2013/9/4 John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com>

> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013  Chris de Morsella <cdemorse...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>   **
>>>
>>> >>Can not comment, don't know what ASCII sequence "free will" means.
>>>
>>
>>
>  > You are merely being argumentative here.
>>
>> I AM NEVER ARGUMENTATIVE!!!!!
>
>  > You certainly do have a very clear idea of the sensations you
>> experience within your brain that we describe as experiencing "free will"
>>
>
> No I most certainly do not, and not only do I lack a clear understanding
> of what the hell "free will" is supposed to mean nobody on this list has
> the slightest idea either;
>

Yes, yes we know, nobody on this list as a slightest idea, but everybody
since three years have been answering you, it's like the "nobody on this
list knows what comp means but blablablabla"... The only one who doesn't
know (and doesn't ever want to know) and doesn't read is you, John. You can
repeat ad nauseam false facts, they're still false facts.

Quentin


> I know this because for over 2 years I have been reading posts from people
> who claimed to be able to explain what it was without resorting to
> gibberish, and every single one of them failed spectacularly.
>
> > to state that the only meaning this has to you is as a series of ASCII
>> symbols strung together is hiding behind the skirt of semantics
>>
>
> Semantics is the branch of logic concerned with meaning, and I hope to
> hide behind that skirt for the rest of my life.
>
>  > So I take it therefore that you accept that we have "self awareness"
>>
>
> I have self awareness obviously, perhaps others do too.
>
>
>>  > a clear sense of "self"
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>  > but that "free will" is just ASCII characters strung together
>>
>
> Yes.
>
>
>>  Not very consistent of you.
>>
>
> How the hell do you figure that??
>
>   > So if "free will" is an illusion it is therefore necessarily mere
>> noise in your estimation of things [...]
>>
>
> Free will is NOT an illusion! The word "illusion" has a clear meaning and
> is not gibberish, "free will" is.
>
>
>>  > you have left unsupported by any evidence that the brain would go
>> through all the trouble of producing the illusion just to make noise.. and
>> that the evolutionary cost of maintaining this elaborate ruse is
>> essentially non-existent.
>>
>
> For the 99'th time FREE WILL IS NOT A ILLUSION!
>
>  > you need to convincingly show how free will necessarily arises as a
>> by-product of some other necessary brain function
>>
>
> And you need to convincingly show that when you make a "free will" noise
> with your mouth you know what you're talking about.
>
>
>>   > I take it that your position is that free will and self awareness
>> are necessary by-products of intelligence
>>
>
> My position is that because I know for a fact that Evolution produce self
> awareness once (and who knows, maybe my fellow human beings are conscious
> too) and because Evolution can not directly see self awareness any better
> than I can see it in others, Evolution could not have made it, could not
> have selected for it unless self awareness was a byproduct of something
> else that Evolution could see, like intelligence.
>
> As for "free will", my only position on that is that it is a noise that
> for unknown reasons some bipeds like to make with their mouth. Ducks are
> different, they prefer to say "quack" rather than "free will".
>
>
>>  > you cannot show how these are necessary by products of intelligence
>>
>
> If consciousness is fundamental, and I think it probably is, then after
> saying that consciousness is the way data feels when it is being processed
> there is simply nothing more to say on the subject, if there were then it
> wouldn't be fundamental.
>
> > even if you like to state that free will is just  a string of ASCII
>> characters to you -- can be generated within our brains at no extra cost
>>
>
> Random number generators cost very little and can produce gibberish like
> "xudb-eyjq" or "free-will" very efficiently.
>
> > both the direct costs of all the brain activity required in order to
>> generate it and all the ancillary costs for the survival of the individuals
>> who have it and who now must wrestle with "self awareness", "personal death
>> -- i.e. our own mortality",
>>
>
> The awareness of death, the fear it engenders and the wish to avoided it
> has such a strong Evolutionary justification that I won't insult your
> intelligence by spelling it out.
>
>  > and "free will"
>>
>
> Cannot comment, don't know what ASCII sequence "free will" means.
>
>   John K Clark
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>



-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to