That's pretty much how I see it, but unlike some people on the list, I have the luxury of not having to make any really immediate decisions on platform changes. Ss I can sit back, upgrade when the new server apps come out and work on that, AS LONG AS I can see that they are moving toward the progress you mentioned below.
And, like you, I fail to see the long-term benefit (and therefore marketability) in using a product which requires a specialised app server, so they are going to have to make the IDE the killer app described. They have a competitive advantage in ease-of-use, enabling even non-programmers quick development cycles, but the product does seem to have to develop some top-end legs (so to speak), to adequately compete in todays market. So if they can somehow keep that advantage in the product and provide the extra bells and whistles they'll get into a much bigger market. Garth At 11:57 31/07/02 -0400, you wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Round trip JSP Editing in the Tango editor... Man that will be the day! >If WiTango can manage that, they would smoke MANY IDEs out there provided >that they can also do internal debugging (true debugging that is like any >other language with break points, step in/out etc...) from within the >editor. Of course they would need a slew of features to compete including >refactoring, code completion (for html, jsp and xml), and >editing/compiling of java code and JSP from within the editor itself. At >that point I would forget about the Tango app server and let the existing >java app servers deal with it, and concentrate on the IDE only. > >Of course I've been singing this song forever, but everyone thinks I'm >nuts. I just don't see the value of having a specialized app server to >run your code. Even ColdFusion is going to java with their stuff with >NEO. I feel bad for the folks at WithEnterprise because the T5 app >server, from what is described on this list, is something that Everyware >and Pervasive OWED the (Wi)Tango community a long time ago. >Unfortunately they're stuck with the product, and they're stuck with >trying to make things work the way they should have been in the FIRST >PLACE, THEN deal with the added burden of catching up to market demands, >which covering for a period of 2.5 years is just HUGE. So their task is >larger than anyone sees I think... Oh yeah and they loose any kind of >connection they had with the previous name of the product, and they're >having to do it all from outside the US, which can't be easy either >considering 95% of their market is over here. > >Just my 2c. >R > >On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 11:08 AM, Alex Kac wrote: > >>I am a very passionate person about a few things - and sometimes I don't >>know why. Tango is one of them. It is unique. I also tend to be very >>opinionated - that didn't always come out when I worked for PVSW since I >>tended to be quite corporate there :) >> >>Those things I mentioned may not be what an average web application user >>uses (since I think the average one is ASP/PHP driven), but once you've used >>them in .NET or elsewhere such as CF - they really make life simple in so >>many areas. The issue is that some of the features are key to me - >>specifically web services - as I build more automated features into our >>website as well as working with our reseller. Granted, I've been the one >>pushing our retailers to allow registration/serial number generation through >>web services to provide the best user experience, as well as tying into >>their engines in our site through web services - but either way, its >>something that I really do need. >> >>The other part is that I still consult to quite a few Austin based >>enterprises (you know, the ones that buy $100k worth of hardware for a >>website alone or $1mil for one single software/consulting deal) and they all >>HAD tango stuff running and have moved to .NET. Now Tango is probably never >>going to be on their radar again - but who knows? >> >>The other issue is cost. .NET is about $1k in costs. Windows server license >>- about $500. Visual Studio.NET (which is an awesome IDE...) - anywhere from >>$99 to $699 in stores. Or of course if you already have a Windows >>server...anywhere from free to $699 for the IDE. Using that IDE, I can built >>almost the same kind of apps that I can in Tango in some cases far less time >>- and in some cases more. Both have their strengths and weaknesses. But .NET >>runs very fast; has data caching; industrial strength sessions states - and >>best of all - a true programming language that doesn't stop you from >>anything. >> >>Problem is - no cross platform support (yet) and it doesn't feel like home. >>There is just something about Tango's design that I still love. But I want >>to see it grow up. I don't like to sit here and wonder if it will do what I >>want it to do - and I also don't have time to do that. I want to know if I >>should just stop even thinking about it - or :) >> >>Now, the ability to export to J2ee is what intrigues me because then - if >>its editable - I can write most of the app in Tango and export to j2ee for >>the more complex pieces. Granted, I couldn't then edit it in Tango again - >>and that's a big issue. >> >>But once the featureset is announced, I can then sit back and make a >>decision. >> >>-- >>Alex Kac, CEO/Developer >> >>Innovation in Personal and Business Information Management >>http://www.pocketinformant.com/ >> >>zoomzoom >> >> >>>From: Garth Penglase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:03:38 +1000 >>>To: Multiple recipients of list witango-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Witangov5 ?? Vaporware? >>> >>>Well, it would be sad to see you go Alex, since you would be a valued >>>developer on this list, particularly with your programming efforts in the >>>PIM area, so I hope that you find enough in the new version to keep you >>>interested. I would have thought that some of the items mentioned in your >>>wish-list were a bit beyond what the "average" developer (if there is such >>>a thing) would be expecting, I would have thought, but they certainly would >>>take the product a long way further than the previous incarnation and would >>>be exciting additions. I do think that even if the product doesn't live up >>>to these expectations initially, the extension of its legendary ease-of-use >>>and new speed and stability, along with the advancements already mentioned >>>(j2ee etc..) must make it worth consideration for the majority of us. >>> >>>I must say I think that if you went it would be a duller list as well - the >>>number of emails in this thread has got to be a record, and you certainly >>>have made life a little more interesting on the list! >>>cheers >>>Garth >> >>________________________________________________________________________ >>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin) > >iD8DBQE9SAjvK/1j/4sLi/ARAlQVAJ9fJIZmdXesaw2s4aavA9z4HabbbACgqIUG >qe7lzbXZEObjqVWAwQbCxb0= >=dMTD >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >________________________________________________________________________ >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body ________________________________________________________________________ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text/US ASCII email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe witango-talk in the message body
