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:49:50 pm Steve Green wrote:
One of our trainers tells me that only 4% of blind people have no sight at
all. Some may not be able to see a few feet in front of them and need a
guide dog to walk up the street, yet they can see a screen close-up and may
not even need
as to whether they are met or
not.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Livingston
Sent: 03 October 2007 18:03
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Levels of 508 compliance
Hi listers,
Does anyone have a reference (link) to a site
discrimination to a far
higher degree than we do now. Is there something special about websites that
you think should exempt them from the laws that bind everything else? Or do
you think that your right to 'do what the hell you like' outweighs other
people's right to be treated equally?
Steve
of such wilful or ignorant behaviour I believe it
is necessary to legislate. Sure it's inconvenient to have to worry about
people with disabilities and incur additional costs to support them, but
it's a mark of a civilised country that we do. At least where I live.
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
care ever so much. They are not claiming the right to 'do whatever the hell
they want' - they are trying to kid people that this is as good as it gets
and that it can't be any better. And that is just so far from the truth.
Steve
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
of benefits but we need to be able to
quantify this before we can make sweeping statements that it doesn't cost
any more.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ian Chamberlain
Sent: 04 October 2007 00:18
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
to the website, and you don't need to know anything about
accessibility to make that judgement.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Genesis One And One
Sent: 04 October 2007 02:23
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: A: [WSG] Target
emissions from cars? Yes.
Can a car manufacturer ignore this legislation because it costs more? No.
Anti-discrimination legislation is the same, it is about protecting sections
of our community from being excluded because it costs more.
--
Regards,
Steve
Bathurst Computer Solutions
1 - 100 of 241 matches
Mail list logo
