an office i worked with experimented with random dimming of the light.
it very much simulated the occasional cloud passing overhead outside.
People were more alert and aware in the area they did this.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Kyle Mcallister
kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Wed,
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:33:25 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I've shown a roughly square wire loop, with a capacitor in the bottom
leg of the loop, and I've shown arrows next to the wire
indicating the
direction of the E field at all points. The capacitor plates are
2009/9/28 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
On Sep 27, 2009, at 5:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
One thing that could be done now, and probably wouldn't be a waste would
be
algoil. This could make a significant dent in fossil fuel consumption, and
because it targets cars and trucks,
On Sep 29, 2009, at 12:00 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
2009/9/28 Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net:
On Sep 27, 2009, at 5:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
One thing that could be done now, and probably wouldn't be a
waste would
be
algoil. This could make a significant dent in fossil fuel
All I can say is, WTF?!
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/29649/
LH2 somehow forming an Iceman?
Terry
At 10:25 PM 9/28/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
(A blogger asked me what is the source of the dispute, and the
academic politics. I like my answer, so let me copy it here. This
is, perhaps, a softer, more understanding response than I might have
made years ago.)
That's a good explanation, Jed.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
For their part, the cold fusion believers did a lousy job of selling it.
I agree their public relations efforts have not been good. I think it
is a bad idea to make conference proceedings only available as
copyright books. Biberian recently told me that they have
I think the biggest disconnect is trying to make a direct jump from the
materials to fusion without better explaining the interim step that supplies
the energy to
Create the fusion artifacts. I am following a current thread Zero point
fluctuations and the Casimir
At 11:03 AM 9/29/2009, you wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
wrote:
For their part, the cold fusion
believers did a lousy job of selling it.
I agree their public relations efforts have not been good. I think it is
a bad idea to make conference proceedings only available as copyright
books. Biberian
The documents they were given are listed here:
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/DoeReview.htm#Submissions
- Jed
Jed, thank you for that list.
Had not seen it before.
How ironic (or not) that the two LANR/CF researchers
who actually had perfomed open demonstrations at ICCF10,
Selling Cold Fusion? Public Relations? And this is Science we're talking
about? It's disgusting. Guys like Feyerabend were more right than anyone likes
to admit. Peer review becomes sneer review and instead of the Defenders of the
Dominant Paradigm dying off, we're stuck with obituaries in
Chris Zell wrote:
Selling Cold Fusion? Public Relations? And this is Science we're
talking about? It's disgusting. Guys like Feyerabend were more right
than anyone likes to admit. Peer review becomes sneer review and
instead of the Defenders of the Dominant Paradigm dying off, we're
Dr. Mitchell Swartz wrote:
How ironic (or not) that the two LANR/CF researchers
who actually had perfomed open demonstrations at ICCF10,
Dr. Dash and myself, did not have a single paper
on that highly selected, therefore censored, list.
Yes, it is censored, but you yourself are the censor!
I think they gave the reviewers all those papers because years ago I
was in someone's office, and I noticed a cardboard box full of papers
with familiar titles. I asked what's all this? and the person said
that's what we gave the reviewers. Those are all the references in
Peter's paper.
It
At 01:09 PM 9/29/2009, you wrote:
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
wrote:
How ironic (or not)
that the two LANR/CF researchers
who actually had perfomed open demonstrations at ICCF10,
Dr. Dash and myself, did not have a single paper
on that highly selected, therefore censored, list.
Yes, it is censored, but
Dr. Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Sorry that you took this personally, but ...
Wrong. You were given copies. Multiple copies.
By disk. On paper. By mail with green card.
I couldn't read them.
Look, we have been over this 100 times. I will repeat once more. Here
is what you must do if you
Dr. Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Dash is #52, ICCF6. Dash never censors anything and never denies
permission, but I don't happen to have that paper in electronic format.
Gosh. I don't see Prof. Dash at #52 in that table,
so I must not understand what you meant.
I just explained that in the
Chris Zell wrote:
Selling Cold Fusion? Public Relations? And this is Science we're
talking about? It's disgusting.
To be fair, I am the one who calls it public relations. Scientists
tend use more genteel expressions, such as 'educating the public
about the need for this research.' They
At 11:03 AM 9/29/2009, you wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
For their part, the cold fusion believers did a lousy job of selling it.
I agree their public relations efforts have not been good. I think
it is a bad idea to make conference proceedings only available as
copyright books.
At 11:37 AM 9/29/2009, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
I think the biggest disconnect is trying to make a direct jump from
the materials to fusion without better explaining the interim step
that supplies the energy to
Create the fusion artifacts. I am following a current thread Zero
point
At 01:35 PM 9/29/2009, you wrote:
I'll bet if you contacted those people today (the ones still alive),
you would find they have not learned a thing about cold fusion and
they would not change a word of their endorsements.
Unless you could approach them in a way likely to generate rapport,
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'll bet if you contacted those people today (the ones still
alive), you would find they have not learned a thing about cold
fusion and they would not change a word of their endorsements.
Unless you could approach them in a way likely to generate rapport,
and
http://blogs.edmunds.com/greencaradvisor/2009/09/chu-says-hell-stop-
push-to-cut-hydrogen-car-funding-will-work-with-lawmakers.html
http://tinyurl.com/yevy8bu
Chu Says He'll Stop Push to Cut Hydrogen-Car Funding, Will Work With
Lawmakers
Energy Secretary Steven Chu will no longer seek
I am NOT being critical of your efforts or anyone else in trying to promote
acceptance. I am, however, nauseated by the fact that such is deemed necessary
apparently because things have drifted into a sterile orthodoxy dominated by
scientific hierarchs.
Now, I'm not even sure we can depend
Chris Zell wrote:
I am NOT being critical of your efforts or anyone else in trying to
promote acceptance.
I got that. I knew you were not.
My point is, why should you be nauseated by the fact that such is
deemed necessary? Public relations ploys have always been a
necessary part of
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:58:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
What is it, by knowing which, we have all knowledge?
[snip]
...the ability to tap into the galactic telepathy network. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
They said they emphasized their own work because they understood
their own work best, and they could discuss it in depth with the
panel without fear of making a mistake or misrepresenting the work.
That seems sensible to me.
Sensible and very wrong. There is
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:03 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
What is it, by knowing which, we have all knowledge?
[snip]
...the ability to tap into the galactic telepathy network. ;)
Helluva database.
Terry
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:31:35 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
All I can say is, WTF?!
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/29649/
LH2 somehow forming an Iceman?
Ice wouldn't stay in one piece and maintain it's structure like that, especially
at those speeds in the
In reply to Dr. Mitchell Swartz's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:44:24 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Corroborating your fabrications, Jed, you have told others and us
that you demand to EDIT the papers.
[snip]
..from the perspective of an outsider to all of this, I get the impression that
Jed edit's
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:05 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Perhaps that what it is, but on a view port or the camera lens? (It tracks the
tank because the camera is tracking the tank).
It rotates independently of the tank.
Terry
- Original Message -
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 2:54 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resistive Wire
Carrying a Constant Current
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:33:25 -
0400:Hi,
[snip]
I've shown
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Dr. Mitchell Swartz's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:44:24
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Corroborating your fabrications, Jed, you have told others and us
that you demand to EDIT the papers.
[snip]
..from the perspective of an outsider to all of this, I get
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder hvee...@ncf.ca
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:49 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resistive Wire
Carrying a Constant Current
- Original Message -
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Date: Tuesday, September 29,
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:54:07 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Yup, but that is not what bothers me. I have been unable to
consistently apply the concept of an _electric field_ around
a circuit with a steady current without it ending in a
contradiction.
harry
That's because
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:39:29 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:05 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Perhaps that what it is, but on a view port or the camera lens? (It tracks
the
tank because the camera is tracking the tank).
It rotates
At 04:58 PM 9/29/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'll bet if you contacted those people today (the ones still
alive), you would find they have not learned a thing about cold
fusion and they would not change a word of their endorsements.
Unless you could approach them in
At 06:31 PM 9/29/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
They said they emphasized their own work because they understood
their own work best, and they could discuss it in depth with the
panel without fear of making a mistake or misrepresenting the
work. That seems sensible to
- Original Message -
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:51 pm
Subject: Re: correction /Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a
Stationary Resistive Wire Carrying a Constant Current
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:54:07 -
0400:Hi,
This clipping basically summarizes Weber's force:
http://web.ncf.ca/eo200/weber_clipping.JPG
It comes from the paper Weberian Induction
http://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~assis/Phys-Lett-A-V268-p274-278(2000).pdf
harry
40 matches
Mail list logo
