On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:06 AM, John Mikes <jami...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stathis:
> in my simplicity: "free is free" and "pseudo" means "not really". So:
> pseudo-free will is not free (will), only something similar. Restricted by
> circumstances. Or so.
> I allow into my 'deterministically' constrained free will(!) a free
> choice from available variants. I know nothing about how to apply it: how
> the unknowable (hidden? not yet disclosed?) factors incluence my decision,
> so I say "I have a choice. Same way the less agnostics say: free will.
> Please correct me if you know more.
> Thanx
> John M

I think it's a matter of semantics. I could say I still have a choice
even if my actions are determined by my brain and my environment. If
my brain and/or my environment had been different, I could have chosen
differently. That is compatibilism. The incompatibilists would say
that I don't have a choice if my actions are thus determined. But the
incompatibilists still live their life making decisions like everyone

Stathis Papaioannou

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to