Joanna.Zhou wrote:
if the local zone and global zone share the same arp table? The local
zone has the same ether address with the global zone, if I made an arp
reply to the ether address to answer an arp request (I plan to reply to
local zone) , how could the system differentiate which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Observation on NIC gives me:
[e1000g1] /opt/sfw/bin/tethereal -i e1000g1 -t ad host l.l.l.110 and host
c.c.c.186
[e1000g0] /opt/sfw/bin/tethereal -i e1000g0 -t ad host l.l.l.110 and host
c.c.c.186
[1] [e1000g1] 2006-10-06 09:25:11.329472 c.c.c.186 - l.l.l.110 TCP
Roshan Perera wrote:
Hi all,
Appreciate if someone can help me with VLAN tagging on zones please.
Details below. Dummy example..
Global Zone IP address 10.10.10.5 (IPMP real)
ce0 10.10.10.6 (IPMP test)
ce1 10.10.10.7
Peter Memishian wrote:
With regard to the third bullet, please see my concerns above about the
introduction of list -l. I think this should be part of a general
zone status/health facility or perhaps something that dladm(1M) can
print about the link names and how their
Dan Price wrote:
'list -i' religiously follows this idiosyncratic approach ;-)
We have a plan to add 'zoneadm info' or some such to display all the
runtime attributes of running zones. Hopefully we'll get to that in the
next 12 months or so. I'd request that you hold off on adding list -l
Eric Enright wrote:
I just subscribed to this alias, apologies if I'm missing anything
from this thread...
Some of this was discussed a few months back.
I'd like to express interest in this as well. Just last week I came
across the need for this, and was disappointed to learn that it (or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could ifconfig be modified to report all network interfaces that
are assigned to a zone?
I assume you mean in the global zone; ifconfig -a inside a zone (global
or not) does report all the network interfaces that are configured.
But that would be quite odd.
The
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hm. that's unfortunate.
so if a user wanted to use ip filters in an lx zone, how would we
support this?
Do we know what users might want in this space? Has anybody asked on the
brandz-discuss list?
Is the iptables syntax important? Or is IP Filter syntax ok?
Does
Jeff Victor wrote:
Here's one reason: consistency. All users in the GZ can see some
inforamtion about non-global zones (e.g. ps). Privileged GZ users can
see all info about non-global zones, and need to do so in order to
manage them.
But the exclusive-IP behavior is quite different from
Darren Reed wrote:
- Original Message - From: Erik Nordmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could ifconfig be modified to report all network interfaces that
are assigned to a zone?
I assume you mean in the global zone; ifconfig -a inside a zone
(global or not) does
Eric Enright wrote:
I'd like to express interest in this as well. Just last week I came
across the need for this, and was disappointed to learn that it (or
something similar) is not there.
Would
zoneadm list -l
as specified (with example output) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we want any form of internal consistency, wouldn't we also need to
change were we assign datalink names from zonecfg to dladm?
Thus no more 'net' resource in zonecfg for exclusive-IP zones, but
instead some
dladm set-zone zoneA bge1
Only having dladm show it,
James Carlson wrote:
In some usage models, the global zone administrator owns
everything. Even if he can't directly control things from the global
zone (and must log into the non-global zone to turn services on and
off), he wants to see a view of the system that includes everything.
Do you
Original Message
Subject: [crossbow-discuss] Code review for IP Instances
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:32:31 -0800
From: Erik Nordmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IP Instances project is now soliciting code review comments.
You can access the webrev at
http
James Carlson wrote:
Jeff Victor writes:
Detlef Drewanz wrote:
I know dhcp-server and bootp-server were not possible to run in local
zones. So now with S10 11/06 we can configure some more privileges into
a zone. E.g. if I add the privilege net_raw_access to a zone, can I then
run
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik,
Here are my belated comments on the IP Instances design.
And here are my belated responses. But we've already acted on the
comments that affect the design and code, and I'll make sure the Zones
documentation covers the other documentation items.
There are
Robert Thurlow wrote:
Glenn Faden wrote:
4) A bug currently prevents a client instance and a server instance
from being safe to use on the same box (apologies, can't quote the
bugid from here). How likely, in your use case, is it that this will
be a problem, i.e. will your boxes be in the
is sent as if
originated from the global zone.
With your reject routes that packet would be dropped.
Erik
Thanks,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Erik Nordmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 1:24 PM
To: Van Der Hart, Kevin
Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Tony Marshall wrote:
When the application servers and database servers start we are seeing a
large number of timeouts when the application tries to connect to the
localhost to check a service is up.
When a number of blackhole routes are removed these timeouts disappear.
Tony,
Has anybody
James Carlson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to have users on a zone, but we use pidentd to control some
network connections.
It seems that pidentd doesn not work on zones as it can't open kmem.
Is there any way to make it work ?
Essentially, no.
Opening /dev/kmem in the
Martin Man wrote:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Hi Martin, looking at your question again...
What are the requirements?
Do non-global zones need to get their address via DHCP?
yes, not necessarily from the non-global zone, the address can be
assigned and renewed periodically from the global
James Carlson wrote:
Getting the DHCP data into a form where Linux can use it inside the
zone might be a challenge, but it's worth some thought.
I think it would also require emulation/translation of some additional
Linux ioctls; I don't think the ioctl to *set* the IP address and
netmask
LaoTsao (Dr. Tsao) wrote:
try
network_interface=e1000g2 {
hostname=zox04-ipv6
ip_address=2000::214:4fff:fe6a:b80f/64.
protocol_ipv6=yes
}
AFAIK the ipv6 support in sysidcfg is merely the protocol_ipv6=yes
thus it isn't possible to specify a static IPv6 address. Instead the
Coy Hile wrote:
When Sol10u4 comes out, I intend to move my non-global zones to exclusive IP
instances so that I can route traffic through my NAT from the outside more
easily (don't ask!). I do have a question, however. Say I have a machine
with one physical link, e1000g0, which has
Nicolas Williams wrote:
Hmmm, someone commented (in the VSD case) that maybe we ought to have a
common object-specific key facility. Here we have fixes to two
different object-specific key facilities. I think a heads up to the RE
for CR 6588504 is in order. And maybe we should think about
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 03:47:22PM -0700, Erik Nordmark wrote:
Comments?
- $SRC/uts/common/sys/zone.h:483
- $SRC/uts/common/sys/netstack.h:90
s/looks/locks/
- $SRC/uts/common/os/zone.c:321
s/ZONE_EVENT_UNINITIALIZED/ZONE_EVENT_INITIALIZED
Lewis Thompson wrote:
Hi,
I have a customer who has a basic IPMP config in his global zone:
vnet0 vnet1 [currently vnet0 has the 'floating' IP]
In addition he has a zone with ip-type=shared where physical=vnet1
When the zone boots the zone interface gets created on vnet0 instead
Alain Durand wrote:
Thanks for your answer, I might be missing something obvious, but how
can I add this route ?
(global zone) # route add default xx.121.41.254
add net default: gateway xx.121.41.254: Network is unreachable
I forgot about that part.
The common way is to add the route while
Running build 111a of opensolaris I created an exlusive-IP zone.
In the zone I try
r...@c1:~# routeadm -e ipv4-routing
Pattern 'route:default' doesn't match any instances
Comparing svcs -a | grep networking
in the global zone and the exclusive IP zone, there is a lot of
Robert Hartzell wrote:
I have a host that's on two subnets:
10.0.0.0/24 (all external facing services through a firewall)
192.168.0.0/24 (internal lan)
I wish to move my external services into zones (dns, smtp, webstack) but
am having problems which I believe are caused by routing
On 01/25/10 02:29 AM, Tina wrote:
Hi all,
Can Zone work as a DHCP client? In my testing enviorment, all ip must be
assigned from a DHCP server, I have setup a solaris 10 (x86 version) and config
it as a DHCP client, now I tried to create a ZONE on it. How can I config the
ZONE as a DHCP
On 01/28/10 02:44 AM, Tina wrote:
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your suggestion. I have tried the way that run ifconfig bge0 zone
zoneA, it did not work. I'm a newer to solaris ZONE, I did not have a good idea
about how to troubleshooting it. :-) So I deceided to try IP-exclusive. Now I
install
If I want to create zonenames that are known to be unique across a set
of nodes, one way to do this is to use fully qualified domain names as
the zonenames. But this might run into the current limit of the zonename
length.
Looking at the source I see:
/*
* The zone support infrastructure
33 matches
Mail list logo
