Hi.
I've been browsing through the Zope and Zope-dev archives without finding
anything related to this, please stop me if it has already been dealt
with. :)
technical person = someone who doesn't mind fuzzing around with the
manage_main pages
non-technical person = someone
On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Shane Hathaway wrote:
call, it won't redirect. So you should be able to achieve the same
results just by invoking manage_addImage without including the REQUEST
object.
But I have to pass something with the REQUEST, or else it won't add the
image, right?
A convention
Hi.
I was fiddling around with my Zope-instance, and decided to Pack the
database, I had just deleted a lot of objects and the Data.fs was reported
to be about 15MB large; which I knew couldn't be true.
Under Control_Panel/Database I pressed the "Pack" button with "days older
than" set to '0'.
I'm not quite sure if this is already reported or not, so I won't give
much information on it (I've looked for something similar, but I
haven't found it). I'm runnig Zope 2.2.0 under Linux.
I have this product I've made myself - called TravelAgent. I add an
instance of it to the Zope
[Shane Hathaway]
| Johan Carlsson wrote:
|
| I just want to check if things work the way I think (hope) it does.
|
| In a transaction, are objects attributes safe from other threads.
|
| self._v_mytemp in my request does not conflict with other requests?
|
| This is correct (or it's
[Shane Hathaway]
| It means that a correctly operating ZODB will behave this way.
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying that. :)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML
[Petru Paler]
| - how this should be aproached
Couldn't this be implemented by adding more properties to you objects?
One thing that would be great, though, variable checking :)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
Does the performance of Zope degrade as the Data.fs get larger? Both
on startup time (which I'm pretty sure will degrade) and on respons
time, serving a object f ex?
Another thing. Have anyone tried to encrypt all data inside the
Data.fs file? I mean, encrypted the data so that not even
[Chris McDonough]
| [Erik Enge]
|
| Another thing. Have anyone tried to encrypt all data inside the
| Data.fs file? I mean, encrypted the data so that not even root can
| access it, only if you have the right passphrase (or whatever) in the
| management interface are you allowed access
[Chris Withers]
| The point behind CatalogAware was, as I understand it, that the object
| inheriting from CatalogAware wouldn't have to worry about managing its
| own indexing. Sadly, that didn't work out...
I haven't been following this discussion, so my question may be
redundant, and if it
[Michael Bernstein]
| When called, they find the nearest (acquisition-wise) ZCatalog
| (named Catalog by default),
I think you can specify the ZCatalog it should index itself in by
putting the default_catalog attribute in your class.
I think, that this object (in pseudo) would index itself
[Michael Bernstein]
| I need to know how far the ZCatalog will scale using this indexing
| and search strategy. Does anyone have anectodal or benchmark data to
| suggest if (and when) I will hit a 'wall' regarding the number of
| objects being indexed and searched?
I'm going to try to stuff 27
[Michael Bernstein]
| We seem to have disposed of the wildcard issue [snipped out
| below], and I'm looking forward to Eric's results, but does
| anyone else have any information about whether there is a
| practical upper limit on how many objects can be indexed and
| searched in a ZCatalog?
I
[Chris Withers]
| ...and is that specifically for BTree folders, or Zope BTree's in general?
I don't believe that B-Tree folders have those kinds of limitations by
general design. I'm more conserned that somewhere along the lines,
doing operations on a huge BTree Folder (Yes, in Zope) will be
[Michael Bernstein]
| Erik Enge wrote:
|
| I don't believe that B-Tree folders have those kinds of limitations by
| general design. I'm more conserned that somewhere along the lines,
| doing operations on a huge BTree Folder (Yes, in Zope) will be slow.
|
| What sort of 'operations' do
Hola!
Some of us over at ZopeZen.org (URL:http://www.zopezen.org) have
been discussing the fenomena that is called ZopePrints. I'll give a
brief explanation, and would appretiate feedback as to whether this a
good idea or not.
A ZopePrint is a document, or maybe a set of documents, which
[Tres Seaver]
| Please see:
|
| http://dev.zope.org/Projects/PTK
|
| for our work-in-progress.
Hey, looks like what I'm after. I can see that it's a work in
progress, so if you need any help, give me a shout. It didn't say too
much about the project itself, do you have any such information
[Morten W. Petersen]
| There's a new product available, which enables unique ids in a given context,
| take a look at url:http://www.zope.org/Members/morphex/ThreadSafeCounter.
On every view - a call to index_html() - it prints '{}' to stdout. Bug?
[Erik Enge]
| On every view - a call to index_html() - it prints '{}' to stdout. Bug?
Forget it. My fault. *shame, shame*
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML
[Shane Hathaway]
| If no one reports any problems
No problems so far :). Tried them with Zope 2.2.1.
| But here's the biggest news: the Refresh product
Excellent! When will this be included in standard Zope distributions?
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
[Morten W. Petersen]
| indeed a strange problem, anyone experienced this?
What did you do to make this happen? Versions?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding!
[Morten W. Petersen]
| The ideal solution would be to use an object that lives in the ZODB,
| I wonder if there is a way to keep the 'object history' empty? That
| is, keeping the counter 'packed' while retaining 'object history'
| information on all other objects.
I'm no ZODB expert, but I
[Michel Pelletier]
| We would love to see this description from you.
The description of such a system/model in a Fishbowl project? Or just
a general description? Sorry for being slow :)
| I think it would be great to get examples of your problems in a case
| study format, but also in a
[stefano ciccarelli]
| Is there any way to make an existing class catalog aware?
Is this ZClasses or Python classes, and are there any objects that
exist already?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cyril Elkaim]
| Of course I have tried REQUEST.PARENTS[0] but this is the parent
| inside the URL, I'm searching the PARENT inside the object system.
yourobject.getParentNode() should do the trick.
Have a read at lib/python/OFS/ZDOM.py
| Another question how can I get a reference of any
[Cyril Elkaim]
| I want to give the id (eventually qualified) of an object and get a
| reference to it. I'm talking about persistent objects inside the
| ZODB.
What do you need the reference for? How are you going to use it? And
when you're talking about inside ZODB, does that mean that
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Where did getobject come from? I know about Catalog.data, but I've never
| seen a getobject() method...
It's a method of the brain ;). If you have a data_record_id, you can
use getobject() to retrieve the object it represents.
[Morten W. Petersen]
| It's a problem with Linux, if you want to be able to use databases
| 2GB in size on Linux, a kernel = 2.4.0 is required.
Nope. First, the limit is at file-level, not database-level (mind
you, a problem with the filesystem, not Linux per se). You can have
tons and tons
[Morten W. Petersen]
| BTW, there is a list called [EMAIL PROTECTED], for ZODB specific
| questions.
Actually, I think its called ZODB-Dev; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
Hi, Zopistas.
I've been reading a lot of Zope code the last couple of years, but
still I really don't see any overall structure of lib/python. Is this
documented somewhere?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hia.
When entering the ZMI and clicking on Control_Panel, Database
management and then Cache parameters I get two new tabs: Contents
and Undo. It's probably just me, but I don't quite understand these
two. Couldn't we display the Undo tab along with Database, Cache
parameters and Flush Cache?
[Erik Enge]
[about undo tabs]
Hm. Just discovered this. Both
/Control_Panel/manage_undoForm
and
/Control_Panel/manage_UndoForm
work fine. manage_undoForm redirects to manage_UndoForm after you've
pressed the Undo-button though. Maybe that's where
This might be picking on very little things, but hey, someone has to
do that too. :-)
When adding a Version, the Help-button is there. Not a Help-link
which seems to be the standard these days. Same goes for Mail Host,
External Method, Z SQL Method and ZCatalog.
Accelerated HTTP Cache Manager
[Erik Enge]
| This might be picking on very little things
And so is this: why isn't there a grey line above the Users in the
acl_users?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts
[Erik Enge]
| [Erik Enge]
|
| | This might be picking on very little things
|
| And so is this
Yeah, this also - but I promise, this is the last one. For today
anyways. Either my eyes aren't quite awake yet, or this line appears
two times in the Credits-section of /manage_copyright
[Michael R. Bernstein]
| Erik Enge wrote:
|
| I'll let you know how it goes. (And please, do poke at me if it takes
| too long.)
|
| Ok, I'm poking :-).
Thanks. Keep doing it till you get what you need, I truly don't
mind. :-)
| How did it go?
Thanks to the speed of delivery at Royal
[Michael R. Bernstein]
| What I'm looking for is any indication that object creation time
| and/or indexing time goes up with the number of objects already in
| the ZODB.
Well, one thing I've already learned - which you all probably know -
is that you do _not_ want to put index_object() in your
Right.
This is the traceback I get, after doing a search (searchResults) - which
goes fine by teh way - and then trying to do an
getobject(x.data_record_id_) as a non-emergencyuser user get up an login
box and press escape:
Unauthorized
Sorry, a Zope error occurred.
Traceback (innermost
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
how do I turn off this annoying traceback that is always printed out when an
error occurrs?
Start Zope with out the debugging switch; "-D". Look in your z2.py file
for expalation of it, and in start (or start.bat on Windows?) to remove
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'm not sure why this isn't in 2.3.1b1, but yes, the code in getobject was
changed to use unrestrictedTraverse for this very reason.
On closer inspection, I can see that it is actually changed in
2.3.1b1. It does say unrestrictedTraverse (line 457,
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
No...
"No" to which question?
what are you getobjecting? Does it happen only with certain kinds of
objects? Are they ZClass objects or Product-based objects?
It happens with all kinds of objects I have in my index. All my objects
in the index
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
On the subject of numbers, I was wondering how to index
alphanumeric values like ISBN numbers.
Why can't you use FieldIndexes?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it just me, or has the tracebacks provided by Zope when an Exception is
raced gotten "worse"? In Zope 2.3.1b1 it usually says file: DT_In (or one
of them), and doesn't even mention the file which the Exception was raised
from.
Also, When I set the default width/height with the new ZMI and
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
Maybe a "This How-To covers product such-and-such version x.x" is in
order as a standard feature of the How-To?
This is a good idea. It would be an even better idea to allow folks to add
comments to howto pages, so that if the original author
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
It happens with all kinds of objects I have in my index. All my objects
in the index are from Python-based products.
Are they all of one type?
The same type (as in, they are all Python based), but with different
meta_types.
Can you
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
I meant to narrow down the problem domain in cases where you do call
getobject... cases where you aren't calling getobject are not relevant.
Ok. I see.
It would be helpful to find out for which objects getobject fails and for
which it succeeds
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
The short answer is "you can't, easily".
I'm a bit confused.
Will FieldIndexes also behave like TextIndex, in that they remove stop
words, digits and so forth? I think I've picked up somewhere that
FieldIndexes treats the whole content of the
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
Feedback and debug information coming your way as soon as possible :)
Ok, I index DTML Methods, Python objects, and all different kind of
things. Then I did a search, meta_type set to 'DTML Method' and it gave
me an unauthorized. Strangeness.
I've
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
I can't replicate this behavior with normal objects. :-(
Riiight...
*thinking very hard*
I just realized how it all started. Me and a collegue was indexing
objects, searching, doing regular development (probably changing classes,
attributes
I have two nice methods. One of them (methodA) is called via the web.
These belong to one class; classA.
class classA:
"doc string"
def methodA(self):
"doc string"
objects = self.methodB(self)
objects.reverse()
attrib = ''
for object in
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Steve Alexander wrote:
I wasn't reading the code clearly the first time around.
By far the simplest place to return copied results from methodB is to
change the last line to
Thanks, it all works nice. Nearly, that is.
The reverse problem is now gone. But the fact
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
I only get this when a ConflictError occur.
Nope, it occurs every time I change to another object. I need to do some
more testing here. It seems as if the 'objects' variable of 'methodB' is
semi-persistent or something. Weired
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Steve Alexander wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
The use of a literal anonymous list in methodb's signature for "objects" may
have something to do with the results you're getting on conflict. Try
assigning "objects" to an empty list in the method body instead.
Of
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
I've started seeing errors like this:
Hm. It might be related to the problem Andrew K. is seeing over at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Are there archives for that anywhere?
There sure is...
URL:http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2001-February/thread.html
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Is it alright to rely on this attribute of the REQUEST object?
Hm What is 'steps' in context of REQUEST?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No
Hi, Michael.
Sorry for taking so long getting back to you.
The programmer solving our problems with the post codes has solved it in a
different way than what I would've done (his method is way superior), so
we're not ending up adding all addresses as Zope Objects.
Therefore, I don't have any
I need some help with indexes.
I'm confused about what I can index in which Index. Which index does not
remove numbers? Which of them do I use to index a telephone number
(containing characters). What about email addresses? Special characters?
*oink* Help...
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
I'm trying to find out of there is a point where you start getting
non-linear performance penalties for additional objects (storing,
retreiving, or indexing).
I don't know, but I feel that is the case. Actually, I know it is the
case, but I
[observe the speed of Chris replying... *astounded* :)]
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Erik Enge wrote:
I'm confused about what I can index in which Index. Which index does not
remove numbers?
FieldIndex, KeyIndex
Wow, KeyIndex? Is this a new one? Or did you mean
Hi,
I was wondering, is there a way I can choose whether I want searchResults
to Or, Not or And the search? Or do I need to combine searchResult calls
and what not?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
You need to manually do unions or intersections on results from multiple
calls to searchRequest currently.
Is this a feature to be implemented? If not, why not?
Oh, and by the way, "searchRequest"?
___
Hola,
please don't make me touch C or a ... erm... you know, one of those
compiler-thingys. I don't like them.
Does anyone have a nicely baked Splitter.c for Linux? The one that Spisak
hacked to make it chew and swallow anything?
Fhank you very much. :-)
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
I'm trying to find out of there is a point where you start getting
non-linear performance penalties for additional objects (storing,
retreiving, or indexing).
I've just finished adding a somewhat small number of objects: 5000.
For every 1000th
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Are the imported object CatalogAware?
They are.
The old (pre 2.3.1) catalog implementation was know not to be very
storage friendly. If a significant portion of the catalog indexes
would be affected by imports, then you would see a quadratic
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
This level of growth doesn't seem like a sane level of growth... what
Zope version are you using?
Zope 2.3.1b1
Someone told me that ZEO and bulk-adding could be a thing to look at...
Isn't bulk-adding what you're doing now?
It is, but I'm
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Erik Enge wrote:
I'm using Zope 2.3.1b1 so that shouldn't be a problem?
Yes, it will be. [...]
So the bug in Zope 2.3.1b1 which makes the ZODB grow dramatically is
gone in Zope 2.3.2b2?
___
Zope
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Well, I thought the upgrade to 2.3.2b2 would solve the problem but it
hasn't :-( I have a (very important :-S) Zope instance which hangs at
what seems like the slightest touch.
Maybe I can help.
I've seen similar behaviour, and by some chance I
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Very strange!
Indeed.
Did you look in the log files? Have their been any core dumps?
I'll try to do an hour or so of analysing this tomorrow, and I'll get back
to you. :-)
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Thanks for the fast reply!
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
Have you read
http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/HowTos/UpgradeToNewCatalog/index_html
? I suspect there will be improvement.
Surely there will be improvement, but not of factors two or three, or
more?
And, I can do the
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
Probably not much difference on bare bulk indexing speed, but I'll bet
that it finishes this time. ;-)
We'll see :)
I'd either make my own CatalogAware-alike mixin class that did things
a bit differently than CatalogAware (perhaps didn't index
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
YourCatalog.catalog_object(newobject)
as opposed from inheriting from CatalogAware and relying on manage_afterAdd
or calling object.index_item() manually. That's really it.
Well, if you put it that way :)
*removing CatalogAwareness*
(it's
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'll be curious to see the results. Hopefully you'll have better luck
under 2.3.1b2.
I've indexed about 410.000 objects now. A plain query with 'meta_type'
and 'firstname' to searchResults takes about 3-4 seconds. Not too bad,
but not that good
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'd be curious to know how long a query that involves only a single
field index takes, and how long a query that involves only a single text
index takes... does each take a roughly equivalent amount of time?
I might be able to check that for you
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
Well, that's good, except I thought you couldn't get rid of objects?
Muhahaha. I got those little bastards... :)
Yes, but not with 1,000,000 objects (see
lib/python/ZCatalog/tests/testCatalog.py). It would be nice to have
such a report.
If I
Hiya,
it basically says it in the subject. How can I search for word1
word2 without ZCatalog/TextIndex interpreting it as word1 or/and
word2?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
You should be able to do this with quotes around the words, but that
feature is sort of only half-wired-up at this point. [snip] Currently,
quotes around word do the same thing as parens around words (word1
NEAR word2). Sigh.
What does NEAR mean,
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
I believe it means within 8 words in the current implementation...
So, word1 NEAR wordlongerthan8characters wouldn't come up with
anything? Or is it number of characters inbetween?
Is it in line for 2.4?
No, unfortunately. I'm not sure when
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
8 words. Not characters. But actually I just looked at the source
and it's not even that. It's treated essentially as an AND query,
because the UnTextIndex code doesn't store any proximity information
between words. ( I knew this once, but I had
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Casey Duncan wrote:
Works great for me. Perhaps you are using a Vocabulary that has
Globbing turned off?
I'm not sure, how do I check?
This query works:
wil?car*
This doesn't:
(wil?car* or something else) and (word1 and word2)
I can't see that the
searching for:
eri
and that gave me four results. No globbing, then?
Then again, where did you get these objects? If you were looking at the
wrong point in the code, the wildcards may not have been expanded yet.
Could be it...
[['erik', '...', '...', '...', 'enge']]
Where do
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Michel Pelletier wrote:
I don't think you are using a globbing vocabulary.
I think I am:
print_info(applic.Catalog(word='scripto*'))
unsplitted ['scripto*']
unl: ['scripto*']
unq: [104623, 'or', 112198, 'or', 151568]
Length: 6
Content: [mybrains instance at 1226d358,
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
I have written a proposal.
So, if I understand correctly, when this is implemented, will the ZCatalog
always resolve conflicts and never raise ConflictErrors? If there are no
ConflictErrors in the main object system?
I think I'm missing the point
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
How did you miss the point? That's exactly the point! :-)
Oh :)
Right now ZCatalog randomly generates ConflictErrors even if there are
no conflicts in the data being indexed.
This is why I think I've missed a/the point: wouldn't it be better to
Hi,
has anyone given this a good run? I'm a bit confused as to how to make it
work. Do I just subclass it in FileStorage? Will it work with existing
Data.fs or do I need to start anew, so to speak?
Thanks.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL
On 31 May 2001, Ty Sarna wrote:
Zope basically uses whatever object custom_zodb.Storage is as the
storage.
Ahh... I can feel the zen pouring over me :)
What you want to do is create a FileStorage, and wrap it with a
CompressedStorage and use that. Your custom_zodb.py would look like:
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Brian Lloyd wrote:
Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 has been released - you can download it from
Zope.org:
Cool stuff.
I have a couple of comments, though. For future ref., should I post them
to the Collector?
- lib/python/Products/PluginIndexes/__init__.py is missing the ZPL
- why
Hi,
sorry I can't test this myself. I get this behaviour in 2.3.2, and I find
it strange. I'd classify it as a bug.
If I pass this query to a TextIndex:
(word1 OR word2) AND (word3)
it is first translated to this:
[['word1', 'or', 'word2'], 'and', ['word3']]
which is fine. But then,
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
I'll try to do an hour or so of analysing this tomorrow, and I'll get back
to you. :-)
Well, now we all know what vikings believe an hour or so mean, don't we?
I figured it out, I think. Let's say I have these two methods:
def a():
b()
def
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... at least then we know what the exception is.
:
Again - try that code in an interactive interpreter if you really want to
find out what's going on...
Yeah, thanks, that would work as a workaround, but isn't this buggish
behaviour?
[no cross-posting, please]
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
We're planning a Yahoo! Clubs like system that should scale to about
30, 000 users. Assuming about 3,000 groups and 20MB per group (group
functionality includes photo albums), gives a database size of 60GB.
Assuming on
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
I'm running a 1GB Data.fs with CompressedStorage here and that takes
probably about 3-5 minutes on a 1GHz with 1GB RAM. I keep banging my
head against it, but it just won't run faster.
Oops, misleading you there. Actually, FileStorage uses about 40
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Richard Jones wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/anthony/BarewordExcepts
Feel free to find the bad except: and submit a patch...
Ugh. There are tons of them... I'll see what I have time for.
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Magnus Heino (Rivermen) wrote:
Where can I get PartitionedFileStorage?
Here: URL:http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/PartitionedFileStorage
Didn't show up in any searches, though. Maybe worth indexing?
___
Zope-Dev maillist
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Matt Hamilton wrote:
Out of interest, is this startup time avoided when using BerkeleyDB as
the storage? I know that it has its own indexes etc. so I am
wondering if it no longer needs to load an index into memory.
I'm not sure, but as I said in a previous
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Amos Latteier wrote:
I encourage you to check it out and leave your comments, criticisms, and
suggestions.
I like. That pretty much captures it :)
There is one thing, though. Let's say I have this class NiceBigCar. The
developers docs from what you suggest are fine,
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
It really doesn't matter how many conflicts there are. Within a
single transaction, 1 conflict is as bad as 100.
Why?
But I think I have a solution for all of the issues in conflict
resolution.
Whee!
If you, or anyone else, is also
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Andreas Jung wrote:
Feel free to review and comment the propsal to replace
the current DateTime module of Zope by the mxDateTime module:
From the proposal:
License issues
mxDateTime stands under the EGENIX Public License that is considered to be
an Open Source license.
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
See an earlier post on a different thread. Chris wrote that the
license is BSDish and is therefore compatible with ZPL. This means
that mxDateTime could be distributed with Zope.
Yes, but in the proposal Andreas mentions the GPL, not the ZPL, and
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Stian Jenssen wrote:
Hi there!
Hello :)
I wan't to use php with zope, does anybody know how the header syntax
shall look like? Tried diffrent syntaxes but i get wierd outputs, not
as expected.
Try this one: URL:http://www.zope.org/Members/Mamey/PHP.
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
