On 9/27/2012 4:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
So does comp provide any hints as to which aspects of our local
universe should be universal and which are geographical?
Yes, as the logic of probabilty one for observation (given by S4Grz1,
and/or the X and Z logics) already provides an arithmetical
quantization explaining why the observables cannot be boolean, and are
quantum like, with a MWI formal aspect. It is open if this is enough
to explain why the physical universe looks like a quantum computer,
but all the evidences go in that direction, including the reason why
the bottom is linear and symmetrical. The physical is quantum like,
even "quantum group" like.
The hamiltonians might be more geographical, perhaps. Here some ASSA
might even play some bayesian-like role.
Dear Bruno,
"observables cannot be Boolean" What does this mean? Is this
different from "observables can be represented by Boolean algebras"? A
1p v. 3p dichotomy?
--
Onward!
Stephen
http://webpages.charter.net/stephenk1/Outlaw/Outlaw.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
