Sure. let's see...
Velocity Tools is working through a short backlog of patch
contributions and bugs hoping to get a 1.3 version released before
Velocity 1.5 goes final. It's also the plan to test VelocityStruts
1.3 against Struts 1.3 for compatibility. VelocityTools 1.3 is likely
to be the
On 11/25/06, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Apparently, the main example in the Texen docs in Velocity 1.4 is
broken. Geir broke it in early 2002, and Shinobu found and fixed the
problem in early 2005. So while this has been fixed for 1.5, for the
past couple of years the docs
In 1.3, i've been on something of a push to simplify the syntax and
readability of how tools are used in templates. The idea is to make
an elegant, simple VTL interface for these tools, even if it looks odd
from a java perspective. Given the choice between:
$context.context and
technically, it would be an empty map not empty list, but even so, i'm
not sure about this. if we can say for sure that no one (especially
us) will ever want to tell the difference between an empty toolbox and
no toolbox being set, then it would be marginally simpler to ensure
that toolbox is
hey folks,
you probably noticed that i just checked in a new example app for
VelocityTools to replace the layout example. this is something i've
been thinking of doing for years, and finally got around to doing.
basically, it provides demonstrations (most of which are interactive)
of all the
On 12/11/06, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 11 décembre 2006 à 09:45 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
On 12/9/06, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks very cool. That's a lot of work!
Some remarks:
- Alternator: we'd like the hand-made examples to return
On 12/10/06, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
p.s. VelocityView and the Generic Tools are largely ready for a 1.3
release. if anyone wants to help me get 1.3 out the door, i'd love
some help updating the VelocityStruts dependencies
of an
application, where it is more natural to present the human month value
rather than the machine one.
On 12/11/06, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 11 décembre 2006 à 12:47 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
so basically, there's plenty of capability in DateTool, but only
limited
Ok. Make sure you move it to the Struts 1.x head, and not Struts 2.x.
They are entirely different frameworks.
On 12/11/06, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
velocity-tools builds again (see
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/velocity
I like the direction this is heading, especially as laid out here:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-velocity/VelocitySite
I'll help with the Tools docs at least. But it might be a week or so.
I've gotta get some other work done first.
On 12/11/06, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
On 12/14/06, Tod Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna wrote:
and what does your web.xml have?
Sorry, plain vanilla:
!-- Define Velocity template compiler --
servlet
servlet-namevelocity/servlet-name
servlet-class
First, general thoughts
I would like to see our web site reflect our charter in the sense that
the Velocity Engine is always prominent and pre-eminent. It is a
requirement that the other subprojects be dependent on that core
center pole, otherwise the umbrella will become a mere sack. I'm
best to do that now...
Claude
Le lundi 18 décembre 2006 à 12:06 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
Ok, i've got all the dependencies upgraded. The ant build system seems
to be working great. I've attempted to get the Gump build working
again, but that shouldn't hold up a release anyway.
So
On 12/21/06, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, i've got all the dependencies upgraded. The ant build system seems
to be working great. I've attempted to get the Gump build working
again, but that shouldn't hold up a release anyway
The reasons for this are primarily historical at this point. I
believe the original motivation was to make it easy to update the
public site by just doing svn update.
At this point, i guess i'm +0.1 on removing the generated
documentation from version control in this version. Once we have
On 12/23/06, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le samedi 23 décembre 2006 à 15:45 -0800, Nathan Bubna (JIRA) a écrit :
I don't really care. Both have advantages, both will work fine. If you're
going to do the work, i say you should get to decide. :)
That's the new commiter syndrom
:
Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(First: Happy new year, Velocity folks!)
Hi Nathan,
I somehow missed that you have put the 1.3 beta-1 release archives
onto www.apache.org/dist.
As this is a beta version and not a release, the location is a bit
unfortunate. I'd very much prefer if you could
The more canonical example for an evaluate tool (or directive) is
being ably to dynamically decide what method to call on a particular
reference. So, something along the lines of:
#if( $this $that )
#set( $method = $foo )
#else
#set( $method = $bar )
#end
$render.eval( \${someRef}.${method}
I can see some value in this process, but not enough that i really
care either way for myself. I'll do whatever pleases. :)
On 1/11/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just reopened and resolved some issues. Reason for this is: I'd like
to follow the proposed status
there :-)
Claude
Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 13:37 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
That's an odd question. Not sure what far means when we're talking
about mailing lists, but i am subscribed to all the newly created
Tiles TLP mailing lists.
On 1/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just
Just giving fair warning to anyone planning/hoping to make any further
changes to VelocityTools before 1.3 is released...
My current plan is to call for a vote to release 1.3-rc1 on Monday.
At that time, it would be rather unhelpful for further changes to be
made, since that would require a
VelocityTools is getting a Gump failure because we recently upgraded
our Validator tool to use the
org.struts.validator.Resources.getVarValue(Var,ServletContext,HttpServletRequest,boolean)
method (to mirror the same change in JavascriptValidatorTag).
The problem appears to be that the
Sorry, wrong thread. let's try that again...
On 1/25/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The vote has passed! I'll tag the release today and try to upload it
tonight or tomorrow. Announcement should follow once the release is
mirrored.
PMC +1
Nathan Bubna
Will Glass-Husain
Henning
just need to use Maven 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT, would you point me to a
build? i'd rather not have to build it myself this weekend.
On 1/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) Great! Well, since our chair was so enthusiastic and he and i
have been doing the recent releases, i'm going to go
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been waiting for this day for a while now :)
+1
On 1/25/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 1/24/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's do it.
The list of changes
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
version
On 1/27/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henning, i've updated all the relevant stuff in velocity/site that i
can think of, but i have not been able to successfully build it
locally, much less deploy it. Would you mind deploying
On 1/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henning, i've updated all the relevant stuff in velocity/site that i
can think of, but i have not been able to successfully build
The Apache Velocity project is pleased to announce the first release
candidate for VelocityTools 1.3. You may download this release from:
http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi
Significant changes since VelocityTools 1.2 are:
- New tools: ContextTool for accessing context data, ResourceTool
I'd rather not leave something running that is out of our control for
a month unless there is very clear need for it, which i don't see at
this point. As long as Will's concerns are addressed in the
announcement emails and news blurb on the web site, we should be fine
until you get back.
On 1/30/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Reluctantly, I vote -1.
:(
I tested the release. It compiled fine, ant test ran fine under JDK
1.5 and 1.6, worked with Velocity Tools 1.2. But when I checked all
the hyperlinks, the anakia page was missing. There's an error
On 1/30/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I did discuss this in some depth with Will on IRC. He explained me his
reasons for the vote in depth I respect them. Here is my response:
- The problem with the anakia.html file is apparent and obvious. So we
have a single file
could call this Velocity 1.5rc1. But
given the historic significance of this release, I urge us to release
Velocity 1.5 in a professional distro without obvious errors.(no
need to immediately issue Velocity 1.5.1).
best,
WILL
On 1/30/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/30/07
to immediately issue Velocity 1.5.1).
best,
WILL
On 1/30/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/30/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Reluctantly, I vote -1.
:(
I tested the release. It compiled fine, ant test ran fine
under JDK
1.5 and 1.6, worked
ok, there seems to be some confusion about the different ways to
prepare, label, and vote on releases. here's my understanding of the
two most common options.
1) How we used to do it.
We would put the quality/status of the release in the release
name. These would typically go something
. Claude has agreed to be the European contact for the
press and I'll be listed as the US contact.
that's great! perhaps we could put out a request for commercial
soundbites on the user list?
WILL
On 1/31/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're willing to do the release, go
No problems new problems have been reported since the release of
1.3-rc1, and i've made another, more thorough pass through the docs
and build scripts, so i think we are ready to release 1.3 final.
Changes since VelocityTools 1.3-rc1 are as follow:
- Improved publish target in build.xml
- Added
logging in with
SSH keys.
WILL
On 2/9/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't get too excited yet.
So, i gave up on trying to get the site plugin to generate the
index.html page with the news macro. Instead, i commented out the
news macro and manually added the latest news. So now i
nice! i'll try to take a look at it this week.
On 2/12/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
In writing unit tests for velocity tools, I needed a component like this
and it didn't already seem to exist. So, I created a formal
permissions right on the public key
and containing folder? That always trips me up when logging in with
SSH keys.
WILL
On 2/9/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't get too excited yet.
So, i gave up on trying to get the site plugin to generate the
index.html page with the news macro
://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/changes.html
VelocityTools 1.3 is available in either source or binary form at:
http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi#tools
For more information about VelocityTools go to:
http://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/index.html
Nathan Bubna,
on behalf of the Velocity
Awful lot of formatting changes mixed in here, makes it hard to tell
what changed. :(
On 2/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wglass
Date: Sun Feb 18 21:17:09 2007
New Revision: 509094
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=509094
Log:
Allow SecureUberspector to
weeks lately due to work deadlines. When that hits 8, I'll
have a little free time to address this :-) Give me till this
weekend to do the right thing here...
WILL
On 2/13/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
finally got it working. the updated site has been uploaded and should
Ok, Will has fixed the doc issues that made him -1 the last test
build, as well as a minor bug in the new SecureUberspect. All the
tests pass, the build looks solid to me, and the included
velocity-1.5.jar works just dandy with the VelocityTools example apps.
The test build for this release is
On 2/25/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there!
Here are some structural evolutions I'd like to discuss before any
coding. I'm pretty sure that the first one is a good option - the second
one is more prospective.
1. On-demand tools loading: instead of a standard HashMap, the idea
I've got to rush out the door to a meeting, but i'll be back in an
hour or so. Then i'll comment further, tally the votes and get things
moving.
And yes, i'm all for a 1.5.1. no shame in that.
On 3/6/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 3/6/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My vote is reluctantly +1, because the I want to get it out weights
more for me than the issues that I have found:
BTW: Strictly spoken are the references in the POM wrong because they
should
On 3/6/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 10:09 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote:
If you'd prefer, i'd be happy to cede the update of the web site to
you or at least enlist your help. I've got things working adequately,
but not splendidly. Things left
On 3/6/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/6/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 10:09 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote:
If you'd prefer, i'd be happy to cede the update of the web site to
you or at least enlist your help. I've got things working
this tonight.
WILL
On 3/6/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/6/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/6/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 10:09 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote:
If you'd prefer, i'd be happy to cede the update of the web
On 3/7/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i noticed that there weren't many there, but i couldn't remember if
there were a lot beforehand. (i.e. i didn't know if my update
introduced that or not).
I've deployed both sites again
I agree that this is not part of the public API, and i'm ok with the
change. However, we need to make sure this is very well-documented,
so that those who do more heavy hacking on Velocity get warning of the
change.
And, if it's easy/trivial to add a deprecation path, that wouldn't
hurt
There are some grammatical/spelling issues*, but on the whole it looks
good to me.
*On spelling, change cashing to caching. If you want grammar
corrections let me know, and i can go through it again and send you a
list later today.
On 3/21/07, Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 2/26/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/25/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there!
Here are some structural evolutions I'd like to discuss before any
coding. I'm pretty sure that the first one is a good option - the second
one is more prospective.
1. On-demand
On 3/22/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 09:26 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
snip/
Oh, responding to one of your previous points:
i don't see why we need a filter or to constitute the three toolboxes
at all.
It's a need I frequently encountered. Quite
+1
On 3/21/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Let's say, it will not get better and I'm already bored out of my mind
again tinkering with XSL and XML.]
This is the CfV for the first release of the Velocity DocBook Framework.
It is intended for creating and maintaining high
,
Thanks for the effort. I have corrected most of the spelling issues
and grammatical issues. If you have time please go thought it.
Thanks,
Supun..
On 3/22/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some grammatical/spelling issues*, but on the whole it looks
good to me.
*On spelling
On 3/23/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathan,
Nathan Bubna wrote:
The VelocityView class can
be easily used in a filter as it is, and once we have the toolboxes in
the request/session/application attributes, then we can access
this all the time (generating a
syntax error).
$Tool.someMethod($velocityCount - 1)
or similar.
WILL
On 3/24/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/24/07, Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. I'll add those additions and corrections.
I think
new features.
For completeness, I'd like to see us do a release of DVSL as well.
I'll help with all this.
The treat arrays like lists, support iterables, support vararg
also seem good improvements on usability. Are all these items in
JIRA?
they are now.
WILL
On 3/26/07, Nathan Bubna
On 3/27/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean a decimal number is supported in an integer range?
yeah, it just takes the intValue(). i was a little surprised at this
at first, until i realized it basically makes it so that template
authors needn't care about the
Hey folks,
So, the only reason CommonsLogLogSystem ever went into VelocityTools
was that that was the path of least resistance for me at the time. I
wanted it to be released soon, and Velocity releases didn't happen
soon.
Now that we are up to speed, more or less, the reality is that
size(), isEmpty(), get(int), and set(int,Object) are
+ * supported. Later, support may be added for other read-only methods
+ * such as contains(Object) or subList(int,int). Patches are welcome! :)
+ *
+ * @author Nathan Bubna
+ * @version $Id: VelArrayMethod.java 440740 2006-09-06 15:37:44Z
See r524894
On 4/8/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Author: nbubna
Date: Mon Apr 2 12:27:29 2007
New Revision: 524893
[...]
# Needs to be configured with system location of javacc for parser task
-javacc.home= *unset*
+javacc.home=
On 4/10/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 4/8/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I hope to grasp the intention of this patch; why can't you wrap
the Array into Arrays.asList
Congrats on getting your application accepted!
On 4/13/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Supun,
Welcome to the Velocity community! You've probably already heard that your
application for Google Summer of Code 2007 has been accepted.
As your official mentor I'm sending you a
Please don't cross-post. This is a user list question. Wait a few
days to get a reply there before you try this list.
On 4/16/07, santas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
What i want to do is that whenever i change Locale of my application
depending on that locale i want to change my
This looks like it might be a good situation to use the
MultiViewsTool to find the appropriate header.vm file:
http://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/javadoc/org/apache/velocity/tools/view/i18n/MultiViewsTool.html
I haven't used it myself, but my understanding is that you use it to
find the
, rather than asking on the Velocity list.
Thanks
Nathan Bubna wrote:
This looks like it might be a good situation to use the
MultiViewsTool to find the appropriate header.vm file:
http://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/javadoc/org/apache/velocity/tools/view/i18n/MultiViewsTool.html
I
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-533
On 4/23/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henning,
Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd be happy to attach this code to a Jira isssue
Ah, it was in the next email. weird.
On 4/25/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is there no diff for this?
On 4/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: henning
Date: Wed Apr 25 17:16:22 2007
New Revision: 532551
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev
On 4/27/07, Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have been playing with Velocity in the past few days. By doing so I
encountered couple of problems. I'm not sure weather these are the
documented behavior so I thought I should ask the list.
1.I couldn't set a property after I
hey folks,
so, i thought i'd give a heads up that VelocityTools 2.x has come
along quickly. at this point, the new code can be used to build apps
with much less configuration and much greater flexibility and power
than the previous version. it is also almost completely backwards
compatible.
On 4/28/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.I couldn't call inner class methods. I put an inner class object in
to Velocity context and then tried to call its methods from the
template. But it didn't work. Velocity just outputs
should not be
accessible within a template. No need to open an issue for this.
Thanks,
Supun.
On 4/29/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/28/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.I couldn't call inner class methods
On 5/3/07, Ahmed Mohombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically removing all the @author tags from the velocity code base
and docs and replacing it with 'Velocity development community' and a
link to the dev-list.
How about doing this?
-1 from me as a user.
In a lot of projects when I had
On 5/8/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathan,
Nathan Bubna wrote:
I'm not sure. Have you tried it?
Of course! ;)
just didn't want to assume... :)
It doesn't work :(
StrutsLinkTool.setForward()
basically just hands things
On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 15:41 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
i don't know if anyone else has taken the time to try out Tools 2.x or
cares about it yet, but i thought i'd give an update anyway...
For now I just followed your updates. I'll
On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 17:24 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
I just tried a drop-in replacement, just to see what would happen. It
failed in my case due to the fact that the ViewTool interface
disappeared - after all the efforts you made
On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 19:50 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
On the next test I made, I ran into the first real problem, I think: the
init(Object) method seems to not be called at all on an old request
tool. If you've got an idea about
ways to do that or
make it optional, but it's looking like quite the challenge at the
moment.
On 5/16/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/16/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 19:50 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
On the next test I made, I ran
Sure, go for it!
On 5/28/07, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose to relax the access to the three following methods in
VelocityView.java :
-protected Template getTemplate(HttpServletRequest request)
+public Template getTemplate(HttpServletRequest request)
-protected
On 6/1/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathan,
Nathan Bubna wrote:
2. Throw another exception (MacroDepthExceededException?)
The way I see it, neither of these options is any better than simply
allowing the stack overflow
On 6/1/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/1/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi--you will find me to be a complete novice to
Velocity and Anakia; nevertheless I have come to
spoil
the fun. ;) Actually I feel like my timing
On 6/3/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The last thing that might be handy to know is that
you can also feed
an already instantiated ResourceLoader into the
system (rather than
have it be loaded and instantiated by class name
Me too. And it's worse than that. A couple of Sergio's emails have
been empty replys to his own replys to a commit message. Who's the
moderator for our lists anyway? Can we shut these down?
On 6/8/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/8/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a question for the Struts2 user list. They are the ones who
created and maintain the #ssubmit directive. You may get an answer
here, but it is not likely. I'm not aware of any Struts2 users or
developers who are active on this list.
On 6/25/07, sudhitekkala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we need to find some way to get a Wendy Smoak-type person interested
in helping out around here. she has far more expertise and patience
for build and doc issues than i could ever dream of having... :)
anyway, here's my thoughts:
- whoever's ready and willing to jump in and do work on the
VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I
would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated
documentation and has received precious little feedback to date.
The test build for this release is available at:
On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I
would call this a beta, but it has essentially no updated
documentation and has received precious little feedback to date.
The test build for this release is available
If you need the extra hour, then you are welcome to it. :)
On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PST or PDT? Nice bonus to get that extra hour :-)
:-)
On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/27/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VelocityTools
:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-
tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test.xml:75: Warning: Could n
ot find file C:\Documents and Settings\wglass\My
Documents\Workspace\misc\velocity-tools-2.0-alpha1-src\test\etc\jetty.x
ml.tmpl to copy.
WILL
On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL
On 6/29/07, Ahmed Mohombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna-3 wrote:
VelocityTools 2.0 is, in my estimation, ready for an alpha release. I
Why not user the same version number like Velocity?
never done it before. all Tools 1.x releases are (i believe
compatible with all 1.3+ Engine
are wrong, and the tools
are mostly documented via javascript?
Best, WILL
On 6/29/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/28/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1. (sorry!)
There are no docs. All the generated doc files in the binary distro
have
size
The vote has passed:
+1 Nathan Bubna, Will Glass-Husain, Claude Brisson
No other votes were recorded.
On 6/28/07, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, here goes again. The problem with the source build has been fixed
and my refactorings from this morning are now included. Sorry
-1 :( sorry...
It was built with Java 6, while it should probably be built with as
early of a JDK as possible. Due to some uses of the @Deprecated
annotation, i believe this is Java 5. Though perhaps, we can have the
compiler target 1.4? I really wouldn't be picky about this if it were
an
On 7/26/07, Jonathan Revusky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan Bubna wrote:
I believe your analysis is correct. The parser will have to treat
anything in the form of #foo( ... ) is a potential macro at parse
time, then leave the check for a matching macro to render time. If it
turns out
On 8/1/07, Nicholas Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm testing an application that uses the Velocity Template engine. I've
deliberately introduced some parse errors in to my .vm file to test
error handling in Template.merge(). The error is a $variable that isn't
present in the context.
On 8/7/07, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathan,
Nathan Bubna wrote:
I also wonder if there's some way to turn your Table/Cell classes into
a TableTool of sorts that could go into the VelocityTools project.
http://velocity.apache.org/tools/devel/
While I think
On 8/21/07, B.Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Now I am in the possition to choose the good presenation layer frame work to
start working the web oriented project.
I have been looking around the forum to use the velocity.
We have decided to use the new technologies like Seam
Great work, Supun! The code and tests look great. I look forward to
trying this out myself.
On 8/22/07, Supun Kamburugamuva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I'm really glad that I could solve both VELOCITY-362 and VELOCITY-529.
Here is a general description about how I solved the two
1 - 100 of 1183 matches
Mail list logo
