election-methods-electorama.com

Messages by Date

2005/06/27 [EM] Contd., Miscellaneous comments on MMPO & MDDA MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/27 [EM] RE: clone winner and three slot ballots Simmons, Forest
2005/06/27 [EM] Re: Miscellaneous comments on MMPO & MDDA MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/27 RE: [EM] Miscellaneous MMPO & MDDA comments. Kevin Venzke
2005/06/26 [EM] MMPO vs MDDA MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/26 [EM] Miscellaneous MMPO & MDDA comments. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/26 [EM] ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity Chris Benham
2005/06/26 [EM] Russ: Abuses MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/26 Re: [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting] Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/26 Re: [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting] Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/26 [EM] ER-Bucklin fails monotonicity Kevin Venzke
2005/06/26 RE: [EM] MDDA3, 67%MDDA, & 67%MDDA3 Kevin Venzke
2005/06/26 Re: [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting] Jobst Heitzig
2005/06/26 Re: [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting] Bill Clark
2005/06/25 Re: [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting] Jobst Heitzig
2005/06/25 [EM] MDDA3, 67%MDDA, & 67%MDDA3 MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/25 Re: [EM] Part 2, Mr. Lomax's posting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/25 RE: [EM] RE: FBC, Clone-Winner, and pairwise components seem incompatible Kevin Venzke
2005/06/25 [EM] Condorcet and FBC are incompatible Kevin Venzke
2005/06/25 [EM] RE: FBC, Clone-Winner, and pairwise components seem incompatible Simmons, Forest
2005/06/25 Re: [EM] FBC, Clone-Winner, and pairwise components seem incompatible Kevin Venzke
2005/06/25 Re: [EM] Brief comment on Russ's posting Russ Paielli
2005/06/25 [EM] Brief comment on Russ's posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/25 Re: [Fwd: Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting] Russ Paielli
2005/06/25 [EM] Part 2, Mr. Lomax's posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/25 [EM] Mr. Lomax's "non'-reply, part 1 MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/25 Re: [EM] FBC, Clone-Winner, and pairwise components seem incompatible Russ Paielli
2005/06/25 [EM] FBC, Clone-Winner, and pairwise components seem incompatible Kevin Venzke
2005/06/24 [EM] 2200 GMT, 24 June, '05, Ted MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/24 [EM] Ted, 6/24/05,2124 GMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/24 Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/24 Re: [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting Russ Paielli
2005/06/23 [EM] Completed comments on Abd's posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/23 [EM] correction, was Re: James: Definition, electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/23 [EM] Reform isn't whiny, but whining about reform suggestions is whiny. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/23 Re: [EM] Re: James: Definition, electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/23 [EM] Re: James: Definition, electowiki Araucaria Araucana
2005/06/23 Re: [EM] Thought on Redistricting Algorithms Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/23 [EM] Thought on Redistricting Algorithms Alex Small
2005/06/22 Re: [EM] Re: James: Definition, electowiki Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/22 Re: [EM] James: Definition, electowiki James Green-Armytage
2005/06/22 [EM] Re: James: Definition, electowiki Araucaria Araucana
2005/06/22 [EM] James: Definition, electowiki MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/22 RE: [EM] Majority-defeat-disqualification//Approval sounds like the best Kevin Venzke
2005/06/22 Re: [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Kevin Venzke
2005/06/22 [EM] Mike: my mistake James Green-Armytage
2005/06/21 Re: [EM] Comments on Russ's MinMax posting Russ Paielli
2005/06/21 [EM] Majority-defeat-disqualification//Approval sounds like the best MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/21 Re: [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Russ Paielli
2005/06/21 [EM] Election Methods Polls Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/21 Re: [EM] FBC isn't complicated. PT isn't dangerous. Reform isn't whiny. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/21 [EM] Mike: what is the "tied at the top rule"? James Green-Armytage
2005/06/21 RE: [EM] FBC isn't complicated. PT isn't dangerous. Reform isn't whiny. Paul Kislanko
2005/06/21 [EM] FBC isn't complicated. PT isn't dangerous. Reform isn't whiny. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/21 [EM] A new method satisfying FBC, SDSC, and SFC Kevin Venzke
2005/06/21 [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Chris Benham
2005/06/21 Re: [EM] Comments on Russ's MinMax posting Russ Paielli
2005/06/21 Re: [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Russ Paielli
2005/06/20 RE: [EM] Kevin: Power Truncation Kevin Venzke
2005/06/20 [EM] Chris--Correct: MMPO is Approval MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/20 [EM] A few more comments about Russ's MMPO posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/20 [EM] Kevin: Your MMPOpt example MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/20 [EM] Kevin: Power Truncation MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/20 Re: [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Kevin Venzke
2005/06/20 Re: [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Russ Paielli
2005/06/20 Re: [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Kevin Venzke
2005/06/20 Re: [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Russ Paielli
2005/06/19 [EM] Comments on Russ's MinMax posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/19 [EM] Chris, 6/19/05, 2209 MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/19 [EM] Chris: Brief preliminary power truncation reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/19 [EM] Power truncation Chris Benham
2005/06/19 [EM] Clarification about trust & hope for borderline strategizers MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/19 RE: [EM] Power truncation Kevin Venzke
2005/06/19 [EM] Power truncation Chris Benham
2005/06/19 Re: [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Kevin Venzke
2005/06/19 RE: [EM] AERLO loses any FBC. MMPO is Approval. Still the best public method. Kevin Venzke
2005/06/19 Re: [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Russ Paielli
2005/06/19 [EM] AERLO loses any FBC. MMPO is Approval. Still the best public method. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/19 RE: [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Kevin Venzke
2005/06/19 [EM] Re: minmax is not a good public election method Russ Paielli
2005/06/18 RE: [EM] James: Power truncation Kevin Venzke
2005/06/18 Re: [EM] Election-methods Digest no longer reliable RLSuter
2005/06/18 [EM] James: Power truncation MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/18 [EM] Contd, ASPCA yes. SOACC & SFBC no. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/18 [EM] Enhanced MMPO fails FBC but conditionally meets expectation FBC. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/18 [EM] SPCA, ASPCA, CSPCA yes. SOACC & SFBC no. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/17 [EM] The elusive description of enhanced MMPO's benefits MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/17 Re: [EM] Election-methods Digest no longer reliable Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/17 [EM] Election-methods Digest no longer reliable RLSuter
2005/06/17 Re: [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/17 Re: [EM] The poll is a good idea--suggestions for a better one Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/17 Re: [EM] The poll is a good idea--suggestions for a better one Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/17 Re: [EM] The poll is a good idea--suggestions for a better one James Green-Armytage
2005/06/17 [EM] The poll is a good idea--suggestions for a better one Chris Benham
2005/06/16 RE: [EM] Power truncation Kevin Venzke
2005/06/16 [EM] The poll is a good idea--suggestions for a better one MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] weigh in on the method poll! Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Russ Paielli
2005/06/16 [EM] New name for SSPCA? MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Russ Paielli
2005/06/16 [EM] Clarification about ranking someone at 2 rank positions MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/16 [EM] Who says you can't vote a candidate at 2 rank positions. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/16 [EM] Power truncation MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/16 [EM] Sincere Protection of Candidates Acceptable (SPCA) MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] weigh in on the method poll! Dave Ketchum
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] weigh in on the method poll! Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] The wiki questionaire Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Dave Ketchum
2005/06/16 [EM] weigh in on the method poll! James Green-Armytage
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/16 [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Araucaria Araucana
2005/06/16 RE: [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Paul Kislanko
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Anthony Duff
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] the simplest election reform Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/16 [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Araucaria Araucana
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] The wiki questionaire Kevin Venzke
2005/06/16 Re: [EM] the simplest election reform Andrew Myers
2005/06/15 Re: [EM] The wiki questionaire Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/15 Re: [EM] The wiki questionaire Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/15 [EM] Contd, Oops! MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/15 [EM] Kevin: Oops! It's a matter of finding out how much of SOACC & SFBC can be saved. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/15 Re: [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Dave Ketchum
2005/06/15 RE: [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Kevin Venzke
2005/06/15 [EM] Minor corrections to yesterday's postings MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/15 [EM] Re: the simplest election reform Araucaria Araucana
2005/06/15 [EM] the simplest election reform Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/15 [EM] The wiki questionaire Chris Benham
2005/06/15 [EM] The wiki questionaire Chris Benham
2005/06/14 [EM] Are rank methods really better than Approval & CR? MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/14 RE: [EM] The Sincere Optimality for Acceptable Candidates Criterion Kevin Venzke
2005/06/14 RE: [EM] The wiki questionaire Kevin Venzke
2005/06/14 [EM] The Sincere Optimality for Acceptable Candidates Criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/14 [EM] Brief clarification of two recent postings MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/14 [EM] The wiki questionaire Chris Benham
2005/06/14 Re: [EM] The wiki questionaire Jobst Heitzig
2005/06/14 [EM] A simpler geographical example showing that mere ordinal info is inadequate Simmons, Forest
2005/06/14 [EM] Nanson Simon Gazeley
2005/06/14 Re: [EM] wiki opinion poll Juho Laatu
2005/06/14 Re: [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure Juho Laatu
2005/06/14 [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure Juho Laatu
2005/06/14 Re: [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods Juho Laatu
2005/06/14 [EM] another wiki poll - assign ratings to single-winner methods! James Green-Armytage
2005/06/14 [EM] wiki opinion poll James Green-Armytage
2005/06/14 Re: [EM] Re: ICC and Approval Russ Paielli
2005/06/14 Re: [EM] two more variations of MMPO Russ Paielli
2005/06/13 Re: [EM] two more variations of MMPO Russ Paielli
2005/06/13 [EM] Two questions added to wiki questionaire MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/13 [EM] The wiki questionaire MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/13 [EM] Nanson MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/13 [EM] Approval and ICC MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/13 [EM] James--MMPO & wv strategy wrap-up MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/13 [EM] IRV _does_ meet IICC MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/13 Re: [EM] order reversal incentive in approval? James Green-Armytage
2005/06/13 Re: [EM] Re: ICC and Approval James Green-Armytage
2005/06/13 Re: [EM] NANSON - Elections to one seat James Green-Armytage
2005/06/13 Re: [EM] Re: ICC and Approval James Green-Armytage
2005/06/13 [EM] NANSON - Elections to one seat Simon Gazeley
2005/06/13 RE: [EM] Re: ICC and Approval Kevin Venzke
2005/06/12 Re: [EM] Re: ICC and Approval Russ Paielli
2005/06/12 [EM] ICC posting comments MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/12 Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/12 RE: [EM] Re: ICC and Approval Paul Kislanko
2005/06/12 [EM] Re: ICC and Approval MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/12 [EM] Mike: order reversal incentive in approval? MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/12 [EM] wv strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/12 Re: [EM] Dynamic Opinion Poll in our Wiki Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/12 Re: [EM] Mike: order reversal incentive in approval? Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/12 [EM] two more variations of MMPO Chris Benham
2005/06/11 [EM] Miscellaneous addenda to SSD vs MMPO MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/11 Re: [EM] two more variations of MMPO Kevin Venzke
2005/06/11 Re: [EM] two more variations of MMPO Russ Paielli
2005/06/11 Re: [EM] Mike: order reversal incentive in approval? Bart Ingles
2005/06/11 [EM] Dynamic Opinion Poll in our Wiki Jobst Heitzig
2005/06/10 [EM] Mike: order reversal incentive in approval? James Green-Armytage
2005/06/10 Re: [EM] MMPO has incentive for reversa l, but not compromise-reversal. James Green-Armytage
2005/06/10 [EM] MMPO has incentive for reversa l, but not compromise-reversal. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/10 [EM] SSD vs MMPO. What's important in voting system results. MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/10 [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Chris Benham
2005/06/10 Re: [EM] two more variations of MMPO Kevin Venzke
2005/06/10 Re: [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure Ken Kuhlman
2005/06/10 [EM] two more variations of MMPO (oops! CDTT, not CGTT) Chris Benham
2005/06/10 [EM] two more variations of MMPO Chris Benham
2005/06/09 Re: [EM] two more variations of MMPO Russ Paielli
2005/06/09 Re: [EM] two more variations of MMPO Russ Paielli
2005/06/09 [EM] two more variations of MMPO Russ Paielli
2005/06/09 [EM] Mike: does MM(po) have compromising-reversal incentive?? James Green-Armytage
2005/06/09 RE: [EM] Plurality criterion (Oops! X/Y mix-up) Kevin Venzke
2005/06/09 [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Araucaria Araucana
2005/06/09 Re: [EM] approval and ICC Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/09 Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
2005/06/09 [EM] Re: CIBR examples, and its CC failure Chris Benham
2005/06/08 Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Jobst Heitzig
2005/06/08 [EM] James: MMPO & criteria MIKE OSSIPOFF
2005/06/08 Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Russ Paielli
2005/06/08 [EM] approval and ICC James Green-Armytage
2005/06/08 Re: [EM] Not only _would_ Nader be CW, but Nader _is_ CW in most rank polls Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/08 Re: [EM] strategy and method complexity and the advantage of minmax methods Abd ulRahman Lomax
2005/06/08 [EM] Plurality criterion (Oops! X/Y mix-up) Chris Benham
2005/06/08 Re: [EM] Re: Voting Systems Study of the League of Women Voters of Minnesota Abd ulRahman Lomax