On Jul 24, 9:02 pm, Colin Geoffrey Hales <[email protected]> wrote:
> artificially. i.e. REPLICATE. Not emulate. Not simulate. You master the > natural version, make it artificially, then you experiment to find out a > theory of it... not the other way around. It's what we did for flight, > fire and light and who knows what else. Cognition is no different. I agree and flight and fire are great examples. It intuitively seems like a similar kind of thing; the notion of igniting a relatively uncontrollable natural process through controlled artificial means. Here's my Theory of Everything if you want to check it out: http://www.stationlink.com/docs/Executive_Summary_SEE_TOE_v4.pdf Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
