You'll have to modify the package for squid in /usr/local/pkg/squid.xml.
You should upgrade to the latest version before doing anything:
http://pfsense.com/updates/pfSense-Full-Update-0.70.4.tgz
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Abdul Aziz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet:
1. config all your public IPs as CARP-IPs, so the pfsense will answer them on
wan
2. use firewallNATportforward to forward the virtual IPs to the Servers
inside your Network (check the autocreate rule option)
3. use firewallNAToutbound with enabled advanced outbound NAT to make the
Servers use
An: Holger Bauer
Betreff: Re: AW: [pfSense Support] 73.6 embedded - ssh
Holger Bauer ha scritto:
the ssh passwort always is the webgui password. so change your webguipassword
in the webgui (general setup) to something else and your ssh password will
change with that too.
I restored
A c3 Nehemia 1 GHz can push almost full 100 Mbit/s (I get 89 mbit/s if
testpcs are connected directly to each other and 87 mbit/s with a pfsense in
between)in factory default config of pfsense lan to wan.The
WRAP can push about 20 Mbit/swith the older
versions. The new version from last
From the m0n0 documentation (hidden options in the config.xml file). Same like
m0n0:
interfaces/(if)/media and interfaces/(if)/mediaopt
If you need to force your NIC to a specific media type (e.g. 10Base-T half
duplex), you can use these two options. Refer to the appropriate FreeBSD
manpage
That config is a bit weired but doable with some changes.
I would suggest making LAN1 and LAN2 seperate interfaces (if they are not
already, from the line to the switch it seems to be one and virtual ips won't
work for different subnets on the same nic) and different networks: Connect
LAN1 to
It can be done the way you describe it and I have this setup at home in my
testenvironment (however, I use different subnets on my wans, but it should
work with your setup too as far as I know). If properly configured you should
see the 2 wans used roundrobin. In my setup this means if I
Most of the packages are aiming at more powerful platforms (more diskspace,
more ram, lots of logging) and aren't suitable for the embeddeds. To get rid of
problems like I installed squid to my wrap and now... it was removed. Maybe
it will come back later with a version where you only can
0.50.2? I guess you are talking about 0.85.2, if not upgrade! ;-)
I only have experienced such problems if the carpinterfaces didn't match the
real ip/subnet-range of the real interface the carp interface is running on.
Another thing to try is to manually disable and enable CARP at
Go to http://pfsense.com/index.php?id=22 and follow the link New Installs.
Choose a mirror near you and download the embedded image (like
http://pfsense.iserv.nl/downloads/pfSense-Embedded-0.85.2.img.gz ). Once you
have a version Installed you'll find mini wrap upgrades in the
downloadsection
Just a question (and maybe something I've overread in your original mail). You
have pppoe on WAN. Is your CARP-Interface for WAN or for LAN? pppoe and dchp
interfaces won't work together with CARP. You need at least 3 static IPs on WAN
for this to work (1 for the master, 1 for the backup and 1
-
Von: Rodolfo Vardelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 26. September 2005 13:22
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [pfSense Support] wrap 85.2
Holger Bauer wrote:
After reboot (third), carp interface goes up (as backup).
The interface is a wan interface, but I have a router
-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 10:55 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] 050.2 CARP won't go Master or Backup
0.50.2? I guess you are talking about 0.85.2, if not upgrade! ;-)
I only have experienced such problems
I'm seeing this problem since 0.85.2. the same cd-rom reader was working ever
since pfsense 0.20 for me :-/
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. September 2005 00:12
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE:
ok, I have experienced some strange problems bringing up CARP-Interfaces here
as well (quite reproducable but also a bit sporadic). Scott did several changes
and he finally came up with something that now is running on my systems without
any problems any more (my systems are also syncing via a
Try disabling the ftp-helper under systemadvanced. Also setting your
ftp-client to passive mode might help.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Moacyr Leite da Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2005 15:14
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense
note that monitoring a wan for availability doesn't work at the moment, so if
one wan goes down you'll have some of your connectionattempts go through, some
time out under such a condition. The monitoring feature still has to be
implemented.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mark
we can start selling ringtones at some point for $1? lol
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2005 21:22
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Sesamie Street on 086.2
I think so. I'm not sure how
1. Download the latest full upgradefile from a mirror near you (like
ftp://reflection.ncsa.uiuc.edu/pub/pfSense/updates/pfSense-Full-Update-0.86.4.tgz
). You find the mirrors selection at our page under Downloads/Upgrades.
2. Go in your WebGui to generalfirmware and go to tab manual upgrade
3.
Maybe you can try this: Enter your BIOS and set your drive parameters MANUALLY
(CHS). There was someone reporting this behaviour in the IRC channel and this
solved it for him. Please report back if this makes any difference for the
installation.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
The tutorial is for starters or to show how easy it actually is. Some people
that haven't dealt with embedded platforms and/or a routerdistribution like
m0n0wal or pfsense before might expect it as something that can't be easily
done by them. Btw, that's why it is under the basic section and
We have dyndns-ipsec support, however I have not set it up by now. Only heard
Scott implemented it. Other option (if you want to do it with the ping) would
be to add a cron-job to send a single ping once in a minute. However, as you
can't ping through the tunnel from the pfsense directly you
Hi JD,
I moved your question to the support list. It get's much bigger audience there
and also belongs there. You should subscribe to the list if you are not already
subscribed.
-paste follows-
Configuration:
has anyone
What kind of WAN do you have? In case you have DHCP and are trying to trigger
the updateprocess by unhooking and replugging the interface you might not be
able to test this. There is a fix for replugging cables in the next version. I
think without this fix you're not able to test this but
This FAQ-Entry adresses your question as well:
http://faq.pfsense.com/index.php?sid=4624lang=enaction=artikelcat=4id=78artlang=en
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. November 2005 05:36
An: support@pfsense.com
PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. November 2005 19:56
An: support@pfsense.com
Cc: Holger Bauer
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] PFSense on CF card
Hi Holger,
Thanks for this hint. Great.
I've a probably very stupid question, after changed the
platform to wrap, can
I upgrade
nice
to hear, I'll put it "under construction" so nobody fetches that topic again
:-)
Thanks,
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Christian Veith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. November
2005 23:41An: support@pfsense.comBetreff: [pfSense
Support] Tutorial
In the list beloware the Intel Chipsets that should
work, taken from http://pfsense.com/index.php?id=37,
which is basically the hardwaresupportlist of freebsd6. I don't know if anybody
is using this card with pfsense and as you see it is not listedthere.
However, as it is supported by
.
- Original Message -
From:
Holger Bauer
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:43
PM
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Tutorial
under construction.
nice to hear, I'll put it "under construction" so nobody fetches that
t
The
forum was a kind of "experiment". There were many people complaining about the
lists demanding a forum. We don't shut down the ML because of the forum.
Actually it's up to the user to decide if the forum or the ml is the better way.
>From what it looks at the moment, most people seem to
I have been using all versions of pfsense at my wrap with 4 nics (3 on board, 1
atheros). I noticed random reboots on applying wlan settings with pre .90
versions. This stopped with .90 and never came back. Actually I have been
running .90, .90a, .92 (which was pulled due some issues) and I'm
.
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 1:56 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Boot issues with .90 and .92
I have been using all versions of pfsense at my wrap with 4
nics (3 on board, 1 atheros
I have these in my logs as well with wraps randomly. Doesn't have to do
anything with wireless at all as I'm seeing these even at systems without
wireless from time to time. Never caused an issue for me either.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL
There will be further releases. Beta stage has not yet started but things are
getting there ;-)
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tommaso Di Donato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. November 2005 12:10
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] New
It
depends how much bandwidth you want to handle. The WRAP does WAN to LAN with the
new .93.2 (which has some more optimizations) about 28 mbit/s. I haven't tested
wireless to WAN throughput lately but some versions ago it was pushing about 17
mbit/s in turbo g with WPA. If you need more
I have 3 wraps with cm9 and wpa running as Accesspoints without issues. One of
them was running with 0.84.6 with an uptime of 35 days without any problems
before I updated it today. However, I haven't tried clientmode yet.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich
Thanks for the info, but pfSense should run fine on other hardware than WRAPS
as well AND it actually DOES run stable on other hardware as well. The WRAP is
a very fine device, I agree, but if it comes to pushing larger loads you need
something with more power under the hood (a WRAP does 28+
Just a real-life example:
I have an IPSEC-Mesh between several locations. Each location has it's own VoIP
PBX. The PBXs don't talk to each other unless there is a call. If the tunnel is
down and you try to call a phone at the distant PBX you get a busy before the
tunnel is up (tunnel needs
Heh, looks like this option should be called make voip happy [X]
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: John Cianfarani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. November 2005 22:18
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] IPsec Does Auto Establish work?
Here is my
Depending on how many VoIP-Endpoints you have I would suggest modifying the
VoIP-Rule (It sounds that you only get one phone as you want to set it to about
90-128 kbit/s?) to just hold this one IP. Keep in mind that other programs
using the low delay flag in the IP-Header will go to this queue
Please report the dyndns service that works/works not as well and what kind of
WAN you are using. It might apply only to a certain dyndns service/wan type.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Damien Dupertuis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. November 2005 08:59
An:
Thanks to Dan Solsona we now have a tutorial how to setup policy-based
multi-WAN:
http://pfsense.com/index.php?id=36
Holger
Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
All conf files are generated dynamically from the config.xml, so everything you
copy over get's overwritten sooner or later.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael Lednev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2005 21:42
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff:
Known issue, should be solved with one of the next versions.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: alan walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 15:36
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] 0.95a and wrap
Seem to have an issue with disk usage on
This is already fixed since 0.95.4 and later.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mo 05.12.2005 16:59
An: support@pfsense.com
Cc:
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] 0.95a and wrap
option 9) pftop from the shellmenu gives you some of the desired info too in
realtime. It has various ways of sorting and several pages (press 'h' for
options once you have launched it).
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: dny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7.
We are trying to reduce the image size. The recent versions now even run from
64 MB CF-Cards. As the embedded images don't support packages there is no need
to inflate them with emptyness if 64 MB is everything that's needed. Dump that
image to whatever size of CF-card you have (=64 MB). You
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Dezember 2005 13:13
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] 0.95.4 built on Sun Dec 4 00:44:31 UTC 2005
ok ive noticed a few things with the new build, so simple questions
follow
: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Dezember 2005 14:07
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [pfSense Support] 0.95.4 built on Sun Dec 4 00:44:31
UTC 2005
Holger Bauer wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Looking at the timeline we switched to lighttpd with version 0.95.2, so
versions after that one should be save to upgrade.
However, always keep in mind that the embedded updates are webgui only updates
and that binaries are not included. Reflashing
from time to time is highly recommended until
Run ifconfig iwi0 list channel in the webgui at diagnosticscommand and set
manually an appropriate channel. not all channels support each mode.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ethan Bonick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Di 13.12.2005 03:00
Yes, keyboard and serial is disabled. all output appears at com1 9600 baud.
And no, it's not nic independent. the driver has to support it. the ep-driver
doesn't do afaik. check this for more details:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=16.0
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
Well, I haven't tested that but as we lately moved to freesbie2 now it might be
different. However the new Label for embedded builds now reads embedded, so
you have to use this tag instead of wrap. If you want to test it with the new
tag please report back if it works.
Holger
Maybe update to latest racoon version made it break:
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/chngview?cn=8634
Holger
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Ispanovits Imre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. Dezember 2005 01:21
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] IPSec VPN in
The queues need longer time to load if there is no traffic. Generate some
traffic and they load more quickly.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Luis Avila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Dezember 2005 00:28
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE: [pfSense
Sure, go to ServicesDHCP in the webgui. You'll notice a seperate tab for each
internal interface you have (like your OPT1, it's labeled with the interface
name). Switch to that tab and make your settings. DHCP-Server in pfSense is per
Interface, so you can have different DHCP-settings for each
They'll work again with 1.0beta2 which isn't released yet.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Vinc Duran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Januar 2006 08:14
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] beeps gone?
Hi, I'm trying out the beta and I don't
I usually don't shutdown my testmachines properly to see how robust it is under
such a condition. I just power them down (I kill the poweruplink of the rack,
no acpi button power down). I never had this issue and I have done that a lot
of times.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
The autoupdate is under developement atm and should work for versions past
1.0beta2. This is a known issue.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David Strout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2006 12:58
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Firmware
It's recommended to do a fresh install with one of the beta releases. You might
want to use http://pfsense.com/~sullrich/BETA2-BUGVALIDATION5/ which is a
snapshot of the upcoming beta2.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ijez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19.
Upgrade for embedded builds are not working yet. The available mini updates
only upgrade webgui files.
atm you still have to reflash.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Anders D. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2006 15:09
An: support@pfsense.com
The nat-device has to support ipsec pass through and shoule be able to
forward IPSEC-Traffic to the pfsense behind it.
the pfsense behind the NAT has to use the public IP-Adress of the nat-device
as identifier as the connection appears to originate from that ip at the other
end. All other
Answers are between the lines:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stephen Cimarelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2006 01:07
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] A few questions, newbie :)
I All
I just found out about pfsense this
Disable PPTP at the pfSense you are natting through. There is a strange bug
lurking somewhere that we still have to discover.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeb Barger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 30. Januar 2006 18:44
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense
You are talking about policy based routing. pfSense can do this kind of
routing. Configure the WAN interface with the PPPoE-settings and one of your
OPTx interfaces with the static settings of the other line. Don't forget to
enter the gateway there.
Then check out your firewall rules at you LAN
No, you only have the possibility to disable the local console completely. It
then will only show logging information. Check settings at systemadvanced.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tommaso Di Donato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Januar 2006 15:31
An:
As you said, we are planning to make pfSense an enterprise class firewall, but
enterprise means as well enterprise stability, not only enterprise features.
That said, pfSense will be released when it's done and when we feel we have
reached that point. I wouldn't start speculating about a date
Please try the latest snapshot:
http://pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-1-29-06/
beta1 already is more than 1 month behind developement.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ronald Henriksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 05:43
An:
.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: dogbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2006 11:59
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [pfSense Support] VPN tunnel between PfSense and
CheckpointNG
Holger Bauer wrote:
Some logs would be helpful.
Holger
There is an option at the wireless settingspage where you can prevent clients
to talk to each other if the pfSense is used in accesspoint-mode:
Allow intra-BSS communication:
When operating as an access point, enable this if you want to pass packets
between wireless clients directly.
Disabling
checking an item sends that kind of traffic to low priority.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Robert Fantini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Februar 2006 17:59
An: pfSense Support
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaping question, peer to peer networking
screen
Corporate decision, can't do anything against it ;-)
and by the way, there are not many alternatives that work well together
with blackberrys :-/
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Februar 2006 18:45
An:
Ok, did some changes. Now my german contacts get RE's too but I guess that
should be no problem ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 6:57 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: AW: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaping question, peer
, February 05, 2006 7:04 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: AW: [pfSense Support] Traffic shaping question, peer to
peernetworking screen
I really wouldnt worry about it honestly.
On 2/5/06, Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, did some changes. Now my german contacts get RE's
@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Empty or corrupt config.xml
I am running the version 1.0b2rc5 on a standard platform.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2006 10:10
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE
.
It seems to be a pfsync replication issue.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2006 10:22
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] Empty or corrupt config.xml
Are you sure your drives are ok? Maybe
]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11:10 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] Empty or corrupt config.xml
That would be possible. Can you give me hints how this
configuration should loock like?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL
, inclusive unexpected power
interrupting.
Thanks a lot!
Bernhard
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2006 11:20
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] Empty or corrupt config.xml
Check out
We have still some issues we want to have fixed for beta2. We don't want to
relase beta2 with these in. No exact date when beta2 will be out but there are
nearly 100 new commits since beta1 was released already.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Tommaso Di Donato [mailto:[EMAIL
It's intended to sync to backup with an advskey +100 to make it automatically
the failovernode. Do you have DHCP at your interfaces? CARP and DHCP won't work
together.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Jure Pecar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 7:36 PM
To:
You can redirect it to com1 simply ba checking the serial console option at
systemadvanced in the webgui. A reboot is needed for that setting to be
applied.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Xavier Beaudouin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:25 AM
To:
Hi Rainer,
I have no issues accessing ebay.de from behind different pfsenses. What is the
problem you are seeing exactly? Does the IP resolve? What kind of WAN do you
have? Sounds like PPPoE? Please add some details.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL
this I'm out of ideas for now.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 1:14 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Problem accessing some sites
Holger Bauer wrote:
Hi Rainer,
I have no issues
fixed for some time. I assume you are still running beta1?
try http://pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-BETA1-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-2-8-06/
Holger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:30 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject:
That's doable. I have the info what needs to be added at home and can send that
to you later (I'm at work atm) unless anybody else is faster in answering ;-)
Holger
-Original Message-
From: thomas peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:41 PM
To:
In the webgui go to Diagnosticsedit file and load /etc/crontab
Then add the following line:
* reconnecthour * * * root killall mpd
/usr/local/sbin/mpd -b -d /var/etc -p /var/run/mpd.pid pptp
Then save that file. Reboot to make sure the new settings are reloaded. This is
mpd handles all ngX interfaces. these are pptp and pppoe as well. pptp is
getting restarted by that as a sideeffect too thus the pptp in the command.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: thomas peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:34 PM
To:
That's not correct, at least not for newer versions. I'm setting up nexcoms
with usb keyboards and I have an experimental live-usb-stick that was generated
by a script from Dario to convert the livecd to run from usbstick with custom
config.xml which boots up at the nexcom fine. Don't have a
Light system, USB Boot
Hi Holger,
Where is Dario's script?
Once USB is enabled, it will boot from USB devices on the
OpenBrick-E, which is similar to the Lex Light CV860A3R53.
Bao
On Wed, February 22, 2006 3:13 am, Holger Bauer wrote:
That's not correct, at least not for newer
@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] LEX Light system, USB Boot
I have no plans on changing our current behavior. Any time we mess
with this portion it ends up in a lot of breakage and grey hairs on my
head.
I've got enough grey hairs for now, thanks.
On 2/22/06, Holger Bauer [EMAIL
I'm using Wistron CM9 (Info can be found at http://pcengines.ch/cm9.htm ). They
can do a/b/g and are atheros based.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: David Strout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 11:36 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support]
The Intel card is not supported in AP mode due to firmware license limitations.
Atheros based cards can be bridged in pfsense, but not using m0n0. m0n0 doesn't
support Atheros as it is based on freebsd 4.11 (at least if you are not running
1.2b7 which was based on freebsd 5).
Holger
Make sure you are not running that on an amiga LOL
(sorry couldn't resist)
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 8:16 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] BETA2 booting issue
I've seen that on
Add another machine as CARP member, then you can seamlessly upgrade ;-)
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Duffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 8:42 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Upgrade 0.84.x - BETA2?
Bill Marquette
Create a portforward like this one:
http://www.pfsense.com/screens/redirect_lan_to_another_mail_server.PNG but
change the ports to the ones of your example. Also you should set the Webgui to
a different port as you redirect port 80 to the proxy then. The exception for
the proxy will be
Yes, add an OPT1 interface and create one pass rule to allow all traffic to
destination not lansubnet.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 7:05 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] seperation of network
Hi,
As you have these cards available, can you test vpn throughput? I would be
interested especially in results for the wrap.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 4:56 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support]
Creata a rule at your DMZ subnet to allow traffic to destination IP INT MTA at
destination port 25. Make sure that rule is above your block rules. It's
routing between DMZ and LAN by default. Then just send over the Mail to the LAN
MTA by using the internal LAN IP 172.16.130.4.
Holger
Skype is a bitch if it comes to shaping as it uses any available port IF
available and each endpoint can have random incoming connection ports (the
incoming port is configurable): http://www.skype.com/help/guides/firewall.html
So there is nor real way to set priority for that kind of traffic
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=600.0
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 7:46 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Not able to use my DLink DVC-1000
You most likely need a static port entry
1 - 100 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
