On Fri, 5 May 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to make the ruby version of texexec the default. Are there any
strong objections to this?
Is ruby stable with respect to system calls? Is the behaviour
consistent on Linux and Windows? Are there active Ruby users on the
list who can
On 5/5/06, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to make the ruby version of texexec the default. Are there any
strong objections to this?
OK
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
On 5/4/06, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I'd like to make the ruby version of texexec the default. Are there anystrong objections to this?Also, i'd like the stubs to run texmfstart as launcher. For that purpose i'll add a /scripts/context/stubs/[mswin|unix] path with the default stubs
Nice, I don't have to use texmfstart newtexexec.rb my_doc anymore (and
don't have to think to make a stub !!! ;) )
What about the perl script for the future ?
Hans Hagen a écrit :
Hi,
I'd like to make the ruby version of texexec the default. Are there any
strong objections to this?
Also, i'd
On May 4, 2006, at 6:03 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
I'd like to make the ruby version of texexec the default. Are there
any
strong objections to this?
I think Ruby is now installed on enough machines out there. At this
point, I have no objection to the switchover.
Steve
Hi,
I'd like to use the stand-alone-version of ConTeXt with Win2k,
but it doesn't work:
F:\isoimage\usr\local\context\demotexexec --make --all
f:/isoimage/usr/local/context/tex/texmf-local/scripts/context/ruby/newtexexec.rb:8:in
`require': No such file to load -- base/switch (LoadError)
from
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Stefan Lagotzki wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to use the stand-alone-version of ConTeXt with Win2k,
but it doesn't work:
F:\isoimage\usr\local\context\demotexexec --make --all
f:/isoimage/usr/local/context/tex/texmf-local/scripts/context/ruby/newtexexec.rb:8:in
`require
Aditya Mahajan said:
Which ruby do you have (one-click installer or from cygwin)? Try
setting RUBYLIB path variable to
F:\isoimage\usr\local\context\tex\texmf-local\scripts\context\ruby
set RUBYLIB=/cygdrive/f/[my-texmf-tree]/scripts/context/ruby
Thanks ;-)
Stefan
Hi,
I'd like to make the ruby version of texexec the default. Are there any
strong objections to this?
Also, i'd like the stubs to run texmfstart as launcher. For that purpose i'll
add a /scripts/context/stubs/[mswin|unix] path with the default stubs that one
can copy to some bin path
Hans
/kpseremote on library paths:
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/i686-linux
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby
/usr/lib/ruby/1.6
/usr/lib/ruby/1.6/i686-linux
.
/home/archiv/tex/texmf-linux/bin
/home/archiv/tex/texmf-linux/bin/texmfstart-lib
/home/archiv/tex/texmf-local/scripts/context
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Which as as it should be [however, newtexexec --check does not
perform alll tests as it should]. On Mac OS X, I get at the end:
Perhaps the ruby scripts are confused about the separator on
Mac OS X? (I do not really know, just guessing).
Taco
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Apr 27, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Perhaps the ruby scripts are confused about the separator on
Mac OS X? (I do not really know, just guessing).
Not very probable since OS X uses the same separator as linux/Unix, /
I meant the separate paths
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Which as as it should be [however, newtexexec --check does not
perform alll tests as it should]. On Mac OS X, I get at the end:
Perhaps the ruby scripts are confused about the separator on
Mac OS X? (I do not really know, just
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Apr 27, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Perhaps the ruby scripts are confused about the separator on
Mac OS X? (I do not really know, just guessing).
Not very probable since OS X uses the same separator as linux
completely broken.)
The first impression makes me feel that you won't need only if
(MikTeX) whitches in your ruby scripts, but also if (MikTeX 2.5),
...
And what I least understand: the developer puts a lot of effort into
development itself (features like improving YaST to display just about
every
Jilani Khaldi wrote:
interesting (i assume that it produced pdf)
Yes with the difference that while Metapost, Asympthote and GLE
(http://glx.sourceforge.net/) use their own proprietary language to do
PDF graphics, Tioga(*) uses Ruby, a full featrured and very nice
language. I
Hans Hagen wrote:
Jilani Khaldi wrote:
interesting (i assume that it produced pdf)
Yes with the difference that while Metapost, Asympthote and GLE
(http://glx.sourceforge.net/) use their own proprietary language to do
PDF graphics, Tioga(*) uses Ruby, a full featrured and very nice
/MetaPost):
z0.. controls z1 and z2 .. z3
Very true, but you forgot that in Tioga everything is done inside Ruby
interpreter. Tioga is a Ruby extension so you could use the power of
Ruby, its standard library and all the other extensions made for it
inside Tioga.
However, I don't like
was asking myself if it would not be possible
(and better) to have an .exe installer as usual happens in win,
including Perl, maybe Ruby (+ or- 20 Mb doesn't change too much).
Double click, and it set ups all the installation parameters. A
completely autonomous installer would allow many people
olivier wrote:
Your students can also install Ruby (single click .exe
: Rubyinstaller from
: http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/9417/ruby184-16_rc1.exe)
and Perl (single click .exe : activePerl
:http://www.activestate.com/Products/ActivePerl/) whithout any pb's of
adding new
than this (Asymptote/MetaPost):
z0.. controls z1 and z2 .. z3
Very true, but you forgot that in Tioga everything is done inside Ruby
interpreter. Tioga is a Ruby extension so you could use the power of
Ruby, its standard library and all the other extensions made for it
inside Tioga
On 4/21/06, Jilani Khaldi wrote:
So, more generally, I was asking myself if it would not be possible
(and better) to have an .exe installer as usual happens in win,
including Perl, maybe Ruby (+ or- 20 Mb doesn't change too much).
Double click, and it set ups all the installation parameters
So, more generally, I was asking myself if it would not be possible
(and better) to have an .exe installer as usual happens in win,
including Perl, maybe Ruby (+ or- 20 Mb doesn't change too much).
Double click, and it set ups all the installation parameters. A
completely autonomous installer
Jilani Khaldi wrote:
So, more generally, I was asking myself if it would not be possible
(and better) to have an .exe installer as usual happens in win,
including Perl, maybe Ruby (+ or- 20 Mb doesn't change too much).
Double click, and it set ups all the installation parameters
interesting (i assume that it produced pdf)
Yes with the difference that while Metapost, Asympthote and GLE
(http://glx.sourceforge.net/) use their own proprietary language to do
PDF graphics, Tioga(*) uses Ruby, a full featrured and very nice
language. I even see more presence
2006 09:57:11 +0200, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
works here; do you use the latest (new)texexec?
The problem appears only for the old perl texexec. Testing with the ruby
one does not produce the problem. I guess it's a problem with the OS: in
the thread the problem
as usual happens in win,
including Perl, maybe Ruby (+ or- 20 Mb doesn't change too much).
Double click, and it set ups all the installation parameters. A
completely autonomous installer would allow many people to try, use
and get fond conTeXt (and maybe to leave Word) without having
and you do not mind installing
ruby, you can instal the windows installation from pragma in a
different (from Miktex texmf and localtexmf trees) directory. Use
setuptex.bat to add the pragma binaries to the path only when you need
them. This way, you can keep on using latex from miktex and can
try to use texmfstart, I get this error:
/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/base/
kpseremote.rb:8:in `require': No such file to load -- base/kpse/drb
(LoadError)
from /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/
base/kpseremote.rb:8
from
it with ruby,
but where is it supposed to end up?
it is supposed to stay there and be launched using texmfstart (alsl ruby)
Hans
i remember from long ago that there's also some path trickery involved
(btw, i'm not sure where the binaries live)
Hmm, tell me more about that if you
this error:
/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/base/
kpseremote.rb:8:in `require': No such file to load -- base/kpse/drb
(LoadError)
from /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/
base/kpseremote.rb:8
from /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local
does not work, it just doesn't process
the modules (works with old texexec)
2. not sure if this is a misconfiguration on my system, but when I
try to use texmfstart, I get this error:
/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/base/
kpseremote.rb:8:in `require': No such file
develop software faster than
I can even read about it! By the way, where is newtexexec? I see the
newtexexec.rb in the .zip file, and could presumably run it with ruby,
but where is it supposed to end up?
* As root, ran update-texmf to regenerate /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf
ah ... i hate
a minimal example in a clean directory,
post that here along with what commands to run, and all
of the results (logs, temp files) you get.
The perl script (texexec.pl) has some difficulties (sometimes the
problem with wrong format loding appears and sometimes not), but since
the ruby
(logs, temp files) you get.
The perl script (texexec.pl) has some difficulties (sometimes the
problem with wrong format loding appears and sometimes not), but since
the ruby script is supposed to replace it anyway it doesn't really
make sense to lose time fixing old stuff.
Hans has just fixed
-project lead for the OOo bib project).
Second, I have started porting CiteProc to Ruby (and put a citeproc-py directory
in the repo for those python coders that might want to contribute), which might
integrate better with ConTeXt. (I suppose Lua might also be an option given the
integration
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Oops, forgot to attach the logs
--- On Mar 1, Aditya Mahajan wrote ---
--- On Feb 28, Aditya Mahajan wrote ---
I was trying to make the stand along context work with cygwin using
cygwin ruby. Following the advice on the wiki of adding
/scripts/context/ruby to rubylib
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I was trying to make the stand along context work with cygwin using
cygwin ruby. Following the advice on the wiki of adding
/scripts/context/ruby to rubylib, everything works fine. However, I am
not able to enable write18. I copied texexec.rme to texexec.ini
--- On Mar 1, Hans Hagen wrote ---
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Oops, forgot to attach the logs
--- On Mar 1, Aditya Mahajan wrote ---
--- On Feb 28, Aditya Mahajan wrote ---
I was trying to make the stand along context work with cygwin using
cygwin ruby. Following the advice on the wiki
mswincontext.zip.
I have properly installed perl and ruby as the wiki says.
(http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Windows_Installation#Stand-alone_ConTeXt_dist
ribution)
But when it comes to use cdemo.bat I got:
texmfstart newtexexec.rb --autopdf --pdf demo-tex.tex
TeXExec | processing document 'demo
I was trying to make the stand along context work with cygwin using
cygwin ruby. Following the advice on the wiki of adding
/scripts/context/ruby to rubylib, everything works fine. However, I am
not able to enable write18. I copied texexec.rme to texexec.ini and
added -shell-escape to all set
--- On Feb 28, Aditya Mahajan wrote ---
I was trying to make the stand along context work with cygwin using
cygwin ruby. Following the advice on the wiki of adding
/scripts/context/ruby to rubylib, everything works fine. However, I am
not able to enable write18. I copied texexec.rme
Jose Ignacio Marín Alberdi wrote:
Hi all,
I am experiencing some trouble using mswincontext.zip.
I have properly installed perl and ruby as the wiki says.
(http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Windows_Installation#Stand-alone_ConTeXt_dist
ribution)
But when it comes to use cdemo.bat I got
: lunes, 27 de febrero de 2006 13:08
Para: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Asunto: Re: [NTG-context] mswincontext.zip installation
Jose Ignacio Marín Alberdi wrote:
Hi all,
I am experiencing some trouble using mswincontext.zip.
I have properly installed perl and ruby as the wiki says.
(http
Hi all,
I am experiencing some trouble using mswincontext.zip.
I have properly installed perl and ruby as the wiki says.
(http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Windows_Installation#Stand-alone_ConTeXt_dist
ribution)
But when it comes to use cdemo.bat I got:
texmfstart newtexexec.rb --autopdf --pdf
Subject: [NTG-context] mswincontext.zip installation
Hi all,
I am experiencing some trouble using mswincontext.zip.
I have properly installed perl and ruby as the wiki says.
(http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Windows_Installation#Stand-alone_ConTeXt_dist
ribution)
But when it comes to use cdemo.bat I
to make ConTeXt documents from
wiki pages! :-)
I have a mediawiki2... ruby script where ... is currently html and
xml. Its not perfect yet and not published anywhere, but if anybody is
interested in doing some ConTeXt stuff there
Firstly i would like to integrate Context in my wiki, like you
Hi Taco, happy to read you again :-) !
I don't have texmfstart. It is a win script, isn't it ? I have a debian
box. Maybe I have to do some hacks in m-gnuplot.
I have try ruby
/usr/local/texlive/2005/texmf-dist/scripts/context/ruby/newpstopdf.rb
--method=raw m-gnuplot-gnuplot-1.ps
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Hi Taco, happy to read you again :-) !
I don't have texmfstart. It is a win script, isn't it ? I have a debian
box. Maybe I have to do some hacks in m-gnuplot.
I have try ruby
/usr/local/texlive/2005/texmf-dist/scripts/context/ruby/newpstopdf.rb
--method=raw m-gnuplot
Hi Hans,
texmfstart is a ruby script (in scritps/context/ruby); Normally there
should be a copy without suffix in some bin path
No... I have put a copy in /usr/local/bin and texexec --pdf --mode=demo
m-gnuplot works now.
depends on how you installed the lucidas's
texfont --en
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Hi Hans,
texmfstart is a ruby script (in scritps/context/ruby); Normally there
should be a copy without suffix in some bin path
No... I have put a copy in /usr/local/bin and texexec --pdf
--mode=demo m-gnuplot works now.
depends on how you installed the lucidas's
Hooman Javidnia wrote:
Hi Hans and Taco,
Thanks to all your guidance and a lot of trial and error, now I have a
SciTE under windwos XP which works. There is one strange feature though. I
had to put the .exe version of texmfstart into the scripts ruby scripts
folder so that my files get
Hi Hans and Taco,
Thanks to all your guidance and a lot of trial and error, now I have a
SciTE under windwos XP which works. There is one strange feature though. I
had to put the .exe version of texmfstart into the scripts ruby scripts
folder so that my files get compiled. SciTE can't understand
={latex,pdflatex,plain,pdfetex}
etc.? No need to do smart things, just run the command
that results from engine+format, once.
the ruby version of texexec can handle that (if i did it right);
Hans
to covnert it to VimL. I do not want to
reinvent the wheel.
her eis the ruby method used in newtexexec:
def scantexcontent(filename)
if FileTest.file?(filename) and tex = File.open(filename) then
while str = tex.gets do
case str.chomp
`--engine=pdfetex'
take a kpsewhich from the latest tex live; it looks like miktex does not have a
recent one;
(well, meybe it's about time to the ruby version and use the alternative kpse
script)
Hans
/ruby/base/tex.rb:
1249:in `processfile'TeXExec | option 'filename' is set to
'beredsamkeit.tex'
TeXExec | option 'mainlanguage' is set to 'standard'
TeXExec | option 'bodyfont' is set to 'standard'
TeXExec | option 'language' is set to 'standard'
TeXExec | option 'engine' is set to 'standard
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Sorry it's me again who's breaking the bad news... Today's release
seems to have a bug; newtexexec won't run. Here's the output I get:
On line 1249 in scripts/context/ruby/base/tex.rb there is a bare
if verbose. It should be if getvariable('verbose')
Cheers, Taco
/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/base/tex.rb:
1249:in `processfile'TeXExec | option 'filename' is set to
'beredsamkeit.tex'
TeXExec | option 'mainlanguage' is set to 'standard'
TeXExec | option 'bodyfont' is set to 'standard'
TeXExec | option 'language' is set to 'standard'
TeXExec
news... Today's release
seems to have a bug; newtexexec won't run. Here's the output I get:
On line 1249 in scripts/context/ruby/base/tex.rb there is a bare
if verbose. It should be if getvariable('verbose')
Cheers, Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
Hooman Javidnia wrote:
texexec is known, I know this because I can run it from command
line. texmfstart is located in
E:\TeXLive2005\texmf-dist\scripts\context\ruby but I am not sure if it is
known to the system or not. How can I test this? Should I tweak any file
or add to to PATH variable
Hooman Javidnia wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hooman Javidnia wrote:
texexec is known, I know this because I can run it from command
line. texmfstart is located in
E:\TeXLive2005\texmf-dist\scripts\context\ruby but I am not sure if it is
known to the system
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hooman Javidnia wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hooman Javidnia wrote:
texexec is known, I know this because I can run it from command
line. texmfstart is located in
E:\TeXLive2005\texmf-dist\scripts\context\ruby but I
:\TeXLive2005\texmf-dist\scripts\context\ruby but I am not sure if it is
known to the system or not. How can I test this? Should I tweak any file
or add to to PATH variable?
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo
done
everything in SCiTE in ConTeXt manual, but I can't still compile my files. I
have to go to command line and do it manually. Should I install Ruby on my
machine? What is Ruby for anyway? Where should I get those .rb scripts and
where should I put them?
Keep up the good work,
Cheers,
Hooman
Hooman Javidnia wrote:
It seems that SciTE can't still detect type of the file that I want to
compile or build. I get the same message when I Build myfile.tex too,
although Build process finishes without any errors.
run this once in a console:
FTYPE RubyScript=c:\data\system\ruby\bin
done
everything in SCiTE in ConTeXt manual, but I can't still compile my
files. I have to go to command line and do it manually. Should I install
Ruby on my machine? What is Ruby for anyway? Where should I get those .rb
scripts and where should I put them?
Keep up the good work,
Cheers,
Hooman
Hooman Javidnia wrote:
Should I install Ruby on my machine?
Yes, you'll need both Ruby and Perl. Both are scripting languages.
You must have missed the discussion about this earlier today, but no
problem, it got wikified:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Windows_Installation#Stand
It would of course help if I learned to read - I didn't exactly answer
your question fully and I'm sorry about that. I cannot quite answer to
all parts of your questions, but here's a bit more:
Yes, you need to have working installations of Ruby and Perl on your
computer. If you can make
Thanks Mari for the very valuable advice. With your help, now I have
something that works (kind of): Here is what I did:
1. I installed Ruby. I have no idea why it should be installed on a system
so that ConTeXt works.
2. I downloaded texmfstart.exe and put in the texmf bin folder (I have
need to install Perl and Ruby.
Take a look at: http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2005/014223.html
If you had instaled Miktex on Windows before you should note that
you might need to take Miktex from your PATH. I had to do it.
Miguel Queirós
? Is there an editor in this zip configured and ready
to go?
the slightly bigger variant is cdwincontext, which has also scite ruby
and perl; if you put that on a windows machine, and run the bat file in
the root path you have a stand alone environment (in projects, this is
what we give authors
someone explain to me what this is? If it is downloaded and
unzipped, is it ready to go? Is there documentation of this
particular zip? Is there an editor in this zip configured and
ready to go?
the slightly bigger variant is cdwincontext, which has also scite
ruby and perl; if you put
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I had a similar problem. I needed cygwin ruby because there are
certain ruby packages (e.g. narray) that I could get to work with
cygwin ruby without any hassle but do not work with the ruby one click
installer. But cygwin ruby and context do not go together. I
David Arnold wrote:
Will it be required to install Ruby and/or Lua on the windows
platform? If so, is this the binary I should download and install?
http://luaforge.net/frs/download.php/1148/lua5_1b1_Win32_bin.tar.gz
Anything else required besides perl?
Not always required, but I would
David Arnold wrote:
Will it be required to install Ruby and/or Lua on the windows
platform? If so, is this the binary I should download and install?
http://luaforge.net/frs/download.php/1148/lua5_1b1_Win32_bin.tar.gz
Anything else required besides perl?
also reacting to anouther mail
as they are and use another distro
instead.)
I'm not sure, but I guess that you would need tetex to run it from
bash. Don't ask me about the numerous (still unsolved) problems I had
just because the ruby executable is only available under cygwin at the
university.
Mojca
than in miktex.
I'm not sure, but I guess that you would need tetex to run it from
bash. Don't ask me about the numerous (still unsolved) problems I had
just because the ruby executable is only available under cygwin at the
university.
I had a similar problem. I needed cygwin ruby because
Will it be required to install Ruby and/or Lua on the windows
platform? If so, is this the binary I should download and install?
http://luaforge.net/frs/download.php/1148/lua5_1b1_Win32_bin.tar.gz
Anything else required besides perl?
On Jan 15, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
David
not just use, e.g., Ruby (less languages for me to
learn-)?
But you are quite right: the otp language is a real bear...
Best
Idris
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
it such a great tool? Why not just use, e.g., Ruby (less
languages for me to learn-)?
well, there is google ...
lua is
- small, so no huge overhead and expanding library base
- clever enough for the job needed
- a well designed embedded language
- fun
But you are quite right: the otp
sjoerd siebinga wrote:
I have made a Ruby-script (for personal use loosely based on Adam's
xsl-files) which generates all the encoding- and symbolfiles from a
given cmapfile. If someone could send me the ttf-font, I can generate
all the necessary encodingfiles for you.
the chinese fonts
Hi,
sjoerd siebinga wrote:
I have made a Ruby-script (for personal use loosely based on Adam's
xsl-files) which generates all the encoding- and symbolfiles from a
given cmapfile. If someone could send me the ttf-font, I can generate
all the necessary encodingfiles for you.
Nice
On 13 Dec 2005, at 11:34, Hans Hagen wrote:
sjoerd siebinga wrote:
I have made a Ruby-script (for personal use loosely based on
Adam's xsl-files) which generates all the encoding- and
symbolfiles from a given cmapfile. If someone could send me the
ttf-font, I can generate all
sjoerd siebinga wrote:
On 13 Dec 2005, at 11:34, Hans Hagen wrote:
sjoerd siebinga wrote:
I have made a Ruby-script (for personal use loosely based on
Adam's xsl-files) which generates all the encoding- and
symbolfiles from a given cmapfile. If someone could send me the
ttf-font, I
ktt wrote:
Yes, that's true.
ok, let's solve this off-list; i'll send you a patched ruby script for
testing
Hans
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Perl and Ruby to
be installed.
By the way... Are there any sugestions on the installation
of Ruby and Perl on windows ?
http://www.activestate.com/ they provide avtivepearl. It's no problem
to install it.
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/ there you get ruby. They provide a link
tracked in the collector?
is that dll needed? afaik the kpse dll is: tl90kpse.dll
maybe you're calling the wrong binary?
btw 1: since the kpse library is not that suited for usage outside the
tex collection of binaries (the interface changes now and then) i
decided to write a ruby variant. since
is a new command to be used like \item, \head and \sym
inside itemgroups (e.g. '\startitemize ... \stopitemize')
* texmfstart can be used to generate the stub commands like
'texfont' now
Bugs fixed compared to the 2005.11.16 version:
* the new texexec (in ruby) has gained some backward
http://www.activestate.com/ they provide avtivepearl. It's no problem
to install it.
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/ there you get ruby. They provide a link to
the one click ruby installer which you will find here:
http://rubyinstaller.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl there is the
I'v had
there
should be an updated manual about how to install context.
I'm still using a context version from 2004.08 as it is the
only one it worked for me. I downloaded as far as I remember
the file mswincontext.zip , the stand alone version of
context, but the newer versions need Perl and Ruby
I mentioned this earlier but had only now time to look into it: there
appears to be a bug in newtexexec, it bombs out when I try to post-
process pdf-files. Here's a log:
ruby /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/
newtexexec.rb --pdfselect --selection=1 grammatik2.pdf
to all of Gerben's latest stuff, so I
am as current as I can be with that distribution.
I do have Ruby on this Mac.
So, hold my hand and and guide me through the compile stage. The
first problem, as I see it, is to get the expected organizational
tree for these manuals For example
. But successful ones. Just the way I like to work. :-)
Now, I want to compile mfonts.tex. Ruby is on my system (Mac Tiger).
fonts $ which ruby
/usr/bin/ruby
I am looking in mfonts.rb:
fonts $ cat mfonts.rb
# usage: runtools mfonts.rb
#
# copyright=pragma-ade readme=readme.pdf licence=cc-gpl
job = Job.new
Hi,
The following manual source trees are now available:
allkind (some)
columns (whole manual)
details (whole manual)
lua (experimental)
magazines (all)
metafun (whole manual)
some of them use independent pdf files (as image) which need to be
processed using the provides ruby
are now available:
allkind (some)
columns (whole manual)
details (whole manual)
lua (experimental)
magazines (all)
metafun (whole manual)
some of them use independent pdf files (as image) which need to be
processed using the provides ruby 'runtools' script [runtools is my way
Hi,
On Die 15.11.2005 14:32, Hans Hagen wrote:
I also want to move on to the ruby variants of texexec and texutil, so
i want the latest versions to be available (for testers).
is the perl-version still avilable?
Because the most platform have perl in the default installation ;-)
Greetings
Alexander Lazic wrote:
Hi,
On Die 15.11.2005 14:32, Hans Hagen wrote:
I also want to move on to the ruby variants of texexec and texutil, so
i want the latest versions to be available (for testers).
is the perl-version still avilable?
Because the most platform have perl in the default
from the http://modules.contextgarden.net site.
(currently, it contains only the 'ConTeXt Lettrines' module)
Bugs fixed compared to the 2005.11.15 version:
* some ongoing bugfixes to the new ruby scripts
* \sqrt can now again be used in ToCs and captions (etc.)
* \type can again be used
Hi,
The next couple of weeks there will probably more 'updates' than normal;
this is due to the fact that i'm adding long due features and such. I
also want to move on to the ruby variants of texexec and texutil, so i
want the latest versions to be available (for testers).
Currently I'm
1001 - 1100 of 1321 matches
Mail list logo
