Hi Jim,
We will be restaging the ZFS community info, most likely on OTN.
The zfs discussion list archive cannot be migrated to the new
list on java.net, but you can pick it up here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org/
We are looking at other ways to make the zfs discuss
On 02/17/2013 06:40 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
Toby Thain wrote:
Signed up, thanks.
The ZFS list has been very high value and I thank everyone whose wisdom
I have enjoyed, especially people like you Sašo, Mr Elling, Mr
Friesenhahn, Mr Harvey, the distinguished Sun and Oracle engineers who
post
From: cindy swearingen [mailto:cindy.swearin...@gmail.com]
This was new news to use too and we're just talking over some options
yesterday
afternoon so please give us a chance to regroup and provide some
alternatives.
This list will be shutdown but we can start a new one on java.net.
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Why would I spend all that time and
energy participating in ANOTHER list controlled by Oracle, when they have
shown they have no qualms about eliminating it with basically 0 warning, at
their whim?
From an open source, community perspective, I
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Why would I spend all that time and
energy participating in ANOTHER list controlled by Oracle, when
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
We can agree to disagree.
I think you're still operating under the auspices of Oracle wanting to have an
open discussion. This is patently false.
I'm just going to respond to this by saying thank you, Cindy, Casper, Neil, and
others, for all the
Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
We can agree to disagree.
I think you're still operating under the auspices of Oracle wanting to have an
open discussion. This is patently false.
I'm just going to respond to this by saying
Ian Collins writes:
Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
We can agree to disagree.
I think you're still operating under the auspices of Oracle
wanting to have an open discussion. This is patently false.
I'm just going
Of Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 11:00 AM
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: [zfs-discuss] zfs-discuss mailing list opensolaris EOL
So, I hear, in a couple weeks' time, opensolaris.org is shutting down. What
does that mean
*To:* zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
*Subject:* [zfs-discuss] zfs-discuss mailing list opensolaris EOL
** **
So, I hear, in a couple weeks' time, opensolaris.org is shutting down.
What does that mean for this mailing list? Should we all be moving over to
something at illumos or something
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 11:00 AM
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: [zfs-discuss] zfs-discuss mailing list
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
wrote:
So, I hear, in a couple weeks' time, opensolaris.org is shutting down. What
does that mean for this mailing list? Should we
all be moving over to something at illumos or something?
There is a
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
That would be the logical decision, yes. Not to poke fun, but did you really
expect an official response after YEARS of nothing from Oracle? This is the
same company that refused to release any Java patches until the DHS issued
a national warning
From: sriram...@gmail.com [mailto:sriram...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Sriram Narayanan
Or, given that this is a weekend, we assume that someone within Oracle
would see this mail only on Monday morning Pacific Time, then send out
some mails within, and be able to respond in public only by
From: Bob Friesenhahn [mailto:bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us]
Good for you. I am sure that Larry will be contacting you soon.
hehehehehe... he knows better. ;-)
Previously Oracle announced and invited people to join their
discussion forums, which are web-based and virtually dead.
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
That would be the logical decision, yes. Not to poke fun, but did you really
expect an official response after YEARS of nothing from Oracle? This is the
same company
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
That would be the logical decision, yes. Not to poke fun, but did you
really
expect an official
On 02/16/2013 06:44 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
We've got Oracle employees on the mailing list, that while helpful, in no
way have the authority to speak for company policy. They've made that
clear on numerous occasions And that doesn't change the fact that we
literally have heard NOTHING from
Hey Ned and Everyone,
This was new news to use too and we're just talking over some options
yesterday
afternoon so please give us a chance to regroup and provide some
alternatives.
This list will be shutdown but we can start a new one on java.net. There is
a huge
ecosystem around Solaris and
Hello Cindy,
Are there any plans to preserve the official mailing lists' archives,
or will they go the way of Jive forums and the future digs for bits
of knowledge would rely on alternate mirrors and caches?
I understand that Oracle has some business priorities, but retiring
hardware causes
7:42 AM
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs-discuss mailing list opensolaris EOL
Hello Cindy,
Are there any plans to preserve the official mailing lists' archives, or will
they
go the way of Jive forums and the future digs for bits of knowledge would rely
on alternate
On 16/02/13 3:51 PM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
On 02/16/2013 06:44 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
We've got Oracle employees on the mailing list, that while helpful, in no
way have the authority to speak for company policy. They've made that
clear on numerous occasions And that doesn't change the fact that
Toby Thain wrote:
Signed up, thanks.
The ZFS list has been very high value and I thank everyone whose wisdom
I have enjoyed, especially people like you Sašo, Mr Elling, Mr
Friesenhahn, Mr Harvey, the distinguished Sun and Oracle engineers who
post here, and many others.
Let the Illumos list
+--
| On 2013-02-17 18:40:47, Ian Collins wrote:
|
One of its main advantages is it has been platform agnostic. We see
Solaris, Illumos, BSD and more recently ZFS on Linux questions all give the
same respect.
I do
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Bryan Horstmann-Allen b...@mirrorshades.net
wrote:
+--
| On 2013-02-17 18:40:47, Ian Collins wrote:
|
One of its main advantages is it has been platform agnostic. We see
Solaris,
Richard Elling wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Bryan Horstmann-Allen b...@mirrorshades.net
wrote:
+--
| On 2013-02-17 18:40:47, Ian Collins wrote:
|
One of its main advantages is it has been platform agnostic.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:42 PM, cindy swearingen
cindy.swearin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Ned and Everyone,
This was new news to use too and we're just talking over some options
yesterday
afternoon so please give us a chance to regroup and provide some
alternatives.
This list will be
+--
| On 2013-02-17 01:17:58, Tim Cook wrote:
|
| While I'm sure many appreciate the offer as I do, I can tell you for me
| personally: never going to happen. Why would I spend all that time and
| energy participating in
So, I hear, in a couple weeks' time, opensolaris.org is shutting down. What
does that mean for this mailing list? Should we all be moving over to
something at illumos or something?
I'm going to encourage somebody in an official capacity at opensolaris to
respond...
I'm going to discourage
29 matches
Mail list logo
