On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Christopher Warner
cwar...@kernelcode.com wrote:
Unfortunately in the above specific case I'm building against a standalone
Plone instance which ships only with a static lib version of Python 2.6. So
this doesn't work. This became an issue with Plone 4.0b5 as
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
ZTK 1.1 deprecates Python 2.4 *and* 2.5. So, 2010-12-31 is the last day
for their official support.
Who told you that? We documented our decision at
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:57 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
If everybody is using this, nobody is using CMF.buildout for
development. Anyway. I fixed CMF.buildout:
http://svn.zope.org/?rev=115204view=rev
I'm using CMF.buildout and was always annoyed by it overriding the -m
option.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I don't believe that zope.testing's testrunner works without 'def
test_suite()'.
Oh it does. Ever since 3.8.0 from mid 2009:
- Testrunner automatically picks up descendants of unittest.TestCase
in test modules, so you
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
...is currently useless, as far as I can see.
I thought the -p option was an artifact of zdaemon, which zopectl just
didn't support. I took it as a case of the lower level API's leaking
through.
I think the attached
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
A while back, I wrote collective.xmltestreport [1,2]. In short, it's a
wrapper around zope.testing's test runner that can produce output in
an XML format compatible with the xUnit family of testing tools. This
is
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
Considering recent discussions on Python 2.7 support, should we disable the
failure reports for Python 2.7? (6 failures out of 17 in the last report)
I think we can let them stay, even though they test something
Hi.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Jonathan Lange j...@mumak.net wrote:
When running zope.testing's tests on my laptop, I get many failures.
I've run the tests plenty of times before and haven't got these
failures. Am a bit mystified, so I'd appreciate any help.
Looks like the tests assume
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
The attached patch adds such a warning, and also reveals where Zope2
commits the same sins. If there are no objections I'll commit it to
2.12 and trunk.
Thanks for committing it.
Finally, I'd like to ask
Hi.
I released Zope 2.12.9 and Zope 2.13.0a2 today. Both contain a fix for
the missing browser:view permission support
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/578326). As this might affect
security of your applications, you are advised to upgrade. Zope 2
itself is not vulnerable. Thanks goes to
Hi.
We have Python 2.7 final now and some work has begun on making ZTK
packages compatible with it. Currently we still see various test
failures in the zopeapp set though and nobody who steps up to fix
them.
Apart from that, we have made a promise to support Python 2.4 up to
2.6 for the ZTK 1.0
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
What do others think about this?
Based on what you wrote, I think this is the right solution. Python 2.4 is
clearly important to the Zope 2 / Plone world
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
In other news Zope 2.13.0a2 now officially supports Python 2.7.
How can Zope 2.13 support Python 2.7, when the ZTK 1.0 does not?
Zope 2.13 only uses
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
I put that info into the post scriptum of my mail.
Have I missed a mail with more failures? I would have thought getting
those tests to pass for a release is a reasonable
Hi.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
The latest Zope 2.12.9 release broke the last release of Products.ZMySQLDA.
You are not by any chance interested in taking over maintenance of
ZSQLMethods, are you?
You'll get the following traceback:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Given all of these, I'm leaning towards not supporting Python 2.7 for
a ZTK 1.0 release. A 1.1 can drop Python 2.4 support and we can try to
support 2.7 in addition.
We discussed this in todays zope-dev IRC meeting
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
And I'm not disagreeing with the policy, but it can be argued that
depending on the location of *data* files inside the Zope2 package is
not necessarily relying on guarantees on internals.
I'd call anything
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
is there a change log showing the differences between versions 1.0a1 and the
lately released 1.0a2 of the ztk?
There's no changelog yet. Diff'ing the files from the tags is the best
you get right now.
We are planning to
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed in r114488 (2.12 branch) and r114490 (trunk). I don't think I'm
allowed to close the issue on Launchpad, but it should be fine now.
Awesome! You truly rock!
Much appreciated,
Hanno
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Ideally I'd love to add support for the permission attribute, as
clearly people have been using it. But if there's nobody who can
figure out how to do that, I'd at least like to clarify the add view
case.
Why can't
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
[zope.traversing absolute URL behavior]
I've applied the fix to zope.traversing and added a test as well. It's
released as zope.traversing. I've also updated the ZTK to use this version.
Thanks!
(initially I used
Hi David,
awesome work!
Sidnei or Stephan, can one of you comment on David's approach or offer a review?
Cheers,
Hanno
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:42 AM, David Glick davidgl...@groundwire.org wrote:
I am done (as far as I can tell) evaluating RestrictedPython to see if
changes are needed to
Hi.
I noticed that all three frameworks (BB, Grok, Zope2) have version
pins for Paste, PasteDeploy and PasteScript. Does anyone object to
including them into the ztk-versions.cfg under dependencies?
It's currently:
Paste = 1.7.4
PasteDeploy = 1.3.3
PasteScript = 1.7.3
Note that Paste 1.7.4
Hi.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
http://svn.zope.org/zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk-versions.cfg?rev=114375view=auto
is there any reason why the versions pinning of the toolchain are in the
ztk-versions.cfg ? Packages such as z3c.recipe.depgraph,
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
The afpy buildbots now all run a slave with Python 2.7 final
http://buildbot.afpy.org/
Yeah!
Jan-Jaap and Sebastien, could you update your buildouts as well?
Python 2.7 should run for the ZTK trunk, zc.buildout and Zope
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
However, the 2.7 slaves don't send any alert to the zope-tests list. Should I
enable this?
The winbot already sends reports for Python 2.7, so I'd say go ahead
and spam us :) More blame might get someone to fix those two
Hi.
Are you using Products.ZSQLMethods or DC.Shared.ZRDB? Are you
interested in maintaining it?
Starting with Zope 2.13 these packages are no longer part of the Zope
2 distribution. The code has moved to its own project, as the core
Zope 2 developers haven't had a strong interest in it anymore.
that has such registrations, anonymous users should be able to
create any such content item in any location.
Hanno
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
recently MJ opened a security related bug and disclosed it to the
public at https://bugs.launchpad.net
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
The fix in my code was to make my model provide ILocation itself, so
that it would adapt itself and therefore avoid the proxy. I think that
might be correct but at the same time is really obscure; in my code the
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
I'm not sure what the best way to handle this is. My initial thought
is that all test runners should enable deprecations by default. This
seems hard to enforce.
Individual test modules can do this, but I'm uncomfortable having
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Fred Drake fdr...@acm.org wrote:
I've yet to hear any response to my post about non-backward-compatible
classes:
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2010-July/040898.html
Is no one else concerned about the backward incompatibility introduced
by
Hi again.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
with Python 2.7 final being released, I ran the ZTK tests against it.
zope.exceptions, zope.formlib and zope.proxy all have one test output
related failure.
I fixed all of those and released new versions
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Zope Tests Summarizer
zope-te...@epy.co.at wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Jul 5 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue Jul 6 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 41 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 3 from buildbot at
enfoldsystems.com, 11 from buildbot
Hi there,
with Python 2.7 final being released, I ran the ZTK tests against it.
zope.exceptions, zope.formlib and zope.proxy all have one test output
related failure.
RestrictedPython will need a security review.
Any help with those appreciated,
Hanno
Full test output:
Running
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Zope Tests Summarizer
zope-te...@epy.co.at wrote:
Unknown
---
Subject: UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat Jul 3 21:30:30 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-July/016058.html
Subject: UNKNOWN :
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Subject: UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.5 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Jul 2 21:32:12 EDT 2010
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-July/016028.html
These are due to an SSH issue:
-
Hi.
I'm reviewing your branch now and will look at the nt_svcutils issue.
Hanno
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
I was working on running ZEO as a windows service using
plone.recipe.zeoserver:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Well, that should be all I need to say - the help system is missing from
Zope 2 trunk. I don't know exactly when it disappeared but I use it
occasionally as a quick way to check on stuff and Hanno didn't
Hi.
On behalf of the Zope Toolkit release team and the Zope community, I'm
happy to announce the first 1.0 alpha release of the Zope Toolkit.
You can read more about the release at
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/releases/overview-1.0a1.html. The
first ZTK release supports all of Python 2.4,
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
So I'd like to open up the floor to everyone who ponders participating
and express their wishes/hopes/expectations for the summit. Don't start
your engines trying to solve any specific issue right now. Try to
abstain from
Hi there,
recently MJ opened a security related bug and disclosed it to the
public at https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/578326.
In short Zope 2 never supported the permission attribute on ZCML
browser:view declarations. It seems some people might have specified
this attribute and assumed it
Hi there,
on behalf of the Zope community it is my pleasure to announce the
release of a new maintenance release of Zope 2.12.8 - most noteworthy
it should install on FreeBSD now.
I'm also happy to announce the first alpha release of the next major
version 2.13.0a1.
You can read all the news at
Hi.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
There is a nice (and yet useless) python version check done in
Zope2.Startup to verify that you have at least Python 2.3.4 when the
daemon start.
I guess it's a bit outdated in Zope2 2.12.7 (this version).
Hi.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
I think the Before Commit Hook option is probably best here.
DirectMailDelivery should only be used for testing anyway, or at least
only on very small sites in production - QueuedMailDelivery will scale
better.
A
Hi.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
I just wanted to test something with the CMF buildout and I'm getting the
following error. As far as I can tell I have everything correctly up to
date. What's going wrong?
You have likely some old SVN
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. Can I commit it to Zope 2.12 as well? It is backward
compatible and helps us address a bug we see on production.
Go ahead. It really is trivial :)
Hanno
___
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
On 06/17/2010 01:58 PM, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Unknown
---
Subject: FAILURE: Total languishing bugs: 1
From: ct at gocept.com
Date: Wed Jun 16 20:30:17 EDT 2010
URL:
Hi.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
The buildbot seems to work fine.
I'll let it do the following packages tonight:
What exactly is do here?
It builds binary Windows eggs for those packages for various Python
versions I'd assume. What does it do with
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Sidnei da Silva
sidnei.da.si...@canonical.com wrote:
Has not arrived here. But then again Brazil is far away.
Not here either, Norway is far away as well, except from the north pole :)
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Hi.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org wrote:
first, thanks for clarifying. did i get you right, that for the future,
monolithic source releases of zope2 are planned again once the dust has
settled?
No. There is currently no monolithic released planned at all.
, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Aim for having a Zope 2.13 release in time for Plone 4.1, get a first
alpha release out by the end of the month or early July. We can have
more alpha releases during the summer, a beta probably around the
zope-dev summit / German Zope User Group conference
Hi Charlie,
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
thanks for the information. I'm a little confused by the narrative - is
Plone 4.0 being held back by a Zope 2 release?
No, Plone 4 is delayed for all the normal reasons of too many open
bugs
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 9:29 PM, David Glick davidgl...@groundwire.org wrote:
Has the process of reviewing RestrictedPython against a new Python
release been documented anywhere?
Not that I know of. Stephan Richter and Sidnei da Silva were the last
to do these reviews, maybe they know.
Hanno
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
On the whole, I would actually favor getting a 2.13.0 out even sooner
than Hanno suggests, to get it used (and therefore more polished)
sooner. With the post-eggification reduction in Zope2's scope, I think
a six month
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
I assume the breakage occurs, since I released zc.recipe.testrunner last night
that uses zope.testrunner instead of zope.testing.
Hhm, the new zc.recipe.testrunner introduces a non-backwards
compatible
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
We are not really changing the API in a BBB incompatible way. We simply
shuffled
code around. We did that all the time and never increased the major version
number.
The code is no longer compatible with
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
If the comments are valid, these all smell like process fouls: a new
third-dot release should not introduce backward incompatibilities.
Sure. These are all from late 2009 cut in the middle
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
After more testing, I have more information. This bug has been
introduced by the release 2.13.0 of ExtensionClass and Persistance
packages. Running 2.12.0 of packages make it disappear.
I guess I should report this
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
zope.browserpage, which I am not privileged to release. Can one of the
owners (nadako, J1m, srichter, gary, tlotze, hannosch, faassen, baijum,
agroszer) either add me ('tseaver') to the list, or else make a release?
You
Hi there,
I've been slacking and forgot to post the summary of the first ZTK
release team meeting.
Here it is. I'll put it into SVN into the ztk-docs area as well.
Cheers,
Hanno
ZTK meeting - 2010-05-06
Attendance
--
ccomb, j-w, hannosch
Agenda
--
- No
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
I'm planning to make a new bugfix release of Zope2 on Monday
(2010-05-17) in time for the next Plone 4.0 beta release.
The 2.12.6 release is made, Windows binary eggs will follow later today.
Hanno
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
- Move Shared.TaintedString to an external distribution.
+1 for putting it into AccessControl.
Yeah, makes most sense I guess. It's just one file after all.
- Move the ZMI parts
Hi.
I've started working some more on my pet project of refactoring Zope2
- specifically to move all C code to external distributions. My
working branch is at
svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/hannosch-dtml-vs-accesscontrol
which also has a TODO.txt with some notes. On the branch
Hi.
I'm planning to make a new bugfix release of Zope2 on Monday
(2010-05-17) in time for the next Plone 4.0 beta release.
There's a ton of changes already. If you have more things to wrap up,
please do so :)
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
ZODB is only included in the ZTK as a dependency, because some packages
import it: nothing else in the ZTK configures server instances.
Nothing in zopeapp uses it either?
Not that I know off.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Should the triumvirs so decide, attached is the patch for zopetoolkit
which adopts the versions from Zope2. The normal buildout (using eggs
rather than checkouts) passes all test-ztk and test-zopeapp tests with
this
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
I think some kind of paper trail is definitely a good idea. Not sure if
docs is the right place but Christian is planning to put the reports into
the svn repository. And both location and form are less
Hi Martijn,
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Because my suggestions (besides the fork issue) as a ZTK
user/contributor were scattered through the thread, here's a handy summary:
Thank you very much for your suggestions. I'm sure the release team
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Last december Hanno made progress on the ZTK's dependency structure,
removing a lot of dependencies on packages. In his enthusiasm, he
unilaterally just removed all those suddenly-unneeded (by him!) packages
from the
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
Hhm. I'm inclined to drop 2.4 support here. Using a zope.testing that
tries to be compatible all the way from 2.4 to 3.1 is quite a bit of a
stretch.
Unless I missed something, the ZTK
Good evening :)
If you have a specific issue with me, you might contact me in private.
But with your follow-ups this turned into a more general issue.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Of course what applies to Hanno should
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Uli Fouquet u...@gnufix.de wrote:
It would mean for zope.password to depend additionally on
zope.configuration and zope.component.
Are there any objections to this step?
No objection here. zope.password isn't used in Zope2 :)
Hanno
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated zc.receipe.testrunner to use zope.testrunner instead of
zope.testing.testrunner. Initial testing has shown that this should be
compatible, and although the code changes are minor, it's potentially
unexpected.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Fred Drake fdr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
If it is intended to be backwards compatible and seems to be so, I'd
say go with 1.3. It sounds like a new package dependency, like we have
had many
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I started carefully with zope.interface 3.6.0. :)
Source only so far. I have a Windows machine, and I could make Windows
releases as well, I guess. Is there any docs on what's needed for
that? I haven't built
Hi.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
I believe packages such as z3c.form, z3c.macro, z3c.template, z3c.pagelet (and
many others) are among the most important packages. I wonder why they are not
included in the ZTK? I always end up using them, I
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Incomplete is the auto-expiring state: if nobody responds in 30 days,
it automatically disappears.
I agree that we should at least attempt to reproduce even really old
bugs before assigning them 'wontfix' status (if we
Hi.
I'm planning to do a new Zope 2.12.5 release this weekend.
Yvo is going to try to look some more into the unauthorized /
exception view interaction and I hope to get a ZODB 3.9.5 release from
Jim.
If you have anything else you want to get in, commit away or let me know.
Cheers,
Hanno
P.S.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote:
And who runs that script atm?
Talk to testmaster Stefan Holek irc: lurker, stefan (at) epy dot co dot at
He wrote the script and runs it.
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Hi.
I've seen lots of checkins recently stating Comply with repository policy.
I haven't seen any announcement of a new official repository policy.
Have I missed it?
I'd be especially interested who exactly is responsible for changing
code so that it complies with the new policy. How much of
Hi.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote:
I will be the representative for BlueBream, since Baiju is already doing an
enormous amount of work and he needs help.
Awesome news!
Let's wait a little bit more for a caveman to stand up for Grok, and we can
Hi,
looks like SVN and viewcvs weren't responding for a couple minutes. I
could log into the machine via SSH and Apache serving docs.zope.org
still worked.
I only noticed:
27059 simon 20 0 98664 6388 4360 R 100 0.2 43327:19 darcs
Why do we have darcs running on that machine and more
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I don't think I'll be able to work on it, but I think it's worth
consideration: Unicode issues with Zope 2.12. I've seen these on at
least three different Zope 2 sites built with a combination of TTW page
templates,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
- Five deprecation
+1 - sounds hairy, though.
Getting rid of the Zope 2 specific ViewPageTemplateFile and BrowserView
(already done, I guess) would be a good starting point.
With Zope
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 01.04.2010, 15:30 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu:
With Zope 2.12 BrowserView is basically done. You can now import the
BrowserView class from zope.publisher.browser instead of the one
Hi there,
I was in too much of a good mood while having some vacation. So I
thought I need more work to do :)
I'd like to step up as the release manager for Zope2 for the 2.12 and
2.13 (trunk) releases.
I've gotten an overwhelmingly positive response to this proposal from
the Zope Foundation
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
* Zope 2: In theory I'd suggest the Zope 2 release manager. In practice
I'd like to nominate Hanno because he's been very active with Zope 2
recently and already has done work on the ZTK before. (Hanno: sorry.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
great that you'll be Release Manager. I only have questions on the
forthcoming release - a summary of the proposed changes / bugfixes for us
to moan about! ;-)
We release whatever is on the stable branch,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the next step? I'd love to see some roadmapping ala that you did
for Plone 5, in particular to discuss our WSGI story (which I'm
interested in helping out with if others can help too).
There's no big roadmap
Hi.
For Zope 2.13 (trunk) I'd like to try to reduce the C dependencies of
the Zope2 distribution itself. Ideally it would not have any C
dependencies in its own distribution, but that's a bit too much for
now.
As a next step I'd like to split out the initgroups, Missing,
MultiMapping, Record and
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
For Zope 2.13 (trunk) I'd like to try to reduce the C dependencies of
the Zope2 distribution itself. Ideally it would not have any C
dependencies in its own distribution
Why
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
It simplifies the release process for Zope2. In most cases upgrading
to a new version of Zope2 won't involve any changes to C code. If the
C code is split out, we won't have to release any
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 3/30/10 16:56 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
If this is done the remaining C libraries are in AccessControl,
DocumentTemplate and ZCTextIndex. AccessControl has a reference
implementation in Python and could the C
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
If I remember corrcetly Malthe's pure-python variant of zope.i18nmessage
got vetoed late 2008, so it is still requires C compilation.
Look at the source [1] or the release notes for the 3.5.0 release from
last June.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
We'd therefore like to add a new event in the HTTPResponse class (in
ZServer, though I think it makes sense to add to the ZPublisher base
class version as well). It'd hook in something like this:
if not
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Why would you need to have the event on the request, if all you want
is to set headers? Why not make it an event with the response as the
argument instead?
Mainly because that's what all
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
In Zope 2.12, Control Panel - Product Management doesn't display
normal products.
This functionality was working until Zope 2.11
What do you mean with normal products ? A simple folder in one of
the products/ directories
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
Does the current plone.recipe.zope2instance disable that? I also noticed
recently that in a stock Plone 4 install products no longer show up in
the control panel.
Yes, that specific recipe in versions 4.x targeted at
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I could upload a fixed tarball to PyPI (if I could make up my mind if it
should
be 3.9.0 or 3.9.1), but I'm interested in the root cause: how was the tarball
generated?
Given that Sidnei did the release, I suspect the
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
It's not really in scope for this patch, but given the rising popularity
of Hudson I think it would be nice to have a small README.hudson in
zope.testing explaining the integration.
Well, if all you want is Hudson output
201 - 300 of 620 matches
Mail list logo
