--On 18. Januar 2006 09:30:37 -0800 Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:20:41 -0800, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:--On 18. Januar 2006 09:03:15 -0800 Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Note that I'm not saying it *won't* ship with 2.9, just that we reserve the right to ship with 2.8, since the 2.9 status is still uncertain,What is uncertain (except the issues with the Windows release)?The Windows release is a big part of what makes Plone interesting to new adopters, so that is the primary one.
In addition, I have yet to use a Zope release which didn't have serious problems in its .0 release. I'm not saying this *has* to be the case with the 2.9 release - just being realistic. ;)
I agree :-) But I would like to see reasonable feedback from the Plone community about any problems with 2.9.0 to have them fixed for you in 2.9.1.
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests