ai-geostats  

Messages by Thread

• AI-GEOSTATS: A software enayat khojasteh
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: A software seba
• AI-GEOSTATS: correlation of autocorrelated data tomas hlasny
• AI-GEOSTATS: kriging estimation precision G. Allegri
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: kriging estimation precision Ashton Shortridge
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: kriging estimation precision G. Allegri
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: kriging estimation precision seba
• AI-GEOSTATS: Variogram Jamina Dogic
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Variogram Isobel Clark
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Variogram enayat khojasteh
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Variogram Isobel Clark
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Variogram Malvić Tomislav
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Variogram Abani R Samal
• AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging with glove as extent Werner Meyer
• AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software Adrián Martínez Vargas
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software Isobel Clark
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software Michael Grant
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software Michael Grant
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software stefano pegoretti
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software Michael Grant
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software Isobel Clark
  • AI-GEOSTATS: KT3D abedini
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software sebastiano.trevisani
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software damion . knudsen
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software Adrián Martínez Vargas
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: New geostatistical open source software Isobel Clark
• AI-GEOSTATS: public domain software for reserve modeling and mine planning M. Nur Heriawan
• AI-GEOSTATS: Global estimation on a domain of unknown geometry M. Nur Heriawan
• AI-GEOSTATS: Desurveying software steinar . ellefmo
• AI-GEOSTATS: IK- conditional variance Suzaneh
• AI-GEOSTATS: Systematic grid sampling Zhang, Chaosheng
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Systematic grid sampling Mat Pawley
  • AI-GEOSTATS: Summary: Systematic grid sampling Zhang, Chaosheng
• AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging variance, lagrangian multiplier Abani R Samal
  • AI-GEOSTATS: Re: Kriging variance, lagrangian multiplier Isobel Clark
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging variance, lagrangian multiplier marco.alfaro
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging variance, lagrangian multiplier isaaks
• AI-GEOSTATS: Smoothness of indicator kriging over ordinary kriging Suzanne
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Smoothness of indicator kriging over ordinary kriging tom andrews
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Smoothness of indicator kriging over ordinary kriging Suzanne
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Smoothness of indicator kriging over ordinary kriging Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy
  • Re:AI-GEOSTATS: Smoothness of indicator kriging over ordinary kriging sebastiano.trevisani
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Smoothness of indicator kriging over ordinary kriging sebastiano.trevisani
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Smoothness of indicator kriging over ordinary kriging Suzanne
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Smoothness of indicator kriging over ordinary kriging Suzanne
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Smoothness of indicator kriging over ordinary kriging Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy
• AI-GEOSTATS: estimating min & max values in a normal score back-transform Ashton Shortridge
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: estimating min & max values in a normal score back-transform Thomas Adams
• AI-GEOSTATS: Fitting traditional cross semivariogam for co-kriging Vikas Singh
• AI-GEOSTATS: Filtering the influence of a leaking component in a 5 componets decomposition process Ricardo Centeno
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Filtering the influence of a leaking component in a 5 componets decomposition process Glover, Tim
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Filtering the influence of a leaking component in a 5 componets decomposition process Ricardo Centeno
• AI-GEOSTATS: modelling and goodness of fit Andrea Sciarretta
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: modelling and goodness of fit Edzer J. Pebesma
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: modelling and goodness of fit Isobel Clark
• AI-GEOSTATS: 3( or more) point correlation coefficient Elisabeth Meze-Hausken
  • AI-GEOSTATS: geostatistics for vector estimation M. Nur Heriawan
• AI-GEOSTATS: please help me azadeh sadeghian
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: please help me Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy
  • AI-GEOSTATS: please help me azadeh sadeghian
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: please help me Paul Hiemstra
  • AI-GEOSTATS: please help me azadeh sadeghian
• AI-GEOSTATS: GLM, variography and Random Fields to analyse trampling effect on beach vegetation David March Morlà
• AI-GEOSTATS: Space of uncertainty Suzanne
• AI-GEOSTATS: paper on wombling Tomas Hlasny
• AI-GEOSTATS: Intrinsic Random Functions -- what it mean for lambda to annihilate a polynomial? Olumide
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Intrinsic Random Functions -- what it mean for lambda to annihilate a polynomial? Isobel Clark
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Intrinsic Random Functions -- what it mean for lambda to annihilate a polynomial? Olumide
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Intrinsic Random Functions -- what it mean for lambda to annihilate a polynomial? Isobel Clark
• AI-GEOSTATS: Defining path for SGS sara sabri
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Defining path for SGS Ashton Shortridge
• AI-GEOSTATS: Universal Cokriging -- algebraic dependence between drifts Olumide
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Universal Cokriging -- algebraic dependence between drifts Isobel Clark
• AI-GEOSTATS: Meaning of Intrinsic and Incremental wrt to (universal) Kriging Olumide
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Meaning of Intrinsic and Incremental wrt to (universal) Kriging M.J. Abedini
• AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging variance Marache Antoine
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging variance Marache Antoine
• AI-GEOSTATS: Analyzing two non-coincident point datasets Suzanne Richardson
• AI-GEOSTATS: bivariate (cross) k-function vs k-function difference berto costa rica
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: bivariate (cross) k-function vs k-function difference José Manuel Blanco Moreno
• AI-GEOSTATS: The effect of raising and lowering the sill and the absence or presence of a nugget. LUIS ARCIA
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: The effect of raising and lowering the sill and the absence or presence of a nugget. Edzer J. Pebesma
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: The effect of raising and lowering the sill and the absence or presence of a nugget. Adrián Martínez Vargas
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: The effect of raising and lowering the sill and the absence or presence of a nugget. bob sandefur
• AI-GEOSTATS: spatial statistics in remote sensing shoujingy
• AI-GEOSTATS: upscaling methods KARTIKO . SAMODRO
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: upscaling methods Syed Shibli
• AI-GEOSTATS: nugget effect plus linear model Gslib sebastiano trevisani
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: nugget effect plus linear model Gslib Adrián Martínez Vargas
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: nugget effect plus linear model Gslib sebastiano trevisani
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: nugget effect plus linear model Gslib Syed Shibli
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: nugget effect plus linear model Gslib sebastiano trevisani
• AI-GEOSTATS: difference between correlogram and variogram models Abani R Samal
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: difference between correlogram and variogram models Paul Hiemstra
• AI-GEOSTATS: Block model differences Abani R Samal
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Block model differences Bill Northrop
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Block model differences Bill Northrop
• AI-GEOSTATS: Sample statistics vs. Block statistics Abani R Samal
• Rm: AI-GEOSTATS: Geostatisitc Project LUIS ARCIA
  • Re: Rm: AI-GEOSTATS: Geostatisitc Project Adrián Martínez Vargas
• Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Geo LUIS ARCIA
• AI-GEOSTATS: trend and direction of continuity LUIS ARCIA
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: trend and direction of continuity Edzer J. Pebesma
• AI-GEOSTATS: bottom types interpolation Beatriz Yannicelli De Olivera Bueno
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: bottom types interpolation bob sandefur
  • AI-GEOSTATS: the importance of additiveness M. Nur Heriawan
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: bottom types interpolation sebastiano trevisani
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: bottom types interpolation Dan Cornford
• AI-GEOSTATS: FW: cosim files Gregoire Dubois
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: FW: cosim files Syed Shibli
• AI-GEOSTATS: ANOVA with autocorrelation - DDDF calculation and post hoc tests Tomas Hlasny
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: ANOVA with autocorrelation - DDDF calculation and post hoc tests Jeffrey G. White
• AI-GEOSTATS: What does Drift mean? Olumide
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: What does Drift mean? M.J. Abedini
  • AI-GEOSTATS: Re: What does Drift mean? Isobel Clark
• AI-GEOSTATS: ANOVA with spatial autocorrelation 2 Tomas Hlasny
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: ANOVA with spatial autocorrelation 2 Roger Bivand
• AI-GEOSTATS: anova with spatial autocorrelation in data Tomas Hlasny
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: anova with spatial autocorrelation in data Jeffrey G. White
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: anova with spatial autocorrelation in data José Manuel Blanco Moreno
• AI-GEOSTATS: Nonstationary Random Function M.J. Abedini
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Nonstationary Random Function Gerald van den Boogaart
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Nonstationary Random Function M.J. Abedini
• AI-GEOSTATS: sill, range and variogram type Vikas Singh
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: sill, range and variogram type Gerald van den Boogaart
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: sill, range and variogram type Edzer J. Pebesma
• AI-GEOSTATS: Testing for intrinsic correlation Julian Burgos
  • AI-GEOSTATS: ore grade and reserve estimation M. Nur Heriawan
  • AI-GEOSTATS: Re: ore grade and reserve estimation Isobel Clark
• AI-GEOSTATS: checking for bivariate normality Eduardo
• AI-GEOSTATS: ICA for less common data Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy
• AI-GEOSTATS: Dumping Lagrange Multiplier/weight data from software Mark Dowdall
• Re: AI-GEOSTATS: positive-definiteness needed for kriging Nicholas N Nagle
• AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging a non-planar surface lacking natural parametization e.g. meteorite Olumide
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging a non-planar surface lacking natural parametization e.g. meteorite sebastiano trevisani
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging a non-planar surface lacking natural parametization Peter Bossew
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging a non-planar surface lacking natural parametization sebastiano trevisani
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging a non-planar surface lacking natural parametization Olumide
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging a non-planar surface lacking natural parametization Roderik Lindenbergh
  • AI-GEOSTATS: positive-definiteness needed for kriging Marc Serre
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging a non-planar surface lacking natural parametization e.g. meteorite Edzer J. Pebesma
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging a non-planar surface lacking natural parametization Peter Bossew
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging a non-planar surface lacking natural parametization e.g. meteorite Gerald van den Boogaart
• AI-GEOSTATS: multi-point geostatistics Peter Bossew
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: multi-point geostatistics Paul Hiemstra
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: multi-point geostatistics sebastiano trevisani
• AI-GEOSTATS: Re: Sichel's t estimator Isobel Clark
• AI-GEOSTATS: Dealing with nested spatial structures Gregoire Dubois
• AI-GEOSTATS: tests for semivariogram comparison Ashton Shortridge
• AI-GEOSTATS: Pluto tom andrews
• AI-GEOSTATS: WinVAM: Variogram auto modeling Software Behrang Kushavand
• AI-GEOSTATS: Getis-Ord Gi* statistic Gabriele Nicolò
  • AI-GEOSTATS: Getis-Ord Gi* statistic Gabriele Nicolò
• AI-GEOSTATS: Sabbatical leave M.J. Abedini
• AI-GEOSTATS: war-related pollution Maarten De Boever
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: war-related pollution M.G. Mudrey, Jr.
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: war-related pollution David Rossiter
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: war-related pollution Peter Bossew
• AI-GEOSTATS: Validation of Joint Multi-Variate Simulation Badenhorst, Colin
• AI-GEOSTATS: Regression trees and spatial autocorrelation Volker Bahn
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Regression trees and spatial autocorrelation Edzer J. Pebesma
• AI-GEOSTATS: gslib source code? Samuel Verstraete
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: gslib source code? Gregoire Dubois
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: gslib source code? Pierre Goovaerts
• AI-GEOSTATS: spatial weights Bill Thayer
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: spatial weights Digby Millikan
  • AI-GEOSTATS: RE: spatial weights Isobel Clark
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: spatial weights bob sandefur
• AI-GEOSTATS: SGeMS free workshop Alexandre Boucher
• AI-GEOSTATS: RE: Clarification required Pierre Goovaerts
• AI-GEOSTATS: Rank-order geostats Mark Dowdall
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Rank-order geostats Pierre Goovaerts
• AI-GEOSTATS: Sichel's t estimator Peter Bossew
  • AI-GEOSTATS: Sichel's t estimator Eric PIRARD
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Sichel's t estimator Isobel Clark
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Sichel's t estimator Juan de Dios Magallanes Quintanar
• AI-GEOSTATS: Statistical analysis to verify BLOCK MODEL Abani R Samal
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Statistical analysis to verify BLOCK MODEL Badenhorst, Colin
• AI-GEOSTATS: Selective Mining Unit orestes gomez gonzalez
• AI-GEOSTATS: Simulation with hard and soft data Rühaak , Wolfram
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Simulation with hard and soft data Adrian Martínez Vargas
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Simulation with hard and soft data sebastiano trevisani
  • AI-GEOSTATS: how to incorporate drilling and wireline logging data M. Nur Heriawan
• AI-GEOSTATS: Markov Model 1 Co-Simulation Badenhorst, Colin
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Markov Model 1 Co-Simulation Maria N. Morales Boezio
• AI-GEOSTATS: kriging and patchiness index L.
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: kriging and patchiness index Gerald van den Boogaart
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: kriging and patchiness index John Walter
  • AI-GEOSTATS: kriging and patchiness index L.
• AI-GEOSTATS: Re: Kriging using Nugget Model bob sandefur
• AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging using Nugget Model Mehari Tekeste
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging using Nugget Model Gerald van den Boogaart
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging using Nugget Model Gerald van den Boogaart
  • AI-GEOSTATS: Re: Kriging using Nugget Model Isobel Clark
  • AI-GEOSTATS: Re: Kriging using Nugget Model Isobel Clark
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Re: Kriging using Nugget Model Edzer J. Pebesma
  • RE: AI-GEOSTATS: Re: Kriging using Nugget Model Zhang, Chaosheng
  • Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Re: Kriging using Nugget Model Edzer J. Pebesma
• AI-GEOSTATS: Variogram and covariance Digby Millikan

• Earlier messages
• Later messages