I think the question makes sense as SynonymGraphFilterFactory accepts
tokenizerFactory,
he asked the managed version of SynonymGraphFilter could accept it as well.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/filter-descriptions.html#synonym-graph-filter
The answer seems to be NO.
Koji
On
Hi,
I have a use case that one of our customers wants to set different mm parameter
per field,
as in some fields of qf, unexpectedly many terms are produced because they are
N-gram fields
while in other fields, few terms are produced because they are normal text
fields.
If it is reasonable,
eck, is this supported in Solr 7.4.0?
Regards,
Edwin
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 11:02, Koji Sekiguchi
wrote:
Hi,
> https://github.com/airalcorn2/Solr-LTR#RankNet
>
> Has anyone tried on this before? And what is the format of the training
> data that this model requires?
I haven't tried i
Hi,
> https://github.com/airalcorn2/Solr-LTR#RankNet
>
> Has anyone tried on this before? And what is the format of the training
> data that this model requires?
I haven't tried it, but I'd like to inform you that there is another project of LTR we've been
developed:
Hi,
I don't think Lucene/Solr can know which field matches the query you posted.
You should usually use Highlighter to know it.
Koji
On 2017/08/22 2:46, ruby wrote:
Is there a way to return only the matched field from a multivalued field
using filtering?
--
View this message in context:
Hi Shamik,
I'm sorry but I don't understand why you use KeywordRepeatFilter.
I think it's normal to create separate fields to solve this kind of problems.
Why don't you have another separate field which has ShingleFilter as I
mentioned in the previous reply?
Koji
On 2017/07/20 12:13, shamik
Hi Shamik,
How about using ShingleFilter which constructs token n-grams from a token
stream?
http://lucene.apache.org/core/6_6_0/analyzers-common/org/apache/lucene/analysis/shingle/ShingleFilter.html
As for "about dynamic block", ShingleFilter produces "about dynamic" and "dynamic
block".
Hi,
ExternalFileField was introduced via SOLR-351.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-351
The author thought values could optionally be updated often...
I think it describes why it is read from not config, but datadir.
Koji
On 2017/06/29 17:17, apoorvqwerty wrote:
Hi,
As per the
Hi Walter,
May I ask a tangential question? I'm curious the following line you wrote:
> Solr is a vector-space engine. Some early engines (Verity VDK) were probabilistic engines. Those
do give an absolute estimate of the relevance of each hit. Unfortunately, the relevance of results
is just
Hi,
I'm not sure that it can help you but I'd like to show you the link of an
article
which I wrote about document classification years ago:
Comparing Document Classification Functions of Lucene and Mahout
Hi Peter,
I'm not sure if I can correctly see the result you attached, I think it sounds
reasonable to me
that you couldn't get search result, because your query 均匀肤色 is used as it is
without
being analyzed whereas the same string 均匀肤色 is tokenized as 均匀 匀肤 肤色 in the
index.
So it is obvious
Hi,
NLP4L[1] has not only Learning-to-Rank module but also a module which calculates
click model and converts it into pointwise annotation data.
NLP4L has a comprehensive manual[2], but you may want to read "Click Log
Analysis"
section[3] first to see if it suits your requirements.
Hope this
Hello Panagiotis,
I'm sorry but it's a feature. As for hl.usePhraseHighlighter parameter, when
you turn off it,
you may get only foo or bar highlighted in your snippets.
Koji
On 2016/09/18 15:55, Panagiotis T wrote:
I'm using Solr 6.2 (tried with 6.1 also)
I created a new core and the only
Hello,
I'm curious, why do you want the particular document to place second, not top,
of the result for a particular query?
Sorry this isn't the answer for your question, but I think you can implement it
rather easy
if you study the existing query elevation.
Koji
On 2016/07/08 19:59,
Hi,
... must have one and only one and
it can have zero or more s. From the point of view of the
rules, your ... is not correct
because it has more than one and
... is not correct as well because it has no .
Koji
On 2016/03/02 20:25, G, Rajesh wrote:
Hi Team,
Can you please clarify the
Hi Teague,
I couldn't understand the part of "document size" in your question, but if
you'd like
Solr to return snippet
My search phrase
instead of
My search phrase
you should use FastVectorHighlighter. In case use of FVH, your highlight field
(hl.fl=text)
need to be indexed with options
Hi Vitaly,
I'm not sure I understand you correctly, why don't you put EdgeNGramFilter just
after
ShingleFilter? That is:
Koji
On 2015/10/15 22:47, vitaly bulgakov wrote:
I want to rephrase my question I asked in another post.
As far as I understand filter ShingleFilterFactory creates
Hi Mark,
I think I saw similar requirement recently in mailing list. The feature sounds
reasonable to me.
> If not, how do I go about posting this as a feature request?
JIRA can be used for the purpose, but there is no guarantee that the feature is
implemented. :(
Koji
On 2015/10/01 20:07,
Hi Vincenzo,
By intuition, regardless of what value you set for attributes such as expand or
ignoreCase,
I think synonym records that LHS==RHS are meaningless. That is, you can remove
these lines.
Koji
On 2015/09/17 16:51, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
Hello,
this may be a silly question.
I
Hi brent3600,
You can use NLP4L for this purpose. NLP4L is good at counting the number of
words
not only in whole index but also in a set of documents. There is a tutorial
for this function.
Count the number of words
http://nlp4l.github.io/tutorial_ja.html#useNLP
Sorry but the tutorial is
Hi,
You're right. Those sets are same each other, only documents order is different.
Koji
On 2015/03/26 0:53, innoculou wrote:
If I do an initial search without any field sorting; and then do the exact
same query but also sort one field will I get the same result set in the
subsequent query
Lucene uses TFIDFSimilarity class to calculate the similarity.
It is implemented on the idea of cosine measurement but it modifies the cosine
formula.
Please take a look at Lucene Practical Scoring Function in the following
Javadoc:
Hello,
It's my pleasure to share that I have an interesting tool word2vec for Lucene
available at https://github.com/kojisekig/word2vec-lucene .
As you can imagine, you can use word2vec for Lucene to extract word vectors
from Lucene index.
Thank you,
Koji
--
') + vector('woman')
is close to
vector('queen')
Thanks,
Koji
(2014/11/20 20:01), Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Hello Koji,
how would you compare that to SemanticVectors?
paul
On 20 nov. 2014, at 10:10, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
Hello,
It's my pleasure to share that I have
more transparent math in the web-page.
Maybe this helps a bit?
SemanticVectors has always rather pleasant for the LSI/LSA-like approach, but
precisely this is mathematically opaque.
Maybe it's more a question of presentation.
Paul
On 20 nov. 2014, at 16:24, Koji Sekiguchi k
has always rather pleasant for the LSI/LSA-like approach,
but precisely this is mathematically opaque.
Maybe it's more a question of presentation.
Paul
On 20 nov. 2014, at 16:24, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Paul,
I cannot compare it to SemanticVectors as I don't know
Hi Ali,
I don't think Solr has such function OOTB. One way I can think of is that
you can implement UpdateRequestProcessor. In processAdd() method of
the UpdateRequestProcessor, as you can read field values, you can calculate
the total score and copy the total score to a field e.g. total_score.
Hi Jan,
(2014/09/05 21:01), Jan Verweij - Reeleez wrote:
Hi,
If I'm correct you will get a statuscode=0 in the response if you
use XML messages for updating the solr index.
I think you mean by statuscode=0 is status=0 here.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
response
lst
Hi Peter,
It seems like a bug to me, too. Please file a JIRA ticket if you can
so that someone can take it.
Koji
--
http://soleami.com/blog/comparing-document-classification-functions-of-lucene-and-mahout.html
(2014/08/05 22:34), Peter Keegan wrote:
When there are multiple 'external file
Hi,
In addition, this might be useful:
Fundamentals of Information Retrieval, Illustration with Apache Lucene
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCsS5ePGmCs
This video is about 40 minutes long, but you can fast forward to 24:00
to learn scoring based on vector space model and how Lucene customize
Hi Teague,
If you want phrase-unit tagging for highlighter, you need to use
FastVectorHighlighter instead of the ordinary Highlighter.
To turn on FVH, set hl.useFastVectorHighlighter=on when querying.
In addition, when indexing, you need to set termVectors=on, termPositions=on
and
Hi Manuel,
I think OCR error correction is one of well-known NLP tasks.
I'd thought it could be implemented in the past by using Lucene.
This is a brief idea:
1. You have got a Lucene index. This existing index is made from
correct (i.e. error free) documents that are same domain of OCR
In addition, KeywordTokenizer can be seemingly used but it should be avoided
for unique key field. One of my customers that used it and they had got OOM
during a long term indexing. As it was difficult to find the problem,
I'd like to share my experience.
Koji
--
Hi Bijan,
Have you tried to set hl.maxAnalyzedChars parameter to larger number?
hl.maxAnalyzedChars
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.maxAnalyzedChars
As the default value of the parameter is 51200, if the second Andy is
at the end paragraph of your large stored field, the
(2014/03/26 2:29), abhishek jain wrote:
hi friends,
when i search for A and B it gives me result for A , B , i am not sure
why?
Please guide how can i exact match when it is within phrase/quotes.
Generally speaking (w/ LuceneQParser), if you want phrase match results,
use quotes, i.e. q=A B.
1. Nutch follows the links within HTML web pages to crawl the full graph of a
web of pages.
In addition, I think Nutch has PageRank-like scoring function as opposed to
Lucene/Solr, those are based on vector space model scoring.
koji
--
Hi,
I'm not sure but you probably met Tika exception.
Have you checked Apache Tika mailing list?
Hmm, just now I googled Your document contained more than 10 characters,
I found a page in StackOverFlow. According to it, there is API to change
the limit. But I don't know whether Solr can
Hi,
(13/12/16 19:46), Nutan wrote:
how to index pdf,doc files from browser?
I think you can index from browser.
If you said that
this query is used for indexing :
curl
http://localhost:8080/solr/document/update/extract?literal.id=12commit=true;
Hi Dileepa,
The stanbolInterceptor processor chain will be used in multiple request
handlers. Then I will have to pass the stanbol.enhancer.url param in each
of those request handler which will cause redundant configurations.
Therefore I need to pass the param to the processor directly.
But
(13/11/13 22:25), Anupam Bhattacharya wrote:
How can I post the whole XML string to SOLR using its SOLRJ API ?
The source code of SimplePostTool would be of some help:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_5_1/solr-core/org/apache/solr/util/SimplePostTool.html
koji
--
(13/11/10 3:43), Andreas Owen wrote:
I have a multivalue field with links pointing to ids of solrdocuments. I
would like calculate how many links are pointing to each document und put
that number into the field links2me. How can I do this, I would prefer to do
it with a query and the updater so
(13/11/06 9:00), PeterKerk wrote:
By default solr sorts facets by the amount of hits for each result. However,
I want to sort by facetnames alphabetically. Earlier I sorted the facets on
the client or via my .NET code, however, this time I need solr to return the
results with alphabetically
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: class
com.mahout.solr.classifier.CategorizeDocumentFactory
at java.lang.Class.asSubclass(Unknown Source)
at
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.findClass(SolrResourceLoader.java:433)
at
(13/10/30 22:09), lovely kasi wrote:
Hi,
I made few changes to the solrconfig.xml, created a jar file,added it to
the lib folder of the solr and tried to start it.
THe changes in the solrconfig.xml are
updateRequestProcessorChain name=mahoutclassifier default=true
processor
Hi Siva,
(13/10/30 18:12), sivaprasad wrote:
Hi,
We have a requirement where we need to send the matched synonyms as part of
Solr response.
I don't think that Solr has such function.
Do we need to customize the Solr response handler to do this?
So the answer is yes.
koji
--
Hi Suren,
(13/10/25 23:36), Suren Raju wrote:
Hi,
We are trying to solve a business problem by performing solr more like this
query. We are able to perform the more like this search. We have a specific
use case that requires different boost on different match fields. Say i do
more like this
Hi Mingz,
If you use Eclipse, you can debug Solr with your plugin like this:
# go to Solr install directory
$ cd $SOLR
$ ant run-example -Dexample.debug=true
Then connect the JVM from Eclipse via remote debug port 5005.
Good luck!
koji
(13/10/21 18:58), Mingzhu Gao wrote:
More information
)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1904)
at
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:659)
at
org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:362)
... 16 more
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
Hi
Hi Roland,
(13/10/17 20:44), Roland Everaert wrote:
Hi,
I helped a customer to deployed solr+manifoldCF and everything is going
quite smoothly, but every time solr is raising an exception, the
manifoldcfjob feeding
solr aborts. I would like to know if it is possible to configure the
(13/10/16 17:47), elfu wrote:
hi,
can i access TermVector information using solrj ?
There is TermVectorComponent to get termVector info:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermVectorComponent
So yes, you can access it using solrj.
koji
--
Hi Tim,
(13/10/15 5:22), Tim Vaillancourt wrote:
Hey guys,
Sorry for such a simple question, but I am curious as to the differences in
caching between a
combined filter query, and many separate filter queries.
Here are 2 example queries, one with combined fq, one separate:
1)
(13/10/10 18:17), Silvia Suárez wrote:
I am using solrj as client for indexing documents on the solr server I am
new to solr, And I am having problem with the highlighting in solr.
Highlighting exact phrases with solr does not work.
For example if the search keyword is: dulce hogar it returns:
See line 33 to 50 at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/QParserPlugin.java?view=markup
koji
--
http://soleami.com/blog/automatically-acquiring-synonym-knowledge-from-wikipedia.html
(13/08/11 8:05), William Bell wrote:
Can you list them out?
(13/08/04 14:36), Alex Cougarman wrote:
Hi all. I'm having some issues with highlighting and proximity searching in
Solr 4.x. Matching words in the query are sometimes highlighted even if they
are not within proximity and in some cases, matching words in the query are not
highlighted at all.
(13/08/02 17:53), Jochen Lienhard wrote:
Hello,
we have a problem with some special characters: for example æ
We are using the ICUTranformFilterFactory for indexing and searching.
We have some documents with urianae and with urianæ
If I search urainae so I find only the versions with
I have tried doing this via custom SearchComponent, where I can find all similar
documents for each document in current search result, then add a new field into
document hoping to use sort parameter (q=*sort=similarityCount).
I don't understand this part very well, but:
But this will not
You may want collocations a given word? I've implemented LUCENE-474 for Solr
a while ago and I found it worked pretty well.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-474
Hope this helps.
koji
--
http://soleami.com/blog/automatically-acquiring-synonym-knowledge-from-wikipedia.html
(13/07/04
Hi Dotan,
(13/07/04 23:51), Dotan Cohen wrote:
Thank you Jack and Koji. I will take a look at MLT and also at the
.zip files from LUCENE-474. Koji, did you have to modify the code for
the latest Solr?
Yes. As the Lucene APIs for accessing index have been changed,
I had to modify the code.
shared source code / jar for the same so at it could be used ?
Thanks,
Rajesh
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for cross post. I just wanted to announce that I've written a blog
post on
how to create synonyms.txt file automatically from
Hi Jack,
I'd like to ask as a person who contributed a case study article about
Automatically acquiring synonym knowledge from Wikipedia to the book.
(13/05/24 8:14), Jack Krupansky wrote:
To those of you who may have heard about the Lucene/Solr book that I and two
others are writing on
Hello,
Sorry for cross post. I just wanted to announce that I've written a blog post on
how to create synonyms.txt file automatically from Wikipedia:
http://soleami.com/blog/automatically-acquiring-synonym-knowledge-from-wikipedia.html
Hope that the article gives someone a good experience!
contribution, that would be great. The focus
of the book will be
hard-core Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Koji Sekiguchi
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 8:07 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Note on The Book
Hi Jack,
I'd like to ask as a person who contributed a case
(13/05/20 20:53), J Mohamed Zahoor wrote:
Hi
How do i disable cache (Solr FieldValueCache) for certain queries...
using HTTP it can be done using {!cache=false}...
how can i do it from solrj?
./zahoor
How about using facet.method=enum?
koji
--
(13/04/24 7:09), Petersen, Robert wrote:
Hi guys,
What would happen if I changed a field definition on an existing field in an
existing index from stored to not stored? Would solr just party on ignoring
the fact that this field's data is stored in the current index? I noticed I am
(13/04/19 23:24), Achim Domma wrote:
Hi,
I'm executing a search including a search for similar documents
(mlt=truemlt.fl=) which works fine so far. I would like to get the
similarity value for each document. I expected this to be quite common and simple,
but I could not find a hint how
Hi Mark,
Is it possible to do a conditional query if another query has no results? For example, say I
want to search against a given field for:
- Search for car. If there are results, return them.
- Else, search for car* . If there are results, return them.
- Else, search for car~ . If
(13/04/02 21:45), Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Is there any documentation something like flow chart of Solr. i.e.
Documents comes into Solr(maybe indicating which classes get documents) and
goes to parsing process (i.e. stemming processes etc.) and then reverse
indexes are get so on so forth?
There
(13/04/03 5:27), Van Tassell, Kristian wrote:
Thanks Koji, this helped with some of our problems, but it is still not
perfect.
This query, for example, returns no highlighting:
?q=id:abc123hl.q=text_it_IT:l'assiemehl.fl=text_it_IThl=truedefType=edismax
But this one does (when it is, in
(13/03/20 6:14), Van Tassell, Kristian wrote:
...but I'm finding some examples where the stored text is so big (14,000 words)
that Solr fails to highlight anything. But the data is definitely in the text
field and is returning due to that hit.
Does anyone have any ideas why this happens?
Hi Sarita,
I've not dug into your code detail but my first impression is that
you are missing store term positions?
FieldType fieldType = new FieldType(); IndexOptions indexOptions =
IndexOptions.DOCS_AND_FREQS_AND_POSITIONS_AND_OFFSETS;
fieldType.setIndexOptions(indexOptions);
Hi Jochen,
There is a restriction in FVH. FVH cannot deal with variable gram size.
That is, minGramSize == maxGramSize in your NGramFilterFactory setting.
koji
--
http://soleami.com/blog/lucene-4-is-super-convenient-for-developing-nlp-tools.html
(13/03/18 22:17), Jochen Just wrote:
So just to be clear:
There is no possibility to highlight results, if I use variable gram size.
Neither the original highlighter nor FVH do the job.
Or am I missing something?
I don't know the latest original highlighter has such restriction or not today,
but when FVH came in 2.9, at that time,
(13/03/16 4:08), Van Tassell, Kristian wrote:
Hello everyone,
If I search for a term “baz” and tell it to highlight it, it highlights just
fine.
If, however, I search for “foo bar” using the q parameter, which appears in
that same document/same field, and use the hl.q parameter to
Hi Alex,
(13/02/23 10:53), alx...@aim.com wrote:
Hello,
I was unable to change pre and post tags for highlighting when
usefastVectorHighlighter is set to true. Changing default tags in
solrconfig.xml works for standard highlighter though. I searched mailing list
and the net with no success.
(12/11/20 1:50), Gabriel Croitoru wrote:
Hello,
I'm using Solr 1.3 with http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
options.
The client just asked us to change the order from the default score to the
number of hl.snippets per
document.
It's this posibble from Solr configuration?
(12/11/09 19:20), mechravi25 wrote:
Hi All,
Im using Solr 3.6.1 version. For the issue given in the following url, there
is no patch file provided
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3790
Can you tell me if there is patch file for the same?
Also, We noticed that the below url had the
(12/10/11 20:40), ahmed wrote:
Hi, Thanks for reply
i fact i tried this tutorial but when i execute 'ant compile' i have
probleme taht class not found despite the class a re their.I dont know wats
the probleme
I think if you attach the error you got helps us to understand your problem.
Also
(12/09/27 22:45), darshan wrote:
Hi All,
Can anyone refer me few number blogs that explains both
imports in little bit more detail and with examples.
Thanks,
Darshan
Asking Google, I got:
http://www.arunchinnachamy.com/apache-solr-mysql-data-import/
(12/09/27 9:29), Radim Kolar wrote:
Its possible to use SOLR binary protocol instead of xml for taking TO SOLR? I
know that it can be
used in Solr reply.
Have you looked javabin?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/javabin
koji
--
http://soleami.com/blog/starting-lab-work.html
Hi Arcadius,
I think it is a feature. If no match terms found on hl.fl fields then it
triggers
hl.alternateField function, and if you set hl.maxAlternateFieldLength=[LENGTH],
the highlighter extracts the first [LENGTH] characters of stored data of the
hl.fl
field. As this is the common feature
Use delimiter option instead of pattern for PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory
koji
--
http://soleami.com/blog/starting-lab-work.html
(12/09/12 22:22), mechravi25 wrote:
Hi,
Im Using Solr 3.6.1 version
(12/07/09 19:41), Alok Bhandari wrote:
Hello,
this is how the field is declared in schema.xml
fieldType name=text_path class=solr.TextField stored=true
indexed=true positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer
tokenizer class=solr.PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory/
filter
My problem was gone. Thanks Staszek and Dawid!
koji
--
Query Log Visualizer for Apache Solr
http://soleami.com/
(12/05/21 18:11), Stanislaw Osinski wrote:
Hi Koji,
Dawid came up with a simple fix for this, it's committed to trunk and 3.6
branch.
Staszek
Hello,
As I'd like to use custom ITokenizerFactory, I set the following Carrot2 key
in solrconfig.xml:
searchComponent name=clustering
enable=${solr.clustering.enabled:true}
class=solr.clustering.ClusteringComponent
lst name=engine
str
Hi Staszek,
I'll wait your fix. Thank you!
Koji Sekiguchi from iPad2
On 2012/05/20, at 18:18, Stanislaw Osinski stanis...@osinski.name wrote:
Hi Koji,
You're right, the current code overwrites the custom tokenizer though it
shouldn't. LuceneCarrot2TokenizerFactory is there to avoid
(12/05/20 23:21), Xue-Feng Yang wrote:
Hi Staszek,
I haven't found a way for inputting data into solr in the wiki. Does that mean
docs can be inputted in a normal solr way after configuration? for example, DIH
or solrj.
Thanks,
Xue-Feng
Right, because Carrot2 clustering is for search
with
this, let me know.
Staszek
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Koji Sekiguchik...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Staszek,
I'll wait your fix. Thank you!
Koji Sekiguchi from iPad2
On 2012/05/20, at 18:18, Stanislaw Osinskistanis...@osinski.name wrote:
Hi Koji,
You're right, the current code overwrites
(12/05/07 15:38), James wrote:
I notice the index replication utilize the full bandwidth. So the normal query
stalled. Is there any method to control the bandwidth of replication?
I don't know the status of Java based replication, but there is bwlimit
option for your problem for script based
(12/05/03 1:39), Noordeen, Roxy wrote:
Hello,
I just started using elevation for solr. I am on solr 3.5, running with Drupal
7, Linux.
1. I updated my solrconfig.xml
from
dataDir${solr.data.dir:./solr/data}/dataDir
To
dataDir/usr/local/tomcat2/data/solr/dev_d7/data/dataDir
2. I placed my
(12/05/02 1:47), Shanmugavel SRD wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone help me on how to integrate sen and lucene-ja.jar in SOLR 3.4
or 3.5 or 3.6 version?
I think lucene-ja.jar no longer exists in Internet and doesn't work with
Lucene/Solr 3.x because interface doesn't match (lucene-ja doesn't know
(12/04/05 15:34), Thomas Werthmüller wrote:
Hi
I configured solr that also word parts are found. When is search Monday
or Mond the right document is found. This is done with the following
configuration in the schema.xml:filter
class=solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory minGramSize=3 maxGramSize=30/.
How does your sequence field look like in schema.xml, fieldType and field?
And what version are you using?
koji
--
Query Log Visualizer for Apache Solr
http://soleami.com/
(12/03/27 13:06), neosky wrote:
all of my highlights has one character mistake in the offset,some fragments
from my
(12/03/09 12:35), Donald Organ wrote:
Are there any reporting tools out there? So I can analyzer search term
frequency, filter frequency, etc?
You may be interested in:
Free Query Log Visualizer for Apache Solr
http://soleami.com/
koji
--
Query Log Visualizer for Apache Solr
(12/03/06 0:11), Donald Organ wrote:
Try to remove tokenizerFactory=**KeywordTokenizerFactory in your
synonym filter
definition because I think you would want to tokenize the synonym settings
in
synonyms.txt as floor / locker = storage / locker. But if you set
it
to KeywordTokenizer, it will be
(12/03/06 11:07), Donald Organ wrote:
No I do synonyms at index time.
:
I am still getting results for storage locker and no results for floor
locker
synonyms.txt still looks like this:
floor locker=storage locker
So that's the cause of the problem. Due to the definition floor
(12/03/06 11:23), Donald Organ wrote:
Ok so do I need to use a different format in my synonyms.txt file in order
to do this at index time?
Right, if you want to apply synonym rules to only index time.
Use , like this:
floor locker, storage locker
And don't forget to set expand=true in your
(12/03/03 20:32), alessio crisantemi wrote:
this is my nutch log after configured it for solr index:
:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Internal Server Error
Internal Server Error
request: http://localhost:8983/solr/update?wt=javabinversion=2
at
(12/03/04 0:09), alessio crisantemi wrote:
is true.
this is the slr problem:
mar 03, 2012 12:08:04 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
Grave: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: invalid boolean value:
Solr said that there was an erroneous boolean value in your solrconfig.xml.
Check
It is not solr error. Consult nutch/hadoop mailing list.
koji
--
Query Log Visualizer for Apache Solr
http://soleami.com/
(12/03/04 2:38), alessio crisantemi wrote:
now,
I solve the boolean problem.
but my indexing don't works now also..
But this time, I don't have error in tomcat log and
(12/03/03 1:39), Donald Organ wrote:
I am trying to get synonyms working correctly, I want to map floor locker
tostorage locker
currently searching for storage locker produces results were as searching
for floor locker does not produce any results.
I have the following setup for index
1 - 100 of 520 matches
Mail list logo
