From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rick Barlow
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 7:30 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
I moved LUNs from a DS8880 in CA to a new DS8910 in OH. I defined EDEVs on
both ends and used PIPEDDR to send it across TCPIP most
on behalf of Christian
Borntraeger
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 1:56 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
Am 05.04.22 um 23:19 schrieb Martha McConaghy:
I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct
attached SAN LUN (not an EDEV or ECKD
Troth
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 11:48 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
Use 'dd' to copy block device to block device. (The name reminds me of DDR
every time I use it!)
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022, 11:44 Martha McConaghy
wrote:
> Christian,
> Looks like
on behalf of Christian
> Borntraeger
> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 1:56 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
>
> Am 05.04.22 um 23:19 schrieb Martha McConaghy:
> > I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct
> at
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Christian
Borntraeger
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 1:56 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
Am 05.04.22 um 23:19 schrieb Martha McConaghy:
> I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct attac
Am 05.04.22 um 23:19 schrieb Martha McConaghy:
I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct attached
SAN LUN (not an EDEV or ECKD). They reside on an old DS8870 and I need to move
them to a new DS8910. (No PPRC, GDPS, etc.) Is there a way that I could use
VM to copy
-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
I moved LUNs from a DS8880 in CA to a new DS8910 in OH. I defined EDEVs on
both ends and used PIPEDDR to send it across TCPIP most of the way across
the country. I can probably share more details if you need them. a 4G LUN
took about 10
artha McConaghy
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 5:20 PM
>> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [LINUX-390] Moving LUNs using z/VM
>>
>> I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct attached
>> SAN LUN (not an EDEV or ECKD). The
5, 2022 5:41 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
>
> Hi Martha
> I did this successfully some years back. Make the input a “full pack “
> mini on edev link it read only to reduce stress.
> Good luck
> Dave
>
>
>
> From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of David
> Kreuter
> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 5:41 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
>
> Hi Martha
> I did this successfully some years back. Make the input a
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Neale Ferguson
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 6:01 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
Is there a maximum edev size?
You can copy the LUNs with DDR, but you have to first define an EDEVICE for
them.
Regards,
Alan
on 390 Port On Behalf Of
> Martha McConaghy
> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 5:20 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [LINUX-390] Moving LUNs using z/VM
>
> I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct attached
> SAN LUN (not an
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of David Kreuter
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 5:41 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
Hi Martha
I did this successfully some years back. Make the input a “full pack “ mini on
edev link it read only to reduce
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
OK, I want to make sure I am understanding it clearly. Its an interesting
idea, but I really can't afford to blow away the original disks, so want to be
really sure.
The existing disks are used by the virtual machine by having LOADDEV statements
Association: Secretary
Marist College IT
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rick Troth
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 5:27 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
What I mean is:
define them even temporarily as EDEVs
What I mean is:
define them even temporarily as EDEVs for the DDR and go for it.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, 17:25 Rick Troth wrote:
> If they're defined as EDEVs then you can use DDR.
>
> FBA (EDEV or 3370, etc al) being fixed block, copying the whole disk will
> include the boot partition.
t; Martha McConaghy
> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 5:20 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [LINUX-390] Moving LUNs using z/VM
>
> I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct attached
> SAN LUN (not an EDEV or ECKD). They reside on an old
If they're defined as EDEVs then you can use DDR.
FBA (EDEV or 3370, etc al) being fixed block, copying the whole disk will
include the boot partition. (Partition tables are not really needed on
fixed block disks, even laptop SSDs, but don't get me started.) Any
"partition table", and all
I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct attached
SAN LUN (not an EDEV or ECKD). They reside on an old DS8870 and I need to move
them to a new DS8910. (No PPRC, GDPS, etc.) Is there a way that I could use
VM to copy these LUNs to the new storage? I was looking at
that you don't care as much about moving around since it's easy
enough to (re)create them. That's the theory, anyway.
- - - - - - - - - -
Timothy Sipples
I.T. Architect Executive
Digital Asset & Other Industry Solutions
IBM Z & LinuxONE
- - - - - - - - - -
E-Mail: sipp...@sg
Closing the loop... I got the system up and running under KVM. I hadn't seen
Viktor's message yet but I did basically the same steps.
Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Viktor
Mihajlovski:
>I assume it's SLES,
It is. I'm starting with a SLES guest but I have RHEL
volumes and IPLing off of the new volumes. No luck, the virtio
modules aren't available in the guest so it can't see any DASD.
Has someone put together a recipe for moving a guest from z/VM to KVM? Or am I
heading down a dead end?
I'm not aware of one, but I wouldn't call it a dead end, either
On 12/1/20 5:25 PM, Alan Haff wrote:
Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Richard J Moore:
In this case I think you're saying have two configurations - one under KVM
and another under zVM. Then manually co-ordinate the sharing or resources
but ensure that you don't
Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Richard J Moore:
>In this case I think you're saying have two configurations - one under KVM
>and another under zVM. Then manually co-ordinate the sharing or resources
>but ensure that you don't have both guests logged on
Linux on 390 Port wrote on 01/12/2020 11:51:37:
> From: Christian Borntraeger
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 01/12/2020 11:55
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Moving a Linux guest from z/VM to KVM?
> Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
>
> On 01.12.20 12:07, Richard J Moore wrot
On 01.12.20 12:07, Richard J Moore wrote:
> Is that really possible (KVM guest <-> z/VM guest)?
> As far as I am aware the KVM and zVM hypervisors share no metadata
> regarding the guest's set up. Nor do they share any of the protocols used
> in live (or dead) guest relocation.
>
> Am I
Christian Borntraeger
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 01/12/2020 06:35
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: Moving a Linux guest from z/VM to KVM?
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port
On 30.11.20 21:10, Mark Post wrote:
> On 11/30/20 1:16 PM, Alan Haff wrote:
>> I have a number of Linux g
ff of the new volumes. No luck, the virtio
>> modules aren't available in the guest so it can't see any DASD.
>>
>> Has someone put together a recipe for moving a guest from z/VM to KVM? Or am
>> I heading down a dead end?
>
> I'm not aware of one, but I wouldn't cal
dules aren't available in the guest so it can't see any DASD.
>
> Has someone put together a recipe for moving a guest from z/VM to KVM? Or am
> I heading down a dead end?
I'm not aware of one, but I wouldn't call it a dead end, either. As a
first step, I would rebuild the initrd wit
.
Has someone put together a recipe for moving a guest from z/VM to KVM? Or am I
heading down a dead end?
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 8:46 AM Grzegorz Powiedziuk
wrote:
> Hi, I could use some ideas. We moved a huge db2 from old p7 aix to rhel7
> on Z and we are having big performance issues.
>
What about enabling SMT in z/VM ? Would 10 cpu db2 take an advantage of
this? On the p8 they had SMT-8 turned
> Where can I look for potential relief? Everyone was hoping for a better
> performance not worse.I am hoping that there is something we can tweak to
> make this better.
Only because I didn't see it specifically in the thread yet, do you have
similar large page size support/tuning in both
Can you provide the zVM SRM parameters and MT status?
Regards, Phil Tully
Chief Architect-z/VM & z/Linux
phil.tu...@adp.com
cell: 973-202-7427
1-800 377-0237,,5252697#
On 11/3/20, 12:25 PM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Grzegorz Powiedziuk"
wrote:
WARNING: Do not click links or
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 21:27, Grzegorz Powiedziuk
wrote:
>
> In the performance monitor toolkit it shows around 12.000 diag x'9c' /s
> and 50 x'44'
> But at this time of a day everything is calm. i will check again tomorrow.
> Lot's of diag x'9c' would indicate too many virtual cpus right?
>
You
Diag 9C are low cost, Diag 44 not so much. 50 is a low number.
On 11/3/2020 12:27 PM, Grzegorz Powiedziuk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Grzegorz Powiedziuk
wrote:
Thanks Christian.
There is no pagging (swapping) here besides just regular kernel's house
keeping (vm.swappiness =5 )
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 3:25 PM Jim Elliott wrote:
> Gregory,
>
> Yes, thrashing. :-)
>
>
I like my name better and it even fits better :)
I will keep an eye on page faults tomorrow but we are not overcommitting
memory at all. Unless something inside of db2 is cooking but in linux there
is no
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Grzegorz Powiedziuk
wrote:
> Thanks Christian.
> There is no pagging (swapping) here besides just regular kernel's house
> keeping (vm.swappiness =5 )
> rhel 7 doesn't give me diag_stat in the debug filesystem hmm
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:37 PM Christian
Gregory,
Yes, thrashing. :-)
Jim Elliott
Senior IT Consultant - GlassHouse Systems Inc.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 2:07 PM Grzegorz Powiedziuk
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:57 PM Jim Elliott wrote:
>
> > Gregory,
> >
> > The 9117-MMD could range from 1 chip/4 cores all the way up to 16
>
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:57 PM Jim Elliott wrote:
> Gregory,
>
> The 9117-MMD could range from 1 chip/4 cores all the way up to 16 chips/64
> cores at either 3.80 or 4.22 GHz. If it has 15 cores, then it was likely
> the 4.22 GHz 5 chip/15 core version. Using 10 out of 15 cores (even at 100%
>
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:35 PM r.stricklin wrote:
>
> I recently had a vaguely similar problem with a much smaller database on
> linux (x86, mysql for zabbix) that presented bizarre performance issues
> despite clearly having lots of resources left available.
>
> What our problem ended up being
Thanks Christian.
There is no pagging (swapping) here besides just regular kernel's house
keeping (vm.swappiness =5 )
rhel 7 doesn't give me diag_stat in the debug filesystem hmm
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:37 PM Christian Borntraeger <
borntrae...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 03.11.20 14:46,
Gregory,
The 9117-MMD could range from 1 chip/4 cores all the way up to 16 chips/64
cores at either 3.80 or 4.22 GHz. If it has 15 cores, then it was likely
the 4.22 GHz 5 chip/15 core version. Using 10 out of 15 cores (even at 100%
busy) should fit on 5 z14 ZR1 or z14 M0x IFLs. Sounds like there
On Nov 3, 2020, at 5:46 AM, Grzegorz Powiedziuk wrote:
> DB2 is running on the ext4 filesystem (Actually a huge number of
> filesystems- each NODE is a separate logical volume). Separate for logs,
> data.
I recently had a vaguely similar problem with a much smaller database on linux
(x86, mysql
Can you provide the output of
Q MULTITHREAD and Q SRM
Regards, Phil Tully
Chief Architect-z/VM & z/Linux
phil.tu...@adp.com
cell: 973-202-7427
1-800 377-0237,,5252697#
On 11/3/20, 8:47 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Grzegorz Powiedziuk"
wrote:
WARNING: Do not click links or open
On 03.11.20 14:46, Grzegorz Powiedziuk wrote:
> Hi, I could use some ideas. We moved a huge db2 from old p7 aix to rhel7 on
> Z and we are having big performance issues.
> Same memory, CPU number is down from 12 to 10. Although they had
> multithreading ON so they saw more "cpus" We have faster
Hi Jim,
correction - we have z14 not z114
.. .not sure why I keep calling our z14 z114 ;) We have z14
We have 16 IFLs in total shared across 5 z/VM lparps but really there is
literally nothing running in there yet beside this one huge VM which has 10
IFLs configured. We have plenty of spare
Gregory:
Do you have a z114 with 10 IFLs? That is the maximum number of IFLs
available on a z114 (2818-M10) and would be unusual. Is this a single z/VM
LPAR? How much memory is on the z114 (and in this LPAR)? Also, what was the
specific MT/Model for the P7 box?
If you were to compare a 12-core
you've got a gig of swap used , and you said %system CPU time is way higher
while the system becomes unusable ?
are you actively swapping during that time when the system is not
responsive? If yes you need to try to either add memory or reduce the
memory demand on the system.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020
Hi, I could use some ideas. We moved a huge db2 from old p7 aix to rhel7 on
Z and we are having big performance issues.
Same memory, CPU number is down from 12 to 10. Although they had
multithreading ON so they saw more "cpus" We have faster disks (moved to
flash), faster FCP cards and faster
On Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 11:56 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving Root to Larger disk
On 6/26/20 9:54 AM, Davis, Larry (National VM Capability) wrote:
> I am trying to move a Linux root (/) file system to a larger disk
> format
I'm not sure what yo
On 6/26/20 9:54 AM, Davis, Larry (National VM Capability) wrote:
> I am trying to move a Linux root (/) file system to a larger disk format
I'm not sure what you mean by "a larger disk format" because:
> I was able to block copy the data from one device to the other using the DD
> command below
I am trying to move a Linux root (/) file system to a larger disk format
I was able to block copy the data from one device to the other using the DD
command below
dd if=/dev/dasdb1 of=/dev/dasdd1 bs=64K conv=noerror,sync
But I need to make the new Device Bootable and normally I
Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
Ah - I see you meant for this to be run against new DASD -- assuming the
copy had been done... I wasn't sure how/when the DASD would be copied to
the old...so it does depend... the script should be run before or
after
: Thursday, August 16, 2018 7:39 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
Ah - I see you meant for this to be run against new DASD -- assuming the
copy had been done... I wasn't sure how/when the DASD would be copied to
the old...so
; 'COMMENTS ? IPLPARMS' ipl_parm
>>
>>queue 'IPL Parameters Options are: '
>>queue 'CONS= FN=fn FT=ft CLEARPDR REPAIR NOEXITS NOHCD PROMPT'
>> queue 'PDNUM=n PDOFF=offset PDVOL=addr STORE=M/G/T/P/E '
>>queue
'SALIPL' dev_addr '(' salp_opt end
>
> Exit
>
>
>
> Larry Davis
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Davis, Jim [PRI-1PP]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 17:54
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.E
rom: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Davis,
Jim [PRI-1PP]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 17:54
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
Thanks for the info. I get the following.
Current IPL parameters:
FN=SYSTEM
Of Davis,
Jim [PRI-1PP]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 17:15
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
I have been tasked with moving our z/VM and zlinux file system volume from an
old DASD system to a New DASD system.
All of my device numbers / unit
Just a small warning: QUERY IPLPARMS shows you the parameters that will be
used on SHUTDOWN REIPL.
They will typically be the parameters that were in effect at IPL time, but
they can be changed by SET IPLPARMS.
I recommend updating AUTOLOG1 to stash away the output of QUERY IPLPARMS so
Rohling
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 5:40 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
>
> CP Query IPL gives you the parms used...
>
> You can use SAIPL to bring up z/VM the first time on new DASD (just s
on 390 Port On Behalf Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 5:40 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
CP Query IPL gives you the parms used...
You can use SAIPL to bring up z/VM the first time on new DASD (just specify
pdnum=1 pdvol=F004
To determine the IPL parameters of the existing system, use the Q IPLPARMS
command.
Regards, Fred
From: "Davis, Jim [PRI-1PP]"
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 08/16/2018 05:16 PM
Subject:Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new
Move all six volumes to their new addresses.
IPL from new res volume address.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Tom Huegel
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 5:36 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
Last
] <
jim.da...@primerica.com> wrote:
> I have been tasked with moving our z/VM and zlinux file system volume from
> an old DASD system to a New DASD system.
> All of my device numbers / unit addresses will change.
>
> I have been successful in moving all of the z/linux volumes.
Last question Q IPLPARMS
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Davis, Jim [PRI-1PP] <
jim.da...@primerica.com> wrote:
> I have been tasked with moving our z/VM and zlinux file system volume from
> an old DASD system to a New DASD system.
> All of my device numbers / unit addresses wil
I have been tasked with moving our z/VM and zlinux file system volume from an
old DASD system to a New DASD system.
All of my device numbers / unit addresses will change.
I have been successful in moving all of the z/linux volumes.
My problem is how to move the 6 VM volumes since the IPL text
Hi Donald,
> Just FYI... I spent many hours tinkering with VM DRR and Linux dd and
> different experiments of formatting etc etc. I had a case open with Red
> Hat, which they eventually pretty much gave up on and gave me the source
> code for fdasd and dasdfmt (which is where I learned of the
Peter,
THANK YOU !! Using fdasd option u fixed it up. I was then able to expand
the file system and I now have a happy RHEL system on a mod-27 with lots of
spare space.
Just FYI... I spent many hours tinkering with VM DRR and Linux dd and
different experiments of formatting etc etc. I had a case
On 29.06.2018 00:10, Donald Russell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 14:27 Donald Russell wrote:
>> The dasdfmt -b 4096 --mode=expand worked great. Started formatting the
>> disk at track 150240 as expected. But then fdasd choked saying only the
>> first 10016 cylinders are formatted so I
>>> On 6/28/2018 at 06:10 PM, Donald Russell wrote:
> I forgot to put a subject. Now there*s one. :-)
> Don
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 14:27 Donald Russell wrote:
>
-snip-
>> Any suggestions beyond install from scratch on the larger disk? :-)
What I typically do is:
1. Run dasdfmt on the
I forgot to put a subject. Now there’s one. :-)
Don
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 14:27 Donald Russell wrote:
> I have RHEL 7 system on a mod-9 (10016 cup) ECKD DASD and want to move it
> to a mod-27 (32759 cyl).
>
> The disk is not in use, I used zVM/CMS to DDR the disk to the larger one.
> Then I
> I started in the business in 1972. Our local college had an 8k IBM 1130
Almost immediately,
> I wanted to find out move about it. After graduation, I went to work at
my present employer
> (Baldor). After 40 years here, I have accepted an early retirement.
Sounds like we both got into the
I just unsubscribed with my old email and reset with a personal one. Really
makes sense noting Corp social policies these days too.
Kurt
On Feb 9, 2017 1:08 PM, "Mark Post" wrote:
>>> On 2/8/2017 at 02:57 PM, Ron Foster wrote:
> After 40 years here, I
>>> On 2/8/2017 at 02:57 PM, Ron Foster wrote:
> After 40 years here, I have accepted an early retirement.
Hi, Ron,
Glad to hear you're able to retire. Are you going to actually retire, or look
for work elsewhere?
It was nice getting to know you via work and at SHARE.
f Of Ron
> Foster
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 11:57 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Moving on
>
> I started in the business in 1972. Our local college had an 8k IBM 1130
> Almost immediately, I wanted to find out move about it. After graduation,
>
Create a gmail account and ask Baldor's IT to auto-forward your emails for a
couple of months?
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ron
Foster
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 11:57 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Moving on
I
I started in the business in 1972. Our local college had an 8k IBM 1130
Almost immediately, I wanted to find out move about it. After graduation, I
went to work at my present employer(Baldor). After 40 years here, I have
accepted an early retirement.
I enjoyed the people on the mailing
: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael
MacIsaac
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 10:43 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Moving on
Hello lists,
I have again started a new job, moving on from Innovation Data Processing to
ADP.
At Innovation, helping to roll out
congrats!
On 08/17/2015 10:43 AM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
I have again started a new job, moving on from Innovation Data Processing
to ADP.
At Innovation, helping to roll out the FDRPASVM product that allows you to
migrate running Linux and z/VM systems to new DASD regardless
Hello lists,
I have again started a new job, moving on from Innovation Data Processing
to ADP.
At Innovation, helping to roll out the FDRPASVM product that allows you to
migrate running Linux and z/VM systems to new DASD regardless of
manufacturer was a challenging and satisfying project
On 8/17/2015 at 10:43 AM, Michael MacIsaac mike99...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello lists,
I have again started a new job, moving on from Innovation Data Processing
to ADP.
It's starting to get difficult to keep track of you lately. After 30 years in
one place, now you're job hopping. :) I
AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Moving on
Hello lists,
I have again started a new job, moving on from Innovation Data Processing
to ADP.
At Innovation, helping to roll out the FDRPASVM product that allows you to
migrate running Linux and z/VM systems to new DASD regardless
Congratulations Mike!
We will need to reinstate a moving on list just for you.
David
div Original message /divdivFrom: Michael MacIsaac
mike99...@gmail.com /divdivDate:08-17-2015 11:43 (GMT-04:00)
/divdivTo: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU /divdivSubject: Moving on /divdiv
/divHello
Congrats and good luck on your new job Mike...
I have again started a new job, moving on from Innovation Data Processing
to ADP.
At Innovation, helping to roll out the FDRPASVM product that allows you
to
migrate running Linux and z/VM systems to new DASD regardless of
manufacturer
I previously sent first article, not second. Here are both parts...
Planning for Data Center Move Is Critical
Clearly defining steps and outcome before a move, upgrade or build helps
ensure a smooth transition to success
Ich bin zur Zeit nicht im Haus. Meine Mails werden nicht weitergeleitet.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
Porto Alegre: A smarter city that keeps its citizens moving
http://www-03.ibm.com/software/businesscasestudies/us/en/corp?synkey=L470824Z40607B29
Sent from LinkedIn for Android
Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Bruce Arro
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 4:41 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Z9 to Z114, Z/VM5.4 to Z/VM6.2 and moving Z/OS to a guest?
Hi list
Looking for the way
And just for completeness, I have a customer happily running 5.4 on a z114.
I would go for 6.2 on the new box, but you'd have to think IBM would cane you
something awful with licensing for running z/OS as guests.
Needs must I suppose ...
Shane ...
On Tue, May 28th, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Feller, Paul
z/VM 540 is at least supported on a z114... however running production zOS
under z/VM is not really recommended so I have to ask why you are not
considering upgrading zOS? That would also have to help simplify your
System z push/pull process for the upgrade.
Here is a quick high level z114 FAQ
On Monday, 05/27/2013 at 04:43 EDT, Bruce Arro ba...@amcotec.co.za
wrote:
Have a Z9 with 1 CP and 5 IFL's. Have 4 X Z/VM 5.4 LPARS with various
versions
of SUSE Linux running as guests and a Z/OS Prod and Test Lpar.
Are installing a Z114 in a few weeks time and would like to upgrade to
Z/VM
On Tuesday, 05/28/2013 at 06:29 EDT, Shane G ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
I would go for 6.2 on the new box, but you'd have to think IBM would
cane you
something awful with licensing for running z/OS as guests.
Why? Some of my IBM brethren are more knowledgeable on this subject than
I, but I
On Tuesday, 05/28/2013 at 09:14 EDT, Kurt Acker/Endicott/IBM@IBMUS wrote:
z/VM 540 is at least supported on a z114... however running production
zOS
under z/VM is not really recommended
There was a time when even the minimal overhead of z/VM was enough to make
running z/OS as a guest
Hi list
Looking for the way forward.
Have a Z9 with 1 CP and 5 IFL's. Have 4 X Z/VM 5.4 LPARS with various versions
of SUSE Linux running as guests and a Z/OS Prod and Test Lpar.
Are installing a Z114 in a few weeks time and would like to upgrade to Z/VM 6.2
also
Questions.
1) Is it easier
mkinitrd # not necessary with RHEL6
With zfcp attached scsi disks this is usually mandatory since one can
hardly influence target WWPN and LUN to be the same after moving to
another disk (or even a disk in another storage system).
If you don't have another running Linux you can do something similar
Would he need to execute the 'chroot' and 'zipl' commands after
copying the disk contents?
Thomas Denier
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
-Scott Rohling wrote: -
The easiest thing to do is bring the guest down and LINK these 2
disks
from another running Linux .. mount them as /mnt
Hi group. Need to some help in transferring and recreating the ROOT ( /
) dasd device to another dasd
Specifically we want to migrate from a 300MB partition and replace it
with a 2Gb partition which is
already formatted and prepped.
Any pointer or how to's on this ?
Thanks ...
Ben Duncan -
The easiest thing to do is bring the guest down and LINK these 2 disks
from another running Linux .. mount them as /mnt /mnt/disk1 and 2 and copy
- I would use rsync:
rsync -av /mnt/disk1/ /mnt/disk2
Unmount, detach - and swap the disks in the directory so the big disk is
the same address as
On 10/11/2012 at 03:41 PM, Ben Duncan b...@linux4ms.net wrote:
Hi group. Need to some help in transferring and recreating the ROOT ( /
) dasd device to another dasd
Specifically we want to migrate from a 300MB partition and replace it
with a 2Gb partition which is
already formatted and
All,
I'm writing to inform everyone that effective today, I have transferred from
Novell Technical Services to the SUSE SLE Core team. (No more on call duty!
Yay!)
Part of my charter is to help determine what our customers want and need in the
way of improvements and new features, and use
1 - 100 of 339 matches
Mail list logo