Bruno,
In my model which you have already said is not comp,
all the computational histories happen in a mindspace
and only one of them become physical.
Richard


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 27 May 2013, at 20:44, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>
> Bruno,
> With MWI are some universes less probable than others.
>
>
> Only relatively to some state, some computational histories are less
> probable. It is open if there is a more stringer notion of "probable
> universe". Actually it is an open question is the notion of physical
> multiverse make sense. There are only coherence conditions on (sharable)
> dreams. Keep in mind that I am only translating a problem in math. Then it
> is almost obvious it is more a platonist theology than an Aristotelian
> theology. No one knows which one is correct.
>
>
>
>
>
> I have difficulty understanding how a universe can be statistical.
>
>
> I have difficulty understanding how a universe can be.
>
>
>
> I think I understand the frequency argument. But that does not make sense
> either.
>
>
> ? Feel free to explain why. I think it is simpler to forget the notion of
> physical universe, and to concentrate on the "computational histories" as
> seen by a machine/number.
>
> Obviously, "neoneo-platonism" is very young, and an infinity of problems
> are awaiting us there.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard
>
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 27 May 2013, at 19:10, meekerdb wrote:
>>
>>  On 5/27/2013 1:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>>  On 26 May 2013, at 20:23, meekerdb wrote:
>>
>>  On 5/26/2013 1:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>>  On 26 May 2013, at 04:00, meekerdb wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>  Whether or not it is recorded or extractable in this universe is
>>> immaterial.  If the universe is infinitely large or infinitely varied, we
>>> each reappear an infinite number of times.  There are a countably infinite
>>> number of programs, and for any given level of complexity, there is a
>>> finite number of possible programs shorter than some length.  Any
>>> consciousness we simulate is the consciousness of something that exists
>>> somewhere else in the infinitely varied/infinitely large universe, and if
>>> the universe is really this big, then someone else far away could simulate
>>> you perfectly without having to extract a record of you.  Just running
>>> Bruno's UDA for a long enough time "ressurects" everyone, we are all
>>> contained in that short program.
>>>
>>
>>
>> To which, one is tempted to respond: So what?  If there is all this
>> simulation going on, what reason is there to suppose it is being done by
>> being anything like us or that the worlds in which the simulations take
>> place (the "real" ones, if there are any) are anything like this one.
>>
>>
>>  Because the FPI makes "this one" a statistical sum on all possible one.
>>
>>
>> What do you mean by "a statiscal sum"?  FPI must still pick out some kind
>> of unity; not just an average.
>>
>>
>>  Why? How so?
>>
>>
>> If not, then I don't know what FPI means.  I thought it referred to one's
>> experience of being a person, but the is a unity to that experience.  I
>> experience being Brent Meeker.  I don't experience being Bruno Marchal.
>>
>>
>> FPI = First Person Indeterminacy.
>>
>> When you look at your body, or neighborhood, below your  level of
>> substitution what comp predicts you will see, is the trace of the
>> infinitley many computations which go through your state.  That's how the
>> FPI makes "this one" resulting from a statistical sum.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  You are simply led back to trying to discover what are possible worlds,
>> where "possible" can be anything from "familiar enough I can understand it"
>> to "nomologically possible" to "not containing contradictions".
>>
>>
>>  Possible means "livable from a first person point of view in such a way
>> that you would not see the difference above the substitution level".
>>
>>
>> So all simulations must look just like this??
>>
>>
>>  Yes. When done at the right level (if it exists). By definition, I
>> would say.
>>
>>
>> How does that then comport with everything happens, because it's NOT the
>> case that everything happens here.
>>
>>
>> Every possible subjective experience happens, , related to the many
>> computations (in arithmetic) but with different relative probabilities.
>>
>> Comp makes the physical reality more solid, as it show it to rely on
>> eternal statistics on atemporal number relations.
>>
>> "Everything physical happens" is really the "p -> BDp" explained by the
>> LUMs' theology, and it is more like "shit happens", to be short. (I explain
>> the math on the FOAR list if you are interested).
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Brent
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Below the substitution level, everyone (humans, alien, numbers ..) see
>> the same average on all computations, which, due to the constraints of
>> self-reference and theoretical computer science is a well structured,
>> highly complex, mathematical object.
>>
>>  So what? So physics is reduced to arithmetic, or to machine theology...
>> and this in a way which saves humans from reductionism.
>>
>>
>> I didn't know reductionism endangered us. :-)
>>
>>
>>  It eliminates the person, in theory first, in camp, slavery, our gulag,
>> after. It is a constant in human history, and it is what gives to religions
>> (including materialist and atheist one) their bad reputation. Read La
>> Mettrie and Sade to learn more on this.
>>
>>  Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Brent
>>
>>  It makes also comp into science and out of philosophy. All this leads
>> to a different, platonist and non aristotelian, view on "reality". It makes
>> "Matter" into a failed hypothesis (Matter =primitive matter).
>>
>>  Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>>    http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6358 - Release Date: 05/25/13
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6360 - Release Date: 05/26/13
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to