> Betreff: Re: AW: [Zope3-dev] Why do we restrict our egg testing?
> On 9/27/07, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Second, why would you include all of the zope.* eggs if that 
> > particular package doesn't depend on them?
> I suspect there are hidden differences in expectations here.  ;-)
> Roger, when you assemble an application, are you expecting to 
> find all of zope.* in the result?

No I excpect some of them, but others excpect others.
So I'm pretty shure if we count all different setup then
we can excpect all packages in the summary.

> We're not expecting that in the projects I'm involved in.  In 
> fact, I'd be pretty upset to find a lot of that stuff in 
> there, and would like to see less of it than I do.

That's the problem you only solve your problems with
this pattern. but the zope namspace suggest participation.
And you can't ensure quality wiht this point of view.

> Zope 3 is not an application, and I consider that a good thing.

I agree,
Zope 3 is not a application, but packages in this namespace 
can break things outside of your context.

That doesn't matter if this are packages in a 3rd party
namespace, but this should not happen in the zope namespace.

>   -Fred
> -- 
> Fred L. Drake, Jr.    <fdrake at gmail.com>
> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller

Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to