JMJM,

Thanks for your reply.

I've numbered your points so I can refer to them more easily.

The zen I practice, the items that seem to be the same are 3, 4, 5 and 6; 
although I'd have to investigate what you mean by 3 and 6 before I could be 
100% sure.

As you know I consider both chi and karma illusory, teaching tools at best and 
comforting superstitions at worst.

...Bill!

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Jue Miao Jing Ming - ????
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:48 PM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

  
Hello Bill,

As always, thank you for your detailed explanation.  Let me get some of our 
definitions listed.
1. Chi is just a medium.  The wisdom it contains is the spirit. 
2. We all have chi, without it we die. Some can sense it.  Some don't care. 
3. In Chan, only True Form is not illusion.  Everything else is, including this 
post of mine.
4. Every practice, no matter how different, is just a bridge.  Some longer and 
some shorter.
5. Some bridge enable us to help others more efficiently.
6. The end result is still the same -- liberate ourselves and others from 
sufferings.
7. Depending on our karma, our paths are shaped. 
Thank you as always,
JMJM

On 9/10/2010 6:24 AM, billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote: 
  
JMJM,

Please don't take my posts as some kind of 'official' Zen Buddhist position. 
It's not. It's my position and I'm willing to take responsibility for it and 
explain it when asked.

If y

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Jue Miao Jing Ming - ????
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:30 PM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

I always know that Zen and Chan are the same in description, but different in 
practice. Now I am certain the missing practice in Zen is the "Mystic Inner 
Witness" practice or 『秘密內證法』 in Chinese.

[Bill!] I'm not sure what the 'Mystic Inner Witness' practice is, but I think I 
can guess. It sounds like something described by many in the West as the 
'watcher' or the 'witness'. A bodiless awareness that passively and exclusively 
observes. If it is this it is not taught in Japanese Renzai/Soto Zen Buddhism. 
I have experienced this phenomenon while sitting, and when I questioned my 
Roshi (Zen Teacher) about it during dokusan (private interview) I was told to 
just ignore it, that is was just maya (illusion). I did that and after a short 
while I never experienced it again.

That's the reason Zen lost its spirituality and became an everyday 
rationalization, as described by you.
[Bill!] 'Spirit' is defined by Merriam-Webster Online as:
"1: an animating or vital principle held to give life to physical organisms 
2: a supernatural being or essence"
Using those definitions as a basis for 'spirituality', I think you are 
referring to #1 - which I also think you call 'chi'. Again, during my beginning 
Japanese Renzai Zen Buddhist training, and when working on the 'breakthrough' 
koan 'Mu', I was encouraged to generate 'joriki', which was described as a 
'ball of energy, like a small fire, located in my 'hara' (a spot just below the 
navel). I was told it would help me build up my ability to focus and achieve 
the necessary concentration that was necessary to pass the koan. After passing 
'Mu' I asked my Roshi about joriki and if I needed to continue to generate and 
accumulate it. He replied that it was not necessary to do that anymore, that it 
was a form of maya and that although useful as a teaching technique it could 
actually become a hindrance when doing Shikan taza (clear mind zazen) which is 
the direct expression of Buddha Nature. So, if 'chi' is what you mean when you 
say 'Zen has lost its spirituality', you are correct. It is necessary to 
discard that along with all other illusions. 

Well??
[Bill!] I am well, thank you. And you?

On 9/8/2010 9:00 PM, billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote: 

JMJM,

You asked if "...Zen has a "mystic" practice?"

My short answer would be definitely NO.

My long answer would be: Buddhism may have mystical practices, and therefore 
Zen Buddhism may also; but zen in and of itself is the opposite of mysticism as 
the term is usually used. It is nothing special. It is available to all 
sentient beings. It is just everyday life. Zen practice is the 'cypress tree in 
the garden', 'three-pounds of flax', 'a dried shit-stick'. Zen practice is Just 
THIS!

An addendum (long one) to my long answer is: I differentiate Zen Buddhism and 
zen. I do not believe zen is co-dependent with, exclusively associated with or 
a merely a sub-set of Buddhism. I do of course recognize a sub-set or sect of 
Buddhism called 'Zen Buddhism'. I refer to this in my posts as 'Zen' with an 
upper-case 'Z' to denote it is a proper noun. I use 'zen', which I believe to 
simply be the direct experience of reality, with a lower-case 'z' to refer to 
non-denominational zen.

For me Zen Buddhism is a Buddhist expression of zen. It has taken the essence 
of zen and has encased it with the religious dogma of Buddhism. A further 
extension of this would be 'Japanese Zen Buddhism' as contrasted with 'Korean 
Zen Buddhism'. These have been further encased with culture values associated 
with the Japanese or Korean cultures. This layering goes on and on and on until 
the layers are so thick the kernel or essence which is zen is sometimes 
completely obscured. This is also true of Christianity, and I believe all other 
'religions'. In fact that is what I think most 'religions' are: a stylized 
expression of zen - which as I said above very often puts more emphasis on the 
layers of 'style' than the kernel of 'zen'.

I think there are certainly 'mystic practices' within most religions. I think 
religions encourage the belief in 'mysticism' to protect the layers they've 
overlaid on the basic kernel of zen, and to justify the creation of hierarchies 
within the religion - like lay people, monks, priests, prophets, 'mystics', 
etc... 'Mysticism' protects the religion by shielding it from access by most of 
the 'lay people' so the upper hierarchies, such as priest classes, can continue 
to define and reinforce the adherence to the layers. Although 'mystics' are 
sometimes seen as rouges and revolutionaries in a religion, they only are 
allowed to do so under the watchful eye and approval of the religions upper 
hierarchies. Of course some 'mystics' are not accepted, and they are either 
denounced as 'heretics' or, if they are popular enough, might succeed in 
breaking off a group into a sect or even a new religion - such as Jesus did.

...Bill! 

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Jue Miao Jing Ming - ????
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:56 AM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

Hello Bill and all,

Thank you for your answer. As we both know definitions are just labels, my next 
question is whether Zen has a "mystic" practice?

Since Chan is the "Grand Mystic", the foundation of our Chan practice is "Inner 
observation and witnessing the direction unification with the universe, 
including all the phenomena as well as the life force that caused everything."

Through this practice, there will be no conflict between our mind and our 
heart. Both the logic and the universal truth will be one. The discriminating 
mind will be wise to accept all.

What can you comment?

Thank you for your time to read my post,
JM

On 9/8/2010 12:40 AM, billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote: 

JMJM,

You bring up a very good question.

According to Merriam-Webster Online the definitions of these words and my 
opinion as how they could be applied to zen are:

MYSTICAL
1:a : having a spiritual meaning or reality that is neither apparent to the 
senses nor obvious to the intelligence
[Bill!] Zen is not 'spiritual' and is definitely apparent to the senses, so 
this definition doesn't seem to fit. Zen is however not obvious, nor even 
accessible as far as I'm concerned, to the intelligence.
b : involving or having the nature of an individual's direct subjective 
communion with God or ultimate reality
[Bill!] This is pretty close, although I would take out the words 'subjective' 
and 'God or ultimate' which leaves 'direct communion with reality'.

MYSTICISM
1: the experience of MYSTICAL union or direct communion with ultimate reality 
reported by MYSTICS
[Bill!] I could live with this definition. 
2: the belief that direct knowledge of God, spiritual truth, or ultimate 
reality can be attained through subjective experience (as intuition or insight)
[Bill!] Again, this is close, but I don't associate Buddha Nature with 
intuition or insight - although I know in the West these could be used as a 
poor substitute. 
3:a : vague speculation : a belief without sound basis
[Bill!] I don't like this one at all.
b : a theory postulating the possibility of direct and intuitive acquisition of 
ineffable knowledge or power 
[Bill!] This is pretty close. I like the word 'ineffable'. That definitely 
fits. I don't like the words 'intuitive, acquisition, knowledge and power'.

In English, 'mysticism' is generally associated with God or 'hidden' knowledge 
or insight. I associate zen with just everyday stuff. It's no big deal.

...Bill!

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Jue Miao Jing Ming - ????
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 2:14 AM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

Dear all, 

I have a question. In Chinese, the Tibetan practice is literally translated as 
the "Mystic Order", the Chan practice is literally translated as the "Grand 
Mystic Order". Chan is the grand one, because Rong-Shu Patriarch brought the 
Chan to Tibet and affected their practice.

In Chan 『秘密內證法』 "Mystic Inner Witness Dharma" means an inward practice enabling 
heart to heart witness of Buddha. That's all. There is really nothing mystic 
about it.

Is the term "mystic or mysticism" means the same as the I described above or 
not?

Much obliged,
_/\_
JMJM

On 9/7/2010 8:13 AM, DP wrote: 

That's kind of the point of the book. She is trying to bring mysticism down to 
Earth, as it were. She wants to show that not only monks can do it.

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, <billsm...@...> wrote:
>
> DP,
> 
> I haven't heard of this book, but it does sound interesting.
> 
> I don't, however, associate mysticism with zen, or with `seeing the world as
> it is' (which I do associate with zen). How could anyone call that
> mysticism? Or with spiritualism as so many are wont to do?
> 
> …Bill!
> 
> From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of DP
> Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 9:22 PM
> To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill
> 
> 
> I recently downloaded this ebook from a public domain site (the book is
> nearly 100 year old) and I have to say I'm very impressed with it. Underhill
> was an ANglo-Catholic, but her main focus is on how anyone can appreciate
> the mysticism of everyday life by seeing the world as it is, without
> categorization. I think this sounds very Zen, and I wonder if anyone else
> had read it.
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5429 (20100906) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
> database 5429 (20100906) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
>

-- 
Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
http://www.heartchan.org

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5432 (20100907) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5432 (20100907) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

-- 
Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
http://www.heartchan.org

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5435 (20100908) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5435 (20100908) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

-- 
Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
http://www.heartchan.org

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5439 (20100910) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5439 (20100910) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



-- 
Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
http://www.heartchan.org



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5441 (20100910) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5441 (20100910) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 



------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to