Ricardo Newbery wrote at 2008-1-30 13:14 -0800:
...
I meant easier for the end user, not the developer. It's kind of
complicated right now to explain how to set up a ZEO configuration to
work with your third-party product. Makes it a bit of hurdle to
distribute such a thing for general
Ricardo Newbery wrote at 2008-1-30 12:24 -0800:
...
Has anyone given thought to maybe providing a more general class with
conflict resolution in the core distribution?
There can be no *general* class with conflict resolution.
Conflicts usually are fatal. Precise knowledge about the intended
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Another related question. With respect to conflict resolution, is is
safe to assume that products (with _p_resolveConflict methods) in the
main Zope products directory are already available to the ZEO server
without
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Another related question. With respect to conflict resolution, is is
safe to assume that products (with _p_resolveConflict methods) in the
main Zope products directory are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Okay, then assuming you've installed ZEO from Zope software,
if your third-party product includes conflict resolution by
instantiating a class defined in the Zope product directory, then is
it also safe to assume that
On Jan 30, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Okay, then assuming you've installed ZEO from Zope software,
if your third-party product includes conflict resolution by
instantiating a class defined in the Zope product directory, then is
it also safe to assume that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Has anyone given thought to maybe providing a more general class with
conflict resolution in the core distribution? The Length class works
for simple counters and I guess it can also be used for just simple
On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Has anyone given thought to maybe providing a more general class with
conflict resolution in the core distribution? The Length class works
for simple counters and I guess
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Has anyone given thought to maybe providing a more general class with
conflict resolution in the core distribution? The Length class works
for
On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Has anyone given thought to maybe providing a more general class
with
conflict resolution in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 20:49, Brian Brinegar wrote:
One ZEO server can deal with multiple storages just fine.
Transactions involving multiple storages commit just fine.
Caveat: You buy nothing by having a single ZEO process serve several
ZODBs when
One ZEO server can deal with multiple storages just fine.
Transactions involving multiple storages commit just fine.
Caveat: You buy nothing by having a single ZEO process serve several
ZODBs when you're trying to decrease commit times. You should run a
ZEO process per ZODB you're serving
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
HI,
we have quite a Problem with out Zope/Zeo system. We run at the moment
Zope cluster with 10 application servers and a zeo server with
Filestorage. Our Data.fs is 3.5 Gig at the moment (after Pack).
I runs most of
Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
If I had the Time I whould do it. My ToDo List goes around up to the moon
an back twice. About the funding I have to talk to my superior when he is
back from his vacation.
Bear in mind that you will need serious amounts of cash to get this
implemented. This is a
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:23:40AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Proxy between the zope server
at the
--On 3. Mai 2006 08:11:44 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is why is it impossible to run a zeo as a zeoclient.
Because this usecase was/is never supported.
I can
setup a zeo with a zeoclient storage i See teh invalidations coming from
the backend zeo. So this
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:22:22AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 3. Mai 2006 08:11:44 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is why is it impossible to run a zeo as a zeoclient.
Because this usecase was/is never supported.
I can
setup a zeo with a zeoclient
--On 3. Mai 2006 08:35:48 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was lost in the 2.6 version of the Zope book i have scanned the Page
with the Picture. See http://etustar.ze.tum.de/zopebook.jpg
Scary...no idea why it is in the printed edition...at least the 2.6 and 2.7
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:56:28AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 3. Mai 2006 08:35:48 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was lost in the 2.6 version of the Zope book i have scanned the Page
with the Picture. See http://etustar.ze.tum.de/zopebook.jpg
Scary...no
--On 3. Mai 2006 09:15:45 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every major innovation was extremely uncommon bevor it was implemented.
So thats not a reason not to do it. Is there a way to get this to work.
I Think it whould be a very nice feature. Because it whould increase the
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:19:31AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 3. Mai 2006 09:15:45 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every major innovation was extremely uncommon bevor it was implemented.
So thats not a reason not to do it. Is there a way to get this to work.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Proxy between the zope server
at the backup site an the ZEO at the main site.
Secound part is that the
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:23:40AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
I would look for a replication strategy to create your intermediate
storage server: the setup you are trying is not supported by the
current ZEO setup. Such strategies include:
- Zope Corp's Zope Replication Services product,
Tres Seaver wrote:
- Another possibility would be to use 'repozo' to create deltas
on the primary, and then propagate them to the secondary via
rsync, then apply them via 'repozo'.
Hi Tres. I have also been investigating strategies but had not thought
of this possibility. I am not
--On 2. Mai 2006 12:38:28 -0300 David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
- Another possibility would be to use 'repozo' to create deltas
on the primary, and then propagate them to the secondary via
rsync, then apply them via 'repozo'.
Hi Tres. I have also been
Andreas Jung wrote:
repozo does not help you syncing multiple ZEO server..it just performs
an incremental backup of an existing Data.fs file. And I don't know of
any solution have multiple master ZEO servers. There can be only one.
-aj
For sure. I guess the best one could have would be
:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Re: Zeo as a Zeo Client
Andreas Jung wrote:
repozo does not help you syncing multiple ZEO server..it just performs
an incremental backup of an existing Data.fs file. And I don't know of
any solution have multiple master ZEO servers. There can be only one.
-aj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Pratt wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
repozo does not help you syncing multiple ZEO server..it just performs
an incremental backup of an existing Data.fs file. And I don't know of
any solution have multiple master ZEO servers. There can be
Tres Seaver wrote:
ZRS secondaries go into recovery mode whenever they lose connection
with the promary: that recovery is sufficient to allow it to resync
(even to bring up a new, empty secondary).
Hi Tres. This is sort of how I envisioned ZRS (though I have never seen
or used it). I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cyrille Bonnet wrote:
Hi there,
One of my clients is using Plone on Solaris 9. We have set up one ZEO
client on a Solaris machine and a ZEO server on another Solaris machine
(for testing purposes only at this stage).
Performance is great but
Hi Tres,
thanks for your response: it is very helpful. The posting you refer to
is particularly helpful. Thanks for digging it up for me!
Cheers,
Cyrille
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cyrille Bonnet wrote:
Hi there,
One of my clients is using Plone on
Dennis Allison wrote:
We are seeing spontaneous restarts of Zope with no indication in any of
the standard Zope logs. Looking at the ZEO log indicates that the
restarts of Zope are due to a lost connection between Zope ZEO but
with no other information. The logging level is set at the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 02:13:34PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Perhaps your FS grows because ZEO write the cache files to /tmp (which is
on your root filesystem)?
No I checked that. Nothing in /tmp (and that would
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:03:29AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 02:13:34PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Perhaps your FS grows because ZEO write the cache files to /tmp (which is
on your root
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:02:01 +1000, Drew Nichols wrote:
The sessions are fine 4 out of 5 requests, but the information just
disappears every now and then (refreshing the browser shows it still to
be there sometimes, others it is just gone).
I've seen this behaviour - sessions switching
Dennis Allison wrote:
Hi Paul, Thank you. And, yes, I saw Chris' posting, but I don't think
that's the right solution for us. A fast shared session variable store
seems to me to be a better way to go and a whole lot more fail safe.
Hi Dennis,
I posted a solution some time ago. Search the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Allison wrote:
I am just setting up a multi-headed distributed system with several Zope
heads all communications with a ZEO backend. The zopes can be on the same
machine or on different machines connected through a high speed backbone.
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:14:56PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Allison wrote:
I am just setting up a multi-headed distributed system with several Zope
heads all communications with a ZEO backend. The zopes can be on the same
machine or
Hi Paul, Thank you. And, yes, I saw Chris' posting, but I don't think
that's the right solution for us. A fast shared session variable store
seems to me to be a better way to go and a whole lot more fail safe.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:14:56PM -0400,
Bakhtiar A Hamid wrote:
On 4/27/05, ken wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've searched most site that have info on ZEO but have not been able to
find answers to my questions on install for ZEO.
Maybe someone on the list can help.
I am running Zope 2.7 (with Plone site) on a Win'03 Server.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ken wood wrote:
I appreciate all the great tips on the cionfiguration issue. But my main
issue is about infrastructure:
Which hardware and / or operating systems can be used for a Zope/Zeo
system.
In particular, can I run a Zope instance on my
ken wood wrote:
I appreciate all the great tips on the cionfiguration issue. But my main
issue is about infrastructure:
Which hardware and / or operating systems can be used for a Zope/Zeo
system.
OS: pretty much any Unixish OS, though on anything but Linux, BSD, and
Mac OS X (and maybe
FYI,
Back during 2.6.x, I developed my whole system on a Windows Laptop,
migrated to a Windows ZEO System, 1 client, 1 server. Then moved the
ZEO client server to Red Hat AS 2.1, and now finally to SuSE
9.0. The only differences for me were the steps in installing PIL
(Python Imaging
On 4/27/05, ken wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I appreciate all the great tips on the cionfiguration issue. But my main
issue is about infrastructure:
Which hardware and / or operating systems can be used for a Zope/Zeo
system.
In particular, can I run a Zope instance on my
On 4/27/05, ken wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've searched most site that have info on ZEO but have not been able to
find answers to my questions on install for ZEO.
Maybe someone on the list can help.
I am running Zope 2.7 (with Plone site) on a Win'03 Server.
I would like to run ZEO
On 4/14/05, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:21 am, Tres Seaver wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
Yeah, I remember poking around that code way back, and it seemed
reasonable. Its interactions with transactions are
Bakhtiar A Hamid wrote:
On 4/14/05, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:21 am, Tres Seaver wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
Yeah, I remember poking around that code way back, and it seemed
reasonable. Its interactions with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:54 pm, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Bakhtiar A Hamid wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/ZSQLSessionDataManager
ark!
insufficient priveleges
Works now !
Well, it does *sometimes*. Whenever
Richard Jones wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:54 pm, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Bakhtiar A Hamid wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/ZSQLSessionDataManager
ark!
insufficient priveleges
Works now !
Well, it does *sometimes*.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:21 am, Tres Seaver wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
Yeah, I remember poking around that code way back, and it seemed
reasonable. Its interactions with transactions are the bits that scare
me. Using a standard RDBMS connection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Jones wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:21 am, Tres Seaver wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
Yeah, I remember poking around that code way back, and it seemed
reasonable. Its interactions with transactions are the bits that scare
me. Using a standard
Tres Seaver wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/ZSQLSessionDataManager
Cool. Where is CVS for that, so that I don't bug you for features. ;)
I could import it to cvs.zope.org, if you like.
I'd like to add Oracle support since I need it myself, and when I have
working changes would like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Jones wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:44 am, Chris McDonough wrote:
Probably not hard. You could write a session data manager
implementation that used a relational database. The interface for those
things is in
Sven Hohage wrote:
Hallo Jorgen,
I write you cause I've got a question about Zope.
You've posted on the mailing list on my question with the filesize of
the data.fs or in ZEO ZSS.
My problem is that I'd like to know which Unix - versions don't have
this filesize limitations and if there
If you don't wan't to run Sun or HP-UX you could always look
at one of the open *BSD clones. As I can recall both OpenBSD
and FreeBSD have filsystems that manage 2GB files.
/Johan
Sven Hohage wrote:
Hallo Jorgen,
I write you cause I've got a question about Zope.
You've posted on
Hmm.. well .. I can tell you what I know as of today. Linux
has this limitation as of today. At least all the variants I
have come over (mostly Red Hat and Suse). The limitation is in
the filesystem implementation itself; meaning that the number
of "references" that can be created
56 matches
Mail list logo
