--On 18. Januar 2006 09:30:37 -0800 Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:20:41 -0800, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

--On 18. Januar 2006 09:03:15 -0800 Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

Note that I'm not saying it *won't* ship with 2.9, just that we reserve
the right to ship with 2.8, since the 2.9 status is still uncertain,

What is uncertain (except the issues with the Windows release)?

The Windows release is a big part of what makes Plone interesting to new
adopters, so that is the primary one.

ok


In addition, I have yet to use a Zope release which didn't have serious
problems in its .0 release. I'm not saying this *has* to be the case with
the 2.9 release - just being realistic. ;)

I agree :-) But I would like to see reasonable feedback from the Plone community about any problems with 2.9.0 to have them fixed for you in 2.9.1.

-aj

Attachment: pgptKVZ0C9999.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to