Re: [WSG] my site

2010-01-21 Thread Joseph Taylor

Marvin,

I see you fixed the paragraph before the body tag.

I'm re-validating your page and will send back some more tips.

Joseph R. B. Taylor
/Web Designer / Developer/
--
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Clean, Simple and Elegant Web Design/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
Web: http://sitesbyjoe.com
Email: j...@sitesbyjoe.com


On 1/21/10 7:04 PM, Marvin Hunkin wrote:

hi.
here's the url to my site i cam currently working on.
okay go and read the code.
and point out to me what errors i have and how to fix.
any advice would be fine.
well will work on the index page.
and if i can improve it any better as a blind person.
let me know.
willing to take any advice, or pointers.
marvin.

http://www.raulferrer.com/joe/html/




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

   



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] my site

2010-01-21 Thread Joseph Taylor

Marvin,

As I send over items I notice - for now forget about HTML 4.01 or HTML 5 
and stay with XHTML for the moment.


Things to fix then get back to me:

Inside the div tag with the id of banner_new you have double break 
tags surrounding both the first level heading and the image. I see the 
same thing in the navigation area.


I'd rather see you use CSS to create those spaces.

For the heading element you could use this CSS:

div#banner_new h1 { margin: 20px 0; }

For the navigation:

div#navigation { margin: 20px 0; }

This would put a 20 pixel space at the top and bottom of the elements.

If you choose to leave the break tags in place (it's your call), you 
need to add the forward slash prior to closing the tag so they validate.


Try those changes and get back to me.

Joseph R. B. Taylor
/Web Designer / Developer/
--
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Clean, Simple and Elegant Web Design/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
Web: http://sitesbyjoe.com
Email: j...@sitesbyjoe.com


On 1/21/10 7:04 PM, Marvin Hunkin wrote:

hi.
here's the url to my site i cam currently working on.
okay go and read the code.
and point out to me what errors i have and how to fix.
any advice would be fine.
well will work on the index page.
and if i can improve it any better as a blind person.
let me know.
willing to take any advice, or pointers.
marvin.

http://www.raulferrer.com/joe/html/




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

   



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] my site

2010-01-21 Thread Luke Hoggett

as interesting as it is... how about you guys communicate off list.

On 22/01/2010 12:09 PM, Joseph Taylor wrote:

Marvin,

As I send over items I notice - for now forget about HTML 4.01 or HTML 
5 and stay with XHTML for the moment.


Things to fix then get back to me:

Inside the div tag with the id of banner_new you have double break 
tags surrounding both the first level heading and the image. I see the 
same thing in the navigation area.


I'd rather see you use CSS to create those spaces.

For the heading element you could use this CSS:

div#banner_new h1 { margin: 20px 0; }

For the navigation:

div#navigation { margin: 20px 0; }

This would put a 20 pixel space at the top and bottom of the elements.

If you choose to leave the break tags in place (it's your call), you 
need to add the forward slash prior to closing the tag so they validate.


Try those changes and get back to me.

Joseph R. B. Taylor
/Web Designer / Developer/
--
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Clean, Simple and Elegant Web Design/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
Web: http://sitesbyjoe.com
Email: j...@sitesbyjoe.com


On 1/21/10 7:04 PM, Marvin Hunkin wrote:

hi.
here's the url to my site i cam currently working on.
okay go and read the code.
and point out to me what errors i have and how to fix.
any advice would be fine.
well will work on the index page.
and if i can improve it any better as a blind person.
let me know.
willing to take any advice, or pointers.
marvin.

http://www.raulferrer.com/joe/html/




***
List Guidelines:http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help:memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

   


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*** 


--

Luke Hoggett
0419 442 807


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] my site

2010-01-21 Thread Jayachandran Kandasamy
Hi Marvin,

I have highlighted the code below .. please avoid using br/ tags for the
line breaks please use some margin / padding to achieve the same in CSS

Avoid using the inline style with the markup tags itself..

Rest all looks fine buddy   :) :)

Please download this validator to your FF browser.. that will help you for
validating the markup ... so no need to depend on the people for the same...

http://www.totalvalidator.com there is addon available for FF browser too.

Heres your markup :)
**
*!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN **
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd*http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
*
html xmlns=**http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml* http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml*

head
meta http-equiv=content-type content=text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 /
titleJoe's Fruit and Vegetable Shop/title
link href=../styles/joe_style.css rel=stylesheet type=text/css /
/head
body
div id=wrapper
  div id=banner_new
  p a name=Top/a /p
h1Joe's Fruit and Vegetable Shop/h1*

*br
br
img src=../images/fruit.jpg alt=Fruit / /div
br
br
  div id=navigation
  br
  br*

*ul
  lia href=index.htmlHome/a/li
  lia href=produce.htmlAll Produce/a/li
  lia href=recipes.htmlRecipes/a/li
  lia href=staff.htmlStaff/a/li
  lia href=history.htmlHistory/a/li*

*  lia href=search.htmlSearch/a/li
  lia href=links.htmlFruit And Vegetable Links/a/li
  lia href=vegetable.htmlFruit And Vegetable Recipes/a/li
  lia href=copyright.htmlCopyright/a/li
  lia href=credits.htmlCredits/a/li
  br*

*  br
  /ul
div style=clear:both;/div
  /div
  div id=main_content
h2Today's Specials/h2
pPhone 1800-Joe-Fruit/p
hr /*

*div class=specials img src=../images/mango.jpg alt=Mango /
  h3Mangoes/h3
  p Large juicy tropical Queensland mangoes, ideal for letting the
juice drip down your chin as you eat them! br
strong$1.99 each./strong /p
/div
div class=specials img src=../images/Mushrooms.jpg
alt=Mushrooms /*

*  h3Mushrooms/h3
  pDelicious champignon mushrooms, perfect for the French cooking you
do so well. br
strong$3.99 / kg./strong/p
/div
div class=specials img src=../images/strawberries.jpg
alt=Strawberry /
  h3Strawberries/h3*

*  pPunnet of hydroponics strawberries. Exquisite taste, mouth
watering; perfect with French vanilla ice-cream. br
strong$2.99 a Punnet./strong/p
/div
div class=specials img src=../images/tomatoes2.jpg alt=Tomatoes
/
  h3Tomatoes/h3
  pHydroponics tomatoes, vine ripened, juicy and red: they taste like
old-fashioned tomatoes your mother used to serve! br*

*strong$7.99 a tray (approx. 3 kg)./strong/p
/div
hr /
pToday's specials are all available now at:/p
pJoe's Fruit Shop/p
p55 Main Road/p
pAnytown 2999/p*

*pPhone: 9555-9876/p
pFor phone orders: 1800-Joe-Fruit/p
p a 
href=**mailto:i...@joes.com.au?subject=joe's*i...@joes.com.au?subject=joe's
* Website Query target=_topE-Mail Joe Bashir/a /p
hr /
  /div
  div id=footer*
*  p a href=#Top target=_topTop Of Page/a /p
p style=clear:both;
p© All Rights Reserved Joe's Fruit Shop PTY. LTD. 2009./p
  /div
/div
/body
/html
*
*
Cheers,
JC

*
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Marvin Hunkin startrekc...@gmail.comwrote:

 hi.
 here's the url to my site i cam currently working on.
 okay go and read the code.
 and point out to me what errors i have and how to fix.
 any advice would be fine.
 well will work on the index page.
 and if i can improve it any better as a blind person.
 let me know.
 willing to take any advice, or pointers.
 marvin.

 http://www.raulferrer.com/joe/html/




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***


[WSG] My site

2009-10-07 Thread Marvin Hunkin
Hi.
looking to fix my site.
have not got around to it yet.
doing other projects and now iwll get to it tomorrow.
now how do i make all the images the same size.
Do i get rid of the banana images and the second menu.
only one set of links.
On the credits page, do i get rid of the p link from the list of links.
and just have a a href= ...html?
cheers Marvin. 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] My Site

2009-10-07 Thread Marvin Hunkin
my site still errorshi.
take a look at http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com
still errors.
and okay will go and download the vision australia color tester and see what 
colors they say for the background.
okay will go and vallidate the hoem page.
did fix the table reading problem.
it was the screen reader table setting for ie, which was giving me grief on 
the home page.
did not set my table layout settings to screen layout.
now the table reads fine.
and also what other changes i should make to make this a slicker site.
any good, bad or ugly feedback would be fine and making final changes.
I am blind and use a screen reader, and want this to be tarted for blind and 
sighted users.
looking forward to your feedback.
cheers Marvin. 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] My Site

2009-10-07 Thread Raul Ferrer
Hi there!

I have experience building sites for blind people, but have absolutely no
idea how a blind person builds a website.

As for your website, the first thing I'd do is reduce the image of the mango
because that's 3264 x 2448 pixels worth of mango and it's way too much.

Secondly I'd try to get rid of all tables for the code. I don't know if
you're using a program or you're coding by hand, but screen reader don't
deal perfectly (and even less equally) with tables, so it'd be a great idea
to try using XHTML and CSS for presentational purposes.

And finally, colorwise, you should think of changing the links colors,
because you have green over green and it doesn't validate the AAA WCAG2
specification.

Other than that, it should be fine.
Congrats, 'cause I can't believe I could do any of this without my vision.

Cheers

Raul

-Mensaje original-
De: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] En
nombre de Marvin Hunkin
Enviado el: miércoles, 07 de octubre de 2009 14:06
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: [WSG] My Site

my site still errorshi.
take a look at http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com
still errors.
and okay will go and download the vision australia color tester and see what

colors they say for the background.
okay will go and vallidate the hoem page.
did fix the table reading problem.
it was the screen reader table setting for ie, which was giving me grief on 
the home page.
did not set my table layout settings to screen layout.
now the table reads fine.
and also what other changes i should make to make this a slicker site.
any good, bad or ugly feedback would be fine and making final changes.
I am blind and use a screen reader, and want this to be tarted for blind and

sighted users.
looking forward to your feedback.
cheers Marvin. 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site

2009-09-23 Thread Savl Ekk
That's great to learn more, Marvin. Good luck you then. And cheers too :)

2009/9/23 Marvin Hunkin startrekc...@gmail.com

 hi.
 well.
 did this for a course a couple of years ago.
 and got legal use to use all the images.
 so want to put this up on a site.
 as a port folio of my student web projects.
 got a number of projects.
 which trying to find the owners of images and get their permission.
 like a world war ii veterans club site, a soccer club site, mens wear store
 site, a child's flea circus. so will go and take your suggestions for the
 fruit shop site.
 and put lists.
 for the links.
 then will get rid of the second nav menu.
 and the images.
 it was just for sighted users.
 so will go and look at those tutorials.
 how to design and redesign the site with the css, and the java script.
 thanks for your help.
 then a more slicker, more accessible site.
 and will use the vision australia colour tool.
 to try to get the best solution for sighted and blind users.
 cheers Marvin.
 ps: not so stubborn after all.
 and did pass this subject and the course.
 so updating the projects. to get around legal copyright issues.
 Marvin.




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
 ***




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

[WSG] my site and mouse rollovers

2009-09-22 Thread Marvin Hunkin
hi.
well not going to change the site a whole great deal.
proud of this site i created for my course.
and only changing the mouse rollovers.
so if it looks great.
let me know.
it is at:
http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com
cheers Marvin.
ps: might be a few hours before my friend uploads it.
as i cannot upload it and login into the ftp site.
i get a internet cannot open this page.
tried it in firefox and get the same problem. 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site and mouse rollovers

2009-09-22 Thread Stuart Foulstone

Hi Marvin,

I am interested in your angle on regarding the repeating alt attribute
values in your menu, e.g. alt=Closed Banana.

This would appear to be against basic WCAGC accessibility guidelines, and
also totally unnecessary verbiage for the listener.

What is your reasoning for doing this?


On Tue, September 22, 2009 8:27 am, Marvin Hunkin wrote:
 hi.
 well not going to change the site a whole great deal.
 proud of this site i created for my course.
 and only changing the mouse rollovers.
 so if it looks great.
 let me know.
 it is at:
 http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com
 cheers Marvin.
 ps: might be a few hours before my friend uploads it.
 as i cannot upload it and login into the ftp site.
 i get a internet cannot open this page.
 tried it in firefox and get the same problem.




 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
 Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
 ***






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site and mouse rollovers

2009-09-22 Thread Lesley Lutomski

Hi Marvin,

To follow on from what Dave Hurley said about colours, I find the green 
Link text hard to read on the green background.  No matter how great 
your site is, if your users can't read it, it's not doing its job. 
Visionaustralia have a really useful tool on their Web site here:

http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/info.aspx?page=628
It will help you check colour combinations for visibility.

All the best with your course.

Lesley

Marvin Hunkin wrote:

hi.
well not going to change the site a whole great deal.
proud of this site i created for my course.
and only changing the mouse rollovers.
so if it looks great.
let me know.
it is at:
http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com
cheers Marvin.
ps: might be a few hours before my friend uploads it.
as i cannot upload it and login into the ftp site.
i get a internet cannot open this page.
tried it in firefox and get the same problem. 





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site and mouse rollovers

2009-09-22 Thread Lesley Lutomski

Hi Marvin,

To follow on from what Dave Hurley said about colours, I find the green 
Link text hard to read on the green background.  No matter how great 
your site is, if your users can't read it, it's not doing its job. 
Visionaustralia have a really useful tool on their Web site here:

http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/info.aspx?page=628
It will help you check colour combinations for visibility.

All the best with your course.

Lesley

Marvin Hunkin wrote:

hi.
well not going to change the site a whole great deal.
proud of this site i created for my course.
and only changing the mouse rollovers.
so if it looks great.
let me know.
it is at:
http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com
cheers Marvin.
ps: might be a few hours before my friend uploads it.
as i cannot upload it and login into the ftp site.
i get a internet cannot open this page.
tried it in firefox and get the same problem. 





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site

2009-09-16 Thread Dennis Lapcewich
Return Receipt
   
   Your   Re: [WSG] my site
   document:   
   
   wasdlapcew...@fs.fed.us 
   received
   by: 
   
   at:09/16/2009 07:33:08  
   






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] my site

2009-09-15 Thread Marvin Hunkin
hi.
did vallidate all the pages and fixed all the errors.
so what do you mean by excess tags.
that is the way i set it up and want it that way.
what do you mean by images not loading.
cheers Marvin. 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site

2009-09-15 Thread Roberto Gorjão

Hi,

At the homepage source you have a /div too much on line 59.
Also, the mango image is not loading. It seems that the file is corrupt: 
when trying to reach I get a message saying that the image has errors.


I think all the tables are loading correctly, both at the homepage and 
produce. I would suggest:
- add an extra column for the images, instead of inserting them in the 
same cell as text;

- make all images have the same size;
- get rid of the bananas images on the menu because they make it too long.

HTH,

Roberto


Marvin Hunkin wrote:

hi.
did vallidate all the pages and fixed all the errors.
so what do you mean by excess tags.
that is the way i set it up and want it that way.
what do you mean by images not loading.
cheers Marvin. 

  



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site

2009-09-15 Thread Dennis Lapcewich
Return Receipt
   
   Your   Re: [WSG] my site
   document:   
   
   wasdlapcew...@fs.fed.us 
   received
   by: 
   
   at:09/15/2009 08:15:24  
   






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site

2009-09-15 Thread Roberto Gorjão
I'm very, very sorry for the receipt request! It was a long time since I 
last participated in this list. I've already altered my settings.


Roberto


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site

2009-09-15 Thread Julia . Dalbo
Return Receipt
   
   Your   Re: [WSG] my site
   document:   
   
   wasJulia Dalbo/ACT/IMMI/AU  
   received
   by: 
   
   at:16/09/2009 08:55:54 AM   
   







Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally privileged
and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.  DIAC respects your privacy and has
obligations under the Privacy Act 1988.  The official departmental privacy
policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au.  See:
http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm


-



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site

2009-09-15 Thread Kiran

please help



Thanks  Regards
Kiran Nanaware
Production (PPC)

DB Power Electronics (P) Ltd.
Satara, India.

Tel. (O): +91 2162 244093 247093
Fax : +91 2162 244076
Website : www.dbups.com
(Core Competence in Power Electronics)

- Original Message - 
From: Dennis Lapcewich dlapcew...@fs.fed.us

To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] my site



Return Receipt

  Your   Re: [WSG] my site
  document:

  wasdlapcew...@fs.fed.us
  received
  by:

  at:09/15/2009 08:15:24







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***




Disclaimer: This E-Mail (including attached documents) may contain proprietary 
and / or confidential and/or legally privileged Information and is meant for 
the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in error and 
are not the intended recipient/s, kindly notify us at ad...@dbups.co.in and 
then delete this e-mail immediately from your system. You are also hereby 
notified that any use, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, 
disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this e-mail, its 
contents or its attachment/s other than by its intended recipient/s is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful.

Internet Communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as 
information could be delayed, intercepted, corrupted, lost, or contain viruses. 
DB Power Electronics (P) Ltd. does not accept any liability for any errors, 
omissions, viruses or computer problems experienced by any recipient as a 
result of this e-mail.

DB Power Electronics (P) Ltd.

120/37, Ramtekdi Industrial Area, Hadapsar, Pune 411013. (INDIA)


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site

2009-09-15 Thread sharon . pegg
Return Receipt
   
   Your   Re: [WSG] my site
   document:   
   
   wassharon.p...@centrelink.gov.au
   received
   by: 
   
   at:16/09/2009 12:52:08  
   





**
IMPORTANT:  This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may 
contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to 
legal or parliamentary privilege.  If you are not the intended recipient you 
are notified that any review, re-transmission, disclosure, use or dissemination 
of this communication is strictly prohibited by several Commonwealth Acts of 
Parliament.  If you have received this communication in error please notify the 
sender immediately and delete all copies of this transmission together with any 
attachments.
**



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] my site

2009-09-15 Thread Julia . Dalbo
Return Receipt
   
   Your   Re: [WSG] my site
   document:   
   
   wasJulia Dalbo/ACT/IMMI/AU  
   received
   by: 
   
   at:16/09/2009 01:23:08 PM   
   







Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally privileged
and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.  DIAC respects your privacy and has
obligations under the Privacy Act 1988.  The official departmental privacy
policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au.  See:
http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm


-



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



[WSG] My Site Background Image and css

2009-04-14 Thread Marvin Hunkin
HI.
if you visit http://tracs.co.nz/marvin
and a sighted friend, helping me out.
but he says that i have a image with a layover background.
can any one take a look and help me out?
how to do this in css, as a blind web developer, and cannot edit graphics 
using a screen reader like jaws for windows from freedom scientific 
http://www.freedomscientific.com
can any one take a look and help me out.
and also any other comments about the page.
and then once got the front page up and running, then can copy the source 
code and edit my other pages for my site.
cheers Marvin.
E-mail: startrekc...@gmail.com
MSN: sttartrekc...@msn.com
Skype: startrekcafe
We Are The Borg! You Will Be Assimilated! Resistance Is Futile!
Star Trek Voyager Episode 68 Scorpian Part One 




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-22 Thread Jorge Laranjo
Well,
You can start reading  
http://thetaoofwebdesign.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/2004/10/ 
color_schemes_g.html and  
http://thetaoofwebdesign.weblog.com.pt/arquivo/2004/08/ 
update_how_to_c.html to help you out with the colors.

Then pick a pencil and start drawing... them put that in CSS / XHTML  
and your done.
Read more, buy a good book about color.

--
Atentamente,
Jorge Laranjo
site  http://thetaoofwebdesign.tk/
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aim  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Em 21/dez/2004, às 14:46, Anthony Timberlake escreveu:
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
site?  Is there anything wrong with it?  Thanks for your help.
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


RE: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-22 Thread Brett Walsh
Anthony,

You have 120 errors on that page. Most of them are br errors missing their
end tag.

A simple search and replace will get you down to about 20 errors. (maybe
less I can't be bothered wading through them all.)

Try in your favourite editor:

Find: br
Replace With: br /

Even note pad has SR so you should be able to do this without too much
trouble.

But please, do it! The fact that you ask for help but have not addressed
these issues first is quite annoying. You spend more time defending your umm
styles. Meh. 

Next you'll want to clean up your img tags. You should add a trailing slash
to the end of each tag.

E.g. img alt= src= /

Then you will get the errors down to a manageable number and should be able
to work through them yourself. It is important to do this otherwise your
wasting your time even bothering. The validator should be your first port of
call.

As for I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets. I
have no doubt the site is a personal achievement and well done to actually
having a go. I do think you could benefit from suggestions already made
about your site as the comments have be constructive and valid apart from
the one flaming you received but the frustration was well meant. o_O. nice
is nice.

Your style switcher is a good idea but the change of styles should actually
reflect a complete style change. The styles themselves require work and
suggestions made about contrast and font size are definitely something you
should look into. Style2 text is quite hard to read on the right hand side.
Something to do with oh...white on one of the lightest grays. The wellstyled
colorscheme chooser is fantastic. It can do al the work for you.

Would your screen resolution happen to be at 800x600 default? That's ok but
you should change your res to 1024x768 and see what your site looks like
full screen. Pretty standard res these days.

But fix those validator errors here:

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A//www.dotradio.uni.cc/%3F
page%3Dhome

(Copy and past if the link breaks)

Regards,

Brett


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anthony Timberlake
Sent: Wednesday, 22 December 2004 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site

I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.


On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:58:20 +0100, JohnyB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Try http://colorschemer.com/
 
 Have a look at http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
 
 --
 Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-22 Thread Brett Walsh
Validates???

Have I got the wrong url or something. I just checked www.dotradio.uni.cc
and it still has 120 errors? Did I miss something?

Regards,

Brett

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of haggis
Sent: Wednesday, 22 December 2004 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site

Well, it's getting there the html now validates but the css still does not. 
It has the same errors as before only now they are on all three stylesheets.

You cannot list sizes or dimensions without the unit in other words padding:

2; is not valid however, padding: 2px (or em or %) is. and the same goes for

font-size: 14px; is how it should read and NOT font-size: 14; You still need

to specify a generic font as well 
Fix those and it'll be fine ...
B.

William Haggerty
VWH Web Services
http://vwh.ca
- Original Message - 
From: Anthony Timberlake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site


I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-22 Thread James O'Neill
Anthony,

Do not get discouraged. Designing semantically correct, accessible,
and valid sites is not easy. Transitioning to standards compliant
design is a long frustrating road, but it is well worth the pain.

There are many that can forget the journey that we all traveled to get
where we are today. A  good working knowledge of CSS and XHTML takes
time and a lot of hair loss (so invest in a wig or a stress ball now).
We all can take a moment in this holiday to remember  'our own
journey' and be civil in our responses.

Keep chugging along; shunt the negative words and absorb to
constuctive criticism. It can seem like no effort was put into a site
before submitting to the list if the css and XHTML does not validate.
Some take great offense to that. Knowing what constitutes valid css
and XHTML and CSS and how to test for it can be tricky There are many
great resources on the WSG Resources section:

http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/

Good luck! Keep up the work and journey.

Jim

-- 
__
Bugs are, by definition, necessary. 
Just ask Microsoft!

www.co.sauk.wi.us (Work)
www.arionshome.com (Personal)
www.freexenon.com (Consulting)
__
Take Back the Web with Mozilla Fire Fox 
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/

Making a Commercial Case for Adopting Web Standards
http://www.maccaws.org/

Web Standards Project
http://www.webstandards.org/

Web Standards Group
http://www.webstandardsgroup.org/

Guild of Accessible Web Designers
http://www.gawds.org/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-22 Thread Julia
The url given has a valid html4 button, but the doctype of the page itself  
is xhtml 1.0 transitional. The markup is nothing like xhtml, but the  
validator keeps trying to validate it as xhtml because the doctype says  
so. If you cant change your markup to xhtml, it would be easier to change  
your doctype and start validating the page as html 4 instead.  I redid my  
own site 6 months ago, and moved from non valid html 4 to valid xhtml  
strict. It required a complete rewrite of the entire page structure to do  
this, and I fear that this page may well require the same treatment. Also  
the style colors are mostly all very dark and unreadable, imho. Perhaps at  
least one light, readable style choice would be worth consideration?

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:46:27 -0500, Anthony Timberlake  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
site?  Is there anything wrong with it?  Thanks for your help.

--

http://www.jewelswebgraphics.com/
for all your web design needs.

Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
site?  Is there anything wrong with it?  Thanks for your help.

-- 
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
The color scheme is what I do not like.  Can someone  help me find a
better color scheme?


On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:46:27 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
 site?  Is there anything wrong with it?  Thanks for your help.
 
 --
 Anthony Timberlake
 Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
 http://www.statichost.co.uk
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Hanni Ross
Try http://colorschemer.com/
Great tool, I think there's a 15 day trial.

Regards,

Hanni


On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:00:00 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The color scheme is what I do not like.  Can someone  help me find a
 better color scheme?
 
 On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:46:27 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
  site?  Is there anything wrong with it?  Thanks for your help.
 
  --
  Anthony Timberlake
  Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
  http://www.statichost.co.uk
  **
  The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  **
 
 
 
 
 --
 Anthony Timberlake
 DJ on Dot Radio
 http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Johannes Reiss


 My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
 site?  Is there anything wrong with it?  Thanks for your help.
 
 -- 
 Anthony Timberlake
 Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
 http://www.statichost.co.uk



hmmm... eg. you can validate it, esp. change the  to  / (XHTML)

than you have twice head .../head, one in the body-tag...

greetings 
johannes

 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 
 
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Bert Doorn
G'day
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
site?  Is there anything wrong with it?  Thanks for your help.
 

Validate, fix, validate, fix, validate, ...
You might start by changing the Doctype to HTML 4.01 Transitional and 
fix the 19 errors (as opposed to 154 with the XHTML1.0 strict DTD you 
currently use on the home page). 

Once you've fixed those 19 errors, look at updating the site to HTML 
4.01 Strict by removing all presentational attributes and making more 
use of CSS (but don't specify font sizes in pixels like you have - 
cannot be enlarged on MSIE). 

Beyond that, replace the nested tables with more structural markup and 
(optionally) update it to XHTML1.0 Strict.

Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Tom Livingston
http://www.paletteman.com/

Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com

On Dec 21, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Hanni Ross wrote:
Try http://colorschemer.com/
Great tool, I think there's a 15 day trial.
Regards,
Hanni
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:00:00 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The color scheme is what I do not like.  Can someone  help me find a
better color scheme?
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:46:27 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
site?  Is there anything wrong with it?  Thanks for your help.
--
Anthony Timberlake
Owner - StaticHost Internet Services
http://www.statichost.co.uk
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


--
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Al Sessions
Anthony Timberlake wrote:
My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
site?  Is there anything wrong with it?  
I don't mean to be rude but a token attempt at validation is probably in 
order before asking for suggestions.

You may want to start by limiting yourself to one set of head, body and 
html tags :)

--
Al Sessions
http://fultonchain.net
They that can give up essential liberty
  to obtain a little temporary safety deserve
  neither liberty nor safety. 
   -- B. Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
I do have one set of head, body and html tags.

I have validated my CSS and HTML.


On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:51:36 -0500, Al Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Anthony Timberlake wrote:
  My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
  site?  Is there anything wrong with it?
 
 I don't mean to be rude but a token attempt at validation is probably in
 order before asking for suggestions.
 
 You may want to start by limiting yourself to one set of head, body and
 html tags :)
 
 --
 Al Sessions
 http://fultonchain.net
 They that can give up essential liberty
to obtain a little temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety. 
 -- B. Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Matt Hampel
 have validated my CSS and HTML.
This generally means you have fixed the errors the validator displays.
The page you linked to still has 130+ errors.

Johannes' suggestion
hmmm... eg. you can validate it, esp. change the  to  / (XHTML)
would fix quite a few.

Matt Hampel

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:10:35 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
 
 I have validated my CSS and HTML.
 
 
 On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:51:36 -0500, Al Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Anthony Timberlake wrote:
   My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
   site?  Is there anything wrong with it?
 
  I don't mean to be rude but a token attempt at validation is probably in
  order before asking for suggestions.
 
  You may want to start by limiting yourself to one set of head, body and
  html tags :)
 
  --
  Al Sessions
  http://fultonchain.net
  They that can give up essential liberty
 to obtain a little temporary safety deserve
 neither liberty nor safety. 
  -- B. Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
  **
  The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
   See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  **
 
 
 
 
 --
 Anthony Timberlake
 DJ on Dot Radio
 http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Leslie Riggs
I went back and re-checked for CSS and HTML validation:  You still have 
some problems to fix.  The CSS validator shows an error page.  The HTML 
validator clearly states your code is not valid XHTML 1.0 Strict, with 
136 errors.  You'll have to fix those first.

It looks to me like you'll have to go back to the drawing board.  One 
thing I suggest is reviewing not only HTML/XHTML/CSS validation and 
document types, but also learning a bit more about using CSS for 
positioning rather than putting all your content into tables and laying  
them out that way.  Start by looking at 
http://www.positioniseverything.net and go from there.  Once you start 
using those techniques, you'll have a much cleaner site, codewise, that 
is vastly easier to maintain.

As far as the colors, there's definitely room for improvement - I see a 
couple of people have posted some links to color scheme selectors you 
can use, so hopefully you find those helpful.

Leslie Riggs

I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
I have validated my CSS and HTML.
 

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Nick Gleitzman
On 22 Dec 2004, at 8:10 AM, Anthony Timberlake wrote:
I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
I have validated my CSS and HTML.
Don't see how your HTML can validate. Adding a DOCTYPE of XHTML Strict 
will not magically convert an HTML document to XHTML. The syntax of 
your code is entirely wrong - you need, at least, to end the 'unclosed' 
tags (meta, img, br, etc) in your markup with  / instead of just  if 
you want to use an XHTML DOCTYPE.

You use tables for purely presentational purposes - eg to place your 
'Online' header info at right centre of its containing block - 
unnecessary, and deprecated. You even use a center tag within a 
centered p for that header.

You have broken code - your subheading 'News' is rendering as 'bNews'.
Your markup is totally lacking any semantic approach at all. It's just 
a stream-of-consciousness procession of divs, tables and ps used 
to lay out the page in what looks like - to you - a meaningful way.

Your css is inline - one of the aims of modern code, and the ethos of 
Web Standards, is to separate presentation from content by removing css 
to an external file.

You even use font tags!
Sorry, but I don't think you get what this discussion list, or Web 
Standards, is about. If you're serious about your 'website design 
buisness' (sic) you'll do some serious research into how to do this 
stuff properly. This list exists to help with problems that you can't 
readily solve, not to write your code for you.

Oh, and regardless of the choice of colours, I'm not sure if you're 'DJ 
Bullseye', but Didn't Anyone Ever Tell You That Capitalising Every Word 
In A Sentence Makes The Content Really Hard To Read?

Call me harsh, but I just find these 'please fix my site for me' posts 
just plain annoying. Normally I'd ignore them; just so happens I had a 
little time to make what I hope are constructive criticisms.

N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
I am not new at this, just haven't done it for a while now.  I thought
by being on this list, I could get the help I needed.  I appologize if
I offended you.


On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:53:26 +1100, Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 On 22 Dec 2004, at 8:10 AM, Anthony Timberlake wrote:
 
  I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
 
  I have validated my CSS and HTML.
 
 Don't see how your HTML can validate. Adding a DOCTYPE of XHTML Strict
 will not magically convert an HTML document to XHTML. The syntax of
 your code is entirely wrong - you need, at least, to end the 'unclosed'
 tags (meta, img, br, etc) in your markup with  / instead of just  if
 you want to use an XHTML DOCTYPE.
 
 You use tables for purely presentational purposes - eg to place your
 'Online' header info at right centre of its containing block -
 unnecessary, and deprecated. You even use a center tag within a
 centered p for that header.
 
 You have broken code - your subheading 'News' is rendering as 'bNews'.
 
 Your markup is totally lacking any semantic approach at all. It's just
 a stream-of-consciousness procession of divs, tables and ps used
 to lay out the page in what looks like - to you - a meaningful way.
 
 Your css is inline - one of the aims of modern code, and the ethos of
 Web Standards, is to separate presentation from content by removing css
 to an external file.
 
 You even use font tags!
 
 Sorry, but I don't think you get what this discussion list, or Web
 Standards, is about. If you're serious about your 'website design
 buisness' (sic) you'll do some serious research into how to do this
 stuff properly. This list exists to help with problems that you can't
 readily solve, not to write your code for you.
 
 Oh, and regardless of the choice of colours, I'm not sure if you're 'DJ
 Bullseye', but Didn't Anyone Ever Tell You That Capitalising Every Word
 In A Sentence Makes The Content Really Hard To Read?
 
 Call me harsh, but I just find these 'please fix my site for me' posts
 just plain annoying. Normally I'd ignore them; just so happens I had a
 little time to make what I hope are constructive criticisms.
 
 N
 ___
 Omnivision. Websight.
 http://www.omnivision.com.au/
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread haggis
Hello;
I see now that you have changed the doctype to 4.01 transitional which 
still gives up 2 errors
and in the css there are still 8 errors and 1 warning.
In the html you are using self closing tags img src= blah blah blah  / 
you don't need that in 4.01 transitional. Plus you have td tags closed 
that are not open, however, I also notice that it is changing with each 
refresh so you must be working on it ... good for you ! ... :o)
HTH's ...
B.

William Haggerty
VWH Web Services
http://vwh.ca
- Original Message - 
From: Anthony Timberlake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site


I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
I have validated my CSS and HTML.
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:51:36 -0500, Al Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
Anthony Timberlake wrote:
 My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
 site?  Is there anything wrong with it?
I don't mean to be rude but a token attempt at validation is probably in
order before asking for suggestions.
You may want to start by limiting yourself to one set of head, body and
html tags :)
--
Al Sessions
http://fultonchain.net
They that can give up essential liberty
   to obtain a little temporary safety deserve
   neither liberty nor safety. 
-- B. Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


--
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
It is now validated with HTML and CSS.  Does anyone have anything else
that I can do to improve my site?  Sites to read and gain more
knowledge, scripts?

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 14:32:14 -0800, haggis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello;
 I see now that you have changed the doctype to 4.01 transitional which
 still gives up 2 errors
 and in the css there are still 8 errors and 1 warning.
 In the html you are using self closing tags img src= blah blah blah  /
 you don't need that in 4.01 transitional. Plus you have td tags closed
 that are not open, however, I also notice that it is changing with each
 refresh so you must be working on it ... good for you ! ... :o)
 HTH's ...
 B.
 
 William Haggerty
 VWH Web Services
 http://vwh.ca
 - Original Message -
 From: Anthony Timberlake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:10 PM
 Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
 
 I do have one set of head, body and html tags.
 
  I have validated my CSS and HTML.
 
 
  On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:51:36 -0500, Al Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
  Anthony Timberlake wrote:
   My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
   site?  Is there anything wrong with it?
 
  I don't mean to be rude but a token attempt at validation is probably in
  order before asking for suggestions.
 
  You may want to start by limiting yourself to one set of head, body and
  html tags :)
 
  --
  Al Sessions
  http://fultonchain.net
  They that can give up essential liberty
 to obtain a little temporary safety deserve
 neither liberty nor safety. 
  -- B. Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
  **
  The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
   See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  **
 
 
 
 
  --
  Anthony Timberlake
  DJ on Dot Radio
  http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
  **
  The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  **
 
 
 
 
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Nick Gleitzman
On 22 Dec 2004, at 9:04 AM, Anthony Timberlake wrote:
I am not new at this, just haven't done it for a while now.  I thought
by being on this list, I could get the help I needed.  I appologize if
I offended you.
I'm not in the least offended. But if you'd like help from this list 
(and this advice is for all new members) it helps to read the 
guidelines, and at least try and fix the basic problems yourself. 
Validate your code. Research what Web Standards is about. After an 
honest attempt to reach a minimum level of conformance to Standards, 
we're happy to help with those perplexing details. But requests for 
help with a site that has *so many* fundamental errors is, as I said, 
just annoying.

I'll reintroduce an acronym for the list to use: HUTHY. Help us to help 
you.

Good luck.
N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread haggis



Hello;
You have said .
---
 It is now validated with HTML and CSS. 
Does anyone have anything else that I can do to improve my site? 
Sites to read and gain more knowledge, scripts?
---
And I must nowsay ... Sorry but it still 
doesn't validate, it still has 6 errors.. see this link ...
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A//www.dotradio.uni.cc/
and neither does the css validate these are the 
errors there ...


Errors

URI : http://www.dotradio.uni.cc/

  Line: 97 
  Invalid number : paddingUnknown dimension : 
  4x (must be px or em or 
  %)
  Line: 113 
  Invalid number : font-sizeonly 0 can be a 
  length. You must put an unit after your number : 14 (must have px or em or ex or %)
  Line: 121 
  Invalid number : font-sizeonly 0 can be a 
  length. You must put an unit after your number : 11 
  
  Line: 122 
  Invalid number : font-sizeonly 0 can be a 
  length. You must put an unit after your number : 11 
  
  Line: 143 
  Invalid number : font-sizeonly 0 can be a 
  length. You must put an unit after your number : 14 
  
  Line: 151 
  Invalid number : font-sizeonly 0 can be a 
  length. You must put an unit after your number : 11 
  
  Line: 152 
  Invalid number : font-sizeonly 0 can be a 
  length. You must put an unit after your number : 11 
  

Warnings
URI : http://www.dotradio.uni.cc/styles/1.css

  Line : 10 
  font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as a last 
  alternative
  Line : 19 
  font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as a last 
  alternative
  Line : 26 
  font-family: You are encouraged to offer a generic family as a last 
  alternative (this usually means having a generic font such 
  as serif as the last font choice)
Still, it's a lot better than the original 130 
errors ... :o)
What validator are you using that misses these 
errors?
If I may suggest here, a visit to this particular 
website would be very enlightening ...
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/
and down at the bottom there are links to books he 
has written which are very useful in understanding CSS and it's 
implementation...
HTH's ...
B.

William HaggertyVWH Web Serviceshttp://vwh.ca
- Original Message - 
From: "Anthony Timberlake" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 2:47 
PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
 It is now validated with HTML and CSS. Does anyone have 
anything else that I can do to improve my site? Sites to read and 
gain more knowledge, scripts?  On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 
14:32:14 -0800, haggis [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote: Hello; I see now that you have changed the 
"doctype" to 4.01 transitional which still gives up 2 
errors and in the css there are still 8 errors and 1 
warning. In the html you are using self closing tags img src="" / you don't need that in 4.01 
transitional. Plus you have td tags closed that are not 
open, however, I also notice that it is changing with each refresh 
so you must be working on it ... good for you ! ... :o) HTH's 
... B.  William Haggerty VWH Web 
Services http://vwh.ca - 
Original Message - From: "Anthony Timberlake" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:10 PM 
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site  I do have one set of 
head, body and html tags.   I have validated my 
CSS and HTML.On Tue, 21 Dec 
2004 10:51:36 -0500, Al Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:  Anthony Timberlake wrote:  
 My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc. What 
can I do to improve my   site? Is there anything 
wrong with it?   I don't mean to be rude 
but a token attempt at validation is probably in  order 
before asking for suggestions.   You may 
want to start by limiting yourself to one set of head, body and 
 html tags :)   -- 
 Al Sessions  http://fultonchain.net 
 "They that can give up essential liberty 
 to obtain a little temporary safety 
deserve  neither liberty nor safety. 
"  -- B. Franklin, Historical Review 
of Pennsylvania.  
**  The 
discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/   See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm  for some hints on posting to the list 
 getting help  
** 
 
--  Anthony Timberlake  DJ on Dot 
Radio  http://www.dotradio.uni.cc  
**  The 
discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/   See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm  for some hints on posting to the list  
getting help  
** 
 
** The 
discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm fo

Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Felix Miata
Anthony Timberlake wrote:
 
 My site is http://www.dotradio.uni.cc.  What can I do to improve my
 site?  Is there anything wrong with it?  Thanks for your help.

To me, the #3 stylesheet provides the least bothersome color
combination, but that produces a section of virtually invisible text at
the top of the page. Black on dark blue is hard to read anyway, but your
subatomic font-size: 11px makes it wholly useless viewed in IE, except
for the very few users astute enough to trudge into settings and disable
author font sizes entirely. Only after zooming 200% does that black on
blue text begin to become legible. Even the main content text is
uncomfortable to read at 200% zoom due to insufficient contrast. By the
time I zoom enough for comfort, 300%, the page looks rather strange.
There's way too much whitespace.

The web is chock full of helpful links on page design. Maybe you'd do
well to pick a few links off
http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/wauth2.html to start with.
-- 
I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the
Father except through me.John 14:6 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread JohnyB
Try http://colorschemer.com/
Have a look at http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.


On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:58:20 +0100, JohnyB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Try http://colorschemer.com/
 
 Have a look at http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
 
 --
 Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.


On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:58:20 +0100, JohnyB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Try http://colorschemer.com/
 
 Have a look at http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
 
 --
 Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread simon dodson
dude that site bites !
Anthony Timberlake wrote:
I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:58:20 +0100, JohnyB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Try http://colorschemer.com/
 

Have a look at http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**
   


 

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
Excuse me?


On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:19:31 +1000, simon dodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 dude that site bites !

-- 
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread haggis
Well, it's getting there the html now validates but the css still does not. 
It has the same errors as before only now they are on all three stylesheets. 
You cannot list sizes or dimensions without the unit in other words padding: 
2; is not valid however, padding: 2px (or em or %) is. and the same goes for 
font-size: 14px; is how it should read and NOT font-size: 14; You still need 
to specify a generic font as well 
Fix those and it'll be fine ...
B.

William Haggerty
VWH Web Services
http://vwh.ca
- Original Message - 
From: Anthony Timberlake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site


I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Anthony Timberlake
How are you getting errors?

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F1.cssusermedium=all
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F2.cssusermedium=all
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F3.cssusermedium=all
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F4.cssusermedium=all

That is the validator for the CSS.

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:33:59 -0800, haggis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, it's getting there the html now validates but the css still does not.
 It has the same errors as before only now they are on all three stylesheets.
 You cannot list sizes or dimensions without the unit in other words padding:
 2; is not valid however, padding: 2px (or em or %) is. and the same goes for
 font-size: 14px; is how it should read and NOT font-size: 14; You still need
 to specify a generic font as well 
 Fix those and it'll be fine ...
 B.
 
 William Haggerty
 VWH Web Services
 http://vwh.ca
 - Original Message -
 From: Anthony Timberlake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:05 PM
 Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
 
 I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 


-- 
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread Marc Broad
Anthony - you are validating the individual css files. Your inline 
styles still leave a bit to be desired...
When you validate css using a site url it takes the css that page 
accesses and runs . You are validating each file in isolation from 
inline styles.

For example:
div style=height:100%;width:100%;border:1px solid #000;padding:2x
div style=float:right;width:80%;border:1px solid #000;padding:4x 
class=main
Throw up errors when you validate your page, but not when you check an 
individual css file. You are on the right track using external style sheets - 
so why not move inline styles as well?
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css2warning=2uri=http%3A//www.dotradio.uni.cc/
Marc.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site--Sorry

2004-12-21 Thread David Laakso
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:40:50 -0500, Anthony Timberlake  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, see correction below--- sans-serif *not* serif
How are you getting errors?
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F1.cssusermedium=all
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F2.cssusermedium=all
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F3.cssusermedium=all
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F4.cssusermedium=all
That is the validator for the CSS.
When you scroll those links you'll see the warnings.
Change this: font-family : Tahoma, Verdana, Arial;
to read this:
font-family : Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;
each and every time it appears, on each and every style sheet.
David
--
http://www.dlaakso.com/
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My Site

2004-12-21 Thread haggis
Anthony;
You asked .
-
How are you getting errors?
-
I open your site in FF and use the developers toolbar to validate your html 
and your css at the W3C ... when I did it before it was for the html 
4.01 transitional page, now when I click on your link 
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc/?act=homestyle=4style=4
it's back to an xhtml document with 154 errors and the stylesheet (all 4 of 
them have the same error .. an unclosed link tag . So, just how the 
heck are you getting a valid stylesheet?
And what page are you using, the html 4.01 or the xhtml one ???
It seems we're checking against two different sites, so which one is it?
Bill.

William Haggerty
VWH Web Services
http://vwh.ca
- Original Message - 
From: Anthony Timberlake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site


How are you getting errors?
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F1.cssusermedium=all
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F2.cssusermedium=all
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F3.cssusermedium=all
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dotradio.uni.cc%2Fstyles%2F4.cssusermedium=all
That is the validator for the CSS.
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:33:59 -0800, haggis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it's getting there the html now validates but the css still does 
not.
It has the same errors as before only now they are on all three 
stylesheets.
You cannot list sizes or dimensions without the unit in other words 
padding:
2; is not valid however, padding: 2px (or em or %) is. and the same goes 
for
font-size: 14px; is how it should read and NOT font-size: 14; You still 
need
to specify a generic font as well 
Fix those and it'll be fine ...
B.

William Haggerty
VWH Web Services
http://vwh.ca
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Timberlake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] My Site
I think that I have done a nice job with the new stylesheets.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


--
Anthony Timberlake
DJ on Dot Radio
http://www.dotradio.uni.cc
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] My site is broken in Opera

2004-12-03 Thread José López




Alan Trick wrote:
Hi,
  
I finished a nice update for my website, added a browser detection
script on my css because IE doensn't like web standards.
  
Now my site works in all the browsers I have exept for Opera, and I
don't know why, can anyone help me with this?
  
the url is http://jellybean.uni.cc
  
n.b. it uses style.css in firefox/mozilla, and styleie.css all other
browsers
  
All the pages on the site are valid xhtml+xml and both css files are
valid.
  
**
  
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
  
  
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  
**
  
  
  
  

Hi Alan, the problem is simple, you no use the tag "class" else "id" 

 2004 LopezMarcos Design
















  

   2004-2005 LopezMarcos Design 

  




  

  Soluciones web | New Media | Diseo grfico | Ilustracin |
Modelado3D 

  




  

  Mvil: +34 667 60 19 96 | 
   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  | Web: www.lopezmarcos.com 
   | MADRID Spain 

  

- Aviso legal -
Este correo electrnico y, en su caso, cualquier fichero anexo al
mismo, contiene informacin de carcter confidencial exclusivamente
dirigida a su destinatario o destinatarios. Queda prohibida su
divulgacin, copia o distribucin a terceros sin la previa autorizacin
escrita de LopezMarcos Design. En el caso de haber recibido este correo
electrnico por error, se ruega notificar inmediatamente esta
circunstancia mediante reenvo a la direccin electrnica del
remitente, y le rogamos borre de su sistema inmediatamente el mensaje
as como todas sus copias. Cualquier opinin expresada en este mensaje
proviene del remitente, excepto cuando el mensaje establezca lo
contrario y el remitente est autorizado para establecer que dichas
opiniones provienen de LopezMarcos Design.
 
- Disclaimer -
The information in this e-mail and in any attachments is
confidential and solely for the attention and use of the named
addressee(s). You are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this communication is prohibited without the
prior written consent of LopezMarcos Design.. If you have received this
communication in error, please, notify the sender by reply e-mail, and
please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system. Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised
to state them to be the views of LopezMarcos Design.






Re: [WSG] My site is broken in Opera

2004-12-03 Thread Alan Trick
   José López wrote:
   Hi Alan, the problem is simple, you no use the tag class else id
1) I don't think this would do anything different and
2) id's are meant to be unique and I don't want to have a whole bunch of 
id's all with the same css info, that's bad code and redundant.

I think I'll go with some of the recomendations others made and make 
things simpler.

By the way, I use the MathML on my quiz and I'll probably use it more 
often when I start putting content in, the reason that I have MathML 
validated on my homepage is to keep all the doctypes the same

   Bert Doorn wrote:
   Incidentally, when I went to the site in MSIE, it asked me what
   program I
   wanted to open the page with, rather than displaying it. Probably
   related
   to your Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml
Really? What version of MSIE do you have?  I've loaded it many times in 
mine (6) and I've never gotten that.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


RE: [WSG] My site is broken in Opera

2004-12-03 Thread Bert Doorn
G'day

  Incidentally, when I went to the site in MSIE, it asked me what program
I
  wanted to open the page with, rather than displaying it. Probably
related
  to your Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml

 Really? What version of MSIE do you have?  I've loaded it many times in
mine (6) and I've never gotten that.

MSIE 6.0.2800.1106IC  - fully patched but otherwise stock-standard (no
plug-ins, not even a Flash player).

I don't get this problem on other sites, so it's possibly something to do
with the MathML or application/xhtml+xml (if you're feeding that to MSIE).
I get a download dialog box in MSIE.  Perhaps you have a plug-in of some
sort installed for the MathML (which the vast majority of people would not
have) so it displays fine for you. 

Extract from http://www.w3.org/Math/implementations.html :  Viewing web
pages containing MathML requires a browser that can display MathML.
Currently, only Netscape, Mozilla and Amaya can display MathML directly. If
you use Microsoft's Internet Explorer, the best solution for MathML display
is Design Science MathPlayer.

Also, if I go to the Quiz #1 page, in  Firefox (1.0), I am told to install
additional fonts.  In Opera (7.54), on that same page, I see a lot of
code/Markup and get a message that XML Parsing Failed.

Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Web Developer
Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] My site is broken in Opera

2004-12-02 Thread Peter Firminger
Hi Alan,

I strongly suggest putting the binary stuff into a background image. Google
etc. will hate what you have there as will screen readers. Interesting
effect but not a good idea unless maybe you put it at the end of the code
order. Personally, I'd lose it and use an image as a css background.

Is that why you have the mathml doctype? Can't see that it is mathml at all.
It's just 1s 0s and nbsp;s. No formulae or anything mathematical to be
seen. It's valid but not necessary and may choke older browsers.

Also, semantically very poor. Use HTML elements as they were designed. They
are not just for (default) visual behaviour, they are structural. Headings
have more weight and are used by machines (search engines, screen readers
etc.) for real semantic purpose. A div is not the same as a p even
though they are both block level elements. The default settings (for devices
that ignore the css) will make is pretty well unusable.

As with most things, be careful what you ask for. The reason we do what we
do here is to stop the need for code forking (different page/stylesheets for
different browsers). It's not a good thing to do as you don't know what will
happen. How are you determining the user agent? Opera (by default) ids
itself as IE and is indeed getting the IE stylesheet (though you mentioned
other browsers so this is probably not the issue).

My advice, back to basics. Lose all the internal divs (apart from the
containers maybe) and use hn p etc. as they should be used and you won't
have to style every little spacer div and have a huge stylesheet that really
doesn't need to be there. This should solve the issue.

By the way, there is absolutely nothing on that page that would require
using separate stylesheets if it were semantically correct code. It's the
complexity of your HTML that makes it hard for cross browser compatibility.
Saying IE doesn't like web standards is in fact wrong. It does them quite
well if you use them the right way. Just a few little things to be aware of,
none of which should apply to your page.

So:

div class=entrytitlespan class=contentheadThe Wise Words of Google -
25 November 2004/span/div
(etc... Not putting all that here)

Should be just:

h2The Wise Words of Google - 25 November 2004/h2

p
Here's a list of what google thinks of me:
/p
p
jellybean is herebr /
jellybean is a perl object server with an http interfacebr /
jellybean is a gdr dogbr /
jellybean is an enchantingbr /
jellybean is a cat pookabr /
jellybean is preposition the doorbr /
jellybean is about 12br /
jellybean is here to help
/p
p
I got this from a href=http://www.googlism.com/;googlism.com/a.
/p



Peter

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Trick
 Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 4:18 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [WSG] My site is broken in Opera

 Hi,
 I finished a nice update for my website, added a browser detection
 script on my css because IE doensn't like web standards.
 Now my site works in all the browsers I have exept for Opera, and I
 don't know why, can anyone help me with this?
 the url is http://jellybean.uni.cc
 n.b. it uses style.css in firefox/mozilla, and styleie.css all other
 browsers
 All the pages on the site are valid xhtml+xml and both css
 files are valid.
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] my site works on Mac, not PC :: suggestions???

2004-10-18 Thread Shane Helm
Will do Mike.  Thanks for the constructive criticism.  I'll delete the 
full screen.
Good suggestion.

Shane Helm
On Oct 16, 2004, at 6:43 PM, Michael Allan wrote:
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, at 03:13  PM, Shane Helm wrote:
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
If others have solved your float problem Shane, can I suggest that you 
don't insist that the window resize itself to full-screen? I'm lucky 
enough to have a large screen (20 Apple Cinema Display, running at 
1680 x 1050), like a small but presumably growing proportion of web 
users, and I just *don't* need to see that much of your repeating 
background ;-) I do however want to see the windows and applications 
I've got running behind my browser. To make the behaviour worse, 
Firefox places the resize tab *below* the window edge and out of 
reach, which is a pain to say the least. I'm sure you don't want to 
spoil the impression such a beautiful site makes on your visitors by 
instructing it to behaviour rudely in their environment. :o)

Sorry for posting slightly off-topic, but I believe it's in keeping 
with the standards spirit of providing an equally enjoyable experience 
for every user.

Cheers,
Mike
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] my site works on Mac, not PC :: suggestions???

2004-10-18 Thread Shane Helm
That worked!  Sweet!
My last problem seems also to be only in IE on the PC.  Between the top 
button that says SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER and the 12px tan border 
of the header bar there is a green space where those 2 graphics aren't 
lining up.  Got any reason why this is a problem?
http://sonze.com/lange/

Thanks a ton!
Shane
On Oct 16, 2004, at 1:44 AM, Jason Turnbull wrote:
Shane Helm wrote:
http://sonze.com/lange/index.html
http://sonze.com/lange/bios.html
Now the CSS:
http://sonze.com/lange/css/master.css
IE is doubling the margin on the 'right' and 'left' class, which of
course allows no room for the floats to align beside each other
Simply add display:inline to these two class styles
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/floatIndent.html
Regards
Jason
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] my site works on Mac, not PC :: suggestions???

2004-10-16 Thread Joseph Lindsay
Hi Shane,

It's and IE problem.  Looks great on Firefox.

(I don't have linux :( Firefox 0.10.1)


-- 
Gmail invites - just ask nicely

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:45:50 +1000, Joshua Street
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Be nice to PC's.  I've got a PC, and all that looks fine to me.
 
 Mind you, I'm running Linux... ;)
 
 (Firefox 0.10.1, SuSE 9.1)
 
 Josh
 
 p.s. I do get a JavaScript error, though.
 
 Error: window.attachEvent is not a function
 Source File: http://sonze.com/lange/includes/scripts.js
 Line: 73
 
 
 
 On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 15:13, Shane Helm wrote:
  I was having a great week in my Mac world of coding my newest client's
  website in CSS  XHTML.  All was well in my happy little MacLife.  The
  site was working just fine in Mac Safari, Firefox, Netscape,  IE
  5.2.3.  Then I got curious as to what was going on in the PC world.  So
  I went to a friend's PC (using IE) and what to my wondering eyes did
  appear - the site was pretty jumbled and didn't adhere (to my plans).
  Surprised?  No.  Upset?  Of course.  So I believe we need to forget
  making petitions to have Microsoft update IE, how about a petition to
  ban Microsoft from ever creating software again!  Okay I'm ranting and
  raving.  Sorry.
 
  If some of you have a moment, can you verify that my floats are jumbled
  or something is awry.  I believe I've cleared my floats correctly.  I'm
  not sure where I've gone wrong, but I must get a PC to check from now
  on.  Must go shopping.  Oh no, will I actually own a PC.  Dreadful...
  Just teasing you PC folks.  :)
 
  A couple of my html pages:
  http://sonze.com/lange/index.html
  http://sonze.com/lange/bios.html
 
  Now the CSS:
  http://sonze.com/lange/css/master.css
 
  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
 
  Thank you,
  Shane Helm
 
  **
  The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
   See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
   for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  **
 Joshua Street
 
 base10solutions
 
 Website:
 http://www.base10solutions.com/
 Phone: (02) 9898-0060
 Fax: (02) 8572-6021
 Mobile: 0425 808 469
 
 E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded
 as confidential. Please do not distribute or publish any of the contents
 of this e-mail without the sender's consent. If you have received this
 e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to the e-mail, and
 then delete the message without making copies or using it in any way.
 
 Although base10solutions takes precautions to ensure that e-mail sent
 from our accounts are free of viruses, we encourage recipients to
 undertake their own virus scan on each e-mail before opening, as
 base10solutions accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by
 the contents of this e-mail.
 
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] my site works on Mac, not PC :: suggestions???

2004-10-16 Thread Nick Gleitzman
On 16 Oct 2004, at 3:13 PM, Shane Helm wrote:
I'm not sure where I've gone wrong, but I must get a PC to check from 
now on.  Must go shopping.  Oh no, will I actually own a PC.  
Dreadful...  Just teasing you PC folks.  :)

I'm with you, Shane - I'd never use anything but a Mac as my main 
development machine. And swore fervently that I'd never own a PC. But 
as a developer, I accept that (a) I have to check my builds 
cross-platform, and (b) Microsoft get it wrong. My solution? Virtual 
PC. It's a boon, and not that expensive. The program is US$129, or 
US$249 including WinXPPro. The great thing is, once installed, you can 
run multiple PCs - so I have Win98, Win2K, and XP 'machines' - all 
right on my Mac. Cheap, cheap investment for effective testing. Never 
thought I'd be promoting MS software, but there ya go. See 
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/ for a tour/demo.

I know this is drifting OT - apologies. So no replies here, please. If 
you (or anyone) wants to know more about the PC-on-Mac experience, 
email me direct.

N
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] my site works on Mac, not PC :: suggestions???

2004-10-16 Thread Chris Hughes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joseph Lindsay 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi Shane,
It's and IE problem.  Looks great on Firefox.
(I don't have linux :( Firefox 0.10.1)
Also very nice in Opera 7.51 -- definitely down to MSIE...
--
Chris Hughes
Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. (Groucho Marx)
http://www.epicure.demon.co.uk
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] my site works on Mac, not PC :: suggestions???

2004-10-16 Thread Michael Allan
On Saturday, October 16, 2004, at 03:13  PM, Shane Helm wrote:
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
If others have solved your float problem Shane, can I suggest that you 
don't insist that the window resize itself to full-screen? I'm lucky 
enough to have a large screen (20 Apple Cinema Display, running at 
1680 x 1050), like a small but presumably growing proportion of web 
users, and I just *don't* need to see that much of your repeating 
background ;-) I do however want to see the windows and applications 
I've got running behind my browser. To make the behaviour worse, 
Firefox places the resize tab *below* the window edge and out of reach, 
which is a pain to say the least. I'm sure you don't want to spoil the 
impression such a beautiful site makes on your visitors by instructing 
it to behaviour rudely in their environment. :o)

Sorry for posting slightly off-topic, but I believe it's in keeping 
with the standards spirit of providing an equally enjoyable experience 
for every user.

Cheers,
Mike
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


[WSG] my site works on Mac, not PC :: suggestions???

2004-10-15 Thread Shane Helm
I was having a great week in my Mac world of coding my newest client's 
website in CSS  XHTML.  All was well in my happy little MacLife.  The 
site was working just fine in Mac Safari, Firefox, Netscape,  IE 
5.2.3.  Then I got curious as to what was going on in the PC world.  So 
I went to a friend's PC (using IE) and what to my wondering eyes did 
appear - the site was pretty jumbled and didn't adhere (to my plans).  
Surprised?  No.  Upset?  Of course.  So I believe we need to forget 
making petitions to have Microsoft update IE, how about a petition to 
ban Microsoft from ever creating software again!  Okay I'm ranting and 
raving.  Sorry.

If some of you have a moment, can you verify that my floats are jumbled 
or something is awry.  I believe I've cleared my floats correctly.  I'm 
not sure where I've gone wrong, but I must get a PC to check from now 
on.  Must go shopping.  Oh no, will I actually own a PC.  Dreadful...  
Just teasing you PC folks.  :)

A couple of my html pages:
http://sonze.com/lange/index.html
http://sonze.com/lange/bios.html
Now the CSS:
http://sonze.com/lange/css/master.css
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you,
Shane Helm
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**