> > -Eye tracking can be useful for diagnosing problems, not so much for > identifying them.
That's an interesting point. It does seems like eye-tracking would be infinitely more valuable when used in conjunction with other things - like a more traditional test. As in, you identify problems through regular ol' "think out loud" testing and such, and then use the eye-tracking info to help determine maybe where some of the problems start. Hmm. As an idea/theory, I like it. But even in that case, the eye-tracking would only be useful for *some*information, *some* of the time. Certainly not the broad, sweeping generalizations summarized in these "actionable lessons". As such, it would be difficult to justify the expense of the eye-tracking system unless you were a large corporation with money to burn, or a UX research firm. -r- ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
