On 24 Oct 2012, at 20:17, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/24/2012 4:51 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2012, at 15:35, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Nothing is true, even comp, until it is proven by experiment.
Then your own consciousness is false, which I doubt.
But I do experience my consciousness.
Every one does. I was a bit ironical with Roger perhaps, just
following his logic.
Then the existence even of the appearance of a physical universe is
Since Gödel, we know that, even limiting ourselves to 3p truth on
the numbers relations, almost all the true one are unprovable in
Truth is *far* bigger than proof.
And concerning reality, in science there is no proof at all, as
easily explained by the antic dream argument. In science we never
prove anything about reality. We postulate theories, and prove only
things *in* the theories. Then experiment can disprove a theory,
but never prove it to be correct.
Except QM, all theories in physics have been refuted at some time.
Of course QM is really a schema for physical theories, like
Lagrangians are a schema for classical mechanics. No way has been
found to apply it to gravity so there are a range of phenomena
against which it has not been tested.
But factual gravity facts don't refute it either.
And then arithmetic contains the many dreams ... I am not sure there
is any universe, but existing or not, it has to appear like a
multiverse, locally, to ensure the existence of first person plural
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at