So would it be "almost protected". lol
And let's not go any farther with the "qualifications" thing. Time for a new topic........... Craig L. Prahl, CET Fire Protection Group Mechanical Department CH2MHILL Lockwood Greene 1500 International Drive PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 Direct - 864.599.4102 Fax - 864.599.8439 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ch2m.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Williams - FPDC Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 3:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Floating Ceilings "Almost concealed"? Almost only counts in horseshoes and nuclear war. Now concealed spaces? At 02:47 PM 8/5/2008, you wrote: >okay, I'll add more fuel to this pile. >Check out the 2009 Report on Proposals, Item 13-210, for a new >paragraph 8.15.22.3, which it appears that the committee "accepted in >principle". > >This would allow for a "largely" unsprinklered noncombustible space >above a lower ceilings of an office or retail sales area...and the >space above the ceiling doesn't even have to be "cut-off" from the >storage areas. Sprinklers are required below the ceiling, but the >sprinklers at the high roof would only extend into a portion of the >space above the ceiling. The proposal even calls this an "almost concealed" >space. > >I personally don't agree with this proposal, but it on the books for >discussion. >rick matsuda >city of dallas >_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
