Hi Animesh,
Saksham is supposed to send a rebased request to me. Below is what he
wrote to me.
The code has changed a lot after the storage refactoring.
I will submit a new patch after resolving the conflicts.
Saksham
On Thursday 28 February 2013 12:03 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
Hi Animesh,
I am getting the JIRA notification mails through cloudstack-
iss...@incubator.apache.org.
-Radhika
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 1:27 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE:
Ok thanks for following up
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:00 AM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Saksham
Srivastava; Devdeep Singh; Abhinandan Prateek
Subject: Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-924:
Hey Frank,
I think I found the same thing, please check this commit
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=d922f6fd4b41d939ee00c55638d8c5e8b56c8b77
Does that work for you?
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Frank Zhang
Marcus, let me know I can install qemu-guest-agent during
postinstallation phase of the systemvmtemplate, and in
patches/systemvm you can configure cloud-early-config or a script
which runs this service? During startup of a systemvm template,
systemvm.iso is used to patch this template to create
Hi Min,
Looks like something possibly got lost in the merge? In a git pull from a
couple of hours ago I am seeing the following error on starting the
management server. Note the spelling of Hypervisor:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
com.cloud.template.HyervisorTemplateAdapter
The issue is
Fixed now with b683c34d3f5fa47eecddd6bf6e90559ac04af9ba
Thanks to joe and dcahill.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:48:12PM +0530, Mills, Joseph wrote:
Hi Min,
Looks like something possibly got lost in the merge? In a git pull from a
couple of hours ago I am seeing the following error on starting
Hi Anthony,
Any thoughts? We are looking forward to hearing back from you about this.
Just to recap:
(1) Your current changes add Security Group capabilities for the Virtual
Router in advance-shared only, is this correct?
(2) Your future plan is to add Security Groups to Virtual Router in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9651/#review17386
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kishan Kavala
On Feb. 27, 2013, 1:53 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9651/#review17387
---
Ship it!
commit 5b8f0791ec15efd6a77f581a62dde9960d06102c
- Kishan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9651/#review17388
---
Please send a patch request on the dev-list if this has to go into
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9647/#review17390
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Hugo Trippaers
On Feb. 27, 2013, 9:06 a.m.,
Hi,
I have a question or two that fit nicely in this thread, so I'll jump in. :)
I'm pretty comfortable with the Advanced Isolated, Basic, and VPC modes,
but a little unsure as to the purpose of Advanced Shared mode. I took a
peek at the docs and articles above, but can't quite see the answer -
On March 4, 2013, 9:21 p.m., Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote:
Ship It!
will merge once Murali merges the code into Master.
- Radhika
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Hi,
Short answer: Shared networks let you create a manageable DMZ so to speak
between domains.
If you have a multiple domains that need inter-guest communication without
going over the public web.
Another use is that shared can be tagged or untagged letting you connect
hardware into your
On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 11:05 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Support lifetime
-Original
On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:16:36AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
On Mar 1, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:38:27PM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9726/
---
(Updated March 5, 2013, 10:34 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9726/
---
(Updated March 5, 2013, 10:34 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9726/
---
(Updated March 5, 2013, 10:46 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, David
Hi,
I posted a git tutorial intended for beginners who would like to contribute to
CloudStack.
Check it out:
http://www.slideshare.net/sebastiengoasguen/git-101-for-cloudstack
-sebastien
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:53:36AM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:34:41AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
On Feb 28, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, at 03:00 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
I stated my opinion on this
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:20:55PM +0530, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Hi,
I posted a git tutorial intended for beginners who would like to contribute
to CloudStack.
Check it out:
http://www.slideshare.net/sebastiengoasguen/git-101-for-cloudstack
-sebastien
Saw this as it was developing
Thank you for sharing.
Shared with the CloudStack India Podio/FB Groups.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 4:21 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Developers;
cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Git
In minor CloudStack version we OUGHT NOT change the DB schema, maybe
we should not even change the DB version, comment?
So, all minor version should have version info in DB as 4.0 (for 4.0,
4.0.1 and 4.0.2) and 4.1 (possible future 4.1.xs) etc.
Regards.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Prasanna
Nice!
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:20:55PM +0530, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Hi,
I posted a git tutorial intended for beginners who would like to contribute
to CloudStack.
Check it out:
Dear Cloudstack Developers,
For the last couple of months, I have been trying to configure a working setup
with Cloudstack, and I am left with a half bad experience.
I have been trying with this setup:
1 x Cloud management server
2 x Cloud agent servers (KVM - Also tried with Xenserver)
2 x
Thanks Sebestien
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I posted a git tutorial intended for beginners who would like to
contribute to CloudStack.
Check it out:
http://www.slideshare.net/sebastiengoasguen/git-101-for-cloudstack
-sebastien
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9749/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
cleanp
Great - perhaps we can talk with Prasanna about getting those completely
automated with jenkins.
Sure. I'll get the scripts to some shape and will get in touch with Prasanna to
automate with jenkins
Can we get the baseline numbers published somewhere? (as well as the numbers
you get in your
Hello Alex,
I think a lot of us here are running quite successful CloudStack installations.
We wouldn't be developing on it if we did think the product does what it said
on the tin. ;-) However installation is always tricky and depends a lot on the
setup of the systems around CloudStack like
Hello,
Please note: currently the 4.1 branch (and 4.0.1 too) doesn't works with
the French version of UI.
See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-465
If I download the current transifex resource file for French, and put in
4.1 branch, I must :
* Replace all quote ' by \\'
On Mar 5, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Milamber milam...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
Please note: currently the 4.1 branch (and 4.0.1 too) doesn't works with the
French version of UI.
See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-465
If I download the current transifex resource file for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9750/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy.
Description
---
To
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9750/
---
(Updated March 5, 2013, 1:29 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9651/
---
(Updated March 5, 2013, 1:31 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers
Need 4.2 folder in the wiki page so QA can post 4.2 Test results. Some features
are being tested by QA on master branch. We can document test results
appropriately if there is a folder similar to 4.1 [1].
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Test+Execution
QA and Doc are done for this feature. This feature can be closed now. Defects
are being tracked separately. I can close it if there are no objections
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-306
thanks
/Sudha
Hi,
There is an outstanding question [1] if documentation is required for this
feature. I do not think so. But just checking.
If this is clarified, we can close this feature
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-177#comment-13593407
QA Team,
I find defects found in 4.1 not targeted to 4.1 [1]. Is there a reason for it??
I would think they should be targeted to 4.1 unless explicitly moved out of the
release during triage.
[1]
Hi Sudha,
I missed to update fix version as 4.1 while creating the bugs. I have updated
the bugs to fix in 4.1.
Thanks ,
Sailaja.M
From: Sudha Ponnaganti
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:49 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Parth Jagirdar; Sailaja Mada
Subject: [ACS41][QA] Fix
I don't think we require any documentation for these features since they are
more to do with making the user experience more rich . You could probably
close the feature.
Thanks,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 04:55 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
The 4.0.1-incubating release only had one database change
(91a9cce35a67350c856bb10e5fe36f4bf5bac029) so it's probably a good
time to decide on a strategy for upgrades from the 4.0.x line to the
4.x-5.0 line.
That particular issue
Rohit made changes to db upgrade procedure and I am looking for a story related
to that in 4.1/4.2 New feature list. Couldn't locate one. If doesn't exist, can
that be created and documentation can be attached to it. QA will pick it up for
testing.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:19:46PM +0530, Pranav Saxena wrote:
I don't think we require any documentation for these features since they are
more to do with making the user experience more rich . You could probably
close the feature.
Agreed - We discussed this during the initial review of
This vote is now closed, and has *passed*. I'll update the bylaws page
momentarily.
Votes:
+1 - 17 (10 binding)
+0 - None
-1 - None
Binding +1 votes cast by:
David, Joe, Will, John, Chiradeep, Sebastien, Kevin, Alex K, Brett, Noah
Community votes cast by:
Rohit, Animesh, Sudha, Kelcey,
Thanks Sebastien really helpfull
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:07 PM, S.M Basha smbash...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Sebestien
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I posted a git tutorial intended for beginners who would like to
contribute to
Ok looks like I am not getting it. Chip / David when you get a chance can you
check it.
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:01 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS][Action
Community guidelines, if adopted by the majority, become self-sustaining.
So they will enforce themselves.
On 5 March 2013 09:46, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:16:36AM
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Community guidelines, if adopted by the majority, become self-sustaining.
So they will enforce themselves.
+1 - I couldn't have answered better myself.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 07:33:26AM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Ok looks like I am not getting it. Chip / David when you get a chance can you
check it.
Not sure what to check. You are on the subscriber list as
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com. I'm getting emails from Jira sent to
that list.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9651/#review17399
---
Ship it!
Pushed to 4.1 branch. Please update the bug to set to
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:41:31AM -0800, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
Need 4.2 folder in the wiki page so QA can post 4.2 Test results. Some
features are being tested by QA on master branch. We can document test
results appropriately if there is a folder similar to 4.1 [1].
[1]
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:22:42AM +, Parth Jagirdar wrote:
This screen is more appropriate with case below.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12572013/global%20var.jpg
From a user standpoint, I like your proposal Parth. Any thoughts on the
implementation?
Thanks,
..
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Sowmya Krishnan
sowmya.krish...@citrix.com wrote:
Great - perhaps we can talk with Prasanna about getting those completely
automated with jenkins.
Sure. I'll get the scripts to some shape and will get in touch with Prasanna
to automate with jenkins
Can we
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:16:42PM -0800, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
Channy,
Wanted to check if you can submit test cases. All test cases are posted here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Test+Plans
Test execution results can be posted here -
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:42:23AM +0530, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
Looking for best practice to follow when resolving a feature ticket in ASF
JIRA.
If a feature branch has QA and DOC sub task tickets which are still open and
development is complete, should the feature ticket kept open or
Thanks Prasanna. I did mvn build before merging to master locally, not sure
what happened here. Will check my local files again when I am back to my
computer.
-min
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:26 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
Fixed now with
Should this be fixed in 4.1 as well?
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:22:39AM +, t...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 88355b945 - b683c34d3
Fix the typo in componentContext.xml.in
HypervisorTemplateAdapter was mispelt causing server to not startup.
Reported-by:
It looks like we can start the system vm, immediately write cmdline to
the vm's socket, and then we can dump it out of the character device
in the system vm (literally just cat the char dev) in
cloud-early-config where it would normally mount the patch disk. After
that, I think we may want to use
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9740/#review17403
---
Ship it!
Pushed to 4.1.
Please apply to master if required.
-
Hi Mice,
As your ElasterShield solution, I see that one hypervisor node has one
ESVA, which acts like Virtual Router. ESVA has one nic connects to Guest
network, one nic connects to Management network. I wonder that how ESVA
listens all network package? It has to talk with hypervisor, isn't it?
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:15:18AM -0500, Min Chen wrote:
Thanks Prasanna. I did mvn build before merging to master locally,
not sure what happened here. Will check my local files again when I
am back to my computer.
Let's not just do a build. Let's also try to deploy the server. In this
case
So one way to think of this scenario is to have checkboxes corresponding to
each of the global variables . Checking/ Unchecking them to select multiple
items(global variables) together and then have a global Save button where we
pass the Id's for all the global variables selected to the object
Not required actually. Since Min's merge is for 4.2 and was made on
master.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:29:13AM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
Should this be fixed in 4.1 as well?
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:22:39AM +, t...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 88355b945
So this is broken off from the thread on Support Timelines for the
4.0.x group of releases:
The issue is regarding upgrades. With the introduction of the
DatabaseCreator I notice that we don't have to do any sort of changes
to the baseline schema of 4.0. This is a great improvement but it only
is
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
So this is broken off from the thread on Support Timelines for the
4.0.x group of releases:
The issue is regarding upgrades. With the introduction of the
DatabaseCreator I notice that we don't have to do any sort of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/#review17407
---
First - thanks for working on tests!! It's something we need lots
Ideally the upgrade path from any point release like 4.0.x should always run
4.0 to 4.1 upgrade script. This upgrade script should make the changes only if
it is not already present. I came across [1] which shows how to do such checks
but its only applicable for mysql 5 and above. For lower
So far Dev has been using the main JIRA Ticket for their feature completion and
I am going over the subtasks to see if all subtasks are closed then only
closing main JIRA Ticket.
I don't think there is a subtask needed for dev. It would be easy to check
which stories are resolved and take up
OK, one more niggle about the previous system vm. We tried to enable aesni
[1] to boost encryption performance (ipsec vpn, anything ssl), but the
system vm would crash on Vmware if we did that (hence the module
blacklisted). Could someone try the new systemvm on VMWare with aesni
enabled? I
Ok - Transfix process should be fine. In such case, if the ticket is updated
then we can close it
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 8:07 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: cha...@gmail.com
Subject: Re:
Ok - Will create placeholder page and post test results in there
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 8:02 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Can a release folder be created for QA to
This issue has been fixed in both 4.1 and master. A new global setting
api.throttling.enabled is introduced.
By default, it is set to false, so no API throttling is enabled. To enable
it, just change the setting to true, and restart MS. FS is also updated
with this information.
Thanks
-min
On
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
This issue has been fixed in both 4.1 and master. A new global setting
api.throttling.enabled is introduced.
By default, it is set to false, so no API throttling is enabled. To enable
it, just change the setting to true, and
On Mar 5, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com
wrote:
Ok - Transfix process should be fine. In such case, if the ticket is updated
then we can close it
I closed the ticket (because the patch was applied and submitted, the Korean
translation was re-uploaded to
Thanks, Marcus
When Edison sees this e-mail chain, he will be able to fill in extra
details.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
Generally the targets I've worked with support different levels of
access control, so you may have a high level block where
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9749/#review17409
---
Ship it!
Applied to 4.1 branch:
commit
Thanks for the helpful pointers Chiradeep! I'll keep these in mind during the
further performance runs.
On the innodb_buffer_pool_size, I usually set it to 80% of the RAM size for all
my runs.
Thanks for the pointers on the tools as well - I'll try out these for my next
performance run and will
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 9:36 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Test plan for List API Performance Optimization
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Sowmya Krishnan
Thanks a lot Sowmya for trying with comparable hardware setup for this
before and after test.
-min
On 3/5/13 10:01 AM, Sowmya Krishnan sowmya.krish...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 9:36 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 10:26 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk
I've been thinking about how to tackle this, written a little concept code,
The below entries are created during mvn -P systemvm -Dnonoss install build
for the respective master and 4.1 builds. I am able to grep for all vmware
related jars from these zip files.
ASF-master/services/console-proxy/server/dist/systemvm.zip
cloud-plugin-hypervisor-vmware-4.2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
Hi all,
Some IRC discussion triggered this thought:
Should we document our formal release criteria? By that, I mean -
should we document the criteria that we use to claim that we are in a
position to cut an actual Release Candidate for voting?
I realized that I've had my own view sitting in my
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Hi all,
Some IRC discussion triggered this thought:
Should we document our formal release criteria? By that, I mean -
should we document the criteria that we use to claim that we are in a
position to cut an
On 03/05/2013 07:28 PM, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 10:26 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] getting rid of KVM patchdisk
I've been thinking about how to tackle
Hi All,
As most of you are aware, the master branch keeps getting broken by checkins
for various reasons. Committers need to be more responsible about their
checkins but I don't think we can depend on that happening. There are various
reasons. The most obvious to me is that granting
Yes, I knew we were headed that route (API on system vm), but the
amount of work and testing there isn't insignificant. I'd agree that
the api via link local is better than using the socket. But in the
meantime, we can use the socket to get rid of the patch disk for KVM
and easily have that in
On March 1, 2013, 4:06 p.m., Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
plugins/network-elements/netscaler/src/com/cloud/network/resource/NetscalerResource.java,
line 481
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9165/diff/3/?file=263578#file263578line481
Monitor name required to be passed here.
monitor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9165/
---
(Updated March 5, 2013, 6:56 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Vijay
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:39:50PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Some IRC discussion triggered this thought:
Should we document our formal release criteria? By that, I mean -
should we document the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9753/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, Sateesh Chodapuneedi, and Min
I'll pick this up..
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 9:47 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: VMware blocker - Any takers to fix it? (Was: [jira] [Assigned]
(CLOUDSTACK-1252) Failed to download
ABSOLUTELY!
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 10:33 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [QA][DISCUSS] Should we document formal release criteria?
Hi all,
Some IRC discussion triggered
Recently, I read a topic about, why automated test keeping
failing(http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/185819/why-does-automated-testing-keep-failing-in-my-company/185839#185839),
the comment is really resonated with me:
Most unit tests are questionable in value. Since the vast
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:11:51AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote:
So in this definition, MAJOR and above must be fixed before a release is cut?
Personally, I've used the no blockers and 5 critical with work
arounds as the criteria, using the definitions I offered.
--Alex
-Original
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 01:14 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:11:51AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote:
So in this definition, MAJOR and above must be fixed before a release is
cut?
Personally, I've used the no blockers and 5 critical with work
arounds as the criteria, using
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9753/
---
(Updated March 5, 2013, 7:19 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:10:45PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:15:18AM -0500, Min Chen wrote:
Thanks Prasanna. I did mvn build before merging to master locally,
not sure what happened here. Will check my local files again when I
am back to my computer.
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
