Martijn Faassen wrote:
Various things. What you'd need is turn off 'view' permission by
default for just about *everything* except possibly DTML Documents,
otherwise it's just too easy to set up a site that exposes too
much. Exposure to URLs should be turned off by default.
Well, this is why
Robin Becker wrote:
[stuff about 2.2]
You can't create any objects except User Objects as the superuser.
Create a manager, re-login as that manager and then add yoru objects.
Can't speak for TinyTables but make sure the Anonymous role has the
'access TinyTables contents' permission. A lot of
Robin Becker wrote:
What steps should I try to allow my currently unowned
documents/tinytables to be made accessible. When I press the change
ownership button I get a help browser with an error message in the
content frame.
That sounds like a 2.2 bug to me... oh well... it is Alpha so fair
Lena wrote:
I actually need to create a simple web-editor, something very similar to
HelpSys, but I need to link tree items to the folders I create dynamically
in Zope.
I'd suggest looking at the ZWiki Product, it may be exactly what you
want:
http://www.zope.org/Members/simon/ZWiki
cheers,
Hi,
I hope this is a stupid question but why does ZCatalog use the URL of an
object to uniquely identify it?
Why not just use a reference to the object? Persistent object
identifiers must exist for the ZODB so why not use them instead?
cheers,
Chris
PS: This would solve all the problems with
Michel Pelletier wrote:
I'm looking into this right now...
Many thanks :-)
As you may have gathered from my posts, I've been having a bit of a
ZCatalog/SiteAccess (not to mention MIME) nightmare today...
...I took a day off work to try and get Squishdot 0.4.0 out and have
spent the day
Jerry Spicklemire wrote:
[snip]
Steve, please clarify any of the concepts I've managed to mangle!
Now this sounds like something I waffled about a few weeks back...
...cool :-)
I don't think I'm gonna have a chance to play though :S
I'll jump in at 1.0.0 though and I'm there in spirit now
Evan Simpson wrote:
This exists! (sort of). ObjectManager.superValues accepts a list of
meta_types, and returns a list of all objects of those meta_types which can
be found in any ObjectManager in the current one's acquisition context.
and has done for ages... the original Squishdot code
Michel Pelletier wrote:
There allready exists such a thing, superValues([meta_type]). But I
think this is too weak to use as a discovery protocol. An observable
may not know or care what type of observer it wants to discover. Also,
when it finds a number of various resources, catalogs lets
Michel Pelletier wrote:
At the moment this is true, but Jim and I have discussed the possibility
of ZCatalog being treating the paths less atomically and more as a
sequence of nodes from root to the target, this way, you could ask the
catalog for all objects below a certain point that match
Jim Fulton wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/jim/ZopeSecurity/ProposalToAuthenticateDuringURLTraversal
I wonder whether this would fix the following problem:
http://zope.nipltd.com/public/lists/dev-archive.nsf/ByKey/82AE22A20C7E88AE
What I reckon is happening is that HTTP is being dumb and
"R. David Murray" wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Chris Withers wrote:
This is weird... the bit of code in question was:
lib/python/SearchIndex/Lexicon.py line 132:
[...]
Now Michel's patch was to change this to:
else:
self.counter = self.counter + 1
Since www.zope.org and classic.zope.org (not to mention digicool.com)
all seem to be down, I'll dump my feature request here (although given
the lack of mail this morning, maybe mailman is down too ;-)
Could it at least be an option, my view is that it should be the default
option ;-), for text
Tres Seaver wrote:
who's the CTO?
Jim is.
Okay, I get the joke now :-)
* "persistent" references are effectively required to be immortal:
it is _mandated_ that one be able to stringify the IOR, copy it
to a piece of paper, put the paper in a bottle, and cast it on
the waves;
Kevin Dangoor wrote:
I believe this is in the Collector... My guess is that no one has yet
figured out a good way to make the client and namespace be passed in
automatically. This may not be desirable anyhow, because there may be times
when you want to change the client... I've actually done
Shane Hathaway wrote:
1) Enahnce the permissions system to include "Accessible via HTTP",
"Accessible via FTP", etc.
Add to that 'execute in DTML method' ( + python methods perl
methods;-) and you've got what I've been asking for for so long I've
atoped trying :(
This would prevent the nasty
Hi Michel,
I've been good and documented what I learned from the docs discussion in
the interfaces wiki.
Can you check and correct as appropriate please:
http://www.zope.org/Members/michel/Projects/Interfaces/ACPermissions
http://www.zope.org/Members/michel/Projects/Interfaces/QueryObject
Hmmm, you could just use Squishdot 0.4.1 with the 'plain' style, it
looks and behaves pretty much identically to Confera except it works
(although I'm sure it has bugs ;-) and is maintained (by me ;-) which,
sadly, I don't think Confera is.
HTH,
Chris
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
At 02:33 PM 6/11/00 -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
I believe I have come to understand the basics of ZPatterns and would
like to be sure I understand correctly, as well as help others
understand also.
Feel free to flame me if I've got this wrong, but:
I've
Loren Stafford wrote:
In that case we decided to put the Schedule in the root folder. There is no
more global data than the catalog itself, but if there were it could be
stored in the catalog folder, since catalogs are folderish.
Hmm, this is messy. Could the Catalog not be stored in your
Steve Alexander wrote:
I think you're getting your levels of abstraction confused with your
meta-levels of abstraction :-)
Confused? when talking about ZPatterns?
n e v e r ;-)
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Zope currently has two ways of distributing products:
1. Tarballs containing python products
2. .zexps containing methods, ZClass products and the like.
Things are now getting bad as products are emerging (PTK, Tracker, etc)
which require both of these to get a single product working which
Chris Withers wrote:
I'm going to knock up a patch for this anyway and chuck it in the
collector.
The patch (which is for the latest CVS, but shouldn't be too hard to
modify for other versions ;-)
Chris
===
RCS file: /cvs
From a mail about the LinuxTag conference:
P.S. ABout ZPatterns: everyone I spoke to was thought the basic idea
behind ZPattern was good and sound and nice and so on. But _everyone_
complained about it being too pretentious (with all the computer science
claims and theory behind it) and
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
It would be nice to have a single unified way of preparing apps,
products or whatever for distribution. The process be nicely automated
or provide a user interface for building the distributable. The install
process would also need to be just as painless.
Totally agree.
You could try moving stuff to the new dtml style for starters:
dtml-var standard_html_header and the like.
That might help, if not let us know..
cheers,
Chris
Gilles Lavaux wrote:
Hello,
I am a little bit disappointed not getting any echo from my previous
question, so I report it.
Gilles Lavaux wrote:
But I found something: In my 'PUBLIC_Doc' document I display image with a
!--# var image_name-- tag, my problem disappear if I use
!--#var "image_name"--, someone can explain this??
Are you sure the space after the # isn't your problem?
I would STRONGLY recommend
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I am very interested in ZCatalog.
I promiss that I will look into it, when I come to 2.2.
Thanks,
Documentation of the cool stuff which is already there, and making it
work 100% reliably are the two main things...
cheers,
Chris
Hi,
I guess this should be a feature request for the collector but I thought
I'd see what other people thought first...
I'd really like to be able to override methods in an instance of an
object. Examples I can think of are Squishdot and the Tracker.
In Squishdot, or any ZCatalog for that
Monty Taylor wrote:
Make a folder that contains the overridden methods and call things
through the context of that folder.
Neat trick :-)
We love acquisiton, but it won't quite do it :(
The default index_html will get called, unless you put /folder/ on the
end of your URL. which is horrible :(
Hi,
I'm trying to do a tree walk and copy with:
dtml-in objectValues
dtml-call "REQUEST['where'][-1].manage_addFolder(id)"
Created dtml-var id in dtml-var "REQUEST['where'][-1].id"BR
dtml-if "meta_type=='Folder'"
dtml-call "REQUEST['where'].append(this())"
dtml-var iterate
dtml-call
Evan,
Thanks, that worked...
Evan Simpson wrote:
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dtml-call "REQUEST['where'][-1].manage_addFolder(id)"
Error Type: TypeError
Error Value: read-only character buffer, Python Method
Looks like the 'id' of something along the line i
Chris Withers wrote:
Can someone please tell me why folder.id is a method and
everything-else.id is a string?
Sorry, that should be folder.id is a string and everything-else.id is a
method.
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
I'm still not clear on this. Why would I need access to the product
factory when where.manage_addFolder(id,title) works just fine?
I thought manage_addFolder was the product factoy method?
manage_addFolder() is to be considered a shortcut
Brian Lloyd wrote:
That's a problem. Root index_html is viewable by
Anonymous user - Zope
should not complain about wrong (not in acl_users) login/password.
It seems Zope doesn't like being presented with Authentication
information it knows nothing about. A more graceful way of
I think this is a bgu so I'll chuck it into the collector unless someone
tells me otherwise...
I have an external method called navTree (dtml-tree was too broken to
fix in the time frame :( ) with a spec as follows:
def navTree(self,start):
It's called in some DTML as:
dtml-var
Hi Steve,
Since you found the external methods arguments thing interesting, here's
another challenge for you... ;-)
(it's actually from the same nav_tree method)
I was trying to use 'if o in REQUEST.PARENTS' to expand branches on the
way to the currently displayed object and was running into
Steve Alexander wrote:
Smells like an Acquisition Wrapper misunderstanding :-)
You should change your name to Jim...
...or have you been bitten by this before?
Do you know if objects in PARENTS are acquisition wrapped?
cheers and much we're-not-worthy'ing,
Chris
Steve Alexander wrote:
Do you know if objects in PARENTS are acquisition wrapped?
I'm pretty sure that they are.
They are indeed, in fact, pretty much everything is :(
The only way to check if o is in PARENTS appears to be:
if o.aq_base in map (lambda o : o.aq_base,PARENTS):
..nice... :/
Chris Withers wrote:
Steve Alexander wrote:
Do you know if objects in PARENTS are acquisition wrapped?
I'm pretty sure that they are.
They are indeed, in fact, pretty much everything is :(
The only way to check if o is in PARENTS appears to be:
if o.aq_base in map (lambda o
Steve Alexander wrote:
Both.
def external_method(self, ...other args...):
dtml-var "external_method(this(),...other args..." ?
I'll go with this advice since I still can't make heads or tails which
of the two Shane thinks I need to do ;-)
Of course, it's not documented like this. I think
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Here's the logic: ExternalMethod sets up func_* attributes so it can
masquerade as a function. The trick works well enough to convince
ZPublisher's mapply() to pass in a "self" argument as the first
argument when needed.
What 'self' does mapply pass? I always though it
Steve Alexander wrote:
Ah... but are you calling the external method from a DTML method? These
are all methods, and therefore you'd expect the "self" object to be the
object the methods are subobjects of.
The exact turn of events is that index_html is a DTML method which shows
a DTML
Yup,
This looks good, as did your earlier post. However, it raises a question
:(
Something like a ZCatalog or a Squishdot Site (which I have a passing
interest in ;-) are both folderish. However, their __call__ method does
something quite different: it returns the results of searching the
Is there any reason why an object cannot be contained in more than one
Folder in the ZODB?
Apparently what I'm talking about is very similar to hard linking in
UNIX...
I can't think of any reasons why this would be bad but I can't think how
to implement an 'Add hard link to this object'
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
Hardlinks are prohibited on directories; and 5 minutes ago you said all
objects are foldersih :)
I'm not sure if my statement applies in this situation... ;-)
Hardlinks are prohibited on directories because it'd cause infinite
loops on traversing.
Hmm, would
Terry Kerr wrote:
Where would the object aquire its attributes from? Would it try one of its
folders, then the other? Which order would it choose?
Now that's a very good question ;-)
Probably from the folder you referenced it from and then normal
acquisition from then on...
cheers,
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
Yep, like "Acquisition" and "object publishing". :) Seriously, that is
very much the level we're talking about here.
I know, there are docs explaining acquisition and object publishing has
an implicit meaning. Things like 'Specialist' and 'DataSkin' don't have
Ty Sarna wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Too much jargon... by far... Lots of complicated words that are
meanlingless to the layman and don't help to convey the concepts. This
Can you point out some examples of which ones you think
Dieter Maurer wrote:
What is needed is a new way of installing Zope stuff for the following
categories:
1. Python Base Products (Like ZPatterns, PTKBase and TrackerBase)
2. Instantiatable Products (like TinyTables, Squishdot and Tracker)
3. Interface Skins (none right now,
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
2) I need
a good way to make the methods overrideable without any subclassing
(whether in Python or ZClasses),
Ah, so it's not just me who wants this ;-)
I think this may relate to an existing interest of yours regarding
specification of interfaces and overriding
Shane Hathaway wrote:
I have an idea: the _objects attribute of ObjectManagers could include
a "configurable" flag, which would tell _checkId that the object can be
overridden.
Shane,
Is this what became the ConfigurableInstances thing at:
Erik Enge wrote:
call, it won't redirect. So you should be able to achieve the same
results just by invoking manage_addImage without including the REQUEST
object.
But I have to pass something with the REQUEST, or else it won't add the
image, right?
This is the problem we've
Steve Alexander wrote:
The __call__ method is what gets invoked when you call the method,
either through the magic of dtml-var Catalog or with dtml-var
"Catalog(client, namespace, args*)".
Now you see, this is what confuses me...
dtml-var dtml_method renders that method, implying in my mind
Bill Anderson wrote:
I believe he is talkin gabout the __init__ function checking to see if
the .zexp has been imported, and if not, importing it for you. It's an
idea I have kicked around, but haven't tried yet.
IIRC, the 'Distribution' tab creates all this for you...
It creates a binary
Shane Hathaway wrote:
I've created a patch that allows you to create redistributable archives
with the distribution tab. It's checked in to CVS on a branch. This
is what was needed for us to start using the distribution tab more
frequently.
Great :-)
Thanks again Shane...
Is the patch
Erik Enge wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Chris Withers wrote:
Why I'm asking is 'cos it'd be really nice not to have to keep
re-writing UI when there's perfectly good stuff available in the
management interface, things like add forms, edit forms, etc...
Exactly.
Great, so how do we
Johan Carlsson wrote:
First, you can't delegate the permissionto add and delete user except
by assigning the user the role "manager".
IMHO this is to limiting.
Second, if you give a user the permission to Change Persmissions, that
user can change permissions that she doesn't have the right
Steve Alexander wrote:
My guess is that the argument "auth" passed to validate() has some
trailing characters. Either that, or WebWhacker passed just "Basic " as
an auth string.
Yuk, that sounds like a Zope bug. Collector time with patch? A judicious
string.strip should solve the problem,
Chris Withers wrote:
Steve Alexander wrote:
My guess is that the argument "auth" passed to validate() has some
trailing characters. Either that, or WebWhacker passed just "Basic " as
an auth string.
Yuk, that sounds like a Zope bug. Collector time with patch? A jud
Steve Alexander wrote:
snip excellent patches
Well, I think Brian Lloyd'd have to make the call...
Nice work though, 2 for 2 on the day, that's pretty good going, are DC
paying you yet? ;-)
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Every time you create a Zope object, such as a DTML document or Folder,
it gets stored in the ZODB. Perhaps you could be a little more specific
in your aims?
cheers,
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've a question : How could I store and retrieve object in the ZoDB ?
I know that I
Michael Monsen wrote:
When I created the SiteRoot object I was using the superuser
account,
I thought this wasn't supposed to be possible in the first place?!
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yves-Eric Martin wrote:
Does that sound right to you? If no one disagrees, I'll fill a bug
report w/ patch in the Collector.
Sounds great, is it in the collector yet?
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Alexander wrote:
def __getitem__/__getattr__ from HTTPRequest.py:
"""Get a variable value
Return a value for the required variable name.
The value will be looked up from one of the request data
categories. The search order is environment variables,
Brian Lloyd wrote:
Yes - basically any class that defines *or inherits from a
class that defines* permissions should do this to make sure
that the permissions along the inheritance heirarchy are
cobbled together correctly at class initialization time.
I'm sure someone said recently that this
Martijn Pieters wrote:
Oops. You took out the strip. But IIRC, base64 does a strip as well.
Not according to the original error which started this thread :(
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Alexander wrote:
Martijn Pieters wrote:
Oops. You took out the strip. But IIRC, base64 does a strip as well.
So it does!
from base64 import *
s = encodestring('foo')
decodestring(s)
'foo'
decodestring(s+' ')
'foo'
decodestring(' '+s)
'foo'
So what was causing the
Martijn Pieters wrote:
So what was causing the original error then?
Buggy client?
If so, surely Zope should just return an Unauthorized error rather than
exposing its internals?!
If you're a server and the client is buggy, tell it so, but don't look
like you just screwed up really badly
Steve Alexander wrote:
! raise 'InternalError', request.response._error_html(
Can someone enlighten me as to what this does?
Does it reset the HTTP response code?
Is _error_html something that gets the acquired standard_error_message?
If not, it should do ;-)
Has anyone made
Hi,
small rant (no change there for me ;-)
Is there are reason why configuration info for the user doesn't hang off
the user object and is instead stored in cookies?
I'm thinking of the dimensions/etc of the edit boxes and the like. I do
a lot of work through virtual domains and it's a real
Steve Alexander wrote:
Don't see why not. When an object is changed, the new object is just
appended to the end of Data.fs. Unless you use undo, or you pack the
Data.fs.
You missed the problem ;-)
Technically, there is no problem...
Logically, what happens if one user updates and object on
Steve Alexander wrote:
What does Lotus Notes offer to do if you get such a conflict?
Save both versions and ask the user to delete the one which isn't
needed, or merge the changes...
Use Jim's new conflict resolution
algorithm to try to settle conflicts.
Urm? First I heard of this and it
Steve Alexander wrote:
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
So, I am thinking perhaps I should split ZPatterns into two products:
PlugIns and DataSkins.
If 'PlugIns' includes plugins, plugin groups and plugin containers, then
that's a pretty good name :-)
(If I've missed bits out and the like, please
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
DataSkins themselves,
Okay, I'm being dumb again, but could someone explain to me how the name
DataSkin came about and how it relates to what these objects do?
:S
That might be, but the PlugIns part isn't really where it should be before
it could even be proposed to
Steve Alexander wrote:
An object that has DataSkin as a base class allows a DataManager to look
after its data storage requirements. The DataManager stores all the
propertysheets and attributes, and works out what to do and who to
notify when things change.
Okay, makes sense...
There are
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
Despite the implications of the bait-and-switch subject line, I have not
yet written any substantial amounts of documentation. I have, however,
written this:
http://www.zope.org/Members/pje/Wikis/ZPatterns/DataSkinsOverview
Which was actually exceptionally useful,
Loren Stafford wrote:
Does anyone know what was the motivation for the change in the syntax for
the call to connect?
To make it Python 2 compatible, but this shouldn't cause these errors
since connect is supposed to be able to takea tuple now.
Confusedly,
Chris
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/zope-dev/MethodGeddon
Just been reading about this and I was wondering how is coming along...
Is it in the fishbowl under another name or should it be in the
fishbowl?
Shane, would the argument list be a management tab for methods?
That sounds cool to me :-)
I reckon
Evan,
I wonder if the changes Shane suggested in MethodGeddon would make
Simplified Acquistion suffice for what Steve was asking about?
Also can you explain how from the example:
Two path acquisition: A contains B1 and C1, B1 contains B2, C1 contains
C2
How (Natural Acquisition):
A.B1.B2.C1 ==
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I wonder why starting folders with _ is so bad in Zope?
In the time, when everything was allowed what was not explicitely
forbidden, an easy way was necessary to forbid access. Jim
(and, therefore, Zope) used:
anything starting with "_" is private: no DTML access,
Hi Jim, (or any zope-dev'ers who can explain this ;-)
I've just been reading:
http://www.zope.org/Members/jim/Info/IPC8/AcquisitionAlgebra
...and I've got confused on the 'Getting the containment wrapper'
section.
In anser to 'What is A.B.C.D?' I can't see how you can get:
((D o (C o A)) o (B
Toby Dickenson wrote:
Almost all zope-manageable classes (and certainly Folders, that Dieter
mentioned) use the old rule. This happens because they derive from
SimpleItem.Item, which has __allow_access_to_unprotected_subobjects__=1
1) Why does SimpleItem still have this?! Since so much, IIRC,
I still don't get this :(
Here's the situation:
A has attributes B and C, C has attribute D
my old working:
A.B.C.D = (B o A) : .C.D
now, since C is found in A:
= ((C o A) o (B o A)) : .D
again since D is found in C:
= ((D o C) o ((C o A) o (B o
ethan mindlace fremen wrote:
The product page is now topic-ized. Please check your product to ensure
that it's in the categories you want it to be in. A product can have
more than one topic.
Cool :-)
The actual pages still aren't very legible though :(
Can the top row for each product be
Evan Simpson wrote:
Here are the two and a half rules for deriving acquisition from a dotted
expression:
1. A.B == (B o A), where A is an unwrapped object
2. (self o parent).B ==
a. (self.B o (self o parent)), if B is found in 'self'
b. (parent.B o (self o parent)), if B is
Shane Hathaway wrote:
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/DTMLExpressionSyntax
Hmm. No, that's not really related.
How so? Can you list the differences and if they're orthogonal try and
explain it to me? You 'get' this but I sadly don't :(
(yet.. ;-)
Hi there,
While playing with Squishdot to make it more ZSearch-friendly, I noticed
that ZCatalog isn't actually ZSearch friendly either.
I think the following patch corrects that, if peopel agree, I'll stick
it in the collector.
cheers,
Chris
___
D'Oh!
Here's the file...
Chris
--- ZCatalog.py.old Thu Aug 3 15:17:05 2000
+++ ZCatalog.py Thu Aug 3 15:21:25 2000
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@
def _searchable_result_columns(self):
r = []
-for name in self._catalog.indexes.keys():
+for name in
Evan Simpson wrote:
So, is the working below now correct? (I feel like I'm back in School
doing maths ;-)
Yes.
Cool :-)
Where is the order of simplification defined?
In the Acquisition machinery, which simplifies upwards because that's the
way it constructs the wrappers.
okay...
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Will it re-appear when the replacement is deleted?
That could be confusing...
No, and I think it's really not confusing, since it's quite a strange
and rare thing to set __replaceable__=ObjectManager.REPLACEABLE on a
normal instance. :-/
Very true :-)
Think of
Shane Hathaway wrote:
but Brian and Jim have stated before that should the need arise,
releasing a second-dot version can happen at any time.
That sounds promising :-)
OTOH __replaceable__ support has just been checked into the trunk and
if you're working from the CVS repository, just do a
andrew wrote:
Have been delving into ZPublisher.Client to make remote procedure calls
under Zope 2.2.1.
Did someone slip 2.2.1 without mentioning it?!
I thought XML-RPC was now favoured over ZClient?
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
I'm building a DataBlob class (which inherits from SimpleItem.Item,
Persistent and RoleManager), a generic object for storing data is such
that you can do the following in a form-processing method:
dtml-with "manage_addProduct['DataBlob']"
dtml-call "manage_addDataBlob(id='Fred')"
dtml-call
Chris Withers wrote:
snip last idea
At Steve Alexander's suggestion, I'm going to try subclassing DataBlob
from PersistentMapping.
So now I need to add attribute support...
How do the following three methods sound:
def __getattr__(self,name):
try:
return
Chris Withers wrote:
def __setattr__(self,name,value):
self.__setitem__(self,name,value)
Erk...
first problem, why does a Zope __setattr__ take four arguments?!
DataBlob.py, line 62, in __setattr__:
Error Type: TypeError
Error Value: too many arguments; expected 3, got 4
Do either
Steve Alexander wrote:
The application, ./python.exe, generated an application error
The error occurred on 8/ 9/2000 @ 11:48:41.189
The exception generated was c0fd at address 7800118b (lock)
DrWatson also said this was a Stack Overflow error.
Now what am I doing wrong? ;-)
Steve Alexander wrote:
Is there any good reason that the "brains" returned by ZCatalog searches
don't have a standard property that reflects the URL of the object they
have meta-data from?
That sounds like a good idea :-)
This would seem to me to be more object-oriented, and would save
Steve Alexander wrote:
That makes for a lot of security checks.
There are possible optimisations, though. But this starts to get even
more complicated.
Does that mean it won't work, would be very slow, or both? ;-)
cheers for looking though...
Chris
Michel Pelletier wrote:
A.B.C.D
Look for D in C,
if it's not there, look in B
if it's not there, look in A
Someone correct me if I'm wrong here, but...
This is a linear search, which is the way acquisition *used* to work.
Which Zope version? ;-)
Consider:
A /
B/
C/
1 - 100 of 1829 matches
Mail list logo
